60-day FR Notice

15036

Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 46 / Friday, March 8, 2013 / Notices

section or by calling (301) 443–1104,
regarding the IHS information collection
activities (OMB Control No. 1076–0136).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

I. Abstract
Representatives of the BIA and IHS
seek renewal of the approval for
information collections conducted
under their joint rule, 25 CFR part 900,
implementing the ISDEAA. The Act
requires the joint rule to govern how
contracts are awarded to Indian tribes,
thereby avoiding the unnecessary
burden or confusion associated with
two sets of rules and information
collection requirements. See 25 U.S.C.
450k(a)(2)(A)(ii). The joint rule at 25
CFR part 900 was developed through
negotiated rulemaking with tribes in
1996 and governs, among other things,
what must be included in a tribe’s
initial ISDEAA contract proposal to the
BIA or IHS. There is no change to the
approved burden hours for this
information collection.
The information requirements for this
joint rule represent significant
differences from other agencies in
several respects. Under the Act, the
Secretaries of Health and Human
Services and the Department of the
Interior are directed to enter into selfdetermination contracts with tribes
upon request, unless specific
declination criteria apply, and,
generally, tribes may renew these
contracts annually, whereas other
agencies provide grants on a
discretionary or competitive basis. Both
the BIA and IHS award contracts for
multiple programs whereas other
agencies usually award single grants to
tribes.
The BIA and IHS use the information
collected to determine applicant
eligibility, evaluate applicant
capabilities, protect the service
population, safeguard Federal funds and
other resources, and permit the Federal
agencies to administer and evaluate
contract programs. Tribal governments
or tribal organizations provide the
information by submitting Public Law
93–638 contract proposals to the
appropriate Federal agency. No third
party notification or public disclosure
burden is associated with this
collection.
II. Request for Comments
The BIA and IHS request your
comments on this collection concerning:
(a) The necessity of this information
collection for the proper performance of
the functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden (hours

VerDate Mar<15>2010

18:44 Mar 07, 2013

Jkt 229001

and cost) of the collection of
information, including the validity of
the methodology and assumptions used;
(c) ways we could enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and (d) ways we could
minimize the burden of the collection of
the information on the respondents.
Please note that an agency may not
conduct or sponsor, and an individual
need not respond to, a collection of
information unless it has a valid OMB
Control Number.
It is our policy to make all comments
available to the public for review at the
location listed in the ADDRESSES section.
Before including your address, phone
number, email address or other
personally identifiable information in
your comment, you should be aware
that your entire comment—including
your personal identifying information—
may be made publicly available at any
time. While you can ask us in your
comment to withhold your personal
identifying information from public
review, we cannot guarantee that we
will be able to do so.
III. Data
OMB Control Number: 1076–0136.
Title: Indian Self-Determination and
Education Assistance Contracts, 25 CFR
part 900.
Brief Description of Collection: An
Indian tribe or tribal organization is
required to submit this information each
time that it proposes to contract with
BIA or IHS under the ISDEAA. Each
response may vary in its length. In
addition, each subpart of 25 CFR part
900 concerns different parts of the
contracting process. For example,
subpart C relates to provisions of the
contents for the initial contract
proposal. The respondents do not incur
the burden associated with subpart C
when contracts are renewed. Subpart F
describes minimum standards for
management systems used by Indian
tribes or tribal organizations under these
contracts. Subpart G addresses the
negotiability of all reporting and data
requirements in the contracts.
Responses are required to obtain or
retain a benefit.
Type of Review: Extension without
change of currently approved collection.
Respondents: Federally recognized
Indian tribes and tribal organizations.
Number of Respondents: 550.
Estimated Number of Responses:
5,267.
Estimated Time per Response: Varies
from 10 to 50 hours, with an average of
45 hours per response.
Frequency of Response: Each time
programs are contracted from the BIA or
IHS under the ISDEAA.

PO 00000

Frm 00078

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden:
219,792 hours.
Comment Due Date: Your comments
regarding this information collection are
best assured of having their full effect if
received within 60-days of the date of
this publication.
Dated: February 28, 2013.
John Ashley,
Acting Assistant Director for Information
Resources, Bureau of Indian Affairs.
Dated: February 25, 2013.
Yvette Roubideaux,
Director, Indian Health Service.
[FR Doc. 2013–05498 Filed 3–7–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–4J–P

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Indian Affairs
Renewal of Agency Information
Collection for Navajo Partitioned
Lands Grazing Permits
Bureau of Indian Affairs,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of request for comments.
AGENCY:

SUMMARY: In compliance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the
Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) is seeking
comments on the renewal of Office of
Management and Budget (OMB)
approval for the collection of
information for Navajo Partitioned
Lands Grazing Permits authorized by
OMB Control Number 1076–0162. This
information collection expires May 31,
2013.
DATES: Submit comments on or before
May 7, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
on the information collection to David
Edington, Office of Trust Services, 1849
C Street NW., Mail Stop 4637,
Washington, DC 20240; facsimile: (202)
219–0006; email:
[email protected].
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

David Edington, (202) 513–0886.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Abstract
BIA is seeking renewal of the
approval for the information collection
conducted under 25 CFR part 161,
implementing the Navajo-Hopi Indian
Relocation Amendments Act of 1980, 94
Stat. 929, and the Federal court
decisions of Healing v. Jones, 174 F.
Supp.211 (D Ariz. 1959) (Healing I),
Healing v. Jones, 210 F. Supp. 126
(D. Ariz. 1962), aff’d 363 U.S. 758 (1963)
(Healing II), Hopi Tribe v. Watt, 530 F.
Supp. 1217 (D. Ariz. 1982), and Hopi

E:\FR\FM\08MRN1.SGM

08MRN1

Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 46 / Friday, March 8, 2013 / Notices
Tribe v. Watt, 719 F.2d 314 (9th Cir.
1983).
This information collection allows
BIA to receive the information necessary
to determine whether an applicant to
obtain, modify, or assign a grazing
permit on Navajo Partitioned Lands is
eligible and complies with all
applicable grazing permit requirements.

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

II. Request for Comments
The BIA requests your comments on
this collection concerning: (a) The
necessity of this information collection
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility; (b) The accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden (hours
and cost) of the collection of
information, including the validity of
the methodology and assumptions used;
(c) Ways we could enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and (d) Ways we could
minimize the burden of the collection of
the information on the respondents.
Please note that an agency may not
conduct or sponsor, and an individual
need not respond to, a collection of
information unless it has a valid OMB
Control Number.
It is our policy to make all comments
available to the public for review at the
location listed in the ADDRESSES section.
Before including your address, phone
number, email address or other
personally identifiable information in
your comment, you should be aware
that your entire comment—including
your personal identifying information—
may be made publicly available at any
time. While you can ask us in your
comment to withhold your personal
identifying information from public
review, we cannot guarantee that we
will be able to do so.
III. Data
OMB Control Number: 1076–0162.
Title: Navajo Partitioned Lands
Grazing Permits, 25 CFR 161.
Brief Description of Collection:
Submission of information is required
for Navajo Nation representatives,
members, and authorized tribal
organizations to obtain, modify, or
assign a grazing permit on Navajo
partitioned lands. Response is required
to obtain a benefit.
Type of Review: Extension without
change of currently approved collection.
Respondents: Tribes, tribal
organizations, and individual Indians.
Number of Respondents: 750.
Estimated Number of Responses:
1,500.
Estimated Time per Response: On
average, 2 hours.

VerDate Mar<15>2010

18:44 Mar 07, 2013

Jkt 229001

Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden:
3,000 hours.
Dated: March 4, 2013.
John Ashley,
Acting Assistant Director for Information
Resources.
[FR Doc. 2013–05492 Filed 3–7–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–4J–P

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Indian Affairs
Bishop Paiute Tribe—Liquor Control
Ordinance No. 2012–07
Bureau of Indian Affairs,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:

SUMMARY: This notice publishes the
Liquor Control Ordinance No. 2012–07
of the Bishop Paiute Tribe. The
Ordinance regulates and controls the
possession, sale and consumption of
liquor within the Indian Country of the
Bishop Paiute Tribe. The land is trust
land and this Ordinance allows for the
possession and sale of alcoholic
beverages within the jurisdiction of the
Bishop Paiute Tribe. This Ordinance
will increase the ability of the tribal
government to control the distribution
and possession of liquor within their
jurisdiction, and at the same time will
provide an important source of revenue,
the strengthening of the tribal
government and the delivery of tribal
services.

Effective Date: This Ordinance is
effective March 8, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Harley Long, Tribal Government Officer,
Pacific Regional Office, Bureau of
Indian Affairs, 2800 Cottage Way,
Sacramento, CA 95825, Phone: (916)
978–6067; Fax: (916) 916–6099: or De
Springer, Office of Indian Services,
Bureau of Indian Affairs, 1849 C Street
NW., MS–4513–MIB, Washington, DC
20240; Telephone (202) 513–7640.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant
to the Act of August 15, 1953, Public
Law 83–277, 67 Stat. 586, 18 U.S.C.
1161, as interpreted by the Supreme
Court in Rice v. Rehner, 463 U.S. 713
(1983), the Secretary of the Interior shall
certify and publish in the Federal
Register notice of adopted liquor
ordinances for the purpose of regulating
liquor transactions in Indian country.
The Bishop Tribal Council adopted this
Ordinance by Resolution T2012–46 on
October 29, 2012.
This notice is published in
accordance with the authority delegated
by the Secretary of the Interior to the
DATES:

PO 00000

Frm 00079

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

15037

Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs. I
certify that the Bishop Tribal Council
duly adopted Liquor Control Ordinance
No. 2012–07 by Resolution T2012–46 on
October 29, 2012.
Dated: February 28, 2013.
Kevin K. Washburn,
Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs.

The Bishop Paiute Tribal Liquor
Control Ordinance No. 2012–07 shall
read as follows:
Preamble
The Bishop Paiute Tribe (Tribe), aka
the Paiute-Shoshone Indians of the
Bishop Community of the Bishop
Colony (Tribe), a federally recognized
Indian Tribe located on the Bishop
Paiute Reservation, established under
Act of Congress of April 20, 1937 (50
Statutes 70), in Inyo County, California,
with inherent sovereignty and a
government to government relationship
with the United States of America, has
all the rights accorded to federally
recognized tribes, with the Bishop
Paiute Tribal Council recognized as the
duly elected governing body of the
Tribe.
This Ordinance is hereby enacted by
the Bishop Tribal Council (Tribal
Council) in exercising its inherent legal
authority as the governing body of the
Bishop Paiute Tribe.
Additional authority for the adoption
of this ordinance is found in Federal
Law at 18 U.S.C. 1161, providing in part
that the Indian Liquor Laws found in
the United States Code, shall not apply
to any act or transaction with any area
of Indian Country, provided such act or
transaction is in conformity with both
the laws of the state in which such act
or transaction occurs, and with the laws
duly adopted by the Tribe having
jurisdiction over such areas of Indian
Country.
Section 1.00—Declaration of Purpose
The purpose of this Ordinance is to
regulate the sale, possession and use of
alcoholic liquor on the Bishop Paiute
Reservation and other lands subject to
Tribal jurisdiction with the exception of
Blocks thirty seven (37) and thirty eight
(38) which are addressed by General
Council Ordinance adopted on August
22, 1961. This Ordinance (2012–07)
does not change or affect any provisions
of the General Council Ordinance
relating to Blocks thirty seven (37) and
thirty eight (38).
Section 2.00—Definitions
In construing the provisions of this
Ordinance, the following words or
phrases shall have the meaning
designated unless a different meaning is

E:\FR\FM\08MRN1.SGM

08MRN1