Rear Seat Belt Reminder Survey

tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with

Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 18 / Monday, January 28, 2013 / Notices
In accordance with section 47107(h)
of title 49, United States Code, this
notice is required to be published in the
Federal Register 30 days before
modifying the land-use assurance that
requires the property to be used for an
aeronautical purpose.
Following is a legal description of the
subject airport property at the
Outagamie County Regional Airport in
Appleton, WI:
A parcel of land being a part of the
Southeast Quarter of the Southeast
Quarter of Section 35, the Northwest
Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, the
Southwest Quarter of the Southwest
Quarter and the Southeast Quarter of the
Southwest Quarter of Section 36, T21N,
R16E, Town of Greenville, Outagamie
County, Wisconsin more fully described
as follows:
Commencing at the South Quarter
Corner of Section 36; Thence S89°57′00″
W coincident with the South line of the
Southwest Quarter of Section 36 a
distance of 470.22 feet; Thence
N00°51′03″ E a distance of 49.14 feet to
the South right-of-way line of CTH BB
also being the point of beginning.
Thence S89°50′39″ W coincident with
said South right-of-way line a distance
of 1,098.47 feet; Thence S89°53′16″ W
coincident with said South right-of-way
line a distance of 1,348.82 feet; Thence
N00°08′45″ W a distance of 206.41 feet;
Thence N90°00′00″ E a distance of 30.49
feet; Thence N33°46′32″ E a distance of
80.71 feet; Thence N30°09′12″ E a
distance of 99.92 feet; Thence
N33°41′24″ W a distance of 10.70 feet;
Thence S85°14′11″ W a distance of
71.45 feet; Thence S78°41′24″ W a
distance of 75.64 feet; Thence
N85°54′52″ W a distance of 83.28 feet;
Thence N59°02′10″ W a distance of
17.30 feet; Thence N40°48′54″ E a
distance of 86.24 feet; Thence
N27°48′05″ E a distance of 553.39 feet;
Thence N24°30′26″ E a distance of
443.43 feet; Thence N05° 11′40″ E a
distance of 163.84 feet; Thence
N29°07′17″ E a distance of 322.87 feet;
Thence S63°52′35″ E a distance of
1,706.63 feet; Thence N89°51′06″ E a
distance of 803.81 feet to the West rightof-way line of Two Mile Road; Thence
S00°51′03″ W coincident with said West
right-of-way line a distance of 590.25
feet to the North line of Lot 1,
Outagamie County CSM No. 1190;
Thence S89°57′16″ W coincident with
said North line a distance of 420.00 feet
to the West line of said Lot 1, Outagamie
County CSM No. 1190; Thence
S00°51′03″ W coincident with said West
line a distance of 420.89 feet to the
point of beginning.

VerDate Mar<15>2010

17:13 Jan 25, 2013

Jkt 229001

Said parcel of land contains 77.5
Acres (3,376,192 Square Feet) more or
less.
Subject to all easements and
restrictions of record.
Issued in Minneapolis, MN, on December
31, 2012.
Daniel J. Millenacker,
Acting Manager, Minneapolis Airports
District Office, FAA, Great Lakes Region.
[FR Doc. 2013–01670 Filed 1–23–13; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA–2012–0176]

Reports, Forms, and Recordkeeping
Requirements
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation.
ACTION: Request for public comment on
a proposed collection of information.
AGENCY:

Before a Federal agency can
collect certain information from the
public, it must receive approval from
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB). Under procedures established
by the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995, before seeking OMB approval,
Federal agencies must solicit public
comment on proposed collections of
information, including extensions and
reinstatements of previously approved
collections.
This document describes the
collection of information for which
NHTSA intends to seek OMB approval.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before March 29, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
(identified by the DOT Docket ID
Number above) by any of the following
methods:
Electronic Submissions: Go to http://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Docket Management Facility;
M–30, U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Rm. W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery or Courier: West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590 between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m. Eastern Time, Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Fax: (202) 493–2251.
Regardless of how you submit your
comments, you should mention the
docket number of this document. You
SUMMARY:

