Supporting Statement

Supporting Statement.doc

Rev. Proc. 2003-38, Commercial Revitalization Deduction

OMB: 1545-1818

Document [doc]
Download: doc | pdf

SUPPORTING STATEMENT



  1. CIRCUMSTANCES NECESSITATING COLLECTION OF INFORMATION


This revenue procedure provides the time and manner for states to make allocations under § 1400I of the Internal Revenue Code of commercial revitalization expenditures to a new or substantially rehabilitated building that is placed in service by a taxpayer in a renewal community. Once the taxpayer has received this allocation, the taxpayer may elect to deduct the commercial revitalization expenditures over a more accelerated method than is otherwise allowable under the depreciation provisions of the Code (hereinafter, this deduction is referred to as the “commercial revitalization expenditure deduction”).


  1. USE OF DATA


The information will be used by revenue agents to determine if the taxpayer is entitled to claim the commercial revitalization expenditure deduction.


  1. USE OF IMPROVED INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY TO REDUCE BURDEN


There are no plans to provide electronic filing because electronic filing is not appropriate for the collection of information in this submission.


  1. EFFORTS TO IDENTIFY DUPLICATION


We have attempted to eliminate duplication within the agency wherever possible.


  1. METHODS TO MINIMIZE BURDEN ON SMALL BUSINESSES OR OTHER SMALL ENTITIES


Not applicable.


  1. CONSEQUENCES OF LESS FREQUENT COLLECTION ON FEDERAL PROGRAMS OR POLICY ACTIVITIES


Not applicable.


  1. SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES REQUIRING DATA COLLECTION TO BE INCONSISTENT WITH GUIDELINES IN 5 CFR 1320.5(d)(2)


Not applicable.





-2-


  1. CONSULTATION WITH INDIVIDUALS OUTSIDE OF THE AGENCY ON AVAILABILITY OF DATA, FREQUENCY OF COLLECTION, CLARITY OF INSTRUCTIONS AND FORMS, AND DATA ELEMENTS


Revenue Procedure 2003-38 was published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin, (2003-24 I.R.B. 1017), on June 16, 2003.


In response to the Federal Register notice (77 FR 46559), dated August 3, 2012, we received no comments during the comment period regarding Revenue Procedure 2003-38.

  1. EXPLANATION OF DECISION TO PROVIDE ANY PAYMENT OR GIFT TO RESPONDENTS


Not applicable.


  1. ASSURANCE OF CONFIDENTIALITY OF RESPONSES


Generally, tax returns and tax return information are confidential as required by 26 USC 6103.


  1. JUSTIFICATION OF SENSITIVE QUESTIONS


Not applicable.


  1. ESTIMATED BURDEN OF INFORMATION COLLECTION


The collections of information are in Sections 4.02, 5, and 6.02 of this revenue procedure. Taxpayers are required to obtain from a state an allocation of commercial revitalization expenditures in order to claim the commercial revitalization expenditure deduction. The information will be used to verify that a taxpayer is entitled to claim the commercial revitalization expenditure deduction. The estimated total annual reporting burden is 200 hours. The estimated annual burden per respondent varies from 1 to 4 hours, depending on individual circumstances, with an estimated average of 2.5 hours. The estimated number of respondents and is 80.


Estimates of the annualized cost to respondents for the hour burdens shown are not available at this time.

  1. ESTIMATED TOTAL ANNUAL COST BURDEN TO RESPONDENTS


As suggested by OMB, our Federal Register notice dated August 3, 2012, requested public comments on estimates of cost burden that are not captured in the estimates of burden hours, i.e., estimates of capital or start-up costs and costs of operation, maintenance, and purchase of services to provide information. However, we did not receive any response from taxpayers on this subject. As a result, estimates of the cost burdens are not available at this time.


  1. ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED COST TO THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT


Not applicable.


  1. REASONS FOR CHANGE IN BURDEN


There is no change in the paperwork burden previously approved by OMB.


This form is being submitted for renewal purposes only.


  1. PLANS FOR TABULATION, STATISTICAL ANALYSIS AND PUBLICATION


Not applicable.


  1. REASONS WHY DISPLAYING THE OMB EXPIRATION DATE IS INAPPROPRIATE


We believe that displaying the OMB expiration date is inappropriate because it could cause confusion by leading taxpayers to believe that the revenue procedure sunsets as of the expiration date. Taxpayers are not likely to be aware that the Service intends to request renewal of the OMB approval and obtain a new expiration date before the old one expires.


  1. EXCEPTIONS TO THE CERTIFICATION STATEMENT ON OMB FORM 83-I


Not applicable.


Note: The following paragraph applies to all of the collections of information in this submission:


An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless the collection of information displays a valid OMB control number. Books or records relating to a collection of information must be retained as long as their contents may become material in the administration of any internal revenue law. Generally, tax returns and tax return information are confidential, as required by 26 U.S.C. 6103.


File Typeapplication/msword
File TitleSUPPORTING STATEMENT
Authorqhrfb
Last Modified ByR. Joseph Durbala
File Modified2012-11-28
File Created2006-06-05

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy