OMB # 0596-0201
Expiration Date: January 31, 2013
Survey Instrument
[Note: This document will be mailed to potential interviewees and will also be used as a transcript for interviewers conducting the telephone survey.]
Date:
BLM/USFS:
Region/State:
Project:
Who:
Agency person
Community member
Contractor
Other:
State agency
NGO________________
_____________________
FY PROGRAMMATIC MONITORING:
The Role of Local Communities in Development of Stewardship Contracting Agreements or Contract Plans
Participants: When Congress authorized the Forest Service (FS) and the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) to use stewardship contracting, it also required that the agencies provide an annual report on the role of local communities in the development of agreements or contract plans under that authority. In the preparation of this report, a stratified random sample among existing stewardship contracting projects is surveyed each year, and the stewardship contracting project you are involved in was one of those selected for review. We anticipate that your involvement in this telephone survey/interview will take no longer than 30-minutes.
A sample survey form has been included with this e-mail, so that you may have the opportunity to review the questions prior to the telephone survey/interview. Plans are to conduct the telephone surveys/interviews from [insert Month xx, year xxxx through Month xx, year xxxx].
The Pinchot Institute for Conservation is coordinating this study under contract with the Forest Service and the Bureau of Land Management. Your name will not be associated with the interviewer’s notes from the phone survey and the names of those interviewed will not be retained. The information collected in this interview will be analyzed and used by both the Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management to inform the agencies’ yearly report to Congress on stewardship contracting implementation. The survey responses will not be shared with other organizations inside and outside the government but the results of the analysis of the survey responses, through its inclusion in the Forest Service’s and Bureau of Land Management’s reports to Congress, will be available for use by organizations both inside and outside the government.
Participating in the interview is completely voluntary. Your participation assumes your understanding and acceptance of this voluntary agreement. Your decision to participate or not will not affect your current or future relations with the Forest Service, Bureau of Land Management, the Pinchot Institute for Conservation or (insert local/regional subcontractor name here).
On behalf of the Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management, the Pinchot Institute would like to thank you in advance for your thoughtful and candid responses to the following questions related to stewardship contracting in your community.
You are/have been involved in the stewardship contracting project.
1a. If someone asked you to explain stewardship contracting, what would you say? Please check all that apply.
A new contracting mechanism
Goods for services
A way to get work done on the ground
Collaboration with local communities
Benefits to local communities
Other. Please specify._____________________________________________________________
1b. Has your view of stewardship contracting changed since you became involved in this project? Yes No Maybe Don’t know
If yes, how has it changed? Please check all that apply.
Perceive stewardship contracting to be more complicated
More positive and encouraged about stewardship contracting
Less optimistic about stewardship contracting
Positive about community collaboration
Understand it better
View stewardship contracting as required by the agency
Stewardship contracting is too bureaucratic
Believe stewardship contracting is way to get work done
Perceive local benefits
Didn’t know anything before
Other. Please specify. ________________
I want to ask about community involvement in your project.
2. Who initiated the project? Agency Non-agency Joint Don’t know
3. Who has been involved?
|
Check all that apply. |
What is the scale of involvement |
|||
|
|
Local |
State |
Regional |
National |
USDA Forest Service |
|
|
|
|
|
Bureau of Land Management |
|
|
|
|
|
Other Federal agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
Tribal interests |
|
|
|
|
|
State agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
Local governmental interests |
|
|
|
|
|
Community business interests |
|
|
|
|
|
Environmental conservation groups |
|
|
|
|
|
Fire interests/organizations |
|
|
|
|
|
Adjacent landowners/residents |
|
|
|
|
|
Recreation interests/users |
|
|
|
|
|
Educators/educational interests |
|
|
|
|
|
Wildlife and fisheries groups |
|
|
|
|
|
Right to access groups |
|
|
|
|
|
Project contractors |
|
|
|
|
|
Other (Please specify) |
|
|
|
|
|
4a. What is/was the role of the local community in the stewardship contracting project?
|
Check all that apply. |
Planning and design. |
|
Development of alternatives. |
|
Comments and recommendations. |
|
Public outreach and education. |
|
Participation in NEPA process. |
|
Implementation. |
|
Provision of technical information. |
|
Becoming informed. |
|
Providing and/or acquiring funding. |
|
Monitoring. |
|
Representation of concerned/affected local interests |
|
Other: (Please specify) |
|
4b. What did you use as a definition of “local community” when you answered this question?
Counties/Parishes around the forest
Communities/towns around the forest
Whole state/large region of state
Adjacent landowners/neighbors
Forest users
Tribal nations
Other agencies
All affected people/areas
Other: Please specify. ____________
5. What outreach efforts are being/have been used specifically by the Forest Service, BLM, or others to get people involved in the project? Please check all that apply.
