Download:
pdf |
pdfInstructions for Post-Transplant Essential Data (Post-TED) Form
(Version 2)
This section of the CIBMTR Forms Instruction Manual is intended to be a resource for
completing the Post-Transplant Essential Data (Post-TED) Form (Version 2).
Effective December 3, 2007, the Pre- and Post-TED forms replaced the former PreRegistration (Pre-Reg), Transplant Essential Data (TED), Modified TED (M-TED) and
TED Follow-up (TEDFU) registration forms.
E-mail comments regarding the content of the CIBMTR Forms Instruction Manual to:
[email protected]. Comments will be considered for future manual
updates and revisions. For questions that require an immediate response, contact your
transplant center’s CIBMTR liaison.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Abbreviations ....................................................................................................... 2
Key Fields ............................................................................................................ 4
100 Day Report Only ............................................................................................ 5
Initial ANC Recovery ............................................................................................ 6
Example 1: Calculating Absolute Neurophil Count ......................................... 7
Example 2: Tracking ANC Recovery............................................................... 7
Initial Platelet Recovery ........................................................................................ 9
Example 3: Reporting Dates for Platelet Recovery ....................................... 10
Graft vs. Host Disease (allogeneic only) ............................................................ 11
Table 1: GVHD Grading and Staging ............................................................ 12
Table 2: Percent Body Surfaces ................................................................... 13
New Malignancy, Lymphoproliferative or Myeloproliferative Disorder ................ 17
Survival .............................................................................................................. 19
Post-HSCT Therapy ........................................................................................... 23
HSCT for Non-Malignant Disease Only .............................................................. 23
Malignant Disease Evaluation for this HSCT ...................................................... 24
First Relapse or Progression after HSCT ........................................................... 25
Additional Treatment .......................................................................................... 28
Method of Latest Disease Assessment .............................................................. 29
Donor Cellular Infusion (DCI) ............................................................................. 33
Example 4: DCI Calculation Timeline............................................................ 34
National Marrow Donor Program ® and The Medical College of Wisconsin
Document Title: CIBMTR Forms Manual: Post-TED (Form2450)
Document Number: A00425 version 2.0 (8/01/2012)
Page 1 of 35
Post-TED
CIBMTR Form 2450
Abbreviations
The following abbreviations are used throughout the Pre- and Post-TED forms. These
abbreviations are listed on page two of the paper version of the Pre-TED. For a glossary
of abbreviations and common terms used throughout the manual, see Appendices A
and B.
YYYY = 4 digit year
MM = 2 digit month
DD = 2 digit day
AHOP = Adult, Hematology, Oncology,
or Pediatric Unit
ALLO = Allogeneic
ANC = Absolute Neutrophil Count
AUTO = Autologous
BM = Bone Marrow
BMT-CTN = Blood & Marrow Transplant
Clinical Trials Network
CIBMTR = Center for International
Blood & Marrow Transplant Research
CIC = Center Identification Code
CMV = Cytomegalovirus
CR = Complete Remission
DCI = Donor Cellular Infusion
DLI = Donor Lymphocyte Infusion
EBMT = European Group for Blood &
Marrow Transplantation
EBV = Epstein Barr Virus
FACT = Foundation for the Accreditation
of Cellular Therapy
FGF = Fibroblast Growth Factor (e.g.,
velafermin)
FISH = Fluorescent In-situ Hybridization
GVHD = Graft versus Host Disease
HSCT = Hematopoietic Stem Cell
Transplant
KGF = Keratinocyte Growth Factor (e.g.,
Kepivance)
NMDP = National Marrow Donor
Program
NOS = Not Otherwise Specified
NST = Non-myeloablative Stem Cell
Transplant
PBSC = Peripheral Blood Stem Cells
PTLD = Post-transplant
Lymphoproliferative Disorder
RBC = Red Blood Cell
RCI-BMT = Resource for Clinical
Investigations in Blood & Marrow
Transplant
RIC = Reduced Intensity Conditioning
SCTOD = Stem Cell Therapeutic
Outcomes Database
TBI, TLI, TNI = Total (Body, Lymphoid,
Nodal) Irradiation
U = Unclassifiable
UCB = Umbilical Cord Blood
Unit = Adult, Hematology, Oncology, or
Pediatric (AHOP)
VOD = Veno-occlusive Disease
National Marrow Donor Program ® and The Medical College of Wisconsin
Document Title: CIBMTR Forms Manual: Post-TED (Form2450)
Document Number: A00425 version 2.0 (8/01/2012)
Page 2 of 35
Post-TED
CIBMTR Form 2450
Post-Transplant Essential Data (Post-TED)
Transplant centers participating in the CIBMTR must submit a Post-TED Form for
recipients who meet any of the following criteria:
Recipient receives a transplant at a United States center designated as a TEDonly center.
Recipient receives a transplant at an international center, has consented to
participate in research, and has been assigned to the TED track by the Form
Selection Algorithm.
Recipient receives a transplant at a United States center designated as
Comprehensive Report Form center and has been assigned to the TED track by
the Form Selection Algorithm.
Recipient receives an allogeneic transplant at a United States center designated
as Comprehensive Report Form center, but has not consented to participate in
research.
The Post-TED fulfills the requirements of the SCTOD for recipients meeting any of the
above criteria. For more information regarding the SCTOD, see General Instructions,
Stem Cell Therapeutics Outcomes Database.
For more information, including information on the TED and Comprehensive Report
Form Selection Algorithm, see General Instructions, Center Type and Data Collection
Forms.
The Post-TED must be completed at the following time points: 100 days, six months,
and annually post-HSCT. These forms should be completed as closely to these time
points as possible. The structure of the TED Forms is such that each form should fit on
a timeline with distinct start and stop dates that do not overlap any other forms, except
in the case of a subsequent HSCT. The Post-TED is considered past due 120 days
after each of these time points.
NOTE:
If the Post-TED form is being completed for a six-month or annual evaluation, the
answers to all questions should reflect the clinical status of the recipient since the last
report.
If the recipient received a subsequent transplant (excluding an autologous rescue), the
answers to all questions should reflect the clinical status of the recipient the day prior
to the start of the preparative regimen or, if no preparative regimen was given, the
answers to all questions should reflect the clinical status of the recipient the day prior
to HSCT infusion.
National Marrow Donor Program ® and The Medical College of Wisconsin
Document Title: CIBMTR Forms Manual: Post-TED (Form2450)
Document Number: A00425 version 2.0 (8/01/2012)
Page 3 of 35
Post-TED
CIBMTR Form 2450
Subsequent HSCT:
If a recipient receives a subsequent HSCT between Post-TED time points (100 day, six
months, annually), the TED form sequence will start over again with another Pre-TED.
However, if the recipient receives an autologous HSCT as a result of a poor graft or
graft failure, the TED form sequence will not start over again. Generally this type of
infusion (autologous rescue) is used to treat the recipient’s poor graft response, rather
than to treat the recipient’s disease, and is therefore not considered a subsequent
HSCT.
Contact your center’s CIBMTR liaison in order to make the subsequent Pre-TED appear
on your center’s Forms Due Report.
Lost to Follow-Up:
Occasionally, centers may lose contact with recipients for a variety of reasons, including
the recipient’s moving, changing physicians, or death. If contact with a recipient appears
lost, please consider calling the recipient at home or work, sending a letter,
communicating with the treating or referring physician, contacting the hospital billing
department, or beginning a search request with the CIBMTR. If your center receives
documented information that a recipient is alive or dead, the form should be filled out
with the recipient survival status. If no documentation exists and several unsuccessful
attempts have been made to contact the recipient, they are considered lost to follow-up
and the Lost to Follow-up form (Form 2802) should be filled out for each reporting
period in which no contact exists.
Key Fields
Accuracy of the Key Fields is essential for ensuring that:
Data are being reported for the correct recipient.
Transplant centers have access to their data.
Data are being shared with the correct donor center, cord blood bank,
cooperative registry, or other approved agency.
For instructions regarding the completion of the Key Fields, see Appendix K. Key fields
include all fields listed in the Center Identification and Recipient Identification boxes.
NOTE: HSCT Date
The HSCT date must be the same date as was reported on the Pre-TED. If the
transplant date changed after the Pre-TED was submitted, use the error correction
process to change the HSCT date on the Pre-TED. The correct date should then be
used on the Post-TED.
National Marrow Donor Program ® and The Medical College of Wisconsin
Document Title: CIBMTR Forms Manual: Post-TED (Form2450)
Document Number: A00425 version 2.0 (8/01/2012)
Page 4 of 35
Post-TED
CIBMTR Form 2450
REGISTRY USE ONLY
This box appears only on the paper version of the form and is intended for CIBMTR use
only. Do not write in this box. This box does not appear in the FormsNet2™ application.
100 Day Report Only
NOTE:
Question numbers correspond to the FormsNet2™ application. Questions 1-7 should
only be answered for the 100 day reporting period.
Question 1: Is “Date of HSCT” the same as the date given on Pre-TED?
If the HSCT occurred on the date reported on the Pre-TED (question 2, Date of this
HSCT), check “yes” and continue with question 2.
If the HSCT did not occur on the date reported on the Pre-TED, submit an Error
Correction for question 2, Date of the HSCT, on the Pre-TED. The correction of the
Pre-TED must be completed before the Post-TED is started.
If the HSCT did not occur, check “no” and continue with question 2.
Question 2: Was HSCT infusion given?
If the HSCT infusion was given, check “yes” and continue with question 8 (do not
answer questions 3-7). If the HSCT infusion was not given, check “no” and continue
with question 3.
Question 3: At least one dose of the preparative regimen was given?
If at least one dose of the preparative regimen was administered (includes radiation
and/or chemotherapy), check “yes” and continue with question 4. If the preparative
regimen was not started, check “no” and continue with question 5.
Question 4: Patient died during preparative regimen?
If the recipient died after the start of the preparative regimen, but prior to the HSCT
infusion, check “yes” and continue with question 62. If “no,” continue with question 5.
NOTE: Questions 5-6
If the HSCT did not occur, and the patient did not die during the preparative regimen,
either question 5 or question 6 must be answered “yes.”
Question 5: This HSCT is cancelled?
If the HSCT was cancelled, check “yes,” and continue with question 26, and submit the
form. If “no,” continue with question 6.
National Marrow Donor Program ® and The Medical College of Wisconsin
Document Title: CIBMTR Forms Manual: Post-TED (Form2450)
Document Number: A00425 version 2.0 (8/01/2012)
Page 5 of 35
Post-TED
CIBMTR Form 2450
Question 6: This HSCT is postponed?
If this HSCT was postponed, check “yes” and continue with question 7. The “no” should
never be chosen for this question, as the HSCT will either have been cancelled
(question 5) or postponed.
Question 7: New estimated date:
Enter the new estimated date of the HSCT, complete questions 62-74, and submit the
form. A postponed HSCT does not count as an HSCT event. If the postponed event is
re-scheduled and completed, then another Pre-TED will be requested and the follow-up
process will start with the subsequent Pre-TED.
Do not change the date on the previously submitted Pre-TED via the error
correction process. A new Pre-TED must be completed for the re-scheduled
HSCT.
For more information regarding reporting partial or unknown dates, see General
Instructions, General Guidelines for Completing Forms.
Initial ANC Recovery
NOTE: Initial ANC Recovery
Recovery, as reported in this section, does not distinguish between allogeneic
engraftment (blood and stem cells of donor origin) and autologous engraftment (blood
and stem cells of host origin). To demonstrate engraftment for allogeneic recipients,
particularly non-myeloablative or reduced intensity approaches, chimerism tests must
be done. These measure the quantity of donor cells relative to the quantity of host
(recipient) cells. While ANC usually represents donor cells in allogeneic HSCT, it cannot
be proven without chimerism studies.
ANC recovery is defined as an absolute neutrophil count (ANC) of ≥ 0.5 x 109/L
(500/mm3) for three consecutive laboratory values obtained on different days.* Date of
ANC recovery is the date of the first of three consecutive laboratory values where the
ANC is ≥ 0.5 x 109/L. At some institutions, the laboratory reports display the ANC value
once there are sufficient white blood cells to perform a differential count. At other
institutions, the laboratory reports do not display the ANC, and it must be calculated
from the white blood cell count (WBC) and the percent of segmented and band
neutrophils (if the differential was performed on a machine, the percent neutrophils will
include both segmented and band neutrophils). If the laboratory report displays an
automated ANC value of exactly 0.5, the actual ANC value should be calculated from
the manual differential if available. The calculated value from the manual differential will
determine ANC recovery. If your institution’s laboratory reports do not display the ANC
value, use the following calculation to determine the ANC:
National Marrow Donor Program ® and The Medical College of Wisconsin
Document Title: CIBMTR Forms Manual: Post-TED (Form2450)
Document Number: A00425 version 2.0 (8/01/2012)
Page 6 of 35
Post-TED
CIBMTR Form 2450
Example 1: Calculating Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC)
+
=
x
=
% segmented neutrophils
% band neutrophils
% neutrophils
white blood cell count/mm3
absolute neutrophil count/mm3
Example:
(Divide percentage by 100 to convert to decimal)
+
=
x
=
0.45 segmented neutrophils
0.05 band neutrophils
0.50 neutrophils
1000/mm3 white blood cell count
500/mm3* absolute neutrophil count
ANC 500/mm3 = 0.5 x 109/L = 0.5 x 105/mL = 0.5 x 103/mm3
*Traditionally, the definition of ANC recovery required selecting the first date of three consecutive days in
9
3
which the recipient’s ANC was ≥ 0.5x10 /L (500/mm ). For various reasons it may not be possible to
obtain daily laboratory values. Under those circumstances, report ANC recovery based upon three
9
consecutive laboratory values (drawn more than a day apart) as long as the ANC remains ≥ 0.5x10 /L
3
(500/mm ).
Tracking the date of ANC recovery may not always be straightforward. In some cases
the ANC may fluctuate for a period of time before the recipient fully recovers. In other
cases the ANC may remain above 0.5 x 109/L for several days immediately post-HSCT
and then fall below 0.5 x109/L. Do not begin counting ANC values of ≥ 0.5 x 109/L
towards recovery until the ANC has dropped to the lowest level (nadir) post-HSCT. If
the recipient was transplanted using a non-myeloablative (NST) or reduced intensity
(RIC) regimen, or was transplanted for an immunodeficiency (e.g., SCID, WAS), the
recipient’s ANC may never drop below 0.5 x 109/L. If this is the case, an ANC recovery
date will not be reported, and the “never below” option should be chosen. However, if
the recipient’s ANC drops below 0.5x109/L for even one day, this should be considered
the nadir and “never below” should not be chosen. See the following example for more
information regarding tracking the date of ANC recovery.
Example 2: Tracking ANC Recovery
Transplant Date = May 6
Date
WBC % Neutrophils ANC
May 7
900
0.6
540
May 8
850
0.59
502
May 9
720
0.7
504
May 10
300
0.45
135
National Marrow Donor Program ® and The Medical College of Wisconsin
Document Title: CIBMTR Forms Manual: Post-TED (Form2450)
Document Number: A00425 version 2.0 (8/01/2012)
Page 7 of 35
Post-TED
CIBMTR Form 2450
May 11
May 12
May 13
15
30
50
No differential
No differential
No differential
----
May 14
250
0.4
100
May 15
800
0.7
560
May 16
May 17
May 18
May 19
May 20
May 21
May 22
1050
1000
1800
2000
2500
2250
1500
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.55
0.53
0.43
0.45
840
700
1080
1100
1325
968
675
Date of first recovery:
ANC ≥ 0.5x109/L
NOTE:
On the paper form, the “” symbol indicates the answer is only valid on a six-month or
annual evaluation. Questions with the “” symbol should not be answered for the day
100 evaluation.
Question 8: Was ≥ 0.5 x 109/L achieved for 3 consecutive labs?
Indicate whether or not there was evidence of initial ANC recovery following this HSCT.
Check only one response:
If “yes,” continue with question 9.
If “no,” continue with question 10.
Check “never below,” if the recipient’s ANC never dropped below 0.5 x 10 9/L at
any time post-HSCT.
Check “previously reported” if this is the six-month or annual follow-up, and the
initial ANC recovery has already been reported.
Check “unknown” if there is no documentation of ANC recovery and/or laboratory
reports cannot be obtained. This answer should rarely be used, as ANC recovery
is fundamental to a successful HSCT. It is imperative that every effort be made to
report this data.
Question 9: First date of 3 consecutive labs:
Enter the first date of the three consecutive laboratory values obtained on different
days where the ANC was ≥ 0.5 x 109/L. For an example of tracking ANC recovery, see
Example 2.
National Marrow Donor Program ® and The Medical College of Wisconsin
Document Title: CIBMTR Forms Manual: Post-TED (Form2450)
Document Number: A00425 version 2.0 (8/01/2012)
Page 8 of 35
Post-TED
CIBMTR Form 2450
For more information regarding reporting partial or unknown dates, see General
Instructions, General Guidelines for Completing Forms.
Question 10: Date of last assessment:
If ANC of ≥ 0.5 x 109/L was not achieved for three or more consecutive days, enter the
date of the last laboratory report.
For more information regarding reporting partial or unknown dates, see General
Instructions, General Guidelines for Completing Forms.
Question 11: Did graft failure occur?
Graft failure includes persistent neutropenia, < 5% donor chimerism, and ANC
< 0.5 x 109/L for three or more consecutive laboratory values. Graft failure often requires
an additional infusion of donor cells. Graft failure may result from the use of specific
drugs, infection (especially CMV), GVHD, and other etiologies.
If the recipient meets the criteria of graft failure, check “yes.”
Initial Platelet Recovery
NOTE: Transfusions
Currently there is an error on the Form 2450 regarding the date of platelet recovery. The
form should read: “date platelet greater than or equal to (≥) 20 x 109/L.”
The following questions refer to initial platelet recovery following the HSCT for which
this form is being completed. All dates should reflect no platelet transfusions
administered for seven consecutive days. Report the date of the first of three
consecutive laboratory values ≥ 20 x 109 L obtained on different days, as shown in
example 3 below. Note that platelet recovery may take place well after the recipient has
returned to the referring physician for care. It is essential that information and laboratory
values be obtained from the referring physician.
Transfusions temporarily increase blood cell counts. When the data is later used for
analysis, it is important to be able to distinguish between a recipient whose own body
was creating the cells and a recipient who required transfusions to support the counts.
The following example illustrates the procedure to follow for reporting platelet recovery.
National Marrow Donor Program ® and The Medical College of Wisconsin
Document Title: CIBMTR Forms Manual: Post-TED (Form2450)
Document Number: A00425 version 2.0 (8/01/2012)
Page 9 of 35
Post-TED
CIBMTR Form 2450
Example 3: Reporting Platelet Recovery
Transfusion
Day
Platelet Count
Date
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
10,000
35,000
30,000
25,000
10,000
15,000
19,000
23,000
25,000
40,000
50,000
1/1/2008
1/2/2008
1/3/2008
1/4/2008
1/5/2008
1/6/2008
1/7/2008
1/8/2008
1/9/2008
1/10/2008
1/11/2008
1st of 3
Report 1/8/08 as date platelet count ≥ 20 x 109/L
Question 12: Initial platelet recovery
Indicate whether or not there was evidence of initial platelet recovery following this
HSCT.
Check only one response:
If “yes,” continue with question 13.
If “no,” continue with question 14.
Check “never below,” if the recipient’s platelets never dropped below 20 x 109/L
at any time post-HSCT and a platelet transfusion was never required. If the
recipient’s platelet count drops below 20 x 109/L and/or the recipient received a
platelet transfusion even once, do not use this option.
Check “previously reported” if this is the six-month or annual follow-up, and initial
platelet recovery has already been reported on a previous form.
Check “unknown” if there is no documentation of platelet recovery and/or
laboratory reports cannot be obtained.
Question 13: Date platelet ≥ 20 x 109/L
Enter the first date of three consecutive laboratory values obtained on different days
where the platelet count was ≥ 20 x 109/L. Ensure that no platelet transfusions were
administered for seven days immediately preceding this date. Include day seven, as
shown in Example 3 above, when determining the recovery date.
If three laboratory values were not obtained on consecutive days, but a sequential rise
of ≥ 20 x 109/L is demonstrated, follow the examples below when determining an
estimated date.
National Marrow Donor Program ® and The Medical College of Wisconsin
Document Title: CIBMTR Forms Manual: Post-TED (Form2450)
Document Number: A00425 version 2.0 (8/01/2012)
Page 10 of 35
Post-TED
CIBMTR Form 2450
Examples:
A. The recipient is being seen in the outpatient clinic and receives a platelet
transfusion on January 1. The platelet count is ≥ 20 x 109/L on January 2, January
3, and January 4. The recipient does not come into the clinic for evaluation until one
month later. The recipient has not received any more platelet transfusions and the
platelet count is well above 20 x 109/L. Report January 8 (day seven post-platelet
transfusion) for the date of platelet recovery.
B. The recipient is being seen in the outpatient clinic and receives a platelet
transfusion on January 1. The platelet count is ≥ 20 x 109/L on January 2, January
3, and January 4. The recipient is then discharged back to their primary care
physician. The transplant center receives a follow-up note from the primary care
physician that states “recipient recovered their platelets in January of 2011.” Report
the day of the month as the 15th. If the 15th does not make logical sense in relation
to the dates of the platelet counts obtained, use either the 1st or 30th. Report month
and year as documented.
For more information regarding reporting partial or unknown dates, see General
Instructions, General Guidelines for Completing Forms.
Question 14: Date of last assessment
If a platelet count of ≥ 20 x 109/L was not achieved; enter the date of the last laboratory
report.
For more information regarding reporting partial or unknown dates, see General
Instructions, General Guidelines for Completing Forms.
Graft versus Host Disease (allogeneic only)
Graft versus Host Disease (GVHD) is an immunological phenomenon resulting from the
reaction of donor immune cells against major or minor histocompatibility antigens of the
recipient. GVHD is primarily caused by donor-derived T-cells. Very rarely, GVHD may
occur due to autologous reactivity (autologous GVHD), third party transfusions, or with
identical twin transplantation. Due to the rarity of this occurrence, the GVHD section
should only be completed for allogeneic transplants. For autologous HSCT, leave
questions 15-18 blank.
Factors influencing the severity of GVHD are related to three main categories: 1) donor
or graft, 2) recipient, and 3) treatment. The most influential donor/graft factor is the
degree of genetic disparity between the donor and the recipient (HLA match), but other
risk factors include female donor to male recipient, donor parity, older donors, and T-cell
dose. The occurrence of acute GVHD becomes a risk factor for the development of
chronic GVHD. Recipient age and prior infections are also factors. Treatment-related
factors include a myeloablative preparative regimen and inadequate post-HSCT
immune suppression (GVHD prophylaxis).
National Marrow Donor Program ® and The Medical College of Wisconsin
Document Title: CIBMTR Forms Manual: Post-TED (Form2450)
Document Number: A00425 version 2.0 (8/01/2012)
Page 11 of 35
Post-TED
CIBMTR Form 2450
In the past, GVHD was classified as acute or chronic based on its time to diagnosis
following transplant, and other clinical and histological (biopsy or post-mortem) features.
Today, there has been increased recognition that acute and chronic GVHD are not
dependent upon time since HSCT, so determination of acute or chronic should rest on
clinical and histologic features. However, organ staging and overall grade should
only be calculated from the clinical picture, not histology. Acute GVHD usually
begins between 10 and 40 days after HSCT but can appear earlier or later. The organs
most commonly affected by acute GVHD are the skin, gut, or liver. Other sites, such as
the lung, may be involved.
Question 15: Maximum Grade of Acute GVHD
The acute GVHD grading scale is based on clinical evidence (physician observation),
not histology. If there is a difference in the clinical grade recorded by the physician and
a histologic report, use the data from the clinical documentation. Biopsy of affected
organs allows for more precise diagnosis as to the presence or absence of GVHD.
However, overall grading remains clinical and is based on the criteria published by
Przepiorka et al., Bone Marrow Transplant 1995; 15(6):825-8, see Table 1 below.
Table 1: GVHD Grading and Staging
Extent of Organ Involvement
Stage
Skin
Liver
Gut
Diarrhea > 500 ml/dayc
a
b
1
Rash on <25% of skin
Bilirubin 2-3 mg/dl
or persistent nausead
2
Rash on 25-50% of skin Bilirubin 3-6 mg/dl
Diarrhea >1000 ml/day
3
Rash on >50% of skin
Bilirubin 6-15 mg/dl
Diarrhea >1500 ml/day
Generalized
Severe abdominal pain
4
erythroderma with
Bilirubin >15 mg/dl
with or without ileus
bullous formation
Gradee
I
Stage 1-2
None
None
II
Stage 3 or
Stage 1 or
Stage 1
III
-Stage 2-3 or
Stages 2-4
IVf
Stage 4
Stage 4
-a. Use “Rule of Nines” (Table 2) or burn chart to determine extent of rash.
b. Range given as total bilirubin. Downgrade one stage if an additional cause of elevated bilirubin
has been documented.
c. Volume of diarrhea applies to adults. For pediatric patients, the volume of diarrhea should be
based on body surface area. Downgrade one stage if an additional cause of diarrhea has been
documented.
d. Persistent nausea with histologic evidence of GVHD in the stomach or duodenum.
e. Criteria for grading given as minimum degree of organ involvement required to confer that
grade.
f. Grade IV may also include lesser organ involvement with an extreme decrease in performance
status
National Marrow Donor Program ® and The Medical College of Wisconsin
Document Title: CIBMTR Forms Manual: Post-TED (Form2450)
Document Number: A00425 version 2.0 (8/01/2012)
Page 12 of 35
Post-TED
CIBMTR Form 2450
Body Area
Each Arm
Each Leg
Chest & Abdomen
Back
Head
Pubis
Table 2: Percent Body Surfaces
Percent
Total Percentage
9%
18%
18%
36%
18%
18%
18%
18%
9%
9%
1%
1%
NOTE: Pediatric Recipients
Diarrhea in pediatric recipients is assessed in mL/m2 rather than mL/kg since the
recipient’s weight may fluctuate due to cardiac failure, renal failure, or severe diarrhea.
Indicate the maximum grade of acute GVHD present during this reporting period
[including acute GVHD that persists from a previous HSCT or donor cellular infusion
(DCI)].
If acute GVHD was present, but the maximum grade was not documented nor is it able
to be determined from the grading and staging table, check “present (but) grade
unknown.”
Examples:
A. A recipient developed stage 2 skin involvement and elevated liver function
tests (LFTs) attributed to acute GVHD; however, there was no total bilirubin
manifestation. In this case, overall maximum grade I acute GVHD should be
reported since the staging/grading can be determined using Table 1.
B. A recipient developed acute liver GVHD with elevated LFTs with no total
bilirubin manifestation. The progress notes indicate stage 1 (grade II overall)
acute GVHD of the liver. In this case, the clinical manifestations do not fit the
criteria used in Table 1; “present, grade unknown” would be the best option to
report.
If the recipient did not develop acute GVHD, check “0.”
Question 16: Maximum extent of Chronic GVHD during this period
Chronic GVHD can occur following acute GVHD or without prior evidence of acute
GVHD (de novo). Chronic GVHD affects 25-50% of long-term survivors of allogeneic
transplants and usually develops after day 100. It has been documented as occurring as
early as day 60 and as late as day 400 post-HSCT. In chronic GVHD, the mechanism of
tissue damage differs from acute GVHD and a greater variety of organs may be
affected. The staging system for chronic GVHD is divided into two categories: limited
and extensive.
National Marrow Donor Program ® and The Medical College of Wisconsin
Document Title: CIBMTR Forms Manual: Post-TED (Form2450)
Document Number: A00425 version 2.0 (8/01/2012)
Page 13 of 35
Post-TED
CIBMTR Form 2450
Reporting Stage of Chronic GVHD (Sullivan KM, Blood 1981; 57:267.)
Limited: Localized skin involvement resembling localized scleroderma with or without
liver involvement; no other organ involvement.
Extensive: Generalized skin and/or multiple organ involvement.
Indicate the maximum grade of chronic GVHD present during this reporting period. If the
recipient did not develop chronic GVHD, check “none” and continue with question 19.
Report “limited” if chronic GVHD includes only localized skin involvement and/or liver
dysfunction. Continue with question 17.
Report “extensive” if any of the following symptoms are attributed to chronic GVHD:
Generalized skin involvement and/or liver dysfunction
Liver histology showing chronic aggressive hepatitis, bridging necrosis, or
cirrhosis
Involvement of the eye
Involvement of the salivary glands or oral mucous membranes
Involvement of any other target organ
Continue with question 17.
If chronic GVHD was present, but the maximum extent was not documented, check
“unknown” and continue with question 19.
NOTE: Chronic GVHD Grading
A new chronic GVHD grading scale is in development. Once that scale has been
published, CIBMTR will update the forms and manuals to reflect the new criteria.
Reporting chronic GVHD, date of diagnosis, and continuation from last report
(questions 16, 17, & 18)
Question 16 is intended to capture the maximum extent of chronic GVHD during the reporting
period.
Question 17 is intended to capture the date of onset of chronic GVHD or flare of chronic GHVD
if the previous episode has resolved for at least 30 days.
Question 18 is intended to capture if the chronic GVHD episode has continued from the last
post-TED form (Form 2450).
National Marrow Donor Program ® and The Medical College of Wisconsin
Document Title: CIBMTR Forms Manual: Post-TED (Form2450)
Document Number: A00425 version 2.0 (8/01/2012)
Page 14 of 35
Post-TED
CIBMTR Form 2450
Example 1. A recipient developed stage 1 acute skin GVHD in the 100 day reporting period that
persisted into the 6 month reporting period. During the 6 month reporting period, the acute skin
GVHD progressed into limited chronic skin GVHD. The chronic skin GVHD was in remission by
the end of the 6 month reporting period, and there was no subsequent episode of chronic GVHD
in the 1 year reporting period.
Maximum
Extent
(question 16)
Date of Diagnosis
(question 17)
Continued from last report
(question 18)
100 day
None
--
--
6 month
Limited
Date acute progressed to
chronic GVHD
--
None
--
--
Reporting
period
1 year
Example 2. A recipient developed de novo chronic oral GHVD in the 100 day reporting period,
which persisted into the 6 month reporting period. There was no subsequent chronic GVHD
through the 1 year reporting period.
Maximum
Extent
(question 16)
Date of Diagnosis
(question 17)
Continued from last report
(question 18)
100 day
Extensive
Date of clinical diagnosis
--
6 month
Extensive
Leave blank
Yes
None
--
--
Reporting
period
1 year
Example 3. A recipient developed stage 1 acute skin GVHD in the 100 day reporting period
which was in remission by the date of contact for the 100 day form. Towards the end of the 6
month reporting period, the recipient developed limited, chronic GVHD of the skin, which
persisted into the 1 year reporting period.
Maximum
Extent
(question 16)
Date of Diagnosis
(question 17)
Continued from last report
(question 18)
100 day
None
--
--
6 month
Limited
Date of clinical diagnosis
No
1 year
Limited
Leave blank
Yes
Reporting
period
National Marrow Donor Program ® and The Medical College of Wisconsin
Document Title: CIBMTR Forms Manual: Post-TED (Form2450)
Document Number: A00425 version 2.0 (8/01/2012)
Page 15 of 35
Post-TED
CIBMTR Form 2450
Example 4. A recipient developed de novo extensive gastrointestinal (GI) chronic GVHD in the
6 month reporting period. The chronic GI GVHD is in remission on the date of contact for the 6
month reporting period. Two months into the 1 year reporting period, the recipient developed a
flare of the extensive GI GVHD.
Maximum
Extent
(question 16)
Date of Diagnosis
(question 17)
Continued from last
report (question 18)
100 day
None
--
--
6 month
Extensive
1 year
Extensive
Reporting
period
Date of clinical diagnosis in the
6-month reporting period
Date of clinical diagnosis in the
1-year reporting period
No
Yes
Example 5. A recipient developed stage 2 acute GVHD of the skin in the 100 day reporting
period, which persisted into the 6 month reporting period; and subsequently progressed into
limited, chronic GVHD of the skin. Limited chronic GVHD of the skin persisted through the 6
month reporting period and into the 1 year reporting period. The chronic GVHD of the skin
cleared for the last two months in the 1 year reporting period. However, the recipient developed
extensive chronic oral GVHD near the end of the 1 year reporting period.
Maximum
Extent
(question 16)
Date of Diagnosis
(question 17)
Continued from last
report (question 18)
100 day
None
--
--
6 month
Limited
Date of progression from acute
to chronic
No
Extensive
Date of oral GVHD onset
Yes
Reporting
period
1 year
Question 17: Date of diagnosis of chronic GVHD
Report the date of clinical diagnosis of chronic GVHD. The clinical diagnosis date may
not necessarily be the date the symptoms began. If the clinical diagnosis date is not
documented, then report the date of histologic confirmation.
If this form is being completed for the six-month or annual follow-up time point, and the
recipient had a previous onset of chronic GVHD that subsequently resolved for at least
30 days and then reactivated (“flare”), report the flare as a new episode and list the new
date of diagnosis.
If chronic GVHD progressed directly from acute GVHD, the date of onset should be
reported as the date the recipient’s symptoms progressed from acute to chronic.
For more information regarding reporting partial or unknown dates, see General
Instructions, General Guidelines for Completing Forms.
National Marrow Donor Program ® and The Medical College of Wisconsin
Document Title: CIBMTR Forms Manual: Post-TED (Form2450)
Document Number: A00425 version 2.0 (8/01/2012)
Page 16 of 35
Post-TED
CIBMTR Form 2450
Question 18: Continued from last report (answer is only valid on > day 100
evaluation)
Indicate whether the chronic GVHD episode has continued from the last Post-TED form.
This question is not intended to capture when acute GVHD progresses to chronic
GVHD.
New Malignancy, Lymphoproliferative or Myeloproliferative Disorder
Question 19: Did a new malignancy, lymphoproliferative or myeloproliferative
disorder occur?
Indicate whether a new or secondary malignancy, lymphoproliferative disorder, or
myeloproliferative disorder has developed. Do not report recurrence, progression, or
transformation of the recipient’s primary disease (disease for which the transplant was
performed), or relapse of a prior malignancy.
A new malignancies, lymphoproliferative disorder, or myeloproliferative disorder include
but are not limited to:
Skin cancers (basal, squamous, melanoma)
New leukemia
New myelodysplasia
Solid tumors
PTLD (post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder) (report as lymphoma or
lymphoproliferative disease)
The following should not be reported as new malignancy:
Recurrence of primary disease (report as relapse or disease progression)
Relapse of malignancy from recipient’s pre-HSCT medical history
Breast cancer found in other (i.e., opposite) breast (report as relapse)
Post-HSCT cytogenetic abnormalities associated with the pre-HSCT diagnosis
(report as relapse)
Transformation of MDS to AML post-HSCT (report as disease progression)
If a new malignancy, lymphoproliferative disorder, or myeloproliferative disorder has
occurred following the HSCT, check “yes” and continue with question 20. If not, check
“no” and continue with question 62.
National Marrow Donor Program ® and The Medical College of Wisconsin
Document Title: CIBMTR Forms Manual: Post-TED (Form2450)
Document Number: A00425 version 2.0 (8/01/2012)
Page 17 of 35
Post-TED
CIBMTR Form 2450
NOTE: New Malignancy, Lymphoproliferative or Myeloproliferative Disorder
Paper submission of new malignancy: if more than one new malignancy occurred in a
single reporting period and each malignancy had a different diagnosis date, copy the
page and report each malignancy separately, labeling them 1st, 2nd, 3rd, etc. If multiple
malignancies occurred with the same diagnosis date, report all malignancies from that
diagnosis date on the same page.
Question 20: For all new malignancies except “other skin malignancy (basal cell,
squamous),” was testing performed to determine the cell of origin?
Indicate if testing was performed to determine the cell of origin of the new malignancy. If
testing was performed, check “yes” and continue with question 21. If not, check “no” and
continue with question 23.
Question 21: Specify the cell origin of the new malignancy
Indicate the cell origin of the new malignancy.
Question 22: Is a copy of the cell origin evaluation (VNTR, cytogenetics, FISH)
attached?
Attaching a copy of the evaluation for the cell origin of the new malignancy reduces the
need for later data queries.
If “yes,” complete the Log of Appended Documents Form (Form 2800) and attach the
pathology report. Do not attach the pathology report to the 2450. For more information
regarding the Form 2800, see General Instructions, Log of Appended Documents.
NOTE: Questions 23-60
FormsNet2™ application: Check either “yes” or “no” for each option listed, and enter
the “date of diagnosis,” if applicable.
Paper form submission: Check all that apply.
Question 23-60: Specify which new disease(s) occurred
Indicate the disease classification(s) at diagnosis.
Question 27: Other leukemia (including ALL) – Specify
If the disorder is “other leukemia,” specify the type. Do not report AML/ANLL in this
category.
Question 44: Is the tumor EBV positive?
If the disorder is lymphoma or lymphoproliferative disease, indicate if the tumor is EBV
positive.
Question 60: Other malignancy – Specify
If the disorder does not fit one of the categories listed, specify the type.
National Marrow Donor Program ® and The Medical College of Wisconsin
Document Title: CIBMTR Forms Manual: Post-TED (Form2450)
Document Number: A00425 version 2.0 (8/01/2012)
Page 18 of 35
Post-TED
CIBMTR Form 2450
Question 61: Is a pathology/autopsy report or other documentation attached?
Attaching a copy of the diagnostic pathology report for the new malignancy assists in
disease confirmation and reduces the need for later data queries.
If “yes,” complete the Log of Appended Documents Form (Form 2800) and attach the
pathology report. Do not attach the pathology report to the 2450. For more information
regarding the Form 2800, see General Instructions, Log of Appended Documents.
Survival
NOTE: Survival
The latest follow-up date is based on a medical evaluation conducted by a transplant
center physician, referring physician, or other physician currently assuming
responsibility for the recipient’s care. The medical evaluation should be completed as
close as possible to the designated time period of the form (e.g., day 100, six-month, or
annual follow-up visit). If this Post-TED Form is being completed for the day 100 time
period, the answers to all questions should reflect the clinical status of the recipient
between the HSCT infusion date and the latest follow-up date. If this Post-TED Form is
being completed for the six-month or annual time period, the answers to all questions
should reflect the clinical status of the recipient between follow-up dates of the most
recent Post-TED completed and the current Post-TED. If the recipient has not been
seen by a physician but the survival status is known, submit the Post-TED reporting
only the survival status.
If this form reports a subsequent stem cell infusion, report the date of contact as the day
before the preparative regimen began for the subsequent HSCT. If no preparative
regimen is given, report the date of contact as the day before the subsequent HSCT.
Paper submission of Post-TED: For survival status, include the date of latest followup, date of death, or last known date alive in the “latest follow-up” space.
For more information regarding reporting partial or unknown dates, see General
Instructions, General Guidelines for Completing Forms .
Question 62: Survival status at latest follow-up
Indicate the clinical status of the recipient on the date of actual contact for follow-up
evaluation. If the recipient is alive, continue with question 63. If the recipient has died,
continue with question 64.
NOTE: Reporting Latest Follow-up
When reporting the date of latest follow-up prior to a subsequent HSCT, report the date
specified above regardless whether there is actual patient contact on the date. This is
an exception to standard date of follow-up reporting to ensure all dates are captured
within the sequence of forms.
National Marrow Donor Program ® and The Medical College of Wisconsin
Document Title: CIBMTR Forms Manual: Post-TED (Form2450)
Document Number: A00425 version 2.0 (8/01/2012)
Page 19 of 35
Post-TED
CIBMTR Form 2450
It is important to note that the date latest follow-up for the Form 2450 being completed
should be before the date of a subsequent HSCT. Also, even if the subsequent
transplant date falls outside of the reporting period for this form, the answer to “did the
recipient receive a subsequent HSCT” must be “yes” (question 949 in the key fields).
Question 63: Latest follow-up
Enter the date of actual contact with recipient to determine medical status for this followup report. Acceptable evaluations include those from the transplant center, referring
physician, or other physician currently assuming responsibility for the recipient’s care. If
an evaluation was not performed at Day 100, at six months, or on the HSCT
anniversary, choose the date of the visit closest to the actual time point.
If the recipient has not been seen by a physician but the survival status is known,
submit the Post-TED reporting only the survival status.
For more information regarding reporting partial or unknown dates, see General
Instructions, General Guidelines for Completing Forms.
Question 64: Date of death
If the recipient has died since the last report, enter the recipient’s date of death and
check the “date of death” box on paper submission, and continue with question 30. If
the recipient’s date of death is not known, resources such as the Social Security Death
Index may be used. For additional resources, contact your center’s CIBMTR liaison.
For more information regarding reporting partial or unknown dates, see General
Instructions, General Guidelines for Completing Forms.
Question 65: Main cause of death
Cause of death is considered the main disease, complication, or injury that leads to
death. Do not report the mode of death (e.g., cardiopulmonary arrest). Only one primary
cause of death may be specified; however, multiple contributing causes may be listed if
relevant.
Primary cause of death is separated into three main categories: relapse or recurrence of
disease for which the HSCT occurred, HSCT-related causes, and new malignancies
(not transformation or progression). Typically, one of these three categories applies, but
if not, the “other” option may be used. Report the recipient’s primary cause of death as
one of the following:
Relapse / Progression / Persistent disease: Primary cause of death is
attributed to persistence or recurrence of the underlying disease for which the
HSCT was performed. Post-HSCT disease evaluation must reflect the presence
of disease. If this option is chosen, questions 96-106 should also reflect the
disease relapse/recurrence.
National Marrow Donor Program ® and The Medical College of Wisconsin
Document Title: CIBMTR Forms Manual: Post-TED (Form2450)
Document Number: A00425 version 2.0 (8/01/2012)
Page 20 of 35
Post-TED
CIBMTR Form 2450
NOTE: Aplastic Anemia
If the recipient received an HSCT for aplastic anemia, and the primary cause of
death is attributed to relapse/recurrence of disease, report “HSCT related
causes” and select “Rejection/Poor graft function” as the cause of death.
HSCT-related causes: See the detailed instructions for questions 66-73 below.
If the recipient’s primary cause of death is HSCT-related, questions 66-73 must
be completed.
New malignancy: Primary cause of death is attributed to the onset of a new
malignancy after HSCT. If the malignancy was diagnosed prior to this HSCT,
report the disease as “other” and specify the disease in question 72. The new
malignancy must differ from the disease for which the HSCT was performed.
Examples include de novo leukemia, and AML diagnosed many years after a
transplant for ALL. If the recipient received an HSCT for MDS, and posttransplant MDS transformed into AML, this would be considered progression of
disease, not a new malignancy.
Other: See the detailed instructions for question 74 below.
Unknown: This option should be used only when there is no documentation of
the recipient’s cause of death and all methods to try to obtain documentation
have been utilized.
NOTE: Questions 66-73
FormsNet2™ application: Check either “yes” or “no” for each option listed
Paper form submission: Check all that apply
Include all complications, including those only detected at autopsy.
Question 66: GVHD
Check “yes” if the recipient’s primary cause of death is attributed to acute and/or chronic
GVHD. If “yes” is answered for this question, there must also be data reported in the
GVHD section of the form (questions 15-18).
Question 67: Cardiac toxicity
Check “yes” if cardiac toxicity was the recipient’s primary cause of death. Examples of
cardiac toxicity include: heart failure, congestive heart failure, non-infectious pericarditis,
and/ or cardiac tamponade.
Question 68: Infection
Check “yes” if a fungal, bacterial, and/or viral infection (documented or suspected) was
the recipient’s primary cause of death. Examples of infection include: viral pneumonia
and viral infection of other organs.
Interstitial pneumonia (in the absence of viral infection or pneumocystis) should be
reported as “pulmonary toxicity.”
National Marrow Donor Program ® and The Medical College of Wisconsin
Document Title: CIBMTR Forms Manual: Post-TED (Form2450)
Document Number: A00425 version 2.0 (8/01/2012)
Page 21 of 35
Post-TED
CIBMTR Form 2450
Question 69: Pulmonary toxicity
Check “yes” if a pulmonary toxicity was the recipient’s primary cause of death. An
example of pulmonary toxicity is non-infectious lung failure, which can include ARDS,
pulmonary hemorrhage, radiation pneumonia, etc. If bronchiolitis obliterans is a part of
chronic GVHD, it can also be reported here.
Question 70: Rejection/Poor graft function
Check “yes” if rejection/poor graft function was the recipient’s primary cause of death.
This may also be recorded as bone marrow failure or aplasia. Rejection/poor graft
function should be reported if one of the following conditions is met and the recipient
has not relapsed.
ANC < 0.5 x 109/L after day 28 post-HSCT and bone marrow biopsy with < 5%
cellularity.
ANC sustained > 0.5 x 109/L for three or more consecutive days with subsequent
decrease to < 0.5 x 109/L and bone marrow examination with < 5% cellularity.
Question 71: Veno-Occlusive Disease (Hepatic)
Check “yes” if Veno-Occlusive Disease (VOD) was recipient’s primary cause of death.
VOD is often caused by chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy. VOD is characterized
by endothelial damage, micro-thrombosis of the hepatic venules, and sinusoidal fibrosis.
VOD is more common in allogeneic than in autologous HSCT and typically occurs within
3 weeks of transplant. In the absence of a histological diagnosis, recipients must fulfill
the criteria below for a diagnosis of VOD.
Clinical Criteria for Veno-Occlusive Disease Of Liver:
Recipients reported as having VOD based only on clinical signs and symptoms
must have two or more of the following, and no other identifiable cause for liver
disease:
Jaundice (bilirubin ≥ 2 mg/dL or > 34 μmol/L)
Hepatomegaly with right upper quadrant pain
Ascites and/or weight gain (> 5% over baseline, as generally accepted)
(References: McDonald GB, et al., Hepatology 1984;4:116-122. Jones RJ, et al.,
Transplantation 1987;778-783.)
Questions 72-73: Other, specify (HSCT-related)
Check “yes” if the recipient’s primary cause of death is not one of the listed HSCTrelated options. Examples of other causes of death include but are limited to multi-organ
failure, stroke, and hemorrhage.
Question 74: Other, specify (primary cause of death)
This option should only be used if the primary cause of death does not fit one of the
categories listed (e.g., suicide, sudden death, etc.).
National Marrow Donor Program ® and The Medical College of Wisconsin
Document Title: CIBMTR Forms Manual: Post-TED (Form2450)
Document Number: A00425 version 2.0 (8/01/2012)
Page 22 of 35
Post-TED
CIBMTR Form 2450
Post-HSCT Therapy
NOTE: Post-HSCT Therapy
This section collects data on specific therapies for current CIBMTR studies. It is not
intended to collect every type of possible post-HSCT therapy.
Questions 75-77 are optional for non-US centers.
Questions 75-77: FGF (velafermin), Imatinib mesylate (Gleevec, Glivec), KGF
(palifermin, Kepivance)?
Check “yes” if FGF (velafermin), Imatinib mesylate (Gleevec, Glivec), and/or KGF
(palifermin, Kepivance) were given as post-HSCT therapy.
Check “masked trial” if the recipient is part of a study where the agent the recipient
received is not known (e.g., placebo, drug, or other agent). Use the error correction
process to update the data field once the trial is over and the drug the recipient
was given is known.
Check “no” if the recipient was not given FGF (velafermin), Imatinib mesylate (Gleevec,
Glivec), and/or KGF (palifermin, Kepivance) as post-HSCT therapy.
Check “unknown” if there is no documentation to indicate whether the recipient did, or
did not receive FGF (velafermin), Imatinib mesylate (Gleevec, Glivec), and/or KGF
(palifermin, Kepivance) as post-HSCT therapy, and all methods to try to obtain
documentation have been utilized.
HSCT for Non-Malignant Disease Only
NOTE: HSCT for Non-Malignant Diseases
This section should be completed only if the primary disease for this HSCT is a nonmalignant disease. Disease evaluation is not collected for non-malignant diseases, as
there are no standard criteria for measuring non-malignant disease response.
Non-malignant diseases can be identified by the CIBMTR database code number
shown in brackets { } on the Pre-TED, and are numbered 300 and above, with the
exception of “Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria (PNH) (56)” and “other disease
(900)” (where the disease can be either malignant or non-malignant).
FormsNet2™ application: Form 2450, question 78 currently contains an error. If “yes,”
questions 107-109 and 110-146 should be completed. If “no,” questions 107-109
should be completed and the form submitted.
Paper form submission: Form 2450, question 78 currently contains an error. If “yes,”
questions 107-109 and 110-146 should be completed. If “no,” questions 107-109
should be completed and pages one and two will be submitted.
The CIBMTR is in the process of updating this form.
National Marrow Donor Program ® and The Medical College of Wisconsin
Document Title: CIBMTR Forms Manual: Post-TED (Form2450)
Document Number: A00425 version 2.0 (8/01/2012)
Page 23 of 35
Post-TED
CIBMTR Form 2450
Question 78: DCI given in this period?
A Donor Cellular Infusion (DCI) is a cellular therapy that uses cells obtained from the
original HSCT donor. The types of cells used for a DCI include, but are not limited to:
lymphocytes, unstimulated peripheral blood, mononuclear cells, dendritic cells, or
mesenchymal cells. For more information regarding DCI, see question 110.
If the recipient received a DCI in this reporting period, check “yes” and continue with
question 107 and complete the DCI section. If the recipient did not receive a DCI in this
reporting period, check “no,” continue with questions 107-109, and submit form.
Malignant Disease Evaluation for this HSCT
NOTE: Malignant Disease Evaluation
This section should be completed only if the primary disease for which this HSCT is
being completed is a malignant disease.
Malignant diseases can be identified by the CIBMTR database code number shown in
brackets on Pre-TED { }, and are numbered 299 and below, with the exception of with
the exception of “Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria (PNH) (56)” and “other disease
(900)” (where the disease can be either malignant or non-malignant).
This section collects the data known as “best response to transplant.” The purpose of
this section is to report the recipient’s best response to the planned course of the
HSCT. This does not include treatment given for relapsed or persistent disease that was
not planned before the HSCT was executed. Best response is often achieved in the first
100 days. However, for some diseases such as multiple myeloma and CLL, the best
response to HSCT may take longer.
If the recipient relapses/progresses and receives therapy for the disease
relapse/progression, the response to that additional therapy should not be reported in
this section. The best response prior to the relapse/progression should be reported. If
the recipient was in complete remission (CR) at the start of the preparative regimen, the
best response is “not applicable,” as CR has already been attained.
Note: Reporting complete remission (CR) post-HSCT
The disease criteria on pages 23-69 of the Pre-TED (2400) Manual should be used
when determining the recipient’s CR status.
CR undetermined (CRU) is the complete disappearance of all known sites of disease
with the exception of persistent scan abnormalities of unknown significance. CRU
should be reported as “complete remission.”
National Marrow Donor Program ® and The Medical College of Wisconsin
Document Title: CIBMTR Forms Manual: Post-TED (Form2450)
Document Number: A00425 version 2.0 (8/01/2012)
Page 24 of 35
Post-TED
CIBMTR Form 2450
Question 79: Was a CR ever achieved in response to HSCT (including any therapy
as of Day 0, excluding any change in therapy in response to disease
assessment)?
If the recipient was already in CR at the start of the preparative regimen, check
“Recipient already in CR at start of preparative regimen” and continue with question 82.
If the recipient achieved CR post-HSCT (excluding unplanned therapy), check “yes” and
continue with question 80.
If the recipient never achieved CR post-HSCT, check “no” and continue with question
81.
If the recipient’s disease status was not evaluated post-HSCT, check “not evaluated”
and continue with question 82. This option is not commonly used, as this would indicate
that no tests (radiological, laboratory, or a clinical assessment) were performed to
assess the CR status at any time during the reporting period.
Question 80: Date (Yes, post-HSCT CR was achieved)
Indicate the date CR was achieved. If CR was reported on a previous Post-TED, check
“First CR date reported previously.” This option should only be chosen for > 100 day
Post-TED (i.e., six-month or annual evaluation).
For more information regarding reporting partial or unknown dates, see General
Instructions, General Guidelines for Completing Forms.
Question 81: Date assessed (No, never in CR from HSCT)
If the recipient never achieved CR post-HSCT, indicate the date of latest disease
assessment. If the recipient received unplanned therapy, indicate the date of the latest
disease assessment prior to receiving the therapy.
If the recipient never achieved CR post-HSCT and unplanned therapy was reported on
a previous Post-TED, check “best response was previously reported.” This option
should only be chosen for > 100 day Post-TED (i.e., six-month or annual evaluation).
For more information regarding reporting partial or unknown dates, see General
Instructions, General Guidelines for Completing Forms.
First Relapse or Progression after HSCT (in this period, any type, not
persistent disease)
Question 82: First relapse or progression after HSCT
The three methods used to evaluate disease status are: molecular,
cytogenetic/fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH)/flow cytometry, and clinical/
hematological. Any of these three methods can record relapse or progression, but only
the first instance for each method should be reported.
National Marrow Donor Program ® and The Medical College of Wisconsin
Document Title: CIBMTR Forms Manual: Post-TED (Form2450)
Document Number: A00425 version 2.0 (8/01/2012)
Page 25 of 35
Post-TED
CIBMTR Form 2450
If question 82 is answered “yes,” questions 83, 86, and 89 should be answered.
If question 82 was answered “yes” on a previous Post-TED and there are no new
methods which detect relapse or progression, check “no” and continue to 92.
Molecular
Question 83: Relapse/progression detected by molecular method
Molecular assessment involves determining whether a molecular marker for the disease
exists in the blood or bone marrow. Molecular assessment is the most sensitive method
of detection and can indicate known genetic abnormalities associated with the disease
for which the HSCT was performed. RFLP testing (with PCR amplification) is an
example of a molecular test method used to detect BCR/ABL.
If molecular markers for relapse/progressive disease were found, check “yes” and
continue with question 84.
If molecular markers for relapse/progressive disease were not found, check “no” and
continue with question 85.
If disease was detected and reported on a previous Post-TED follow-up, check
“previously reported” and continue with question 86. This option should only be chosen
for > 100 day Post-TED.
If molecular testing was not done, check “not evaluated” and continue with question 86.
Question 84: Date first seen (molecular method)
Indicate the date relapse/progressive disease was determined by molecular method.
Continue with question 86.
For more information regarding reporting partial or unknown dates, see General
Instructions, General Guidelines for Completing Forms.
Question 85: Date of assessment (molecular method)
If molecular markers for relapse/progressive disease were not found, indicate the date
of latest assessment. Continue with question 86.
For more information regarding reporting partial or unknown dates, see General
Instructions, General Guidelines for Completing Forms.
National Marrow Donor Program ® and The Medical College of Wisconsin
Document Title: CIBMTR Forms Manual: Post-TED (Form2450)
Document Number: A00425 version 2.0 (8/01/2012)
Page 26 of 35
Post-TED
CIBMTR Form 2450
Cytogenetic/Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH)
Question 86: Relapse/progression detected by cytogenetic/FISH method
NOTE: Flow Cytometry
Flow cytometry is a technique that can be performed on blood, bone marrow, or tissue
preparations where cell surface markers can be quantified on cellular material. Currently
the CIBMTR forms do not contain fields to capture flow cytometry data. Since the
sensitivity of flow cytometry is similar to that of FISH assays, flow cytometry data should
be reported in question 86.
Cytogenetic assessment involves testing blood or bone marrow for the presence of a
known cytogenetic abnormality that reflects the recipient’s disease. FISH is categorized
with cytogenetics. Although often used for finding specific features in DNA, FISH is not
as sensitive as molecular methods, even though the markers identified may be the
same.
If cytogenetic/FISH/flow markers for relapse/progressive disease were found, check
“yes” and continue with question 87.
If cytogenetic/FISH/flow markers for relapse/progressive disease were not found, check
“no” and continue with question 88.
If disease was found and reported on a previous Post-TED follow-up, check “previously
reported” and continue with question 89. This option should only be chosen for > 100
day Post-TED.
If cytogenetic/FISH/flow testing was not done, check “not evaluated” and continue with
question 89.
Question 87: Date first seen (cytogenetic/FISH method)
Indicate the date relapse/progressive disease was determined by cytogenetic methods
(e.g., FISH). Continue with question 89.
For more information regarding reporting partial or unknown dates, see General
Instructions, General Guidelines for Completing Forms.
Question 88: Date of assessment (cytogenetic/FISH method)
If cytogenetic/FISH/flow markers for relapse/progressive disease were not found,
indicate the date of latest assessment. Continue with question 89.
For more information regarding reporting partial or unknown dates, see General
Instructions, General Guidelines for Completing Forms.
National Marrow Donor Program ® and The Medical College of Wisconsin
Document Title: CIBMTR Forms Manual: Post-TED (Form2450)
Document Number: A00425 version 2.0 (8/01/2012)
Page 27 of 35
Post-TED
CIBMTR Form 2450
Clinical/Hematologic
Question 89: Relapse/progression detected by clinical/hematologic method
Clinical/hematologic assessment is the least sensitive method of disease detection.
Examples include circulating blasts in the bloodstream for AML, or enlargement of a
malignant mass for lymphoma or a solid tumor, as determined either physically or
radiographically. Every recipient who has an evaluation by a physician has a “clinical”
assessment.
If the recipient dies, and the relapse or progression of disease is discovered by autopsy,
the date of assessment should be reported as the date of death, not the autopsy date.
If clinical/hematologic evidence of relapse/progressive disease was found, check “yes”
and continue with question 90.
If clinical/hematologic evidence of relapse/progressive disease was not found, check
“no” and continue with question 91.
If disease was found and reported on a previous post-TED follow-up, check “previously
reported” and continue with question 57. This option should only be chosen for > 100
day Post-TED.
If clinical/hematological assessment was not done, check “not evaluated” and continue
with question 92.
Question 90: Date first seen (clinical/hematologic method)
Indicate the date relapse/progressive disease was determined by clinical/hematological
evaluation. Continue with question 92.
For more information regarding reporting partial or unknown dates, see General
Instructions, General Guidelines for Completing Forms.
Question 91: Date of assessment (clinical/hematologic method)
If clinical/hematological evidence of relapse/progressive disease was not found, indicate
the date of latest assessment. Continue with question 92.
For more information regarding reporting partial or unknown dates, see General
Instructions, General Guidelines for Completing Forms.
Additional Treatment
Question 92: Additional treatment
If additional treatment(s) was given to the recipient post-HSCT for disease or supportive
therapy, check “yes” and continue with question 93.
National Marrow Donor Program ® and The Medical College of Wisconsin
Document Title: CIBMTR Forms Manual: Post-TED (Form2450)
Document Number: A00425 version 2.0 (8/01/2012)
Page 28 of 35
Post-TED
CIBMTR Form 2450
If the recipient did not receive any additional treatment(s) post-HSCT for treatment of
disease, check “no” and continue with question 96.
Questions 93: Additional treatment – DCI (allo only)
If the recipient received a donor cellular infusion (DCI) following an allogeneic HSCT,
check “yes” and complete the DCI section of the Post-TED (questions 110-121).
If the recipient did not receive a DCI, check “no” and continue with question 94.
If the recipient received an autologous transplant, this question should be left blank.
Question 94: Additional treatment – Planned
If the recipient received additional treatment as planned post-HSCT per protocol, check
“yes.” Planned treatment is considered part of the treatment plan regardless of the
disease status post-HSCT. This does not include treatment given for relapsed,
progressive, or persistent disease that was not planned before the HSCT was
performed. If post-transplant treatment is given as prophylaxis or maintenance for
recipients in CR, or as preemptive therapy for recipients with minimal residual disease,
consider this “planned therapy," even if this was not documented prior to the transplant.
If the recipient did not receive planned additional treatment post-HSCT, check “no” and
continue with question 95.
Question 95: Additional treatment – Not planned
If the recipient received additional treatment post-HSCT, and the treatment was not
planned per protocol and given for relapsed, progressive, or persistent disease, check
“yes.”
If the recipient did not receive unplanned additional treatment post-HSCT, check “no”
and continue with question 96.
Method of Latest Disease Assessment
NOTE: Latest Disease Assessment
METHOD:
This section should be completed for every malignant disease, and should reflect the
recipient’s most recent disease assessment. Not all diseases have molecular and/or
cytogenetic/FISH abnormalities identified to monitor disease status. If no disease
assessments exist, check “not evaluated.” In some circumstances, disease may be
detected by molecular or cytogenetic testing, but may not be considered a relapse or
progression. Test results should still be reported.
National Marrow Donor Program ® and The Medical College of Wisconsin
Document Title: CIBMTR Forms Manual: Post-TED (Form2450)
Document Number: A00425 version 2.0 (8/01/2012)
Page 29 of 35
Post-TED
CIBMTR Form 2450
DATE:
If more than one test in the same assessment category is done on different days, report
the date of the most definitive diagnostic assessment within a reasonable time frame of
the date of contact (approximately 30 days).
Example 1 – Leukemia: Blasts appear in the peripheral blood on a CBC, the
next day a bone marrow biopsy is done and reveals relapse of disease. Report the date
of the bone marrow biopsy as the date of latest assessment, as this is a more definitive
assessment than a CBC.
Example 2 – Lymphoma: A bone marrow biopsy is performed and reveals
relapse of disease. The next day a CT scan is performed, which also reveals relapse of
disease. Since both tests reveal the same result, and the tests are of equal diagnostic
relevance, either the date of the bone marrow biopsy or the CT scan date may be
reported.
Example 3- Lymphoma: A PET/CT is done five months prior to the date of
contact, which shows no evidence of disease. On the date of contact, the recipient is
seen in clinic with no evidence of lymphadenopathy upon physical examination. Report
the date of clinic visit as the date of latest assessment.
Example 4- Multiple Myeloma (IgG Kappa): A serum electrophoresis (SPEP),
serum immunofixation and bone marrow biopsy are performed one week prior to the
date of contact (i.e., the office visit). The SPEP shows no evidence of a monoclonal
protein (M-spike); however, the immunofixation is still positive. The bone marrow biopsy
shows no evidence of residual disease. Report the date of the SPEP, immunofixation,
and bone marrow biopsy as the date of latest assessment. In this case, it should be
reported that disease was detected since the immunofixation is positive.
Molecular
Question 96: Molecular
Molecular assessment involves determining whether a molecular marker for the disease
exists in the blood or bone marrow. Molecular assessment is the most sensitive method
of detection, and can indicate known genetic abnormalities associated with the disease
for which the HSCT was performed. RFLP testing (with PCR amplification) is an
example of a molecular test method used to detect BCR/ABL.
In the FormsNet2™ application, check “yes” if a molecular method was used to
determine disease status for this follow-up time point and continue with question 97. If a
molecular method was not used to determine disease status for this follow-up time
point, check “no/not evaluated” and continue with question 100.
This question does not exist on the paper version of the Form.
National Marrow Donor Program ® and The Medical College of Wisconsin
Document Title: CIBMTR Forms Manual: Post-TED (Form2450)
Document Number: A00425 version 2.0 (8/01/2012)
Page 30 of 35
Post-TED
CIBMTR Form 2450
Question 97: Disease detected? (molecular method)
If molecular markers for disease were found, check “yes” and continue with question 98.
If molecular markers for disease were not found, check “no” and continue with question
99.
Question 98: If yes, was the status considered a disease relapse or progression?
(molecular method)
If the physician believes the test results indicate disease relapse or progression, check
“yes.” If the recipient has a positive test result, but the physician does not believe the
result represents relapse or progression (e.g., a recipient transplanted for CML exhibits
a low level of BCR-ABL positivity post-HSCT that the physician does not believe is
disease), check “no.” Continue with question 100.
Question 99: Date latest assessed (molecular method)
Indicate the date of the latest disease assessment. Continue with question 100.
For more information regarding reporting partial or unknown dates, see General
Instructions, General Guidelines for Completing Forms.
Cytogenetic/Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH)
NOTE: Flow Cytometry
Flow cytometry is a technique that can be performed on blood, bone marrow, or
tissue preparations where cell surface markers can be quantified on cellular material.
Currently the CIBMTR forms do not contain fields to capture flow cytometry data.
Since the sensitivity of flow cytometry is similar to that of FISH assays, flow cytometry
data should be reported in question 100.
Question 100: Cytogenetic/FISH
Cytogenetic assessment involves testing blood or bone marrow for the presence of a
known cytogenetic abnormality that reflects the recipient’s disease. FISH is categorized
with cytogenetics. Although often used for finding specific features in DNA, FISH is not
as sensitive as molecular methods, even though the markers identified may be the
same.
In the FormsNet2™ application, check “yes” if a cytogenetic method was used to
determine disease status for this follow-up time point and continue with question 101. If
a cytogenetic method was not used to determine disease status for this follow-up time
point, check “no/not evaluated” and continue with question 104.
This question does not exist on the paper version of the Form.
Question 101: Disease detected? (cytogenetic/FISH method)
National Marrow Donor Program ® and The Medical College of Wisconsin
Document Title: CIBMTR Forms Manual: Post-TED (Form2450)
Document Number: A00425 version 2.0 (8/01/2012)
Page 31 of 35
Post-TED
CIBMTR Form 2450
If cytogenetic/FISH/flow markers for disease were found, check “yes” and continue with
question 102.
If cytogenetic/FISH/flow markers for were not found, check “no” and continue with
question 103.
Question 102: If yes, was the status considered a disease relapse or
progression? (Cytogenetic/FISH method)
If the physician believes the test result indicates disease relapse or progression, check
“yes.” If the recipient has a positive test result, but the physician does not believe the
result represents relapse or progression, check “no.” Continue with question 103.
Question 103: Date latest assessed (Cytogenetic/FISH method)
Indicate the date of the latest disease assessment. Continue with question 104.
For more information regarding reporting partial or unknown dates, see General
Instructions, General Guidelines for Completing Forms.
Clinical/Hematologic
Question 104: Clinical/Hematologic:
Clinical/hematologic assessment is the least sensitive method of disease detection.
Examples include circulating blasts in the bloodstream for AML, and enlargement of a
malignant mass for lymphoma or a solid tumor, as determined either physically or
radiographically. Every recipient who has an evaluation by a physician has a “clinical”
assessment.
In the FormsNet2™ application, check “yes” if a clinical/hematologic assessment was
used to determine disease status for this follow-up time point and continue with question
105. If a clinical/hematologic assessment was not used to determine disease status for
this follow-up time point, check “no/not evaluated” and continue with question 107.
This question does not exist on the paper version of the Form.
Question 105: Disease detected? (clinical/hematologic method)
If clinical/hematologic evidence of disease was found, check “yes.”
If clinical/hematologic evidence of disease was not found, check “no.”
Question 106: Date latest assessed: (clinical/hematologic method)
Indicate the date of the latest disease assessment and continue with question 107.
For more information regarding reporting partial or unknown dates, see General
Instructions, General Guidelines for Completing Forms.
National Marrow Donor Program ® and The Medical College of Wisconsin
Document Title: CIBMTR Forms Manual: Post-TED (Form2450)
Document Number: A00425 version 2.0 (8/01/2012)
Page 32 of 35
Post-TED
CIBMTR Form 2450
NOTE: Questions 107-109
Question 107 appears only in the FormsNet2™ version of the Post-TED Form. For the
paper version of the Form, if a previous HSCT was done for a different malignant
disease than this HSCT, indicate the status of the original disease and the date
determined (see Questions 108-109). If a previous HSCT was not done for a different
malignant disease, continue to the DCI section or submit the Form.
Questions 107-109 only apply to previous HSCTs that were performed for another
malignant disease.
Question 107: Was a previous HSCT performed for a different disease than this
HSCT?
If prior to this HSCT, an HSCT was performed for a different disease (malignant
disease only), check “yes” and continue with question 108.
If this is the recipient’s first HSCT, or a prior HSCT was not performed for a different
disease (malignant disease only), check “no” and continue with question 110.
Question 108: Give status of original disease
Indicate the current status of the original malignant disease as either “CR” or “not in
CR” and continue with question 109.
Question 109: Date determined
Indicate the date this disease status was determined.
If a DCI was done during this reporting period, continue with the DCI section of the form.
If no DCI was done during the reporting period, the form is considered complete and
may be submitted to the CIBMTR.
For more information regarding reporting partial or unknown dates, see General
Instructions, General Guidelines for Completing Forms.
Donor Cellular Infusion (DCI)
The paper version of Post-TED allows the data manager to report up to three Donor
Cellular Infusions (DCI) events. If more than three DCIs were performed during the
reporting period, copy the page and continue to report the subsequent DCIs. The
FormsNet2™ application will allow as many DCI entries as needed.
A DCI is a form of cellular therapy that involves cells from any donor, and is commonly
used to create a graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effect. The recipient does not receive a
preparative regimen prior to receiving the donor cells. The types of cells used for a DCI
include, but are not limited to: lymphocytes, unstimulated peripheral blood mononuclear
cells, dendritic cells, and/or mesenchymal cells.
National Marrow Donor Program ® and The Medical College of Wisconsin
Document Title: CIBMTR Forms Manual: Post-TED (Form2450)
Document Number: A00425 version 2.0 (8/01/2012)
Page 33 of 35
Post-TED
CIBMTR Form 2450
A DCI should be reported for a recipient who received cells from any donor without a
preparative regimen for any reason other than those pertaining to the original HSCT
graft (e.g., no engraftment, partial or poor engraftment, loss of graft, or late graft failure).
If the recipient received an infusion due to the graft, report as a subsequent
HSCT, not a DCI.
Recipients may receive a DCI over several days or weeks. A single DCI section should
be completed for all infusions given within a 10-week period. See the illustration below
for an example of a recipient receiving multiple DCIs:
Example 4: Calculation Timeline
Recipients may receive multiple DCIs. Complete the first DCI section for all infusions
given between day 0 and week 10 post-HSCT. Complete the second DCI section for
subsequent infusion(s) given between week 10 and week 20 post-HSCT. For example:
End of 10-week
time period
Weeks
Post-HSCT: 0
HSCT
day 0
4
1st DCI
Report these
three DCIs in the
first DCI section
8
10
12
Report these two DCIs in
the first DCI section
16
Report this DCI in the
second DCI section
Question 110: Date of first DCI
Indicate the date of the recipient’s first DCI given in this reporting period. Continue with
question 111.
For more information regarding reporting partial or unknown dates, see General
Instructions, General Guidelines for Completing Forms.
Question 111: Total # DCI in 10 weeks
Indicate the total number of DCIs given in a 10-week period. (In Example 4, the total
number is six.) Continue with question 112.
National Marrow Donor Program ® and The Medical College of Wisconsin
Document Title: CIBMTR Forms Manual: Post-TED (Form2450)
Document Number: A00425 version 2.0 (8/01/2012)
Page 34 of 35
Post-TED
CIBMTR Form 2450
NOTE: Questions 112-117: Type of cell(s)
FormsNet2™ application: Check either “yes” or “no” for each option listed
Paper form submission: Check all that apply
Questions 112-117: Type of cell(s)
From the list provided, indicate the type of cell(s) used for the DCI. The most common
type of DCI is the DLI (Donor Lymphocyte Infusion), but there are other types of cellular
therapy as indicated. If the type of cell(s) used for the DCI is not listed, choose “other”
and specify the cell type used. Continue with question 118.
Questions 118-119: Indication
From the list provided, indicate the reason the cells were infused. If the recipient
received multiple DCIs for more than one indication, report the DCI and the new
indication in the second DCI section.
If multiple DCIs were given within the 10-week period, check all applicable indications.
The “other” option should rarely be used. If the reason the recipient receives an infusion
of cells is due to the graft (e.g., no engraftment, partial or poor engraftment, loss of
graft, or late graft failure), then the infusion should be reported as a subsequent HSCT,
not a DCI. Continue with question 120.
Question 120: Maximum Grade of Acute Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD)
DCI can trigger acute GVHD independent of the HSCT. If the recipient develops acute
GVHD as a result of the DCI, indicate the maximum grade. See question 15, Table 1 for
reporting guidelines.
NOTE: Question 121
This question should only be answered if the recipient receives an additional DCI after
the initial 10-week period.
Question 121: If another DCI was received in this reporting period, disease status
before next DCI
Indicate the recipient’s disease status prior to receiving a subsequent DCI as either
“CR,” “not in CR,” or “not assessed.”
Questions 122-133: Date of second DCI
See the detailed instructions for questions 110-121.
Questions 135-146: Date of third DCI
See the detailed instructions for questions 110-121.
National Marrow Donor Program ® and The Medical College of Wisconsin
Document Title: CIBMTR Forms Manual: Post-TED (Form2450)
Document Number: A00425 version 2.0 (8/01/2012)
Page 35 of 35
| File Type | application/pdf |
| File Modified | 2013-04-25 |
| File Created | 2012-08-01 |