Revised September 20, 2012
Supporting Statement
Importation of Shelled Peas from Kenya
OMB No. 0579-0302
A. Justification
1. Explain the circumstances that make the collection of information necessary. Identify any legal or administrative requirements that necessitate the collection.
The United States Department of Agriculture is responsible for preventing plant pests and noxious weeds from entering the United States, preventing the spread of plant diseases not widely distributed in the United States, and eradicating those imported pests and noxious weeds when eradication is feasible.
Under the Plant Protection Act (7 U.S.C. 7701 et seq.), the Secretary of Agriculture is authorized to carry out operations or measures to detect, eradicate, suppress, control, prevent, or retard the spread of plant pests new to the United States or not known to be widely distributed throughout the United States.
The regulations in “Subpart-Fruits and Vegetables” (7 CFR 319.56 through 319.56-56, referred to as the regulations) prohibit or restrict the importation of fruits and vegetables into the
United States from certain parts of the world to prevent the introduction and dissemination of plant pests that are new to or not widely distributed within the United States.
APHIS amended the fruits and vegetables regulations to allow shelled garden peas from Kenya to be imported into the United States. As a condition of entry, the peas must be shelled, washed, and inspection and accompanied by a phytosanitary certificate issued by the Kenya Plant Health Inspectorate Service. This action allows for the importation of shelled peas from Kenya into the continental United States while continuing to protect against the introduction of quarantined pests.
APHIS is asking the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to approve, for 3 additional years, its use of these information collection activities, associated with its efforts to prevent the spread of plant pests and plant diseases into the United States.
2. Indicate how, by whom, and for what purpose the information is used. Except for a new collection, indicate the actual use the agency has made of the information received from the current collection.
APHIS requires the following information collection activities to allow shelled garden peas to be imported into the United States from Kenya:
Foreign Phytosanitary Certificates (Foreign Federal Government) - APHIS requires that some plants or plant products be accompanied by a phytosanitary inspection certificate that is completed by plant health officials in the originating or transiting country. APHIS uses the information on the certificate to determine the pest condition of the shipment at the time of inspection in the foreign country. This information is used as a guide to the intensity of the inspection APHIS conducts when the shipment arrives. Without this information, all shipments would need to be inspection very thoroughly, thereby requiring considerably more time. This would slow the clearance of international shipments.
Kenya is required to inspect shelled peas and issue a phytosanitary certificate for each consignment of peas. The phytosanitary certificate would have to bear an additional declaration confirming that the required post-harvest shelling and washing procedures have been followed, as well as a statement confirming that the peas have been inspected and found free of pests.
3. Describe whether, and to what extent, the collection of information involves the use of automated, electronic, mechanical, or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses, and the basis for the decision for adopting this means of collection. Also, describe any consideration of using information technology to reduce burden.
APHIS has no control or influence over when foreign countries will automate their phytosanitary certificates.
4. Describe efforts to identify duplication. Show specifically why any similar information already available cannot be used or modified for use for the purpose described in item 2 above.
The information APHIS collects is exclusive to its mission of preventing the entry of injurious plant pests, diseases, and noxious weeds and is not available from any other source.
5. If the collection of information impacts small businesses or other small entities, describe any methods used to minimize burden.
The information APHIS collects is the minimum needed to protect the United States from destructive plant pests while increasing the number and variety of fruits and vegetables that can be imported from other countries. APHIS has determined that there are no small entities involved with this information collection.
6. Describe the consequences to Federal program or policy activities if the collection is not conducted or is conducted less frequently, as well as any technical or legal obstacles to reducing burden.
This information collection activity is critical to its mission in ensuring that shelled peas from Kenya are free of plant pests. The spread of plant pests such as Callosobruchus analis and
C. chinesis would result in millions of dollars in damage to U.S. agriculture.
7. Explain any special circumstances that require the collection to be conducted in a manner inconsistent with the general information collection guidelines in 5 CFR 1320.5.
requiring respondents to report information to the agency more often than quarterly;
requiring respondents to prepare a written response to a collection of information in fewer than 30 days after receipt of it;
requiring respondents to submit more than an original and two copies of any document;
requiring respondents to retain records, other than health, medical, government contract, grant-in-aid, or tax records for more than three years;
in connection with a statistical survey, that is not designed to produce valid and reliable results that can be generalized to the universe of study;
requiring the use of a statistical data classification that has not been reviewed and approved by OMB;
that includes a pledge of confidentiality that is not supported by authority established in statute or regulation, that is not supported by disclosure and data security policies that are consistent with the pledge, or which unnecessarily impedes sharing of data with other agencies for compatible confidential use; or
requiring respondents to submit proprietary trade secret, or other confidential information unless the agency can demonstrate that it has instituted procedures to protect the information's confidentiality to the extent permitted by law.
No special circumstances exist that would require this collection to be conducted in a manner inconsistent with the general information collection guidelines in 5 CFR 1320.5.
8. Describe efforts to consult with persons outside the agency to obtain their views on the availability of data, frequency of collection, the clarity of instructions and recordkeeping, disclosure, or reporting form, and on the data elements to be recorded, disclosed, or reported. If applicable, provide a copy and identify the date and page number of publication in the Federal Register of the agency's notice, soliciting comments on the information collection prior to submission to OMB.
In 2011-2012, APHIS held productive consultations with the following individuals concerning the information collection activities associated with its program to import shelled peas from Kenya:
John Kieru, Proprietor
Kankam Exporters LTD
Cannon House Annex, 1st Floor, Suite C1
P.O. Box 10463-00400
Nairobi, Kenya
(tel) 254-020-239-1213
Richard Collins, Chairman
FPEAK/Fresh Produce Exporters Association of Kenya
New Rehema House, 4th Floor
Phapta Road, Westlands
P.O. Box 40312-00100
Nairobia, Kenya
(tel) 254-20-4451488
Elias Bare Shill, Agriculturalist
National Cereals and Produce Board
Nyumba Ya Nafaka
Machakos Road Industrial Area
P.O. Box 30586-00100
Nairobi, Kenya
(tel) 555288/653026
On Tuesday, January 10, 2012, page 1453, APHIS published in the Federal Register a 60-day notice seeking public comments on its plans to request a 3-year renewal for this collection of information. No comments were received.
9. Explain any decisions to provide any payment or gift to respondents, other than remuneration of contractors or grantees.
This information collection activity involves no payments (other than appropriate, program-related payments) or gifts to respondents.
10. Describe any assurance of confidentiality provided to respondents and the basis for the assurance in statute, regulation, or agency policy.
No additional assurance of confidentiality is provided with this information collection. Any and all information obtained in this collection shall not be disclosed except in accordance with
5 U.S.C. 552a.
11. Provide additional justification for any questions of a sensitive nature, such as sexual behavior and attitudes, religious beliefs, and others that are considered private. This justification should include the reasons why the agency considers the questions necessary, the specific uses to be made of the information, the explanation to be given to persons from whom the information is requested, and any steps to be taken to obtain their consent.
This information collection activity asks no questions of a personal or sensitive nature.
12. Provide estimates of the hour burden of the collection of information. Indicate the number of respondents, frequency of response, annual hour burden, and an explanation of how the burden was estimated.
• Indicate the number of respondents, frequency of response, annual hour burden, and an explanation of how the burden was estimated. If this request for approval covers more than one form, provide separate hour burden estimates for each form and aggregate the hour burdens in Item 13 of OMB Form 83-I.
See APHIS Form 71 for hour burden estimates.
• Provide estimates of annualized cost to respondents for the hour burdens for collections of information, identifying and using appropriate wage rate categories.
The total burden for this collection is 1 hour. APHIS arrived at this figure by multiplying the total hours by the estimated average hourly wage of the above respondents. 1 x $ 29.67 = $29.67.
The hourly rate was derived from the U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics May 2011 Report - Occupational Employment and Wages in the United States. See http://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/ocwage.pdf
13. Provide estimates of the total annual cost burden to respondents or recordkeepers resulting from the collection of information, (do not include the cost of any hour burden shown in items 12 and 14). The cost estimates should be split into two components: (a) a total capital and start-up cost component annualized over its expected useful life; and (b) a total operation and maintenance and purchase of services component.
There is zero annual cost burden associated with capital and start-up costs, maintenance costs, and purchase of services in connection with this program.
14. Provide estimates of annualized cost to the Federal government. Provide a description of the method used to estimate cost and any other expense that would not have been incurred without this collection of information.
The estimated cost for the Federal Government is $37.00. (See APHIS Form 79.)
15. Explain the reasons for any program changes or adjustments reported in Items 13 or 14 of the OMB Form 83-1.
Since Kenya is not currently requesting to ship shelled peas to the United States, the burden hours have decreased from 6 hours to 1 (an adjustment of -5 hours), the number of responses decreased from 40 to 1 (an adjustment of -39 responses), and the respondents decreased from 2 to 1. APHIS does not know what the future holds for Kenya requesting to ship shelled peas into the United States, but does not want to retire this information collection at this time in case the shipping changes in the near future.
16. For collections of information whose results are planned to be published, outline plans for tabulation and publication.
APHIS has no plans to tabulate or publish the information collected.
17. If seeking approval to not display the expiration date for OMB approval of the information collection, explain the reasons that display would be inappropriate.
There are no USDA forms involved in this information collection.
18. Explain each exception to the certification statement identified in the "Certification for Paperwork Reduction Act."
APHIS is able to certify compliance with all the provisions in the Act.
B. Collections of Information Employing Statistical Methods
Statistical methods are not used in this information collection.
| File Type | application/msword |
| File Title | Supporting Statement for Information Collection Request |
| Author | Government User |
| Last Modified By | Stratchko, Karen A (APHIS) |
| File Modified | 2012-09-20 |
| File Created | 2012-09-17 |