Catch share systems are being
encouraged and considered in a variety of United States (U.S.)
fisheries. Scientists, policy makers, and stakeholders (including
fishermen and non-governmental environmental organizations) have
different views about potential social and economic impacts and
outcomes of these output-oriented systems. Thus establishing
baselines for trend analysis and identifying and evaluating impacts
over time is essential to assess and improve such systems and
determine whether intended outcomes are realized. The largest-ever
catch share program (in terms of number of permits) was implemented
in the groundfish fishery in the Northeast region May 1, 2010. This
system includes decentralizing the management of groundfish quota
to groups of fishermen called sectors. This management system is
distinctly different from past approaches in a variety of ways. In
particular, it relies heavily on the ability of groups, rather than
individual permit holders, to work together (and in collaboration
with councils and other fisheries managers) to manage the resource.
We hypothesize that the success of the Groundfish Sector Program is
likely to rest in part on the strength of the relationships between
permit holders including their degree of trust and collaboration.
We also hypothesize that successful sectors will build norms and
networks that enable collective action over time. The value of
these relationships is commonly referred to in social and economic
literature as social capital. The survey instrument submitted here
will measure the changes in these relationships and the associated
levels of social capital since the implementation of the Groundfish
Sector Program.
On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that
the collection of information encompassed by this request complies
with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR
1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding
the proposed collection of information, that the certification
covers:
(i) Why the information is being collected;
(ii) Use of information;
(iii) Burden estimate;
(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a
benefit, or mandatory);
(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control
number;
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of
these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked
and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.