GEAR_UP_Att_Attach_A__FY_2012_Supporting_Statement Updated 1 30

EDICS Tracking and OMB Number: (04846) 1840.0777 Revised: XX/XX/XXXX

RIN Number: XXXX-XXXX (if applicable)

SUPPORTING STATEMENT

FOR PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT SUBMISSION

     

A. Justification

1. Explain the circumstances that make the collection of information necessary. Identify any legal or administrative requirements that necessitate the collection. Attach a hard copy of the appropriate section of each statute and regulation mandating or authorizing the collection of information, or you may provide a valid URL link or paste the applicable section¹. Specify the review type of the collection (new, revision, extension, reinstatement with change, reinstatement without change). If revised, briefly specify the changes. If a rulemaking is involved, make note of the sections or changed sections, if applicable.

The Department of Education is requesting an extension of the previously approved (Gaining Early Awareness and Readiness for Undergraduate Programs) annual performance report that expires on January 31, 2013. The information is collected under the authority of Title VII, Part A, Subpart 2, Section 711 of the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended; the program regulations in 34 CFR 648; and the Education Department General Administrative Regulations (EDGAR) in 34 CFR 74.51. (Copies of the authorizing statute and the program regulations are attached). Further, the performance report form lends itself to the collection of quantifiable data needed to respond to the requirements of the Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA). Grantees are required to provide the data requested in order to obtain or retain benefit, according to 20 U.S.C. 1135, 34 CFR Sections 648.20, 648.31 and 648.66.

The overall goal of the program is to increase the number of low-income students entering enrolled in a post-secondary education.

There are two versions of the performance report that are part of this package: the annual report. GEAR UP grants are awarded for a period of six and seven years. Grantees are required to submit an annual performance report on April 15 for each budget period of the grant, and a final performance report 90 days after the grant expires. The annual performance report asks for information specific to the budget year for which the report is being submitted. The final performance report asks for information specific to the last budget year of the grant, and also requires the grantee to update the enrollment and graduation data of all students who have participated in a GEAR UP program at any time during the project period. This information allows the Department to track the number of GEAR UP students who graduated and enrolled in postsecondary education during the grant period.

2. Indicate how, by whom, and for what purpose the information is to be used. Except for a new collection, indicate the actual use the agency has made of the information received from the current collection.

The Department uses the data collected from the performance reports to: (a) monitor grantee compliance with program regulations (34 CFR 648) in administering grant funds and selecting GAANN fellows; (b) collect the quantifiable data needed to evaluate project outcomes; and (c) assist in providing technical assistance to strengthen individual projects.

The performance reports are used to collect programmatic data for purposes of annual reporting, budget submissions to OMB, Congressional hearings, Congressional inquiries, and to respond to inquiries from higher education interest groups and the general public.

3. Describe whether, and to what extent, the collection of information involves the use of automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or forms of information technology, e.g. permitting electronic submission of responses, and the basis for the decision of adopting this means of collection. Also describe any consideration given to using technology to reduce burden.

Grantees use a web-based system to electronically retrieve and submit the requested information in the performance report. The electronic version of the performance report automatically saves grantee information and student level data entered in one year for use in the following year. Therefore, the data does not need to be re-entered, only updated when changes occur. This assists in reducing the burden to grantees, particularly with regard to both the final report and the supplement to the final report, which require updates to the educational and employment status of all students that have been funded over the life of the grant. The supplement is due two years after the final report.

4. Describe efforts to identify duplication. Show specifically why any similar information already available cannot be used or modified for use for the purposes described in Item 2 above.

Since the information submitted in the performance reports is specific to the GEAR UP grant project, there is no duplication. There is no other collection instrument available to collect the information necessary to meet the purposes described in item 2 above.

5. If the collection of information impacts small businesses or other small entities, describe any methods used to minimize burden. A small entity may be (1) a small business which is deemed to be one that is independently owned and operated and that is not dominant in its field of operation; (2) a small organization that is any not-for-profit enterprise that is independently owned and operated and is not dominant in its field; or (3) a small government jurisdiction, which is a government of a city, county, town, township, school district, or special district with a population of less than 50,000.

Learning Education Agencies (LEA) Institutions of Higher Education (IHE) are the sole recipients of GEAR UP grants. There is no impact on small businesses or small entities.

6. Describe the consequences to Federal program or policy activities if the collection is not conducted or is conducted less frequently, as well as any technical or legal obstacles to reducing burden.

Collection of information is annual. Collection of information on a less frequent basis would impede the Department’s ability to determine if the grantee is making satisfactory progress in meeting the goals and objectives proposed in its initial application for funds.

Further, failure to collect this information would hinder the Department’s ability to carry out its required responsibility to perform an overall assessment of the GEAR UP Program and its impact.

7. Explain any special circumstances that would cause an information collection to be conducted in a manner:

• requiring respondents to report information to the agency more often than quarterly;

• requiring respondents to prepare a written response to a collection of information in fewer than 30 days after receipt of it;

• requiring respondents to submit more than an original and two copies of any document;

• requiring respondents to retain records, other than health, medical, government contract, grant-in-aid, or tax records for more than three years;

• in connection with a statistical survey, that is not designed to produce valid and reliable results than can be generalized to the universe of study;

• requiring the use of a statistical data classification that has not been reviewed and approved by OMB;

• that includes a pledge of confidentiality that is not supported by authority established in statute or regulation, that is not supported by disclosure and data security policies that are consistent with the pledge, or that unnecessarily impedes sharing of data with other agencies for compatible confidential use; or

• requiring respondents to submit proprietary trade secrets, or other confidential information unless the agency can demonstrate that it has instituted procedures to protect the information’s confidentiality to the extent permitted by law.

There are no special circumstances that would cause this information collection to be conducted in such a manner, except for the three-year record-keeping retention period in EDGAR 74.53.

8. As applicable, state that the Department has published the 60 and 30 Federal Register notices as required by 5 CFR 1320.8(d), soliciting comments on the information collection prior to submission to OMB. Summarize public comments received in response to that notice and describe actions taken by the agency in response to these comments. Specifically address comments received on cost and hour burden.

Describe efforts to consult with persons outside the agency to obtain their views on the availability of data, frequency of collection, the clarity of instruction and record keeping, disclosure, or reporting format (if any), and on the data elements to be recorded, disclosed, or reported.

Consultation with representatives of those from whom information is to be obtained or those who must compile records should occur at least once every 3 years – even if the collection of information activity is the same as in prior periods. There may be circumstances that may preclude consultation in a specific situation. These circumstances should be explained.

Comments and feedback regarding the frequency, clarity of instructions, reporting format, and data elements included in the performance report have been received from grantee institutions in prior years. The feedback received was the impetus for the changes that have been incorporated into the performance report form in the past. The changes made in the form since the last OMB submission are primarily for the purpose of streamlining and clarifying the intent of the questions. We published 60-day and 30-day Federal Register Notices to allow public comment.

For this submission, clarifying language was added to questions in the performance report to address previous input and comments received from grantees since the previous OMB submission. No questions were added, only the language was clarified. There is no change in burden. The 60 day Federal Register Notice was published in Vol. 77, page 24689 on 4/25/12.

The GEAR UP program received public comments and those comments were addressed. The primary issues addressed included:

• State grantees are now required to list their participating schools. State and Partnership grantees are required to list the NCES ID numbers of participating schools.

• The Student Enrollment in Courses by Grade Level Table has been revised to correspond with the Courses Completion Table. In addition, the Department will include an additional column for English/Language Arts.

• New fields have been added to the APR to accommodate reporting requirements for grantees that have a seventh year.

These changes will result better data collection for the GEAR UP program.

9. Explain any decision to provide any payment or gift to respondents, other than remuneration of contractors or grantees with meaningful justification.

The Department will not provide any payments or gifts to respondents.

10. Describe any assurance of confidentiality provided to respondents and the basis for the assurance in statute, regulation, or agency policy. If personally identifiable information (PII) is being collected, a Privacy Act statement should be included on the instrument. Please provide a citation for the Systems of Record Notice and the date a Privacy Impact Assessment was completed as indicated on the IC Data Form. A confidentiality statement with a legal citation that authorizes the pledge of confidentiality should be provided.² If the collection is subject to the Privacy Act, the Privacy Act statement is deemed sufficient with respect to confidentiality. If there is no expectation of confidentiality, simply state that the Department makes no pledge about the confidentially of the data.

There is no program regulatory requirement for assuring confidentiality, except as provided by EDGAR (34 CFR 75.740 – Privacy), and the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974.

Prior to accessing the web based reporting software there is a Privacy Act Notice that grantees must read. It states that the system contains personal information protected under the provisions of the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. § 552a -- as amended. Violations of the provisions of the Act may subject the offender to criminal penalties. A Privacy Impact Assessment was completed in 2009 with the previous submission and has been updated for the 2012 submission. We do not intend to do a system of records. A system of records has not been needed as we do not collect SSN information, and data is aggregated to evaluate the accomplishments and impact of the GEAR UP program as a whole. The records are destroyed within three years of being received at the federal records center.

11. Provide additional justification for any questions of a sensitive nature, such as sexual behavior and attitudes, religious beliefs, and other matters that are commonly considered private. The justification should include the reasons why the agency considers the questions necessary, the specific uses to be made of the information, the explanation to be given to persons from whom the information is requested, and any steps to be taken to obtain their consent.

This application does not include questions about sexual behavior and attitudes, religious beliefs, or other items that are commonly considered sensitive and private.

12. Provide estimates of the hour burden of the collection of information. The statement should:

• Indicate the number of respondents by affected public type (federal government, individuals or households, private sector – businesses or other for-profit, private sector – not-for-profit institutions, farms, state, local or tribal governments), frequency of response, annual hour burden, and an explanation of how the burden was estimated, including identification of burden type: recordkeeping, reporting or third party disclosure. All narrative should be included in item 12. Unless directed to do so, agencies should not conduct special surveys to obtain information on which to base hour burden estimates. Consultation with a sample (fewer than 10) of potential respondents is desirable. If the hour burden on respondents is expected to vary widely because of differences in activity, size, or complexity, show the range of estimated hour burden, and explain the reasons for the variance. Generally, estimates should not include burden hours for customary and usual business practices.

• If this request for approval covers more than one form, provide separate hour burden estimates for each form and aggregate the hour burdens in the ROCIS IC Burden Analysis Table. (The table should at minimum include Respondent types, IC activity, Respondent and Responses, Hours/Response, and Total Hours)

• Provide estimates of annualized cost to respondents of the hour burdens for collections of information, identifying and using appropriate wage rate categories. The cost of contracting out or paying outside parties for information collection activities should not be included here. Instead, this cost should be included in Item 14.

The estimated total reporting burden for this data collection is 2,475 hours. This includes a total of 225 respondents (159 public institutions and 66 private institutions), each with an estimated response time of 11 hours. The burden hours have not been reduced since the previous collection package was submitted for clearance. Comments and feedback regarding the clarity of instructions in the performance report have been received from grantee institutions. As noted under item 8, clarifying language was added to questions based on feedback received from grantees. The changes did not affect the burden hours.

Affected Public

(Estimated Burden Hours):

Type of institution	Public	Private
Estimated number of respondents	159	66
Estimated preparation time Annual Report	11 hours	11 hours
Average response time [(10.5x2) + 12]/3 = 11 hours	11 hours	11 hours
Annual estimated burden hours	1,749	726
Total estimated burden hours for all respondents	2,475 hours

The burden to each individual respondent, established at 11 hours, is based on feedback from respondents during previous submissions. Please note the two instruments for the GEAR UP public and private sector responses.

Estimated Cost to Respondents

Type of institution	Public	Private
Number of institutions	159	66
Professional staff: 1 personnel x 8 hours x $35	$280	$280
Clerical staff: 1 clerical x 2 hours x $8	$16	$16
Total estimated cost per respondent	$296	$296
Estimated costs to all respondents (# total respondents x $296)	$47,064	$19,536
Total estimated costs to all respondents	$66,600

13. Provide an estimate of the total annual cost burden to respondents or record keepers resulting from the collection of information. (Do not include the cost of any hour burden shown in Items 12 and 14.)

• The cost estimate should be split into two components: (a) a total capital and start-up cost component (annualized over its expected useful life); and (b) a total operation and maintenance and purchase of services component. The estimates should take into account costs associated with generating, maintaining, and disclosing or providing the information. Include descriptions of methods used to estimate major cost factors including system and technology acquisition, expected useful life of capital equipment, the discount rate(s), and the time period over which costs will be incurred. Capital and start-up costs include, among other items, preparations for collecting information such as purchasing computers and software; monitoring, sampling, drilling and testing equipment; and acquiring and maintaining record storage facilities.

• If cost estimates are expected to vary widely, agencies should present ranges of cost burdens and explain the reasons for the variance. The cost of contracting out information collection services should be a part of this cost burden estimate. In developing cost burden estimates, agencies may consult with a sample of respondents (fewer than 10), utilize the 60-day pre-OMB submission public comment process and use existing economic or regulatory impact analysis associated with the rulemaking containing the information collection, as appropriate.

• Generally, estimates should not include purchases of equipment or services, or portions thereof, made: (1) prior to October 1, 1995, (2) to achieve regulatory compliance with requirements not associated with the information collection, (3) for reasons other than to provide information or keep records for the government or (4) as part of customary and usual business or private practices. Also, these estimates should not include the hourly costs (i.e., the monetization of the hours) captured above in Item 12

Total Annualized Capital/Startup Cost :      

Total Annual Costs (O&M) :      

____________________

Total Annualized Costs Requested :      

There are no other costs to the respondent except those that would be customary and usual business practices.

14. Provide estimates of annualized cost to the Federal government. Also, provide a description of the method used to estimate cost, which should include quantification of hours, operational expenses (such as equipment, overhead, printing, and support staff), and any other expense that would not have been incurred without this collection of information. Agencies also may aggregate cost estimates from Items 12, 13, and 14 in a single table.

Cost to Federal Government:

Securing OMB approval once every three years (Review 15 hrs. x $45/per hour = $675 x 50% overhead = $338)	$1,013
Other Departmental staff to review and approve the request (Review 5 hrs. x $55/per hour = $275 x 50% overhead = $138	$413
Estimated OMB review (Review 8 hrs. x $45/per hour = $360 x 50% overhead = $180)	$540
Review of reports and analysis of data (Review 120 hrs. x $45/per hour = $5,400	$5,400
Total estimate cost to government every three years	$7,366

Annual cost to the Federal Government is $2,455.

15. Explain the reasons for any program changes or adjustments. Generally, adjustments in burden result from re-estimating burden and/or from economic phenomenon outside of an agency’s control (e.g., correcting a burden estimate or an organic increase in the size of the reporting universe). Program changes result from a deliberate action that materially changes a collection of information and generally are result of new statute or an agency action (e.g., changing a form, revising regulations, redefining the respondent universe, etc.). Burden changes should be disaggregated by type of change (i.e., adjustment, program change due to new statute, and/or program change due to agency discretion), type of collection (new, revision, extension, reinstatement with change, reinstatement without change) and include totals for changes in burden hours, responses and costs (if applicable).

The GEAR UP APR has a reduction in burden due to the elimination of survey questions in the Appendix, and a more streamlined submission process.

16. For collections of information whose results will be published, outline plans for tabulation and publication. Address any complex analytical techniques that will be used. Provide the time schedule for the entire project, including beginning and ending dates of the collection of information, completion of report, publication dates, and other actions.

The information collected from the performance reports will be analyzed to determine if each grantee is meeting the approved goals and objectives for the project. Further, the information will be aggregated into a single program report and evaluated to determine if the program as a whole is meeting its purpose. The aggregated data in the report will include demographic profiles of project participants, interim and final project outcomes (such as progress towards enrollment into post-secondary education), and program profiles of types of services provided.

The data will be reported at the conclusion of the six-seven-year grant period. Grants are scheduled to expire in the six or seventh year of funding. Final reports are then due to the program office 90 days after the expiration of the grant. Program staff will analyze the data for reporting in January. No complex analytical or statistical techniques will be used.

17. If seeking approval to not display the expiration date for OMB approval of the information collection, explain the reasons that display would be inappropriate.

The Department will display on the form the expiration date for the OMB approval, as required.

18. Explain each exception to the certification statement identified in the Certification of Paperwork Reduction Act.

There are no exceptions to the certification statement.

1 Please limit pasted text to no longer than 3 paragraphs.

2 Requests for this information are in accordance with the following ED and OMB policies: Privacy Act of 1974, OMB Circular A-108 – Privacy Act Implementation – Guidelines and Responsibilities, OMB Circular A-130 Appendix I – Federal Agency Responsibilities for Maintaining Records About Individuals, OMB M-03-22 – OMB Guidance for Implementing the Privacy Provisions of the E-Government Act of 2002, OMB M-06-15 – Safeguarding Personally Identifiable Information, OM:6-104 – Privacy Act of 1974 (Collection, Use and Protection of Personally Identifiable Information)

9