PO 00000

Frm 00095

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

5865

may call the Docket at (202) 366–9324.
Please identify the proposed collection
of information for which a comment is
provided, by referencing its OMB
clearance number. It is requested, but
not required, that two copies of the
comment be provided.
Note that all comments received will
be posted without change to http://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided. Anyone
is able to search the electronic form of
all comments received into any of our
dockets by the name of the individual
submitting the comment (or signing the
comment, if submitted on behalf of an
association, business, labor union, etc.).
You may review DOT’s complete
Privacy Act Statement in the Federal
Register published on April 11, 2000
(65 FR 19477–78).
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received, go to http://
www.regulations.gov or the street
address listed above. Follow the online
instructions for accessing the dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Complete copies of each request for
collection of information may be
obtained at no charge from Ms. Carla
Rush, U.S. Department of
Transportation, NHTSA, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., W43–417,
Washington, DC 20590. (Telephone:
(202) 366–4583, Fax: (202) 493–2739).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
before a proposed collection of
information is submitted to OMB for
approval, Federal agencies must first
publish a document in the Federal
Register providing a 60-day comment
period and otherwise consult with
members of the public and affected
agencies concerning each proposed
collection of information. The OMB has
promulgated regulations describing
what must be included in such a
document. Under OMB’s regulation (at
5 CFR 1320.8(d)), an agency must ask
for public comment on the following:
(i) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(ii) The accuracy of the agency’s
estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection of information, including the
validity of the methodology and
assumptions used;
(iii) How to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected;
(iv) How to minimize the burden of
the collection of information on those
who are to respond, including the use

E:\FR\FM\28JAN1.SGM

28JAN1

tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with

5866

Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 18 / Monday, January 28, 2013 / Notices

of appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology, e.g. permitting
electronic submission of responses.
In compliance with these
requirements, NHTSA asks for public
comments on the following proposed
collection of information:
Title: Rear Seat Belt Reminder System
Survey.
Type of Request: New collection of
information.
OMB Control Number: 2127—NEW.
Requested Expiration Date of
Approval: Three years from the
approval date.
Summary of the Collection of
Information: The National Highway
Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA)
proposes to collect information from the
driving public to determine drivers’ and
car passengers’ seat belt usage habits as
well as the effectiveness and consumer
acceptance of rear seat belt reminder
systems (SBRSs) in order to support an
analysis of the potential benefits of
requiring a rear SBRS. A national
telephone survey will be administered
to 2,500 respondents. Given the low
incidence of Americans who own a car
with a rear SRBS, the respondents will
be selected from vehicle registration
lists. The sampled population will be
then divided up between 2,000 drivers
who own cars with a rear SBRS and 500
drivers who own a car without a rear
SBRS. The main study will be preceded
by a pretest administered to 9
respondents. The survey will collect
basic demographic information, seat belt
usage habits, acceptability of rear
SBRSs, effectiveness of rear SBRSs and
perception of current SBRSs. Interview
length will average 15 minutes.
A Spanish-language translation and
bilingual interviewers would be used to
minimize language barriers to
participation. No personally identifiable
information will be collected during the
telephone interviews. In addition, the
interviewers would use ‘‘Computer
Assisted Telephone Interviewing’’
(CATI) to reduce interview length and
minimize recording errors.
Description of the Need for the
Information and Proposed Use of the
Information: NHTSA was established to
reduce the number of deaths, injuries,
and economic losses resulting from
motor vehicle crashes on the Nation’s
highways. As part of this statutory
mandate, NHTSA is authorized to
conduct research as a foundation for the
development of motor vehicle standards
and traffic safety programs.
A NHTSA survey released in 2010
found passengers in the rear seat of a
vehicle buckle up 74% of the time,

VerDate Mar<15>2010

17:13 Jan 25, 2013

Jkt 229001

compared with 85% for those sitting in
the front. Unbelted rear seat passengers
risk serious injury or death to
themselves and pose a potentially fatal
threat to others in the event of a crash.
SBRSs have been shown to increase the
use of seat belts in the front seats of
vehicles. While rear SBRSs are currently
available on only a few vehicle models
sold in the U.S., NHTSA seeks to collect
data from those who drive these
vehicles (the test group) and draw
comparisons to those who drive similar
vehicles without a rear SBRS (the
comparison group). To this end, NHTSA
will collect basic demographic
information from both groups and
information on their and their
passengers seat belt usage habits, as well
as the effectiveness, preferences and
acceptance of the rear SBRS.
NHTSA will use the findings from
this proposed collection of information
in support of an analysis of the potential
benefits of requiring a rear SBRS in new
vehicles sold in the United States.
Description of the Likely Respondents
(including Estimated Number, and
Proposed Frequency of Response to the
Collection of Information): Under this
proposed effort, 9 pretest telephone
interviews and 2,500 national survey
telephone interviews would be
conducted for a total of 2,509
interviews. The telephone interview
would be conducted with a national
sample of 2,000 drivers aged 18 years
old or older, that drive a vehicle with
a rear SBRS and regularly transport rear
passengers 8 years old or older. In
addition to this, interviews would be
conducted with a comparison group of
500 drivers aged 18 years old or older
that drive similar vehicles as those in
the national sample except these vehicle
do not have a rear SBRS. These drivers
must also regularly transport rear
passengers who are 8 years old or older.
Interview length will average 15
minutes. The sample will be drawn
from registration lists of vehicle owners.
Interviews will be conducted both
with respondents using landline phones
and cellphones. Federal law prohibits
the use of auto dialing to call cell
phones; therefore all cell phone
numbers would be dialed manually.
Each sample member would complete
just one interview. Businesses are
ineligible for the sample and would not
be interviewed.
Estimate of the Total Annual
Reporting and Recordkeeping Burden
Resulting From the Collection of
Information: NHTSA estimates that
respondents would require an average of
15 minutes to complete the telephone
interviews or a total of 627 hours for the
2,509 respondents. All interviewing

PO 00000

Frm 00096

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

would occur during a two to three
month period during 2013.
Thus the annual reporting burden
would be the entire 627 hours. The
respondents would not incur any
reporting or recordkeeping burden from
the data collection.
Authority: 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A).
Issued on: January 17, 2013.
Lori K. Summers,
Director, Office of Crashworthiness
Standards.
[FR Doc. 2013–01715 Filed 1–25–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
[Docket ID PHMSA–2012–0319]

Pipeline Safety: Annual Reports and
Validation
Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration
(PHMSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of extension of submittal
deadline for calendar year 2012 gas
transmission and gathering annual
reports, remind pipeline owners and
operators to validate their Operator
Identification Number data, and request
supplemental reports to correct gas
transmission and liquefied natural gas
annual report data issues.
AGENCY:

Over the past three years,
PHMSA has made a number of
amendments to pipeline data
regulations and reporting forms for gas,
hazardous liquids, and liquefied natural
gas (LNG) operators. Most recently, on
December 5, 2012, the Office of
Management and Budget approved
revisions to the gas transmission and
gathering annual report. Based on the
significant changes to the gas
transmission and gathering annual
report, PHMSA is extending the filing
deadline for calendar year 2012 data
from March 15, 2013, to June 15, 2013.
In addition, certain operators with
Operator Identification Numbers (OPID)
established prior to January 1, 2011, are
required to validate their OPID data
before June 30, 2012. PHMSA has
determined that a number of operators
have not completed their OPID data
validations. Therefore, PHMSA is using
this notice to remind operators to
validate their OPID data. PHMSA has
also noticed that annual reports
submitted by gas transmission and LNG
operators contain data that conflicts
with other required reports submitted to
PHMSA. Operators should review their

SUMMARY:

E:\FR\FM\28JAN1.SGM

28JAN1