SAFETY Act
(1640-0001)
A. Justification
The Support Anti-Terrorism by Fostering Effective Technologies Act (the SAFETY Act) of 2002 (6 CFR Part 25) was enacted as part of the Homeland Security Act of 2002, Public Law 107-296, requires the collection of information.
2. The information collected is used by the DHS Office of SAFETY Act Implementation (OSAI) to:
a. Provide incentives for the development and deployment of anti-terrorism technologies by creating a systems of risk and litigation management. The purpose of the Act is to ensure that the threat of liability does not deter potential manufacturers or sellers of antiterrorism technologies from developing, deploying, and commercializing technologies that could save lives. The Act creates certain liability limitations for claims arising out of, relating to, or resulting from an Act of Terrorism when qualified antiterrorism technologies have been deployed, as defined by the Secretary of Homeland Security.
b. These information is collected through SAFETY Act Applications, DHS Forms approved by OMB and are received from business entities, associations, and State, Local and Tribal Government entities. OSAI reviews and evaluates SAFETY Act Applications are reviewed for eligibility for protections under the SAFETY Actbenefits, technology/program evaluations, and regulatory compliance.
Information is typically collected via the DHS OSAI secure Wweb site, but the public has the option of providing the information via hardcopy forms that can be either mailed or faxed to the DHS OSAI Office.
3. Information technology will bise used in the collection of this information to reduce the data gathering and records management burden. DHS S&T provides a secure Wweb site, accessible through http://www.SAFETYAct.gov, through which the public can learn about the program, submit applications for SAFETY Act protections, submit questions to OSAI, and provide feedback. The data collection forms have standardized the collection of information that is both necessary and essential for the DHS OSAI.
4. The information being collected is either being submitted voluntarily by the public, or through oOutreach efforts initiated by OSAI. The collection of SAFETY Act Application Kit information was based on new legislation which identified the need for the Ffederal Ggovernment to collect critical information regarding technologies that could benefit Homeland Security initiatives. OSAI then evaluates and provides recommendations to the Under Secretary for Science and Technology in the Department of Homeland Security designee regarding qualifies these aAnti-tTerrorism tTechnologies, based on the economic and technical criteria contained in the SAFETY Act Final Rule., for protection in accordance with the Act, and therefore encourages the development and deployment of new and innovative anti-terrorism products and services
5. Collection of this information via a secure Wweb site is intended to minimize burden for small businesses and other small entities , who encompassing a large portion of the OSAI application pool. OSAI also developed established a streamlined on-line application process for providing SAFETY Act coverage for qualified providers of certain categories of technologies known as a Block Designation/Certificationthat can be saved and updated. It has been deployed to minimize the burden by government paperwork information collection imposed on interested Small Business participants and other applicants. Small businesses and other small entities, which do not have access to the Internet, can request that hard copies of DHS forms to be mailed or faxed to them for completion and returned to the DHS OSAI.
6. The DHS OSAI collects only information that is necessary to comply with 6 CFR Part 25. Not collecting this information would make it much more difficult, time consuming and costly for DHS to identify viable anti-terrorism technologies. Collecting it less frequently would result in the review of fewer anti-terrorism technologies resulting in the issuance of fewer SAFETY Act protections and ultimately fewer anti-terrorism technologies deployed to protect the nation.
7. OSAI has the ability to process Classifiedsensitive application information. Respondents may submit company-proprietary information. All such sensitive but unclassified material is safeguarded as outlined in Department of Homeland Security Management Directive Number 11042.1, Safeguarding Sensitive But Unclassified (For Official Use Only) Information.
8. The Federal Register Notice, soliciting public comment by over a 60-day period was published on October 2, 2012 (77 FR 60130). A second Federal Register Notice soliciting public feedback over a 30-day period was published on February 1, 2013 (78 FR 7440). No public comments were received by either of these notices.
9. DHS S&T does not provide payments or gifts to respondents in exchange for a benefit sought.
10. Confidentiality and protection of intellectual property is assured in accordance with the Final Rule, paragraph 25.10. The Privacy Act of 1974 (Public Law 93-589) mandates that personal information solicited from individuals completing Federal records and forms be kept confidential. A Privacy Threshold Analysis was completed and required the submission of a Privacy Impact Assessment, which was accepted as complete. They are included in the submission package.
11. There are no questions of a sensitive nature in this information collection.
12. Estimated Annualized Burden Hours and Costs
Estimates of Annualized Labor Costs and Respondents |
DHS Form # 10010: Registration of a Seller |
DHS Form # 10009: Request for a Pre-Application Consultation |
DHS Form # 10002: Notice of Modification |
No. of Respondents |
500 |
150 |
30 |
Avg. Burden per Form (in hours) |
.5 |
1 |
10 |
Total Annual Burden (in hours) |
250
|
150 |
300 |
Average Hourly Wage Rate |
$100 |
$100 |
$100 |
Total Annual Respondent Cost |
$25,000 |
$15,000 |
$30,000 |
Estimates of Annualized Labor Costs and Respondents |
DHS Form # 10001: Application for Transfer of SAFETY Act Designation |
DHS Form # 10057: Application for Renewal |
DHS Form # 10006: Application for Developmental testing and Evaluation Designation |
No. of Respondents |
10 |
35 |
25 |
Avg. Burden per Form (in hours) |
10 |
50 |
60 |
Total Annual Burden (in hours) |
100 |
1,750 |
1,500 |
Average Hourly Wage Rate |
$100 |
$100 |
$100 |
Total Annual Respondent Cost |
$10,000 |
$175,000 |
$150,000 |
Estimates of Annualized Labor Costs and Respondents |
DHS Form # 10008: Application for SAFETY Act Designation |
DHS Form # 10005: SAFETY Act Block Designation |
|
No. of Respondents |
125 |
50 |
10 |
Avg. Burden per Form (in hours) |
80 |
40 |
50 |
Total Annual Burden (in hours) |
10,000 |
2,000 |
500 |
Average Hourly Wage Rate |
$100 |
$100 |
$100 |
Total Annual Respondent Cost |
$1,000,000 |
$200,000 |
$50,000 |
Estimates of Annualized Labor Costs and Respondents |
DHS Form # 10004: SAFETY Act Block Certification |
DHS Form # 10003: Notice of License |
No. of Respondents |
10 |
5 |
Avg. Burden per Form (in hours) |
50
|
50
|
Total Annual Burden (in hours) |
500 |
250 |
Average Hourly Wage Rate |
$100 |
$100 |
Total Annual Respondent Cost |
$50,000 |
$25,000 |
Annual Reporting Burden and Respondent Cost:
The total estimated ICR Public Burden in hours is 17,300. This figure was derived by summing the total annual burden hours from the forms.
The estimated annual public cost is $1,730,000. This figure was derived by summing the estimated annual respondent costs for all forms.
13. There are no capital or start-up costs associated with this information collection.
14. Government Cost: The annualized cost associated with the program is $8.49M.
15. All form changes were made by DHS S&T to reduce the cost and time burden to the public.
16. DHS S&T does not intend to employ the use of statistics or the publication thereof for this information collection.
17. DHS S&T will display the expiration date of OMB approval for this information collection.
18. DHS S&T does not request an exception to the certification of this information collection.
B. Collection of Information Employment Statistical Methods. Not Applicable.
| File Type | application/msword |
| File Title | SUPPORTING STATEMENT FOR |
| Author | TSA Standard PC User |
| Last Modified By | Dyson, Jennifer |
| File Modified | 2013-03-18 |
| File Created | 2013-03-18 |