Traditional public meetings
Collaborative process meetings
Direct mail
Personal contacts
Media (newspaper, radio, television)
Field tours
Presentations to existing community groups
Presentations to other organizations other than existing community groups
New Collaborative Group
Discussions with local government
Workshops
Meetings with existing collaborative groups
Other: Please specify. _____________
6a. To what degree would you consider community involvement in the stewardship
contracting project to be collaborative?
Very Somewhat Not Don’t
Collaborative Collaborative Collaborative Know
6b. How did you define collaborative when you were answering this question?
Working with others
Achieving a common goal
Commenting on a proposed project
Working with other agencies
Increased level of public participation
Developing, establishing, or building Long-term relationships
Including diverse people and interests
Having meetings
Other: Please specify. ________________
7. What were the reasons you personally decided to become involved with this project (what were the circumstances)? Please check all that apply.
Part of your job responsibilities
Interested in accomplishing work on the ground
Initiated the project
Contacted to bid on the project
Due to experiences with previous stewardship contracting projects
Due to your role in the community
Live near the project
Own property near the project
A business opportunity
Interested in collaboration
Interested in using /trying stewardship contracting tool
There was a problem to solve
Other: Please specify. ________________
8a. Are there individuals or interests you believe should be/should have been involved in the stewardship contracting project that aren’t/weren’t?
Yes
No
Don’t know
8b. If yes, who?
|
Check all that apply. |
At what scale should these individuals or interest be involved? |
Why should they be involved? See list below for options -Include all that apply. |
|||
|
|
Local |
State |
Regional |
National |
|
USDA Forest Service |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bureau of Land Management |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Federal agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tribal interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
State agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Local government interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Community business interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Environmental/conservation groups |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fire interests/organizations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjacent landowners and residents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recreation interests/users |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Educators/educational interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wildlife and fisheries groups |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Right to access groups |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Project contractors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other: (Please specify) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
To avoid misunderstanding.
Because they are users of the area
To avoid appeals and/or litigation
Because they are a constraint to implementation
A need to be inclusive
Because they have valuable expertise to share
A need for local knowledge
Because they are potentially affected by the project
Other (please explain)
9. Are there resources that community members needed to facilitate their participation in the project?
Yes
No
Don’t know
If yes, please check the appropriate boxes in the table below:
|
Check if needed |
Check if received |
From whom |
For what specific purpose |
Financial |
|
|
|
|
Training |
|
|
|
|
In-kind time, services, facilities |
|
|
|
|
Technical |
|
|
|
|
Other (Please describe) |
|
|
|
|
Please rate the local benefits of the stewardship contracting project on a scale of 1-5 with 1 being very high and 5 being very low.
|
Very High |
|
|
|
Very Low |
Don’t Know |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
Economic benefits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
More local jobs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
More on-the-ground work accomplished |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greater opportunity to use local contractors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other: please specify |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increased collaboration |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Improved efficiency and effectiveness |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Improved public trust |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specific project outcomes (Please identify & rate each)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other: Please describe |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Please rate the benefits of community involvement in the stewardship contracting project on a scale of 1-5 with 1 being very high and 5 being very low.
|
Very High |
|
|
|
Very Low |
Don’t Know |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
Broader understanding and consideration of diverse interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Improved trust |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increased opportunity for public input |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Improved sense of project ownership |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increased support for the agency |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other: Please describe |
|
|
|
|
|
|
What level of support do you believe this stewardship contracting project is/was in the community?
Widely supported
Somewhat supported
Indifferent
Somewhat opposed
Widely opposed
Generally unaware
I don’t know
What level of support do you believe this stewardship contracting project is/was in the agency [Forest Service and/or BLM]?
Widely supported
Somewhat supported
Indifferent
Somewhat opposed
Widely opposed
Generally unaware
I don’t know
Are
there any lessons that you learned about community involvement
through this project that you would like to share?
_______________________________________
Based on your experience in this project, would you participate in another stewardship contracting project? Yes No Maybe
Please explain. ______________________________________________________________
Are there any additional comments you want to make about either stewardship contracting generally or your personal experience with it? _____________________________
BURDEN AND NONDISCRIMINATION STATEMENTS
According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, an agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number. The valid OMB control number for this information collection is 0596-0201. The time required to complete this information collection is estimated to average 45 minutes per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at 202-720-2600 (voice and TDD).
To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call toll free (866) 632-9992 (voice). TDD users can contact USDA through local relay or the Federal relay at (800) 877-8339 (TDD) or (866) 377-8642 (relay voice). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.
File Type | application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document |
File Title | Survey Instrument |
Author | FSDefaultUser |
File Modified | 0000-00-00 |
File Created | 2021-01-30 |