60 Day FR Notice

21155

Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 68 / Tuesday, April 9, 2013 / Notices
APPENDIX—Continued
[23 TAA petitions instituted between 3/18/13 and 3/22/13]
TA–W

Subject firm
(petitioners)

Location

82568 ................

Homeward Residentiall, formerly American Home Serv
(State/One-Stop).
Abbott Ross Division (Workers) ...........................................
LexisNexis/Matthew Bender (Company) ..............................
LexisNexis/Matthew Bender (Company) ..............................
Hasbro Games (Union) ........................................................
Hewlett Packard Company (New Version) (Company) ........
Hewlett-Packard Company (Company) ................................
Compucom Systems, Inc. (State/One-Stop) ........................
Global Functions of Hewlett Packard Company (Company)
Hewlett Packard Company (Company) ................................
Hewlett Packard Software (Company) .................................
Resolute Forest Products (Company) ..................................
Revstone Greenwood Forgings (Company) .........................
West Point Home LLC—Wagram Division Office (Company).
Standard Motor Products (Company) ..................................
Chromalloy (State/One-Stop) ...............................................
Nanosolar, Inc. (State/One-Stop) .........................................
Phillips Lightolier (formerly Genlyte Group) (State/OneStop).
AAR Mobility Systems (Union) .............................................
McConway & Torley Corporation (Union) ............................
Katana Summit, LLC (State/One-Stop) ................................

Jacksonville, FL ....................

03/18/13

03/15/13

Altavista, VA ..........................
Charlottesville, VA .................
Albany, NY ............................
East Longmeadow, MA .........
Palo Alto, CA ........................
Palo Alto, CA ........................
Dallas, TX .............................
Palo Alto, CA ........................
Palo Alto, CA ........................
Palo Alto, CA ........................
Calhoun, TN ..........................
Greenwood, SC ....................
Wagram, NC .........................

03/18/13
03/19/13
03/19/13
03/19/13
03/19/13
03/19/13
03/19/13
03/20/13
03/20/13
03/20/13
03/20/13
03/20/13
03/21/13

03/07/13
03/18/13
03/18/13
03/15/13
03/18/13
03/18/13
03/15/13
03/19/13
03/19/13
03/19/13
03/19/13
03/07/13
03/20/13

Independence, KS ................
Gardena, CA .........................
San Jose, CA ........................
Fall River, MA .......................

03/21/13
03/21/13
03/22/13
03/22/13

03/20/13
03/20/13
03/07/13
03/22/13

Cadillac, MI ...........................
Kutztown, PA ........................
Ephrata, WA ..........................

03/22/13
03/22/13
03/22/13

02/28/13
03/21/13
03/15/13

82569
82570
82571
82572
82573
82574
82575
82576
82577
82578
82579
82580
82581

................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................

82582
82583
82584
82585

................
................
................
................

82586 ................
82587 ................
82588 ................

Signed in Washington, DC, this 26th day of
March, 2013.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.

[FR Doc. 2013–08134 Filed 4–8–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

[FR Doc. 2013–08137 Filed 4–8–13; 8:45 am]

sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Employment and Training
Administration

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P

[TA–W–81,387]

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Eastman Kodak Company, IPS—
Dayton Location, Including On-site
Leased Workers From Adecco, Dayton,
Ohio; Notice of Termination of
Reconsideration Investigation

Occupational Safety and Health
Administration

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade
Act of 1974, as amended, a
reconsideration investigation was
initiated in on August 1, 2012 by the
Department of Labor on behalf of
workers and former workers of Eastman
Kodak Company, IPS—Dayton Location,
including on-site leased workers from
Adecco, Dayton, Ohio.
The worker group on whose behalf
the request for reconsideration was filed
is eligible to apply for Trade Adjustment
Assistance under an amended
certification (TA–W–74,813A) which
was issued on March 19, 2013.
Consequently, the investigation has
been terminated.

VerDate Mar<15>2010

16:19 Apr 08, 2013

Jkt 229001

[Docket No. OSHA–2010–0009]

Presence Sensing Device Initiation
(PSDI) Standard; Extension of the
Office of Management and Budget’s
(OMB) Approval of Information
Collection (Paperwork) Requirements
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA), Labor.
ACTION: Request for public comments.
AGENCY:

SUMMARY: OSHA solicits public
comments concerning its proposal to
extend the Office of Management and
Budget’s (OMB) approval of the
information collection requirements
specified in the Presence Sensing
Device Initiation (PSDI) Standard (29
CFR 1910.217(h)).
DATES: Comments must be submitted
(postmarked, sent, or received) by June
10, 2013.
ADDRESSES:
Electronically: You may submit
comments and attachments

PO 00000

Frm 00058

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

Date of
institution

Date of
petition

electronically at http://
www.regulations.gov, which is the
Federal eRulemaking Portal. Follow the
instructions online for submitting
comments.
Facsimile: If your comments,
including attachments, are not longer
than 10 pages, you may fax them to the
OSHA Docket Office at (202) 693–1648.
Mail, hand delivery, express mail,
messenger, or courier service: When
using this method, you must submit a
copy of your comments and attachments
to the OSHA Docket Office, Docket No.
OSHA–2010–0009, Occupational Safety
and Health Administration, U.S.
Department of Labor, Room N–2625,
200 Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20210. Deliveries
(hand, express mail, messenger, and
courier service) are accepted during the
Department of Labor’s and Docket
Office’s normal business hours, 8:15
a.m. to 4:45 p.m., e.t.
Instructions: All submissions must
include the Agency name and OSHA
docket number (OSHA–2010–0009) for
the Information Collection Request
(ICR). All comments, including any
personal information you provide, are
placed in the public docket without
change, and may be made available
online at http://www.regulations.gov.
For further information on submitting
comments see the ‘‘Public
Participation’’ heading in the section of
this notice titled SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION.

E:\FR\FM\09APN1.SGM

09APN1

21156

Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 68 / Tuesday, April 9, 2013 / Notices

Docket: To read or download
comments or other material in the
docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov
or the OSHA Docket Office at the
address above. All documents in the
docket (including this Federal Register
notice) are listed in the http://
www.regulations.gov index; however,
some information (e.g., copyrighted
material) is not publicly available to
read or download from the Web site. All
submissions, including copyrighted
material, are available for inspection
and copying at the OSHA Docket Office.
You may also contact Theda Kenney at
the address below to obtain a copy of
the ICR.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Theda Kenney or Todd Owen,
Directorate of Standards and Guidance,
OSHA, U.S. Department of Labor, Room
N–3609, 200 Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20210; telephone (202)
693–2222.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

I. Background
The Department of Labor, as part of its
continuing effort to reduce paperwork
and respondent (i.e., employer) burden,
conducts a preclearance consultation
program to provide the public with an
opportunity to comment on proposed
and continuing information collection
requirements in accord with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)). This program
ensures that information is in the
desired format, reporting burden (time
and costs) is minimal, collection
instruments are clearly understood, and
OSHA’s estimate of the information
collection burden is accurate. The
Occupational Safety and Health Act of
1970 (the OSH Act) (29 U.S.C. 651 et
seq.) authorizes information collection
by employers as necessary or
appropriate for enforcement of the OSH
Act or for developing information
regarding the causes and prevention of
occupational injuries, illnesses, and
accidents (29 U.S.C. 657). The OSH Act
also requires that OSHA obtain such
information with minimum burden
upon employers, especially those
operating small businesses, and to
reduce to the maximum extent feasible
unnecessary duplication of efforts in
obtaining information (29 U.S.C. 657).
Description of the requirements. A
number of paragraphs in the Standard
contain paperwork requirements. These
requirements include: Certifying brakemonitor adjustments, alternatives to
photoelectric presence sensing devices
(PSDs), safety system design and
installation, and worker training; annual
recertification of safety systems;

