Midwest Modified Index Colloboration Pre-test and Follow-up - Word

F7_Midwest FASD Regional Training Center Modified Index of Interdisciplinary Collab, Pre-Test.docx

Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders Regional Training Centers

Midwest Modified Index Colloboration Pre-test and Follow-up - Word

OMB: 0920-0954

Document [docx]
Download: docx | pdf

Attachment F7 Form Approved
OMB No. XXXX-XXXX
Exp. Date xx/xx/xxxx



Modified Index of Interdisciplinary Collaboration, Pre-test


DIRECTIONS: With regard to your current primary work setting/organization, please indicate the extent to which you agree or disagree with each of the following statements by circling the appropriate number beside each statement.


Email Address: ________________________________________________________(for follow-up only)


Please answer all questions to the best of your ability using the scale below.


1= Strongly Agree 2= Agree 3= Neutral 4= Disagree 5= Strongly disagree


1. I utilize other professionals in different disciplines for their particular expertise.

1

2

3

4

5

2. I consistently give feedback to other professionals in my setting.

1

2

3

4

5

3. Professionals in different disciplines in my setting utilize me for a range of tasks.

1

2

3

4

5

4. Teamwork with professionals from other disciplines is not important in my ability to help clients.

1

2

3

4

5

5. The colleagues from other professional disciplines and I rarely communicate.

1

2

3

4

5

6. The colleagues from other disciplines with whom I work have a good understanding of the distinction between my role and their role(s).

1

2

3

4

5

7. My colleagues from other disciplines make inappropriate referrals to me.

1

2

3

4

5

8. I can define those areas that are distinct in my professional role from that of professionals from other disciplines with whom I work.

1

2

3

4

5

9. I view part of my professional role as supporting the role of others with whom I work.

1

2

3

4

5

10. My colleagues from other disciplines refer to me often.

1

2

3

4

5

11. Cooperative work with colleagues from other disciplines is not a part of my job description.

1

2

3

4

5

12. My colleagues from other professional disciplines do not treat me as an equal.

1

2

3

4

5

13. My colleagues from other disciplines believe that they could not do their jobs as well without my professional discipline.

1

2

3

4

5

14. Distinct new programs emerge from the collective work of colleagues from different disciplines.

1

2

3

4

5

15. Organizational protocols reflect the existence of cooperation between professionals from different disciplines.

1

2

3

4

5

16. Formal procedures/mechanisms exist for facilitating dialogue between professionals from different disciplines (i.e., at staffing, in-service, rounds, etc)

1

2

3

4

5

17. I am not aware of situations in my agency in which a coalition, task force, or committee has developed out of interdisciplinary efforts.

1

2

3

4

5

18. Working with colleagues from other disciplines leads to outcomes that we could not achieve alone.

1

2

3

4

5

19. Creative outcomes emerge from my work with colleagues from other professions that I could not have predicted.

1

2

3

4

5

20. I am willing to take on tasks outside of my job description when that seems important.

1

2

3

4

5

21. I am not willing to sacrifice a degree of autonomy to support cooperative problem solving.

1

2

3

4

5

22. I utilize formal and informal procedures for problem-solving with my colleagues from other disciplines.

1

2

3

4

5

23. The professional colleagues from other disciplines with whom I work stick rigidly to their job descriptions.

1

2

3

4

5

24. Colleagues from other disciplines and I work together in many different ways.

1

2

3

4

5

25. Professionals from other disciplines with whom I work encourage family members’ participation in the treatment process.

1

2

3

4

5

26. My colleagues from other disciplines are not committed to working together.

1

2

3

4

5

27. My colleagues from other disciplines work through conflicts with me in efforts to resolve them.

1

2

3

4

5

28. When colleagues from different disciplines make decisions together they go through a process of examining alternatives.

1

2

3

4

5

29. My interactions with colleagues from other disciplines occurs in a climate where there is freedom to be different and to disagree.

1

2

3

4

5

30. Clients/patients/students participate in interdisciplinary planning that concerns them.

1

2

3

4

5

31. Colleagues from all professional disciplines take responsibility for developing treatment plans.

1

2

3

4

5

32. Colleagues from all professional disciplines do not participate in implementing treatment plans.

1

2

3

4

5

33. Professionals from different disciplines are straightforward when sharing information with clients/patients/students.

1

2

3

4

5

34. My colleagues from other disciplines and I often discuss different strategies to improve our working relationships.

1

2

3

4

5

35. My colleagues from other professions and I talk about ways to involve other professionals in our work together.

1

2

3

4

5

36. Colleagues from other disciplines do not attempt to create a positive climate in our organization.

1

2

3

4

5

37. I am optimistic about the ability of my colleagues from other disciplines to work with me to resolve problems.

1

2

3

4

5

38. I help my colleagues to address conflict with other professionals directly.

1

2

3

4

5

39. Colleagues from other disciplines are as likely as I am to address obstacles to our successful collaboration.

1

2

3

4

5

40. My colleagues from other disciplines and I talk together about our professional similarities and differences including role, competencies, and stereotypes.

1

2

3

4

5

41. My colleagues from other professions and I do not evaluate our work together.

1

2

3

4

5

42. I discuss with professionals from other disciplines the degree to which each of us should be involved in a particular case.

1

2

3

4

5


The public reporting burden of this collection of information is estimated to average 10 minutes per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden to - CDC/ATSDR Reports Clearance Officer; 1600 Clifton Road NE, MS D-74, Atlanta, Georgia 30333 ATTN: PRA (XXXX-XXXX)


File Typeapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Authorsalasj
File Modified0000-00-00
File Created2021-01-30

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy