0651-0044-SupStmt-Nov2012

SUPPORTING STATEMENT
United States Patent and Trademark Office
Invention Promoters/Promotion Firms Complaints
OMB CONTROL NUMBER 0651-0044
(November 2012)

A.

JUSTIFICATION

1.

Necessity of Information Collection

Under the Inventors’ Rights Act of 1999 (Public Law 106-113, sec. 4101 et seq.), as found
in 35 U.S.C. § 297 and implemented by 37 CFR Part 4, the United States Patent and
Trademark Office (USPTO) is required to provide a forum for the publication of complaints
concerning invention promoters and responses from the invention promoters to these
complaints. An individual may submit a complaint concerning an invention promoter to the
USPTO, which will forward the complaint to the invention promoter for response. The
complaints and responses will be published and made available to the public on the
USPTO Web site. The USPTO does not investigate these complaints or participate in any
legal proceedings against invention promoters or promotion firms.
Congress enacted the Inventors’ Rights Act to protect independent inventors from being
defrauded by invention promoters and promotion firms. Invention promoters assist
inventors, particularly independent inventors, with developing, financing, manufacturing,
and marketing their inventions. However, some independent inventors were paying large
sums of money to these firms but not receiving comparable services from them. The
Inventors’ Rights Act requires invention promoters to disclose certain information about
their invention promotion services before entering into a contract with a customer.
Complaints submitted to the USPTO must identify the name and address of the
complainant and the invention promoter or promotion firm, explain the basis for the
complaint, and include the signature of the complainant. The identifying information is
necessary so that the USPTO can forward the complaint to the invention promoter or
promotion firm and also notify the complainant that the complaint has been forwarded.
Complainants should understand that the complaints will be forwarded to the invention
promoter for response and that the complaint and response will be made available to the
public as required by the Inventors’ Rights Act. If the USPTO does not receive a response
from the invention promoter, the complaint will still be published without the response. The
USPTO does not accept complaints under this program if the complainant requests
confidentiality.
This information collection includes one form, Complaint Regarding Invention Promoter
(PTO/SB/2048), which is used by the public to submit a complaint under this program. This
form is available for download from the USPTO Web site. Use of this form is not
mandatory as long as the complaint includes the necessary information and is clearly
marked as a complaint filed under the Inventors’ Rights Act. There is no associated form for
submitting responses to the complaints.

Table 1 provides the statutes and regulations authorizing the USPTO to collect the
information discussed above:
Table 1: Information Requirements
Requirement

Statute

Rule

Complaints Concerning Invention
Promoters/Promotion Firms

Inventors’ Rights Act of 1999 (Public Law 106113, sec. 4101 et seq.), 35 U.S.C. § 297

37 CFR Part 4

Responses to the Complaints

Inventors’ Rights Act of 1999 (Public Law 106113, sec. 4101 et seq.), 35 U.S.C. § 297

37 CFR Part 4

2.

Needs and Uses

The public uses this information collection to submit a complaint to the USPTO regarding
an invention promoter or promotion firm. The USPTO requests responses from the
subjects of the complaints as required by the Inventors’ Rights Act of 1999 and then
publishes the complaints and responses. To ensure that the public provides the minimum
information necessary to process the complaint under this program, the USPTO provides a
form that the public may use to submit a complaint. However, the USPTO is not required to
enforce the provisions of the Inventors’ Rights Act, investigate the complaints, or participate
in any legal proceedings against the invention promoter.
The Information Quality Guidelines from Section 515 of Public Law 106-554, Treasury and
General Government Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 2001, apply to this information
collection, and this information collection and its supporting statement comply with all
applicable information quality guidelines, i.e. OMB and specific operating unit guidelines.
Table 2 outlines how this collection of information will be used by the public and the
USPTO:
Table 2: Needs and Uses of Information Collected
Form and Function

Form #

Needs and Uses

Complaint Regarding Invention Promoter

PTO/SB/2048





Responses to the Complaints

No Form Associated




3.

Used by the public to submit a complaint to the
USPTO regarding an invention promoter or
promotion firm.
Used by the USPTO to ensure that all of the
necessary information is provided for the complaint.
Used by the USPTO to make the complaint publicly
available and to forward complaints for response by
the invention promoter or promotion firm named in
the complaint.
Used by the invention promoter or promotion firm to
respond to a complaint.
Used by the USPTO to make the response to the
complaint publicly available.

Use of Information Technology

Currently, the USPTO does not use automated, electronic, mechanical, or other
technologies to collect the complaints or responses to the complaints. The USPTO does
offer a form for complaints that customers may download from the USPTO Web site. The
2

complaint form may be filled out on the computer, printed, then mailed or faxed to the
USPTO. Additionally, the complaints and responses to the complaints are published on the
USPTO Web site.
The USPTO does not expect to receive a large number of complaints under this program.
To help ensure the authenticity of complaints and responses to the complaints, the USPTO
requires the signature of the person submitting the complaint or response. As the USPTO
expands its electronic filing initiatives, if it becomes feasible to collect the complaint
information electronically, the USPTO will submit the associated electronic forms to OMB
for review as necessary.
4.

Efforts to Identify Duplication

This information is collected only when a customer is dissatisfied with the services received
from an invention promoter or promotion firm and voluntarily decides to file a complaint with
the USPTO. It is not collected elsewhere. These rules do not cover complaints against
registered attorneys or agents. Customers who have such complaints should file them
under the existing USPTO guidelines for complaints concerning registered attorneys and
agents, which are covered under OMB Control Number 0651-0017 Practitioner Records
Maintenance, Disclosure, and Discipline Before the United States Patent and Trademark
Office. Therefore, this collection does not result in a duplication of effort or collection of
data.
5.

Minimizing Burden to Small Entities

The USPTO believes that the complaints covered by this collection will primarily be
submitted by independent inventors since they are the primary customers of invention
promotion firms. Therefore, the USPTO developed the minimum information requirements
and the complaint form with this fact in mind. The USPTO believes that this collection of
information does not impose a significant economic impact on small entities or small
businesses. There is no fee for submitting or responding to a complaint, and all
submissions are voluntary. The same information is required of every customer and is not
available from any other source.
6.

Consequences of Less Frequent Collection

Congress has directed the USPTO to collect and publish complaints regarding invention
promoters and promotion firms, and the USPTO has implemented rules for this complaint
program accordingly. Failure to collect and publish the voluntarily submitted information
would put the USPTO in violation of a statutory duty. This information is collected only
when a customer of an invention promoter or promotion firm files a complaint against them
with the USPTO and when the invention promoter responds to the complaint. This
collection of information could not be conducted less frequently. If this information were not
collected, the USPTO would not be able to publish complaints concerning invention
promoters and their responses to the complaints as required by the Inventors’ Rights Act of
1999.

3

7.

Special Circumstances in the Conduct of Information Collection

There are no special circumstances associated with this collection of information.
8.

Consultation Outside the Agency

The 60-Day Notice was published in the Federal Register on August 10, 2012 (77 Fed.
Reg. 47820). The comment period ended on October 9, 2012. No comments were
received.
The USPTO has previously solicited and considered comments from the public in the
process of drafting the rules of practice for accepting and publishing complaints under the
Inventors’ Rights Act of 1999. The USPTO publishes the complaints and responses on the
USPTO Web site in order to make the information searchable and available to the public as
quickly as possible.
The USPTO has long-standing relationships with groups from whom patent application data
is collected, such as the American Intellectual Property Law Association, as well as patent
bar associations, independent inventor groups, and users of our public facilities. Their
views are expressed in regularly scheduled meetings and considered in developing
proposals for information collection requirements. There have been no comments or
concerns expressed by these or similar organizations concerning the time required to
provide the information under this program.
9.

Payment or Gifts to Respondents

This information collection does not involve a payment or gift to any respondent.
10.

Assurance of Confidentiality

The Inventors’ Rights Act of 1999 requires the USPTO to accept complaints against
invention promoters and promotion firms and make them available to the public. In
addition, the Act requires the USPTO to forward copies of the complaints to the invention
promoters so that they can submit responses to the complaints, which are also published.
Due to these requirements to forward and publish the complaints, the USPTO will not
accept any complaints submitted under this Act that request that the complaint be kept
confidential.
In order to publish the complaint, the USPTO must collect personal information from the
complainant. If the complainant fails to provide all of the necessary information, the
USPTO may not be able to publish the complaint and may even return the submission to
the complainant. To process the complaint, the USPTO requests the complainant’s name,
address, and telephone number. These records may be retrieved by a personal identifier
and include personal information that is subject to the Privacy Act of 1974. The complaint
form includes a Privacy Act statement, and a system of records notice for this collection

4

entitled “PAT/TM-15 System for Maintenance of Invention Promoter Complaints” was
published in the Federal Register on April 25, 2000 (65 Fed. Reg. 24177).
The USPTO stores the records in file folders as well as on electronic storage media. The
buildings where the information is kept are protected by security systems, and the records
are stored in areas that only authorized personnel can access. These personnel are
properly screened, cleared, and trained in security procedures. Systems allowing
electronic access to the information utilize appropriate safeguards.
11.

Justification for Sensitive Questions

None of the required information in this collection is considered to be sensitive.
12.

Estimate of Hour and Cost Burden to Respondents

Table 3 calculates the burden hours and costs of this information collection to the public,
based on the following factors:


Respondent Calculation Factors
The USPTO estimates that it will receive approximately 50 responses per year for
this collection. The USPTO estimates that approximately 60% of these responses
(100% of complaints) will be from small entities. None of the responses will be
submitted electronically.
These estimates are based on the Agency’s long-standing institutional knowledge of
and experience with the type of information collected by these items.



Burden Hour Calculation Factors
The USPTO estimates that it will take the public approximately 15 minutes (0.25
hours) to gather the necessary information, prepare the form, and submit a
complaint to the USPTO and approximately 30 minutes (0.5 hours) for an invention
promoter or promotion firm to prepare and submit a response to a complaint.
These estimates are based on the Agency’s long-standing institutional knowledge of
and experience with the type of information collected and the length of time
necessary to complete responses containing similar or like information.



Cost Burden Calculation Factors
The USPTO expects that complaints will be prepared by paraprofessionals or
independent inventors. Using the average of the paraprofessional rate of $122 per
hour and the estimated rate of $30 per hour for independent inventors, the USPTO
estimates that the average rate for preparing the complaints will be approximately
$76 per hour.
The USPTO uses a professional attorney rate of $371 per hour for respondent cost
burden calculations, which is the mean rate for attorneys in private firms as shown in

5

the 2011 Report of the Economic Survey published by the American Intellectual
Property Law Association (AIPLA). The USPTO expects that the responses to the
complaints will be prepared by attorneys or invention promoters. Using the average
of the professional rate of $371 per hour for attorneys in private firms and the
estimated rate of $100 per hour for invention promoters, the USPTO estimates that
the average rate for preparing the responses to the complaints will be approximately
$236 per hour.
Based on the Agency’s long-standing institutional knowledge of and experience with
the type of information collected, the Agency believes the above figures are
accurate estimates of the cost per hour to collect this information.
Table 3: Burden Hour/Burden Cost to Respondents
Item

Hours
(a)

Responses
(yr)
(b)

Burden
(hrs/yr)
(c)
(a) x (b)

Rate
($/hr)
(d)

Total Cost
($/yr)
(e)
(c) X (d)

Complaint Regarding Invention Promoter
(PTO/SB/2048)

0.25

30

8

$76.00

$608.00

Responses to the Complaints

0.50

20

10

$236.00

$2,360.00

--------

50

18

----------

$2,968.00

Totals

13.

Total Annual (Non-hour) Cost Burden

The total annual (non-hour) respondent cost burden for this collection is estimated to be
approximately $393 per year in the form of postage costs.
The public may incur postage costs when submitting a complaint or a response to a
complaint by mail to the USPTO. The USPTO estimates that the first-class postage cost
for a mailed complaint will be 45 cents. Promotion firms may choose to send responses to
complaints using overnight mail service at an estimated cost of $18.95 per response. The
USPTO estimates that the total postage cost associated with this collection will be
approximately $393 per year, as calculated in Table 4 below.
Table 4: Postage Costs for Respondents
Item

Estimated
annual mailed
responses

Estimated
postage
amount

Estimated
annual postage
costs

Complaint Regarding Invention Promoter (PTO/SB/2048)

30

$0.45

$14.00

Responses to the Complaints

20

$18.95

$379.00

Totals

50

14.

......

