30 Day Federal Register

Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 200 / Tuesday, October 16, 2012 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Protest
U.S. Customs and Border
Protection, Department of Homeland
Security.
ACTION: 30-Day notice and request for
comments; extension of an existing
information collection.
AGENCY:

U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) of the Department of
Homeland Security will be submitting
the following information collection
request to the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) for review and approval
in accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act: Protest (Form 19). This
is a proposed extension of an
information collection that was
previously approved. CBP is proposing
that this information collection be
extended with no change to the burden
hours. This document is published to
obtain comments from the public and
affected agencies. This information
collection was previously published in
the Federal Register (77 FR 47420) on
August 8, 2012, allowing for a 60-day
comment period. This notice allows for
an additional 30 days for public
comments. This process is conducted in
accordance with 5 CFR 1320.10.
DATES: Written comments should be
received on or before November 15,
2012.
SUMMARY:

Interested persons are
invited to submit written comments on
this information collection to the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Office of Management and Budget.
Comments should be addressed to the
OMB Desk Officer for U.S. Customs and
Border Protection, Department of
Homeland Security, and sent via
electronic mail to
[email protected] or faxed
to (202) 395–5806.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information
should be directed to Tracey Denning,
U.S. Customs and Border Protection,
Regulations and Rulings, Office of
International Trade, 799 9th Street NW.,
5th Floor, Washington, DC 20229–1177,
at 202–325–0265.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: CBP
invites the general public and affected
Federal agencies to submit written
comments and suggestions on proposed
and/or continuing information
collection requests pursuant to the
Paperwork Reduction Act (Pub. L.104–

tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

ADDRESSES:

VerDate Mar<15>2010

16:06 Oct 15, 2012

Jkt 229001

13). Your comments should address one
of the following four points:
(1) Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency/component,
including whether the information will
have practical utility;
(2) Evaluate the accuracy of the
agencies/components estimate of the
burden of the proposed collection of
information, including the validity of
the methodology and assumptions used;
(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
(4) Minimize the burden of the
collections of information on those who
are to respond, including the use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
techniques or other forms of
information.
Title: Protest.
OMB Number: 1651–0017.
Form Number: Form 19.
Abstract: CBP Form 19, Protest, is
used by an importer, filer, or any party
at interest to petition CBP, or protest
any action or charge made by the port
director with respect to imported
merchandise. The information collected
on CBP Form 19 is authorized by
Sections 514 and 514(a) of the Tariff Act
of 1930 and provided for by 19 CFR Part
174. This form is accessible at: http://
forms.cbp.gov/pdf/CBP_Form_19.pdf.
Action: CBP proposes to extend the
expiration date of this information
collection with no change to the burden
hours or to CBP Form 19.
Type of Review: Extension (without
change).
Affected Public: Businesses.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
3,750.
Estimated Number of Total Annual
Responses: 45,000.
Estimated Time per Response: 1 hour.
Dated: October 11, 2012.
Tracey Denning,
Agency Clearance Officer, U.S. Customs and
Border Protection.
[FR Doc. 2012–25364 Filed 10–15–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111–14–P

PO 00000

Frm 00034

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

63321

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
[Docket No. FR–5603–N–72]

Notice of Submission of Proposed
Information Collection to OMB
Collection of Information From HUD
Lead Hazard Control Grantees To
Support a Review of the Federal Dustlead Standards
Office of the Chief Information
Officer, HUD.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:

The proposed information
collection requirement described below
has been submitted to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review, as required by the Paperwork
Reduction Act. The Department is
soliciting public comments on the
subject proposal.
Leaded paint in housing remains as
the last major source of lead exposure to
young children. Efforts to reduce
childhood lead poisoning have focused
on controlling lead paint hazards,
specifically lead dust and deteriorated
lead-based paint. Lead hazard control
programs are looking for ways to make
this housing safer without placing an
undue financial burden on the property
owners or tenants. On August 10, 2009,
a petition was submitted to EPA
www.regulations.gov; search for EPA–
HQ–OPPT–2009–0655) to lower the
definition of lead-based paint in pre1978 ‘‘target’’ housing to some value
below the current value of 1 mg/cm 2
or 0.5% by weight (42 U.S.C. 4822(c)),
and to lower the lead hazard control
standards and clearance standards for
lead in dust on floors and window sills
in such housing and in pre-1978 childoccupied facilities below the current
values of 40 and 250 mg/ft 2
(micrograms per square foot),
respectively (40 CFR 745.65(b) and
745.227(e)(8)(viii), and 24 CFR
35.1320(b)(2)(i)), and below the current
clearance standard for window troughs
of 400 mg/ft2 (40 CFR 45.227(e)(8)(viii),
and 24 CFR 35.1320(b)(2)(i)). The HUD
Secretary may reduce the level that
defines lead-based paint in target
housing (42 U.S.C. 4822(c)), and the
EPA Administrator identifies the
leadbased paint hazard standards (15
U.S.C. 2683), and the lead-based paint
standard (15 U.S.C.2683), and the leadbased paint standard in child-occupied
facilities.
In a response dated October 22, 2009,
EPA, writing on behalf of itself and
HUD, agreed to study the issues and
decide whether the lead hazard
standards and/or the lead-based paint
standard should be changed, and to

SUMMARY:

E:\FR\FM\16OCN1.SGM

16OCN1

63322

Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 200 / Tuesday, October 16, 2012 / Notices

collaborate with HUD on this effort.
www.epa.gov/oppt/chemtest/pubs/
eparesponse. pdf). The Agency and the
Department intend to have identical
standards for the sake of maximizing
their effectiveness in this matter.
One of the issues to be considered is
the ability to actually determine
‘‘clearance’’ (a work area is sufficiently
clean of lead dust) before allowing
reoccupancy. The clearance levels for
floors and window sills are the same as
the lead hazard standards. This survey
will question HUD grantees as to their
ability to achieve clearance at the
current level for floors and windowsills,
and whether it would be technically
feasible to achieve clearance at
potentially lower levels.
DATES: Comments Due Date: November
15, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit comments regarding
this proposal. Comments should refer to
the proposal by name and/or OMB
approval Number (2529-Pending) and
should be sent to: HUD Desk Officer,
Office of Management and Budget, New
Executive Office Building, Washington,
DC 20503; fax: 202–395–5806. Email:
[email protected]; fax:
202–395–5806.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Colette Pollard, Reports Management
Officer, QDAM, Department of Housing
and Urban Development, 451 Seventh
Street SW., Washington, DC 20410;
email Colette Pollard at Colette.
[email protected]. or telephone (202)
402–3400. This is not a toll-free number.
Copies of available documents
submitted to OMB may be obtained
from Ms. Pollard.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
notice informs the public that the
Department of Housing and Urban
Development has submitted to OMB a
request for approval of the Information

collection described below. This notice
is soliciting comments from members of
the public and affecting agencies
concerning the proposed collection of
information to: (1) Evaluate whether the
proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility; (2) Evaluate the
accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the
burden of the proposed collection of
information; (3) Enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and (4) Minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on those who are to respond; including
through the use of appropriate
automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submission of
responses.
This notice also lists the following
information:
Title of Proposed: Collection of
Information from HUD Lead Hazard
Control Grantees to Support a review of
the Federal Dust-lead Standards.
OMB Approval Number: 2529Pending.
Form Numbers: None.
Description of the need for the
information and proposed use: Leaded
paint in housing remains as the last
major source of lead exposure to young
children. Efforts to reduce childhood
lead poisoning have focused on
controlling lead paint hazards,
specifically lead dust and deteriorated
lead-based paint. Lead hazard control
programs are looking for ways to make
this housing safer without placing an
undue financial burden on the property
owners or tenants. On August 10, 2009,
a petition was submitted to EPA
www.regulations.gov; search for EPA–
HQ–OPPT–2009–0655) to lower the
definition of lead-based paint in pre1978 ‘‘target’’ housing to some value
Number of
respondents

Annual
responses

100

1

Reporting Burden ..............................................................................

Total estimated burden hours: 1,600.
Status: New collection.

tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Authority: Section 3507 of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 35, as
amended.
Dated: October 10, 2012.
Colette Pollard,
Department Reports Management Officer,
Office of the Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2012–25406 Filed 10–15–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P

VerDate Mar<15>2010

16:06 Oct 15, 2012

Jkt 229001

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
[Docket No. FR–5603–N–71]

Notice of Submission of Proposed
Information Collection to OMB Fee or
Roster Personnel (Appraisers and
Inspectors) Designation and Appraisal
Report Forms
Office of the Chief Information
Officer, HUD

AGENCY:

PO 00000

Frm 00035

below the current value of 1 mg/cm 2
or 0.5% by weight (42 U.S.C. 4822(c)),
and to lower the lead hazard control
standards and clearance standards for
lead in dust on floors and window sills
in such housing and in pre-1978 childoccupied facilities below the current
values of 40 and 250 mg/ft 2
(micrograms per square foot),
respectively (40 CFR 745.65(b) and
745.227(e)(8)(viii), and 24 CFR
35.1320(b)(2)(i)), and below the current
clearance standard for window troughs
of 400 mg/ft2 (40 CFR 45.227(e)(8)(viii),
and 24 CFR 35.1320(b)(2)(i)). The HUD
Secretary may reduce the level that
defines lead-based paint in target
housing (42 U.S.C. 4822(c)), and the
EPA Administrator identifies the
leadbased paint hazard standards (15
U.S.C. 2683), and the lead-based paint
standard (15 U.S.C. 2683), and the leadbased paint standard in child-occupied
facilities. In a response dated October
22, 2009, EPA, writing on behalf of itself
and HUD, agreed to study the issues and
decide whether the lead hazard
standards and/or the lead-based paint
standard should be changed, and to
collaborate with HUD on this effort.
www.epa.gov/oppt/chemtest/pubs/
eparesponse.pdf). The Agency and the
Department intend to have identical
standards for the sake of maximizing
their effectiveness in this matter.
One of the issues to be considered is
the ability to actually determine
‘‘clearance’’ (a work area is sufficiently
clean of lead dust) before allowing
reoccupancy. The clearance levels for
floors and window sills are the same as
the lead hazard standards. This survey
will question HUD grantees as to their
ability to achieve clearance at the
current level for floors and windowsills,
and whether it would be technically
feasible to achieve clearance at
potentially lower levels.

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

Hours per
response

×

16

ACTION:

=

Burden hours
1,600

Notice.

The proposed information
collection requirement described below
has been submitted to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review, as required by the Paperwork
Reduction Act. The Department is
soliciting public comments on the
subject proposal.
HUD requires that appraisals and
inspections be performed on certain
FHA insured properties and the FHA

SUMMARY:

E:\FR\FM\16OCN1.SGM

16OCN1