Supporting Statement – Part A
Supporting Statement For Paperwork Reduction Act Submissions
A. Background
On March 23, 2010, the President signed into law H.R. 3590, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Affordable Care Act), Public Law 111-148. Sections 1402 and 1412 of the Affordable Care Act provide for reductions in cost sharing on essential health benefits for low- and moderate-income enrollees in silver level qualified health plans (QHP) on individual market Exchanges. It also provides for reductions in cost sharing for Indians enrolled in QHPs at any metal level. These cost-sharing reductions will help eligible individuals and families afford the out-of-pocket spending associated with health care services provided through Exchange-based QHP coverage.
The law directs QHP issuers to notify the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) of cost-sharing reductions made under the statute for qualified individuals, and directs the Secretary to make periodic and timely payments to the QHP issuer equal to the value of those reductions. Further, the law permits advance payment of the cost-sharing reduction amounts to QHP issuers based upon amounts specified by the Secretary.
Under established HHS regulations, QHP issuers will receive advance payments of the cost-sharing reductions throughout the year. Each issuer will then be subject to one of two reconciliation processes after the year to ensure that HHS reimbursed each issuer the correct advance cost-sharing amount. This PRA establishes the data collection requirements for a QHP issuer to report to HHS which reconciliation reporting option the issuer will be subject to for a given benefit year.
B. Justification
1. Need and Legal Basis
On December 7, 2012, HHS published a proposed rule entitled “HHS Notice of Benefit and Payment Parameters for 2014.” This rule proposed a payment approach under which CMS would make monthly advance payments to issuers to cover projected cost-sharing reduction amounts, and then reconcile those advance payments after the end of the benefit year to the actual cost-sharing reduction amounts. The reconciliation process described in the rule would require that QHP issuers provide CMS the amount of cost-sharing paid by each enrollee, as well as the level of cost-sharing that enrollee would have paid under a standard plan without cost-sharing reductions. To determine the amount of cost-sharing an enrollee receiving cost-sharing reductions would have paid under a standard plan, QHP issuers would need to re-adjudicate each claim for these enrollees under a standard plan structure. HHS finalized the proposed notice of benefit and payment parameters for 2014 and this approach on March 11, 2013.
During the comment period to the proposed rule, HHS received numerous comments suggesting that the reporting requirements of the reconciliation process for QHP issuers would be operationally challenging for some issuers. In response to these comments, HHS issued an interim final rule with comment period on March 11, 2013 entitled “Amendments to the HHS Notice of Benefit and Payment Parameters for 2014,” which laid out an alternative approach that QHP issuers may elect to pursue with respect to the reporting requirements. This alternative approach would allow a QHP issuer to estimate the amount of cost-sharing an enrollee receiving cost-sharing reductions would have paid under a standard plan in the Exchange, rather than re-adjudicating each of the enrollee’s claims. This approach is intended to permit a reasonable transitional period in which QHP issuers will be allowed to choose the methodology that best aligns with their operational practices, which should reduce the administrative burden on issuers in the initial years of the Exchanges. The interim final rule describes the estimation methodology in sufficient detail to allow QHP issuers to make an informed decision of which reporting approach to pursue.
Under this PRA, we are requesting authority to collect data associated with choosing either the actual option or the transitional estimated option to reporting information for reconciliation. Prior to the start of each coverage year, QHP issuers must notify HHS of the methodology it is selecting for the benefit year. The QHP issuer must select the same methodology for all plan variations it offers on the Exchange for a benefit year. Moreover, as the estimated methodology is intended as a transition to the actual methodology, the QHP issuer may not select the estimated methodology if it selected the actual methodology for the prior benefit year.
A description of the data elements to be collected are included in Appendix A of this package. Issuers have already registered their contact information and established authorized users through previous HIOS data requirements.
2. Information Users
The information collected will be used by HHS to determine which approach, actual or estimated, each QHP issuer will use to determine the amount of cost-sharing that each enrollee receiving cost-sharing reductions would have been responsible for if enrolled in a standard plan in the Exchange.
3. Use of Information Technology
QHP issuers will provide information on which option they choose via the Health Insurance Oversight System (HIOS) – a web-based data collection system that is already being used by issuers to provide information for the healthcare.gov website (additional PRA-related information regarding HIOS is provided in the Web Portal PRA package (0938-1086)). HHS is developing a new module in HIOS for issuers to be able to make this decision. All submissions will be made electronically and no paper submissions are required.
4. Duplication of Efforts
This is a new data collection required under HHS final rules. It does not duplicate any other collection.
5. Small Businesses
Small businesses are not affected by this collection.
6. Less Frequent Collection
QHP issuers must elect which option they prefer prior to the start of each benefit year. This election must occur only once annually. Issuers may not deviate from this collection schedule or provide the information on a more or less frequent basis.
7. Special Circumstances
No special circumstances exist for this information collection.
8. Federal Register/Outside Consultation
The 60-day Federal Register notice was published on ___, 2013.
9. Payments/Gifts to Respondents
There are no payments or gifts to respondents.
10. Confidentiality
We will maintain respondent privacy with respect to the information collected to the extent required by applicable law and HHS policies.
11. Sensitive Questions
There are no sensitive questions associated with this collection.
12. Burden Estimates (Hours & Wages)
HHS estimates that for the first benefit year it will take a senior actuary ($200/hr) 10 hours to read through the final rules pertaining to the reporting options and assess which option is most appropriate considering the issuer’s claims processing system. Additionally, it should take approximately 1 hour for the senior actuary to select which option the issuer will pursue through HIOS. As stated in the HHS Notice of Benefit and Payment Parameters, HHS assumes that approximately 1,200 QHP issuers will participate in the Federally Facilitated Exchange during 2014. Each QHP issuer will be responsible for submitting this data through HIOS.
As the estimated approach is intended to act as a transition to the actual methodology, issuers that elect to use the actual approach in any benefit year may not select the estimated approach for any subsequent benefit year. Therefore, once an issuer chooses to implement the actual approach, that issuer will no longer be required to make any data submission to HHS under this PRA. Only issuers that continue to choose the estimation option will need to annually reassess whether to continue with that approach, as well as submit the chosen reporting option to HHS through HIOS as appropriate. HHS estimates that it will take approximately 2 hours each subsequent year for a senior actuary to accomplish that reassessment and submit the approach through HIOS.
Burden hours: 10 hours reading and analysis time + 1 hour submission time = 11 hours per issuer
Cost: 11 hours x $200/hr x 1,200 issuers = $2,640,000
13. Capital Costs
The health insurance industry is not required to incur capital costs to fulfill these requirements.
14. Cost to Federal Government
The development of the HIOS module and the review of issuer data submissions will be incorporated into already established HHS staff responsibilities. Therefore, this data collection should impose no additional costs to the Federal government.
15. Changes to Burden
There are no changes to the burden (hours and/or capital costs). This is a new collection.
16. Publication/Tabulation Dates
No publication will result from this collection.
17. Expiration Date
CMS has no objections to displaying the expiration date.
| File Type | application/msword |
| Author | CMS |
| Last Modified By | JAMAA HILL |
| File Modified | 2013-09-17 |
| File Created | 2013-09-17 |