$393.00

Annual Cost to the Federal Government

The USPTO estimates that it takes a GS-12, step 4 employee approximately 15 minutes
(0.25 hours) to review a complaint regarding an invention promoter or a response to the
6

complaint. The hourly rate for a GS-12, step 4 employee is currently $39.46. Preparing a
complaint or a response for publication on the USPTO Web site takes approximately 1
hour, including converting the submission into the proper formats (text/HTML and PDF) and
proofreading the file for accuracy. Complaints are converted and published by an
employee with an hourly rate of $32.40.
The total processing time is 1 hour and 15 minutes (1.25 hours) per submission, at a
weighted average rate of $33.81 per hour. Therefore, the USPTO estimates that the cost
of processing this information is approximately $43.95 per hour (weighted average hourly
rate of $33.81 plus 30% ($10.14) added for benefits and overhead).
Table 4 calculates the burden hours and costs to the Federal Government for processing
this information collection:
Table 4: Burden Hour/Burden Cost to the Federal Government
Item

Hours
(a)

Responses
(yr)
(b)

Burden
(hrs/yr)
(c)
(a) x (b)

Rate
($/hr)
(d)

Total Cost
($/yr)
(e)
(c) x (d)

Complaints Regarding Invention Promoters
(PTO/SB/2048)

1.25

30

38

$43.95

$1,670.00

Responses to the Complaints

1.25

20

25

$43.95

$1,099.00

----------

50

63

-----------

$2,769.00

Totals

15.

Summary of Changes in Burden

OMB previously approved this information collection in November 2009 with a total of 100
responses, 38 burden hours, and $897 in annual (non-hour) costs. There have been no
interim approvals.
For this renewal, the USPTO estimates that the total annual responses will be 50 and the
total burden hours will be 18, which is a decrease of 50 responses and 20 hours from the
currently approved burden for this collection. This decrease in responses and burden
hours is due to administrative adjustments.
The total annual (non-hour) cost burden for this renewal of $393 is a decrease of $504 from
the currently approved total of $897 in annual costs for this collection. This decrease in
annual costs is due to administrative adjustments.
Change in Respondent Cost Burden
The total respondent cost burden has decreased by $3,002, from $5,970 to $2,968, from
the 2009 renewal of this collection, due to:

7



Increases in estimated hourly rates. The 2009 renewal used estimated hourly
rates for respondents that were based on previous estimates of $100 per hour for
paraprofessionals and $310 per hour for attorneys. For the current renewal, the
USPTO is using updated estimates of $122 and $371 per hour for paraprofessionals
and attorneys, leading to an increase in the estimated average hourly rates for
respondents in the current submission.



Decreases in estimated burden hours. The total estimated burden hours have
decreased from 38 approved in 2009 to 18 for the current renewal due to decreases
in the estimated total annual responses for this collection. This decrease in total
burden hours offsets the increases in the estimated hourly rates and results in an
overall decrease in total respondent cost burden for this renewal.

Changes in Responses and Burden Hours
For this renewal, the USPTO estimates that the total annual responses will decrease by 50
(from 100 to 50) and the total burden hours will decrease by 20 (from 38 to 18) from the
currently approved burden for this collection due to administrative adjustments, as follows:


Decrease of 20 estimated annual responses for the Complaint Regarding
Invention Promoter (PTO/SB/2048); a burden decrease of 5 hours.



Decrease of 30 estimated annual responses for the Responses to the
Complaints; a burden decrease of 15 hours.

Changes in Annual (Non-hour) Costs
For this renewal, the USPTO estimates that the total annual (non-hour) costs will decrease
by $504 (from $897 to $393) due to administrative adjustments. This decrease in costs is
primarily due to a decrease in total estimated responses, though it is partially offset by an
increase in the estimated postage cost per submission based on updated 2012 postage
rates.
16.

Project Schedule

The USPTO does not plan to publish this information for statistical use. The USPTO is
required by the Inventors’ Rights Act of 1999 to make any complaints received concerning
invention promoters or promotion firms and their responses to these complaints publicly
available. The complaints and the responses to the complaints are published on the
USPTO Inventor Resources Web page. If no response to a complaint is submitted, the
complaint will still be published without a response.
17.

Display of Expiration Date of OMB Approval

The form in this information collection will display the OMB Control Number and the
expiration date of OMB approval.

8

18.

Exceptions to the Certificate Statement

This collection of information does not include any exceptions to the certificate statement.

B.

COLLECTION OF INFORMATION EMPLOYING STATISTICAL METHODS

This collection of information does not employ statistical methods.

9