0286_ss_020113

0286_ss_020113.doc

Section 80.302, Notice of Discontinuance, Reduction, or Impairment of Service Involving a Distress Watch

OMB: 3060-0286

Document [doc]
Download: doc | pdf

3060‑0286

January 2013


SUPPORTING STATEMENT


A. Justification


  1. The Commission is seeking extension of this information collection (no change in reporting requirements) in order to obtain the full three year clearance from the OMB. There are no changes to the 2010 burden estimates.


The reporting requirement contained in Section 80.302 requires that: when changes occur in the operation of a public coast station which include discontinuance, relocation, reduction or suspension of a watch required to be maintained on 2182 kHz or 156.800 MHz, notification must be made by the licensee to the nearest district office of the U.S. Coast Guard as soon as practicable. The notification must include the estimated or known resumption time of the watch.


This requirement is necessary to ensure that the U.S. Coast Guard is timely informed when a coast station, which is responsible for maintaining a listening watch on a designated marine distress and safety frequency, to allow the Coast Guard ample time to seek an alternate means of providing radio coverage to in order to protect the life or lives of persons and/or property at sea, or object to the planned diminution of service. A copy of the rule is attached.


Statutory authority for this collection of information is contained in Secs. 4, 303, 307(e), 309, and 332, 48 Stat. 1066, 1082, as amended; 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 307(e), 309, and 332, unless otherwise noted. Interpret or apply 48 Stat. 1064–1068, 1081–1105, as amended; 47 U.S.C. 151–155, 301–609; 3 UST 3450, 3 UST 4726, 12 UST 2377.


As noted on the Form OMB 83-I, this collection of information does not affect individuals or households; thus, there are no impacts under the Privacy Act.


2. The information is used by the U.S. Coast Guard district office nearest to the coast station. Once the Coast Guard is aware that such a situation exists, it is able to inform the maritime community that radio coverage has or will be affected and/or seek to provide coverage of the safety watch via alternate means. When appropriate the Coast Guard may file a petition to deny an application.


3. Prior to finalizing rule makings the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau conducts an analysis to insure that improved information technology cannot be used to reduce the burden on the public. This analysis considers the possibility of obtaining and/or computer‑generating the required data from existing data bases in the Commission or other Federal agencies.


4. This agency does not impose a similar information collection on the respondents. There is no similar data available.


5. In conformance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the Commission is making an effort to minimize the burden on all respondents, regardless of size. The Commission has limited the information requirements to those absolutely necessary.


6. If the Coast Guard is not notified of the discontinuance, reduction or impairment of the service of a coast station which is required to maintain a listening watch on a designated distress and safety channel, the primary agency responsible for maritime search and rescue would be unaware of the gap in coverage and unable to take appropriate action if needed. Consequently, a decrease in the safety system designed to protect life and property at sea could occur.


7. There are no special circumstances which would require collections to be conducted in a manner inconsistent with the guidelines in 5 CFR 1320.6.


8. We published a 60-day notice in the Federal Register on December 5, 2012 at 77 FR 72346, as required by 5 CFR Section 1320.8(d). No PRA comments were received.


9. Respondents will not receive any payments.


10. There is no need for confidentiality.


11. This does not address any private matters of a sensitive nature.


12. There are approximately 160 coast stations per year that discontinue, reduce, or otherwise impair their service to the maritime public. Based on experience, it is estimated that a secretary or clerical employee would spend no more that one hour notifying the nearest U.S. Coast Guard district office of such an occurrence.


Estimate of cost to respondents: We assume that the respondent would use internal personnel to prepare the information. $15/hour x 160 responses x 1 hour = $2,400.


13. Estimate of cost to respondents


a. There are no capital or start-up costs.


b. There are no operational or maintenance costs.


14. Estimated annual cost to the Federal Government: None.


15. There are no changes in burden in this information collection.


16. The data will not be published for statistical use.


17. No expiration date will be displayed.


18. There were no exceptions to Item 19.


B. Collections of Information Employing Statistical Methods


No statistical methods are employed.



3


File Typeapplication/msword
File Title3060-0286
AuthorJSHAFFER
Last Modified Byjudith
File Modified2013-02-01
File Created2013-02-01

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy