60 Day Notice

65394

Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 208 / Friday, October 26, 2012 / Notices

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
[Docket No. DHS–2012–0064]

Homeland Security Advisory Council;
Open Teleconference Meeting
Office of Policy, Department of
Homeland Security.
ACTION: Notice of Correction of the
Notice of Federal Advisory Committee
Meeting for: Notice of Open
Teleconference Federal Advisory
Committee Meeting.
AGENCY:

This notice corrects the date
of the teleconference meeting of the
Homeland Security Advisory Council
(HSAC) that was published in the
October 22, 2012, Federal Register at FR
77 64532. The date was incorrectly
listed as Thursday, November 8, 2012.
The correct date of the meeting is
Wednesday, November, 7, 2012, and the
time of the teleconference remains 4:00
p.m. to 5:00 p.m. EST.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
William Smith, Director, [email protected]
or 202–282–9445.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice of
correction of this meeting is given under
the Federal Advisory Committee Act
(FACA), Public Law 92–463, as
amended, 5 U.S.C. App.
As stated in the notice published on
October 22, 2012, members of the public
must contact a staff member of the
HSAC to obtain the call-in
teleconference number, and they will be
advised at that time of the correct date
of the teleconference.
SUMMARY:

Becca Sharp,
Executive Director, Homeland Security
Advisory Council, DHS.
[FR Doc. 2012–26327 Filed 10–25–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–09–P

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Transportation Security Administration
[Docket No. TSA–2002–11334]

emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Intent To Request Renewal From OMB
of One Current Public Collection of
Information: Aviation Security
Infrastructure Fee Records Retention
Transportation Security
Administration, DHS.
ACTION: 60 day notice.
AGENCY:

VerDate Mar<15>2010

15:01 Oct 25, 2012

Jkt 229001

Comments Invited
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.), an agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information
unless it displays a valid OMB control
number. The ICR documentation is
available at www.reginfo.gov. Therefore,
in preparation for OMB review and
approval of the following information
collection, TSA is soliciting comments
to—
(1) Evaluate whether the proposed
information requirement is necessary for
the proper performance of the functions
of the agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(2) Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden;
(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
(4) Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including using
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.
Information Collection Requirement

The Transportation Security
Administration (TSA) invites public
comment on one currently approved
Information Collection Request (ICR),
Office of Management and Budget

SUMMARY:

(OMB) control number 1652–0018,
abstracted below that we will submit to
the OMB for renewal in compliance
with the Paperwork Reduction Act
(PRA). The ICR describes the nature of
the information collection and its
expected burden. The information
collection would require the retention of
certain information necessary for TSA to
help set the Aviation Security
Infrastructure Fee (ASIF), including
information about air carriers’ and
foreign air carriers’ costs related to
screening passengers and property in
calendar year 2000.
DATES: Send your comments by
December 26, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be emailed
to [email protected] or delivered to the
TSA PRA Officer, Office of Information
Technology (OIT), TSA–11,
Transportation Security Administration,
601 South 12th Street, Arlington, VA
20598–6040.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Susan Perkins at the above address, or
by telephone (571) 227–3398.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

OMB Control Number 1652–0018;
Aviation Security Infrastructure Fee
Records Retention, 49 CFR part 1511. To
help defray TSA’s costs of providing
civil aviation security services, and as
authorized by 49 U.S.C. 44940, TSA
published in the Federal Register on

PO 00000

Frm 00037

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

February 20, 2002, an interim final rule
which imposed a fee known as the
Aviation Security Infrastructure Fee
(ASIF) on certain air carriers and foreign
air carriers.1 The amount of ASIF
collected by TSA from the carriers, both
overall and per carrier, is based upon
the carriers’ aggregate and individual
costs, respectively, for screening
passengers and property in calendar
year 2000.2
In conjunction with the issuance of 49
CFR part 1511 (ASIF regulations), TSA
requested OMB approval to collect
information necessary for TSA to
establish the ASIF, including
information about the carriers’
individual and aggregate costs related to
screening passengers and property in
calendar year 2000. This information
collection included submissions to TSA
of data on the carriers’ screening-related
costs and also of independent audits of
that data. This information collection is
currently approved under OMB number
1652–0018.
Purpose of Information Collection
The information collection proposed
under this notice is intended to apply to
the retention requirement of the ASIF
regulations. Under the ASIF regulations,
carriers must retain any and all
documents, records, or information
related to the amount of the ASIF,
including all information applicable to
the carrier’s calendar year 2000 security
costs and information reasonably
necessary to complete an audit.3 This
requirement includes retaining the
source information for the calendar year
2000 screening costs reported to TSA;
the calculations and allocations
performed to assign costs submitted to
TSA; information and documents
reviewed and prepared for the required
independent audit; the accountant’s
working papers, notes, worksheets, and
other relevant documentation used in
the audit; and, if applicable, the specific
information leading to the accountant’s
opinion, including any determination
that the accountant could not provide
an audit opinion.
Description of Information Collection
The information collection,
submission, and retention requirement
applies to each air carrier and foreign air
carrier that incurred costs for the
screening of passengers and property in
calendar year 2000. As this is an
ongoing record retention requirement
and no new air carriers and foreign air
carriers are subject to the requirements
1 See

67 FR 7926, as codified at 49 CFR part 1511.
U.S.C. 44940(a)(2)(B)(i), (ii).
3 See 49 CFR 1511.9.
2 49

E:\FR\FM\26OCN1.SGM

26OCN1

Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 208 / Friday, October 26, 2012 / Notices
of current 49 CFR part 1511, the burden
estimates do not anticipate any start-up
costs or changes over subsequent years.
It is estimated that the 185 respondent
air carriers and foreign air carriers will
each on average incur $104.60 annually,
which includes $54.60 in records
storage and $50 in labor costs for 2
hours of records management at $25 per
hour. Thus, the annual average burden
related to this requirement for all
respondents is $19,351. The subject
records may be used by TSA to make
determinations regarding securityrelated costs in calendar year 2000,
including conducting reviews and
otherwise ensuring compliance with 49
CFR part 1511.
Issued in Arlington, Virginia, on October
23, 2012.
Susan Perkins,
TSA Paperwork Reduction Act Officer, Office
of Information Technology.
[FR Doc. 2012–26433 Filed 10–25–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–05–P

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Air Cargo Advance Screening (ACAS)
Pilot Program
Correction
In notice document 2012–26031
appearing on pages 65006–65009 in the
issue of October 24, 2012 make the
following correction:
On page 65007, in the first column,
under the ADDRESSES heading, in the
fourth line, ‘‘[email protected]’’
should read ‘‘[email protected]’’.
[FR Doc. C1–2012–26031 Filed 10–24–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505–01–D

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
[Docket No. FR–5603–N–78]

Notice of Submission of Proposed
Information Collection to OMB: Section
8 Contract Renewal Policy—Guidance
for the Renewal of Project-Based
Section 8 Contracts
Office of the Chief Information
Officer, HUD.
ACTION: Notice.

emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES

AGENCY:

The proposed information
collection requirement described below
has been submitted to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review, as required by the Paperwork
Reduction Act. The Department is

SUMMARY:

VerDate Mar<15>2010

15:01 Oct 25, 2012

Jkt 229001

soliciting public comments on the
subject proposal.
The Section 8 Renewal Policy Guide
implements Section 524 of the
Multifamily Housing Reform and
Affordability Act of 1997 (MAHRA)
(Pub. L. 105–65, enacted on October 27,
1997), which governs how expiring
Section 8 project-based assistance
contracts are renewed. The Section 8
contract renewal process is an essential
component to preserving low income
rental housing affordability and
availability, while reducing long-term
costs of project-based assistance.
Project-based assistance contracts are
renewed under MAHRA to protect
tenants and preserve affordable housing
for low and very low-income tenants.
The Section 8 contract renewal process
will provide housing protection for the
low and very low-income tenants living
in various United States communities.
The Section 8 Renewal Policy Guide
sets forth six renewal options from
which a project owner may choose
when renewing their expiring Section 8
contract: Option One—Mark-Up-ToMarket; Option Two—Other Contract
Renewal with Current Rents at or Below
Comparable Market Rents; Option
Three—Referral to the Office of
Affordable Preservation (OAHP); Option
Four—Renewal of Projects Exempted
From OAHP; Option Five—Renewal of
Portfolio Reengineering Demonstration
or Preservation Projects; Option Six—
Opt Outs. Owners should select one of
six options which are applicable to their
project and should submit contract
renewal on an annual basis to renew
Contract.
DATES: Comments Due Date: November
26, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit comments regarding
this proposal. Comments should refer to
the proposal by name and/or OMB
approval Number (2502–0587) and
should be sent to: HUD Desk Officer,
Office of Management and Budget, New
Executive Office Building, Washington,
DC 20503; fax: 202–395–5806. Email:
[email protected] fax:
202–395–5806.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Colette Pollard, Reports Management
Officer, QDAM, Department of Housing
and Urban Development, 451 Seventh
Street SW., Washington, DC 20410;
email Colette Pollard at
[email protected]. or telephone
(202) 402–3400. This is not a toll-free
number. Copies of available documents
submitted to OMB may be obtained
from Ms. Pollard.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
notice informs the public that the

PO 00000

Frm 00038

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

65395

Department of Housing and Urban
Development has submitted to OMB a
request for approval of the Information
collection described below. This notice
is soliciting comments from members of
the public and affecting agencies
concerning the proposed collection of
information to: (1) Evaluate whether the
proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility; (2) Evaluate the
accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the
burden of the proposed collection of
information; (3) Enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and (4) Minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on those who are to respond; including
through the use of appropriate
automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submission of
responses.
This Notice also lists the Following
Information:
Title of Proposed: Section 8 Contract
Renewal Policy—Guidance for the
Renewal of Project-Based Section 8
Contracts.
OMB Approval Number: 2502–0587.
Form Numbers: HUD–9649, HUD–
9626, HUD–9648D, HUD–9628, HUD–
9628–C, HUD–9630, HUD–9632, HUD–
9633, HUD–9634, HUD–9645, HUD–
9646, HUD–9625, HUD–9627, HUD–
9636, HUD–9637, HUD–9643, HUD–
9641, HUD–9648C, HUD–9648–B,
HUD–9647, HUD–9648–A, HUD–9640,
HUD–9639, HUD–9635, HUD–9638,
HUD–9624, HUD–9624A, HUD–9631,
HUD–9642, HUD–9628–A, HUD–9628B,
HUD–9644, HUD–9625, HUD–9628–D,
HUD–9629, HUD–9651.
Description of the need for the
information and proposed use: The
Section 8 Renewal Policy Guide
implements Section 524 of the
Multifamily Housing Reform and
Affordability Act of 1997 (MAHRA)
(public law 105–65, enacted on October
27, 1997), which governs how expiring
Section 8 project-based assistance
contracts are renewed. The Section 8
contract renewal process is an essential
component to preserving low income
rental housing affordability and
availability, while reducing long-term
costs of project-based assistance.
Project-based assistance contracts are
renewed under MAHRA to protect
tenants and preserve affordable housing
for low and very low-income tenants.
The Section 8 contract renewal process
will provide housing protection for the
low and very low-income tenants living
in various United States communities.
The Section 8 Renewal Policy Guide

E:\FR\FM\26OCN1.SGM

26OCN1