OMB Memo - Sample Boost updated 6-24-13

omb memo- state sample boost_v2.doc

National Crime Victimization Survey

OMB Memo - Sample Boost updated 6-24-13

OMB: 1121-0111

Document [doc]
Download: doc | pdf









MEMORANDUM TO: Lynn Murray

Department Clearance Officer

Department of Justice


FROM: William J. Sabol, Ph.D.

Acting Director

Bureau of Justice Statistics

SUBJECT: Submission of burden changes to the National Crime Victimization Survey


Attached please find OMB Form 83-c concerning an increase of 11,545 hours of the current burden for the National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS). The increase in burden results from a boost of the NCVS sample in 11 states beginning in July, 2013 through December, 2015 to test the feasibility of collecting subnational estimates of victimization.


The 2013 NCVS state sample boost is being conducted to test assumptions about the collection and production of state level estimates, including those pertaining to necessary sample sizes and reliability, expected response rates, victimization rates, state coverage issues, state level sample design and weighting, hiring and training of field representatives, workload and logistic concerns, and cost. The NCVS sample will be increased in 11 states—CA, TX, NY, FL, IL, PA, OH, MI, GA, NC, and NJ—to ensure that the state has representative coverage and that the sample size is sufficient to produce victimization estimates with reasonable reliability and precision.


Initial simulation work by Fay and Li (2012) investigated a boost in all 50 states to determine the proper sample design and reasonable thresholds for considering direct observations as a feasible approach to subnational estimates (http://www.fcsm.gov/12papers/Fay_2012FCSM_I-B.pdf ). The targeted precision is to produce 3-year rolling estimates for violent victimization with a relative standard error equal to or less than 10%. This estimate was determined assuming the national violent victimization estimate and response rate. The rationale for choosing these 11 states was determined based on the current NCVS sample sizes and projections associated with needed sample sizes and costs. Effort needed to boost the sample to meet the established levels of precision are more efficient and economical in the larger states.


The Census Bureau replicated Fay and Li’s simulation and produced estimates for sample sizes, PSUs, field representatives (FRs), and costs associated with boosting sample in 7, 11, and 17 states (7, 11 and 17 represent approximate natural breaks in population size of 10 million or more, 8 million or more, and 6 million or more) (Table 1). Table 2 provides an overview of the estimated sample workload by state by population size that is needed to reach the desired precision under the current design. Please note, these estimates shown in table 2 describe the increase in the specific states or aggregated states and are not for the entire national sample. One constraint with the current sample boost is that the national design could not be changed. In 2016, the NCVS will phase-in a new design based on the 2010 decennial. In addition, the estimates were constructed using the national averages for the victimization rate and response rate. Costs were determined by regional office. These parameters could vary substantially based on the location of new sample. One goal of this state sample boost is to serve as a dress rehearsal for a more comprehensive subnational program and to understand how these factors vary. Obtaining precise cost estimates from Census by task, understanding the complexities and logistics associated with the development of an adaptive sample design that is both responsive to changes in resource availability and stakeholder needs, and developing options for incorporating and validating model-based subnational estimates are critical outcomes of this sample boost. Future decisions to determine the appropriate approach for generating subnational victimization estimates will be informed by what is learned here in terms of controlling and managing survey flexibility, costs, and quality.


The total annual number of respondents will increase by about 21%, from 100,700 to 120,100. Each respondent is interviewed twice per year resulting in an increase of total annual responses from 201,400 to 240,200 (includes respondents and eligible non-respondents). The annual burden will increase by 11,545 hours from 68,905 to 80,450.


If there are any questions concerning this request, please contact Michael G. Planty, Chief, Victimization Statistics, Bureau of Justice Statistics, at (202) 514-9746 or by email at [email protected].



Tabel 1. 17 states in order by population


State/ACS Population

California

36969200

Texas

24774187

New York

19302448

Florida

18688787

Illinois

12790182

Pennsylvania

12660739

Ohio

11525536

Michigan

9920621

Georgia

9600612

North Carolina

9418736

New Jersey

8753064

Virginia

7926192

Washington

6652845

Massachusetts

6512227

Indiana

6454254

Arizona

6337373

Tennessee

6297991


Table 2. Estimated Sample Boost Workloads by State in Population Order (Largest to Smallest):


Pop. Order

State

RO

Total # Current PSUs

Revised Total PSUs

Annual Current Total Sample

Revised Total Sample

Avg Monthly Current Total Sample

Revised Avg Monthly Total Sample

% Increase in Sample

Existing NCVS FRs in Boost PSUs

Expected Non-NCVS Exp. FRs

Expected New FRs

Total FRs Requiring Training

Total FRs Needed for Boost PSUs

1

CA

32

24

26

12727

13576

1061

1131

6.7%

0

0

5

5

5

2

TX

31

46

53

8685

10109

724

842

16.4%

0

3

5

8

8

3

NY

22

29

29

8369

8369

697

697

0.0%

0

0

0

0

0

4

FL

29

24

27

8918

10393

743

866

16.5%

1

0

8

8

9

5

IL

25

21

28

4683

6445

390

537

37.6%

24

1

7

8

32

6

PA

23

20

32

4712

7458

393

622

58.3%

16

0

21

21

37

7

OH

23

36

39

5969

8136

497

678

36.3%

23

0

15

15

38

8

MI

25

18

30

4550

8248

379

687

81.3%

18

0

15

15

33

9

GA

29

32

58

3719

8442

310

704

127.0%

16

13

21

34

50

10

NC

29

16

50

3076

9296

256

775

202.2%

10

12

30

42

52

11

NJ

22

18

19

3421

5408

285

451

58.1%

1

0

17

17

18

12

VA

23

51

66

2496

6460

208

538

158.8%

23

0

29

29

52

13

WA

32

8

15

2743

7496

229

625

173.3%

11

2

18

20

31

14

MA

22

9

14

3351

5954

279

496

77.7%

2

0

15

15

17

15

IN

25

23

47

2453

7691

204

641

213.5%

12

1

22

23

35

16

AZ

31

4

8

3160

7022

263

585

122.2%

4

12

11

23

27

17

TN

23

21

57

2604

8265

217

689

217.4%

29

0

40

40

69

Total

400

598

85636

138768

7136

11564

62.0%

190

44

279

323

513

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Top 7 States

200

234

54063

64486

4505

5374

19.3%

64

4

61

65

129

Top 11 States

284

391

68829

95880

5736

7990

39.3%

109

29

144

173

282

Top 17 States

400

598

85636

138768

7136

11564

62.0%

190

44

279

323

513


File Typeapplication/msword
File TitleMEMORANDUM TO:
Authorbaumk
Last Modified Byadamsd
File Modified2013-06-24
File Created2013-06-24

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy