30 Day Notice

erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 86 / Friday, May 3, 2013 / Notices
document so that we can contact you if
we have questions regarding your
submission.
To submit your comment online, go to
http://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number (USCG–2013–0232) in
the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on ‘‘Submit a
Comment’’ on the line associated with
this notice.
If you submit your comments by mail
or hand delivery, submit them in an
unbound format, no larger than 81⁄2 by
11 inches, suitable for copying and
electronic filing. If you submit them by
mail and would like to know that they
reached the Facility, please enclose a
stamped, self-addressed postcard or
envelope. We will consider all
comments and material received during
the comment period.
Viewing comments and documents:
To view comments, go to http://
www.regulations.gov, type the docket
number (USCG–2013–0125) in the
‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click ‘‘SEARCH.’’
Click on ‘‘Open Docket Folder’’ on the
line associated with this rulemaking.
You may also visit the Docket
Management Facility in Room W12–140
on the ground floor of the Department
of Transportation West Building, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
Privacy Act: Anyone can search the
electronic form of comments received
into any of our dockets by the name of
the individual submitting the comment
(or signing the comment, if submitted
on behalf of an association, business,
labor union, etc.). You may review a
Privacy Act notice regarding our public
dockets in the January 17, 2008, issue of
the Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
Public meeting: We do not now plan
to hold a public meeting, but you may
submit a request for one, using one of
the methods specified under ADDRESSES.
Please explain why you believe a public
meeting would be beneficial. If we
determine that one would aid this
rulemaking, we will hold one at a time
and place announced by a later notice
in the Federal Register.
Basis and Purpose: Under 33 CFR
127.007(a), an owner or operator
planning new construction to expand or
modify marine terminal operations in an
existing facility handling Liquefied
Natural Gas (LNG) or Liquefied
Hazardous Gas (LHG), where the
construction, expansion, or
modification would result in an increase
in the size and/or frequency of LNG or
LHG marine traffic on the waterway
associated with the facility, must submit
a Letter of Intent (LOI) to the COTP of

VerDate Mar<15>2010

14:52 May 02, 2013

Jkt 229001

the zone in which the facility is located.
Under 33 CFR 127.007(e), an owner or
operator planning such an expansion
must also file or update a Waterway
Suitability Assessment (WSA) that
addresses the proposed increase in LNG
or LHG marine traffic in the associated
waterway. Sunoco Partners Marketing
and Terminals in Nederland, Texas
submitted an LOI on March 11, 2013,
and a WSA on March 11, 2013,
regarding the company’s proposed
expansion of its LHG facility in
Nederland, Texas.
Under 33 CR 127.009, after receiving
an LOI, the COTP issues a Letter of
Recommendation (LOR) as to the
suitability of the waterway for LNG or
LHG marine traffic to the appropriate
jurisdictional authorities. The LOR is
based on a series of factors outlined in
33 CFR 127.009 that related to the
physical nature of the affected waterway
and issues of safety and security
associated with LNG or LHG marine
traffic on the affected waterway.
The purpose of this notice is to solicit
public comments on the proposed
increase in LHG marine traffic in
Beaumont, Texas. The Coast Guard
believes that input from the public may
be useful to the COTP with respect to
development of the LOR. Additionally,
the Coast Guard asked the Area
Maritime Security Committee, Port
Arthur, Texas and the Southeast Texas
Waterways Advisor Committee
(SETWAC) to form a subcommittee
comprised of affected port users and
stakeholders. The goal of these
subcommittees will be to gather
information to help the COTP assess the
suitability of the associated waterway
for increased LHG marine traffic as it
relates to navigational safety and
security.
On January 24, 2011, the Coast Guard
published Navigation and Vessel
Inspection Circular (NVIC) 01–2011,
‘‘Guidance Related to Waterfront
Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) Facilities.’’
NVIC 01–2011 provides guidance for
owners and operators seeking approval
to build and operate LNG facilities.
While NVIC 01–2011 is specific to LNG,
it provides useful process information
and guidance for owners and operators
seeking approval to build and operate
LHG facilities as well. The Coast Guard
will refer to NVIC 01–2011 for process
information and guidance in evaluating
Sunoco Partners Marketing and
Terminal’s WSA. A copy of NVIC 01–
2011 is available for viewing in the
public docket for this notice and also on
the Coast Guard’s Web site at http://
www.uscg.mil/hq/cg5/nvic/2010s.asp.
This notice is issued under authority
of 33 U.S.C. 1223–1225, Department of

PO 00000

Frm 00119

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

26057

Homeland Security Delegation Number
0170.1(70), 33 CFR 127.009, and 33 CFR
103.205.
Dated: April 8, 2013.
G.J. Paitl,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, Port Arthur.
[FR Doc. 2013–10456 Filed 5–2–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Transportation Security Administration
Extension of Agency Information
Collection Activity Under OMB Review:
Pipeline Corporate Security Review
Transportation Security
Administration, DHS.
ACTION: 30-day Notice.
AGENCY:

SUMMARY: This notice announces that
the Transportation Security
Administration (TSA) has forwarded the
Information Collection Request (ICR),
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) control number 1652–0056,
abstracted below to OMB for review and
approval of an extension of the
currently approved collection under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA). The
ICR describes the nature of the
information collection and its expected
burden. TSA published a Federal
Register notice, with a 60-day comment
period soliciting comments, of the
following collection of information on
February 26, 2013, 78 FR 13075. The
collection encompasses interviews and
site visits with pipeline operators
regarding company security planning
and implementation.
DATES: Send your comments by June 3,
2013. A comment to OMB is most
effective if OMB receives it within 30
days of publication.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit written comments on
the proposed information collection to
the Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, OMB. Comments should be
addressed to Desk Officer, Department
of Homeland Security/TSA, and sent via
electronic mail to
[email protected] or faxed
to (202) 395–6974.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Susan L. Perkins, TSA PRA Officer,
Office of Information Technology (OIT),
TSA–11, Transportation Security
Administration, 601 South 12th Street,
Arlington, VA 20598–6011; telephone
(571) 227–3398; email
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

E:\FR\FM\03MYN1.SGM

03MYN1

26058

Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 86 / Friday, May 3, 2013 / Notices

Comments Invited
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.), an agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information
unless it displays a valid OMB control
number. The ICR documentation is
available at http://www.reginfo.gov.
Therefore, in preparation for OMB
review and approval of the following
information collection, TSA is soliciting
comments to—
(1) Evaluate whether the proposed
information requirement is necessary for
the proper performance of the functions
of the agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(2) Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden;
(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
(4) Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including using
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.

erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Information Collection Requirement
Title: Pipeline Corporate Security
Review (PCSR).
Type of Request: Extension of a
currently approved collection.
OMB Control Number: 1652–0056.
Forms(s): Pipeline Corporate Security
Review (PCSR) Protocol Form.
Affected Public: Hazardous Liquids
and Natural Gas Pipeline Industry.
Abstract: Under the Aviation and
Transportation Security Act (ATSA) and
delegated authority from the Secretary
of Homeland Security, TSA is tasked
with developing policies, strategies and
plans for dealing with transportation
security. To carry out this responsibility
regarding pipelines, TSA assesses
current industry security practices
through its Pipeline Corporate Security
Review (PCSR) program. The PCSR is a
voluntary, face-to-face visit with a
pipeline operator during which TSA
discusses an operator’s corporate
security planning and also completes
the PCSR Form. The PCSR Form
includes 218 questions concerning the
operator’s corporate level security
planning, covering security topics such
as physical security, vulnerability
assessments, training, and emergency
communications. TSA uses the
information collected during the PCSR
process to determine baseline security
standards and areas of security
weakness in the pipeline mode.

VerDate Mar<15>2010

14:52 May 02, 2013

Jkt 229001

Number of Respondents: 2,200
potential respondents; likely 15 annual
respondents.
Estimated Annual Burden Hours: An
estimated 120 hours annually, based on
TSA conducting 15 PCSR visits a year,
each lasting 8 hours.
Dated: April 30, 2013.
Susan L. Perkins,
TSA Paperwork Reduction Act Officer, Office
of Information Technology.
[FR Doc. 2013–10524 Filed 5–2–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–05–P

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Notice of Issuance of Final
Determination Concerning Generation
II Military Energizer Flashlights
U.S. Customs and Border
Protection, Department of Homeland
Security.
ACTION: Notice of final determination.
AGENCY:

This document provides
notice that U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (‘‘CBP’’) has issued a final
determination concerning the country of
origin of the Generation II military
Energizer flashlight, with light-emitting
diodes. Based upon the facts presented,
CBP has concluded in the final
determination that China is the country
of origin of the Generation II military
Energizer flashlight, for purposes of U.S.
Government procurement.
DATES: The final determination was
issued on April 29, 2013. A copy of the
final determination is attached. Any
party-at-interest, as defined in 19 CFR
177.22(d), may seek judicial review of
this final determination within June 3,
2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robert Dinerstein, Valuation and
Special Programs Branch, Regulations
and Rulings, Office of International
Trade (202–325–0132).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is
hereby given that on April 29, 2013,
pursuant to subpart B of part 177,
Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
Regulations (19 CFR part 177, subpart
B), CBP issued a final determination
concerning the country of origin of the
Generation II military Energizer
flashlights which may be offered to the
United States Government under an
undesignated government procurement
contract. This final determination, in
HQ H215657, was issued at the request
of Energizer Battery Inc. under
procedures set forth at 19 CFR Part 177,
Subpart B, which implements Title III of
SUMMARY:

PO 00000

Frm 00120

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

the Trade Agreements Act of 1979, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 2511–18). In the
final determination, CBP concluded that
the Generation II military Energizer
flashlights assembled in the United
States from foreign made parts and
programmed with U.S. origin software
in the United States are products of
China for purposes of U.S. Government
procurement.
Section 177.29, CBP Regulations (19
CFR 177.29), provides that notice of
final determinations shall be published
in the Federal Register within 60 days
of the date the final determination is
issued. Section 177.30, CBP Regulations
(19 CFR 177.30), provides that any
party-at-interest, as defined in 19 CFR
177.22(d), may seek judicial review of a
final determination within 30 days of
publication of such determination in the
Federal Register.
Dated: April 29, 2013.
Sandra L. Bell,
Executive Director, Regulations and Rulings,
Office of International Trade.
HQ H215657
April 29, 2013
MAR–02 OT:RR:CTF:VS H215657 RSD
CATEGORY: MARKING
M. Jason Cunningham, Esq.
30 South Wacker Drive
Suite 2200 No. 41
Chicago, Illinois 60606
RE: Final Determination of U.S. Government
Procurement: Country of Origin of Military
Energizer Flashlight
Dear Mr. Cunningham:
This is in response to your letter dated
March 28, 2012, requesting a final
determination on behalf of Energizer Battery,
Inc. (Energizer), pursuant to subpart B Part
177 Customs and Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’)
Regulations (19 CFR § 177.21 et. seq.). Under
these regulations, which implement Title III
of the Trade Agreements Act of 1979, as
amended (codified at 19 U.S.C. § 2511 et
seq.), CBP issues country of origin advisory
rulings and final determinations as to
whether an article is or would be a product
of a designated country or instrumentality for
the purpose of granting waivers of certain
‘‘Buy American’’ restrictions in U.S. law or
practice for products offered for sale to the
U.S. Government. This final determination
concerns the country of origin of a
Generation II flashlight. You have provided
additional information regarding the
processing operations performed on the
flashlight in the United States in submissions
made through email and a DVD on July 13,
2012, November 8, 2012, and February 14,
2013. We note that Energizer is a party-atinterest within the meaning of 19 CFR
§ 177.22(d)(1) and is entitled to request this
final determination. We regret the delay in
our response
FACTS:
The product at issue is a finished second
generation military flashlight (Generation II)

E:\FR\FM\03MYN1.SGM

03MYN1