How Differences in Pedagogical Methods Impact ChalleNGe Program Outcomes

Forms and Documents

Document Name	Status
Supplemental_Statement_Part_B_Final.docx Supporting Statement B	2013-12-11
supporting statement_teacher_FINAL.docx Supporting Statement A	2013-12-11

IC Document Collections

IC ID	Document Title	Status
208085	How Differences in PedagogicalMethods Impact ChalleNGe Program Outcomes Other-Respondent emails	New

ICR Details

OMB Control No: 0704-0506	ICR Reference No: 201308-0704-001
Status: Historical Active	Previous ICR Reference No:
Agency/Subagency: DOD/DODDEP	Agency Tracking No:
Title: How Differences in Pedagogical Methods Impact ChalleNGe Program Outcomes
Type of Information Collection: New collection (Request for a new OMB Control Number)	Common Form ICR:  No
Type of Review Request: Regular
OIRA Conclusion Action: Approved with change	Conclusion Date: 12/11/2013
	Date Received in OIRA: 08/06/2013
Terms of Clearance: This collection is approved based on the revised materials provided by the Department.

	Inventory as of this Action	Requested	Previously Approved
Expiration Date	12/31/2016	36 Months From Approved
Responses	152	0	0
Time Burden (Hours)	51	0	0
Cost Burden (Dollars)	1,014	0	0

---

Abstract: The survey is used to gather data on the pedagogical methods of ChalleNGe program academic teachers. The data will be used to evaluate how differences in classroom teaching methods impact program outcomes with the goal of identifying those teaching methods and techniques that are most effective so they may be shared program-wide.

---

Authorizing Statute(s): US Code: 32 USC 509 Name of Law: Natioonal Guard Youth Challenge Program of Opportunities of Civilian Youth
  

Citations for New Statutory Requirements: None

---

Associated Rulemaking Information
RIN:	Stage of Rulemaking:	Federal Register Citation:	Date:
	Not associated with rulemaking

---

Federal Register Notices & Comments
60-day Notice:	Federal Register Citation:	Citation Date:
	77 FR 33200	06/05/2012
30-day Notice:	Federal Register Citation:	Citation Date:
	78 FR 47308	08/05/2013
Did the Agency receive public comments on this ICR? No

---

Number of Information Collection (IC) in this ICR: 1

IC Title	Form No.	Form Name
How Differences in PedagogicalMethods Impact ChalleNGe Program Outcomes

---

ICR Summary of Burden

	Total Approved	Previously Approved	Change Due to New Statute	Change Due to Agency Discretion	Change Due to Adjustment in Estimate	Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA
Annual Number of Responses	152	0	0	152	0	0
Annual Time Burden (Hours)	51	0	0	51	0	0
Annual Cost Burden (Dollars)	1,014	0	0	1,014	0	0

Burden increases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion: Yes

Burden Increase Due to: Miscellaneous Actions

Burden decreases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion: No

Burden Reduction Due to:

Short Statement: This ChalleNGe program had been authorized in the FY98 Defense Authorization bill, and the current survey is a new survey, one developed to help understand how teaching methods impact student outcome.

---

Annual Cost to Federal Government: $190,000

Does this IC contain surveys, censuses, or employ statistical methods? Yes Part B of Supporting Statement

Is the Supporting Statement intended to be a Privacy Impact Assessment required by the E-Government Act of 2002? No

Is this ICR related to the Affordable Care Act [Pub. L. 111-148 & 111-152]? No

Is this ICR related to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, [Pub. L. 111-203]? No

Is this ICR related to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA)? No

Is this ICR related to the Pandemic Response? Uncollected

---

Common Form ICR:  No

---

On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).

The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:

(a) It is necessary for the proper performance of agency functions;

(b) It avoids unnecessary duplication;

(c) It reduces burden on small entities;

(d) It uses plain, coherent, and unambiguous language that is understandable to respondents;

(e) Its implementation will be consistent and compatible with current reporting and recordkeeping practices;

(f) It indicates the retention periods for recordkeeping requirements;

(g) It informs respondents of the information called for under 5 CFR 1320.8 (b)(3) about:

(i) Why the information is being collected;

(ii) Use of information;

(iii) Burden estimate;

(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);

(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and

(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;

(h) It was developed by an office that has planned and allocated resources for the efficient and effective management and use of the information to be collected.

(i) It uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology (if applicable); and

(j) It makes appropriate use of information technology.

If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.

Certification Date: 08/06/2013

---