Questions for an RCR Program Administrator

Office of Inspector General Review of Awardee Implementation of NSF's Requirement for a Responsible Conduct of Research Program

A3-RCR-admin

Questions for an RCR Program Administrator

OMB: 3145-0227

Document [docx]
Download: docx | pdf

Questions for RCR program administrator



  • What is the message from the top (Chancellor; Provost; President)?







    • What is the evidence of this message (e.g., signed memos sent campus-wide; direction to faculty to participate; message to students, etc.)







[if not known already]

  • To whom do you report about the RCR program? How often? Do you receive feedback?







[if there are questions from reviewing the University’s plan, ask here]

  • How is the RCR program structured? [e.g., format and content—online vs face-to-face; didactic seminars/lectures vs discussion of case studies; compliance vs educational oriented?; tracking of participants]















    • What factors/criteria are used to determine who takes what, when, and how much training?







    • What differences in instruction, if any, are given to the undergraduate, graduate, and post-doctoral levels?







[if not specifically addressed above]

    • Do you conduct a risk assessment in your determination of the above?







    • What, if any, is the relationship/similarities/differences between your RCR program(s) for NSF and NIH? Are they combined? Why/why not?











  • What is your message/expectation for the RCR program (facilitator, teachers, participants) and how is that communicated?









  • What are the standards of the training program and how, and how often, do you communicate these standards?







  • Who is responsible for funding the program? How much funding/resources does University put into the program (includes faculty or admin FTEs)?







[If you not the person responsible for funding]

    • What authority do you have to allocate resources and make changes to the program? [How difficult is it to get more resources]







  • How do faculty and students respond to the RCR program and what is the evidence of this response? [assuming they are aware of it—see above Q]







  • Faculty/student involvement:

    • Are faculty involved in the program?

    • If yes, what is the basis for faculty participation (e.g., volunteers, assignments, etc.)? [the number of volunteers could be a measure of the tone from the top]







    • If no, in order for faculty members to serve as effective role models to trainees, how are faculty trained in teaching the concepts of RCR?







[if not answered above]

    • Are any faculty members taking any RCR training?







    • Does the university require subjects of RM inquiries and investigations to take RCR training?







    • What, if any, is the incentive for faculty participation and how is that communicated? Is it part of faculty Tenure & Promotion evaluation?







    • Are students who are not required to, taking any RCR training?







    • How do you know if the proper people have taken the training?







    • Does the university offer appropriate incentives for participation and disciplinary measures for violations?







  • What are the pressure points working against the program?







  • How do you provide oversight (monitor and audit) the program to evaluate its effectiveness?







[if not specifically mentioned above]

    • How will you take reasonable steps to respond to deficiencies to ensure they are addressed, including modifying the program?

File Typeapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Authoramanka
File Modified0000-00-00
File Created2021-01-29

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy