Attachment 2 - 60 Day Federal Register Notice

48608

Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 157 / Tuesday, August 14, 2012 / Notices

[FR Doc. 2012–19438 Filed 8–13–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE C

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[U.S. DOT Docket No. NHTSA–2012–0094]

Reports, Forms, and Record Keeping
Requirements
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA), DOT.
ACTION: Request for public comment on
proposed collection of information.
AGENCY:

Before a Federal agency can
collect certain information from the
public, it must receive approval from
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB). Under procedures established
by the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995, before seeking OMB approval,
Federal agencies must solicit public
comment on proposed collections of
information, including extensions and
reinstatements of previously approved
collections.
This document describes the
collection of information for which
NHTSA intends to seek OMB approval.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before October 15, 2012.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by DOT Docket ID Number
NHTSA–2012–0094 using any of the
following methods:
Electronic submissions: Go to http://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line
instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Docket Management Facility,
M–30, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, Washington, DC
20590.
Hand Delivery: West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
Fax: 1–202–493–2251.
Instructions: Each submission must
include the Agency name and the
Docket number for this Notice. Note that
all comments received will be posted
without change to http://
www.regulations.gov including any
personal information provided.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Alan Block, Contracting Officer’s
Technical Representative, Office of
Behavioral Safety Research (NTI–131),
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., W46–499, Washington, DC

tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

SUMMARY:

VerDate Mar<15>2010

16:51 Aug 13, 2012

Jkt 226001

20590. Mr. Block’s phone number is
202–366–6401 and his email address is
[email protected]
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
before an agency submits a proposed
collection of information to OMB for
approval, it must publish a document in
the Federal Register providing a 60-day
comment period and otherwise consult
with members of the public and affected
agencies concerning each proposed
collection of information. The OMB has
promulgated regulations describing
what must be included in such a
document. Under OMB’s regulations (at
5 CFR 1320.8(d)), an agency must ask
for public comment on the following:
(I) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(ii) The accuracy of the agency’s
estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection of information, including the
validity of the methodology and
assumptions used;
(iii) How to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and
(iv) How to minimize the burden of
the collection of information on those
who are to respond, including the use
of appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology, e.g., permitting
electronic submission of responses.
In compliance with these
requirements, NHTSA asks public
comment on the following proposed
collection of information:
Survey of DWI Courts
Type of Request—New information
collection requirement.
OMB Clearance Number—None.
Form Number—NHTSA 1175.
Requested Expiration Date of
Approval—3 years from date of
approval.
Summary of the Collection of
Information—The National Highway
Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA)
proposes to collect information from
specialized (or problem solving) courts
known as DWI Courts and Hybrid DWI/
Drug Courts to obtain an inventory of
their current operational practices. All
known operating DWI Courts and
Hybrid DWI/Drug Courts will be
contacted by mail and/or email and
asked to go to a designated Web site to
fill out the questionnaire. The most
recent figures (from the National
Association of Drug Court Professionals
(NADCP)) show 598 Courts operating in
the United States that are either

PO 00000

Frm 00115

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

designated DWI Courts (192) or else
Hybrid DWI/Drug Courts (406) as of
December 2010. That number is
projected to increase to approximately
650 Courts by the time the survey is
ready to enter the field. The survey will
ask about case flow, eligibility criteria,
management information systems,
program staffing, treatment, testing,
courtroom practices, sanctions, and
other relevant program characteristics.
The average amount of time for
respondents to complete the survey is
estimated to be 40 minutes.
The survey will be conducted on-line,
with the on-line technology serving to
reduce length and minimize recording
errors. No information will be collected
that could be used to identify any
clients participating in the court
programs. The information provided
will either describe program practices/
characteristics, or provide information
aggregated across all cases.
Description of the Need for the
Information and Proposed Use of the
Information—NHTSA was established
to reduce the number of deaths, injuries,
and economic losses resulting from
motor vehicle crashes on the Nation’s
highways. As part of this statutory
mandate, NHTSA is authorized to
conduct research as a foundation for the
development of motor vehicle standards
and traffic safety programs.
DWI Courts are a relatively new
intervention to combat alcohol-impaired
driving and are authorized under MAP–
21, the current DOT authorization.
Borrowing from the Drug Court Model,
they are directed at repeat offenders and
offenders having high blood alcohol
concentration levels (BACs) at time of
arrest. These Courts attack the source of
the problem by taking a comprehensive
approach to changing behavior that
includes treatment. There is a body of
research that now exists to show that
Drug Courts are effective. However,
Drug Courts and DWI Courts may treat
different populations, and questions
about the effectiveness of DWI Courts
and their services have yet to be
adequately answered. NHTSA is
presently designing a program to
evaluate DWI Courts to directly answer
key questions pertaining to their
effectiveness. But in order to do that, the
agency first needs detailed information
on how the DWI Courts are operating.
NHTSA will use the findings from
this proposed collection of information
to guide the design of an evaluation
program to answer key questions
regarding the effectiveness of DWI
Courts.
Description of the Likely Respondents
(Including Estimated Number, and
Proposed Frequency of Response to the

E:\FR\FM\14AUN1.SGM

14AUN1

Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 157 / Tuesday, August 14, 2012 / Notices
Collection of Information)—The
respondents will be people involved in
the running of DWI Courts and Hybrid
DWI/Drug Courts. These primarily will
be Judges and Court Staff, but may
include others involved in specific
aspects of the DWI Court program such
as treatment providers, law enforcement
and probation/parole personnel.
Contacted Courts will determine who is
appropriate to complete the sections of
the questionnaire, and may apportion
different sections to different people to
complete, if necessary. The projected
total number of DWI Courts and Hybrid
Courts at the commencement of the field
period is 650. Total estimated time to
complete the questionnaire is expected
to average 40 minutes. All Courts will
be administered the survey one time
only.
Estimate of the Total Annual
Reporting and Record Keeping Burden
Resulting from the Collection of
Information—NHTSA estimates that the
Courts would require an average of 40
minutes to complete the survey or a
total of 433.33 hours for the projected
650 DWI and Hybrid Courts. The survey
would be fielded during a two month
period in 2013. Thus the annual
reporting burden would be the entire
433.33 hours. Reporting costs would
entail salaried time for responding to
the questionnaire. Mean hourly wages
for legal occupations range from $21.56
for legal support workers to $53.34 for
Judges, Magistrate Judges, and
Magistrates. At 433.33 total responding
hours for the survey, this would put the
cost burden at a level between $9,343
and $23,114, depending on which Court
personnel respond to the survey. The
respondents would not incur any record
keeping burden or record keeping cost
from the information collection.
Authority: 44 U.S.C. Section 3506(c)(2)(A)
Issued on: August 9, 2012.
Jeffrey Michael,
Associate Administrator, Research and
Program Development.
[FR Doc. 2012–19940 Filed 8–13–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Office of Foreign Assets Control
Additional Designations, Foreign
Narcotics Kingpin Designation Act
Office of Foreign Assets
Control, Treasury.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:

The U.S. Department of the
Treasury ’s Office of Foreign Assets

SUMMARY:

VerDate Mar<15>2010

16:51 Aug 13, 2012

Jkt 226001

Control (‘‘OFAC’’) is publishing the
names of three individuals and five
entities whose property and interests in
property have been blocked pursuant to
the Foreign Narcotics Kingpin
Designation Act (‘‘Kingpin Act’’).
DATES: The designation by the Director
of OFAC of the three individuals and
five entities identified in this notice
pursuant to section 805(b) of the
Kingpin Act is effective on August 7,
2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Assistant Director, Sanctions
Compliance & Evaluation, Office of
Foreign Assets Control, U.S. Department
of the Treasury, Washington, DC 20220,
Tel: (202) 622–2490.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Electronic and Facsimile Availability
This document and additional
information concerning OFAC are
available on OFAC’s Web site at
http://www.treasury.gov/ofac or via
facsimile through a 24-hour fax-ondemand service at (202) 622–0077.
Background
The Kingpin Act became law on
December 3, 1999. The Kingpin Act
establishes a program targeting the
activities of significant foreign narcotics
traffickers and their organizations on a
worldwide basis. It provides a statutory
framework for the imposition of
sanctions against significant foreign
narcotics traffickers and their
organizations on a worldwide basis,
with the objective of denying their
businesses and agents access to the U.S.
financial system and the benefits of
trade and transactions involving U.S.
companies and individuals.
The Kingpin Act blocks all property
and interests in property, subject to U.S.
jurisdiction, owned or controlled by
significant foreign narcotics traffickers
as identified by the President. In
addition, the Secretary of the Treasury,
in consultation with the Attorney
General, the Director of the Central
Intelligence Agency, the Director of the
Federal Bureau of Investigation, the
Administrator of the Drug Enforcement
Administration, the Secretary of
Defense, the Secretary of State, and the
Secretary of Homeland Security may
designate and block the property and
interests in property, subject to U.S.
jurisdiction, of persons who are found
to be: (1) Materially assisting in, or
providing financial or technological
support for or to, or providing goods or
services in support of, the international
narcotics trafficking activities of a
person designated pursuant to the
Kingpin Act; (2) owned, controlled, or

PO 00000

Frm 00116

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

48609

directed by, or acting for or on behalf of,
a person designated pursuant to the
Kingpin Act; or (3) playing a significant
role in international narcotics
trafficking.
On August 7, 2012, the Director of
OFAC designated the following three
individuals and five entities whose
property and interests in property are
blocked pursuant to section 805(b) of
the Kingpin Act.
Individuals
1. MORENO, Daniel (a.k.a. MORENO
JR., Daniel Gonzalo), 50 6th Ave.,
Corozal, Belize; 651 Vista Del Mar,
Ladyville, Belize; 561 Vista Del Mar,
Ladyville, Belize; DOB 12 Oct 1972;
POB Corozal, Belize; Passport
0291622 (Belize) (individual)
[SDNTK] Linked To: D’S
SUPERMARKET COMPANY LTD.
2. ZABANEH, John (a.k.a. ZABANEH,
John Angel), Big Creek, Belize; 3
Magoon St., Dangriga, Belize; Long
Coco Caye, Belize; Valley Rd., Stann
Creek, Belize; 135 Commerce St.,
Stann Creek, Belize; Dangriga Town,
Stann Creek, Belize; N River Side
Docter, Dangriga, Belize; DOB 07 Oct
1954; alt. DOB 02 Oct 1954; POB
Belize (individual) [SDNTK] Linked
To: MAYAN KING LIMITED; Linked
To: MID–SOUTH INVESTMENTS
LIMITED; Linked To: CROWN
PARADISE ENTERPRISES LTD.;
Linked To: BELIZE CHEMICALS
LIMITED.
3. ZABANEH, Dion (a.k.a. ZABANEH,
Dion Christopher), 68 Bela Vista,
Belize City, Belize; 3 Eyre St., Belize
City, Belize; 5468 Seashore Dr., Belize
City, Belize; DOB 12 May 1974; POB
Belize (individual) [SDNTK].
Entities
1. BELIZE CHEMICALS LIMITED (a.k.a.
BELIZE CHEMICALS; a.k.a. BELIZE
CHEMICALS LTD.), 7292 George
Price Blvd., P.O. Box 657, Belmopan,
Belize; 10/12 Halfmoon Avenue,
Belmopan City, Belize; Tax ID No.
GST–SIG 000465 (Belize) [SDNTK].
2. CROWN PARADISE ENTERPRISES
LTD. (a.k.a. CROWN PARADISE
MARINA), 671 Ecumenical Drive,
P.O. Box 64, Dangriga Town, Belize
[SDNTK].
3. D’S SUPERMARKET COMPANY
LTD. (a.k.a. D’S SUPERSTORE),
College Road, Corozal Town, Belize
[SDNTK].
4. MAYAN KING LIMITED (a.k.a.
MAYAN KING LIMITED EXT.; a.k.a.
MAYAN KING LTD.), Dangriga, Stann
Creek District, Belize; 21 Mls South
Stann Creek Road, Stann Creek
District, P.O. Box 64, Dangriga, Belize;
P.O. Box 64, Dangriga Town, Stann

E:\FR\FM\14AUN1.SGM

14AUN1