VerDate Mar<15>2010

16:19 Apr 08, 2013

Jkt 229001

establishing and maintaining the
original certification and validation
records as well as the most recent
recertification and revalidation records;
affixing labels to test rods and to
certified and recertified presses; and
notifying an OSHA-recognized thirdparty validation organization when a
safety system component fails, the
employer modifies the safety system, or
a point-of-operation injury occurs.
Use and purpose of the requirements.
Requiring employers to certify brakemonitor adjustments, alternatives to
photoelectric PSDs, and safety system
design and installation, and to recertify
safety systems annually, provides the
employer, systems engineers,
maintenance personnel, and other
workers with reliable information
regarding the status and operating
characteristics of the presses, which
they can use to determine that the
systems are operating according to the
requirements of the Standard. The
training certification requirement
assures employers that workers receive
the training specified by the Standard at
the required frequencies and, therefore,
can safely operate a PSDI-equipped
mechanical power press. Specifying that
employers establish and maintain for
each press the original certification and
validation records, as well as the most
recent recertification and revalidation
records, allows employers, engineers,
maintenance personnel, and other
workers to determine if the presses are
operating within required
specifications, thereby ensuring that the
presses remain in safe operating
condition.
Having employers affix labels to test
rods provides information to workers
about the minimum object sensitivity of
the sensing field, thereby allowing them
to use the test rods in determining that
a field is operating correctly. The
provision specifying that employers
affix labels to certified and recertified
presses gives assurance to employers
and workers that the presses meet the
requirements of the Standard and,
therefore, that workers can operate them
safely.
Requiring employers to notify an
OSHA-recognized third-party validation
organization when a safety system
component fails, or a point-of-operation
injury occurs, permits these
organizations to identify and correct
design problems in the safety systems.
Having employers inform these
organizations of modifications made to
safety systems allows the organizations
to review the modifications and
determine if the presses will continue to
operate safely.

PO 00000

Frm 00059

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

By complying with these paperwork
requirements, employers ensure that
PSDI-equipped mechanical power
presses are in safe working order,
thereby preventing severe injury and
death to press operators and other
workers who work near this equipment.
In addition, these records provide the
most efficient means for an OSHA
compliance officer to determine that an
employer performed the requirements
and that the equipment is safe.
II. Special Issues for Comment
OSHA has a particular interest in
comments on the following issues:
• Whether the proposed information
collection requirements are necessary
for the proper performance of the
Agency’s functions, including whether
the information is useful;
• The accuracy of OSHA’s estimate of
the burden (time and costs) of the
information collection requirements,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
• The quality, utility, and clarity of
the information collected; and
• Ways to minimize the burden on
employers who must comply; for
example, by using automated or other
technological information collection
and transmission techniques.
III. Proposed Actions
To date, OSHA has not recognized a
third-party organization to validate
employer and manufacturer
certifications that their PSDI equipment
and practices meet the requirements of
the Standard. Therefore, the Agency
cannot attribute burden hours and cost
to the paperwork requirements of the
Standard.
OSHA is proposing that OMB approve
the information collection requirements
specified by the Standard so that it can
enforce these requirements if employers
obtain third-party certification/
validation; thus, the Agency reports no
program changes or adjustments and
requests that it be allowed to retain its
previous estimate of one burden hour
should the requirements of the standard
be implemented.
The Agency will summarize the
comments submitted in response to this
notice and will include this summary in
the request to OMB to extend the
approval of the information collection
requirements contained in the Standard.
Type of Review: Extension of a
currently approved collection.
Title: Presence Sensing Device
Initiation (PSDI) (29 CFR 1910.217(h)).
OMB Control Number: 1218–0143.
Affected Public: Business or other forprofits; Not-for-profit organizations;

E:\FR\FM\09APN1.SGM

09APN1

sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 68 / Tuesday, April 9, 2013 / Notices
Federal Government; State, Local, or
Tribal Government.
Number of Respondents: 0.
Total Responses: 0.
Frequency: Initially; Annually; On
occasion.
Average Time per Response: 0.
Estimated Total Burden Hours: 1.
Estimated Cost (Operation and
Maintenance): $0.

V. Authority and Signature
David Michaels, Ph.D., MPH,
Assistant Secretary of Labor for
Occupational Safety and Health,
directed the preparation of this notice.
The authority for this notice is the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3506 et seq.) and Secretary of
Labor’s Order No. 1–2012 (77 FR 3912).

IV. Public Participation—Submission of
Comments on This Notice and Internet
Access to Comments and Submissions
You may submit comments in
response to this document as follows:
(1) Electronically at http://
www.regulations.gov, which is the
Federal eRulemaking Portal; (2) by
facsimile (fax); or (3) by hard copy. All
comments, attachments, and other
material must identify the Agency name
and the OSHA docket number for the
ICR (Docket No. OSHA–2010–0009).
You may supplement electronic
submissions by uploading document
files electronically. If you wish to mail
additional materials in reference to an
electronic or facsimile submission, you
must submit them to the OSHA Docket
Office (see the section of this notice
titled ADDRESSES). The additional
materials must clearly identify your
electronic comments by your name,
date, and the docket number so the
Agency can attach them to your
comments.
Due to security procedures, the use of
regular mail may cause a significant
delay in the receipt of comments. For
information about security procedures
concerning the delivery of materials by
hand, express delivery, messenger, or
courier service, please contact the
OSHA Docket Office at (202) 693–2350,
(TTY (877) 889–5627). Comments and
submissions are posted without change
at http://www.regulations.gov.
Therefore, OSHA cautions commenters
about submitting personal information
such as social security numbers and
dates of birth. Although all submissions
are listed in the http://
www.regulations.gov index, some
information (e.g., copyrighted material)
is not publicly available to read or
download through this Web site.
All submissions, including
copyrighted material, are available for
inspection and copying at the OSHA
Docket Office. Information on using the
http://www.regulations.gov Web site to
submit comments and access the docket
is available at the Web site’s ‘‘User
Tips’’ link. Contact the OSHA Docket
Office for information about materials
not available through the Web site, and
for assistance in using the Internet to
locate docket submissions.

Signed at Washington, DC, on April 3,
2013.
David Michaels,
Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational
Safety and Health.

VerDate Mar<15>2010

16:19 Apr 08, 2013

Jkt 229001

[FR Doc. 2013–08183 Filed 4–8–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–26–P

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration
[Docket No. OSHA–2010–0016]

Derricks; Extension of the Office of
Management and Budget’s (OMB)
Approval of Information Collection
(Paperwork) Requirements
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA), Labor.
ACTION: Request for public comments.
AGENCY:

SUMMARY: OSHA solicits public
comments concerning its proposal to
extend the Office of Management and
Budget’s (OMB) approval of the
information collection requirements
contained in its Standard on Derricks
(29 CFR 1910.181).
DATES: Comments must be submitted
(postmarked, sent, or received) by June
10, 2013.
ADDRESSES:
Electronically: You may submit
comments and attachments
electronically at http://
www.regulations.gov, which is the
Federal eRulemaking Portal. Follow the
instructions online for submitting
comments.
Facsimile: If your comments,
including attachments, are not longer
than 10 pages, you may fax them to the
OSHA Docket Office at (202) 693–1648.
Mail, hand delivery, express mail,
messenger, or courier service: When
using this method, you must submit a
copy of your comments and attachments
to the OSHA Docket Office, OSHA
Docket No. OSHA–2010–0016, U.S.
Department of Labor, Occupational
Safety and Health Administration,
Room N–2625, 200 Constitution Avenue
NW., Washington, DC 20210. Deliveries
(hand, express mail, messenger, and
courier service) are accepted during the
Department of Labor’s and Docket

PO 00000

Frm 00060

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

21157

Office’s normal business hours, 8:15
a.m. to 4:45 p.m., e.t.
Instructions: All submissions must
include the Agency name and OSHA
docket number (OSHA–2010–0016) for
the Information Collection Request
(ICR). All comments, including any
personal information you provide, are
placed in the public docket without
change, and may be made available
online at http://www.regulations.gov.
For further information on submitting
comments see the ‘‘Public
Participation’’ heading in the section of
this notice titled SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION.
Docket: To read or download
comments or other material in the
docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov
or the OSHA Docket Office at the
address above. All documents in the
docket (including this Federal Register
notice) are listed in the http://
www.regulations.gov index; however,
some information (e.g., copyrighted
material) is not publicly available to
read or download through the Web site.
All submissions, including copyrighted
material, are available for inspection
and copying at the OSHA Docket Office.
You may also contact Theda Kenney at
the address below to obtain a copy of
the ICR.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Theda Kenney or Todd Owen,
Directorate of Standards and Guidance,
OSHA, U.S. Department of Labor, Room
N–3609, 200 Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20210; telephone (202)
693–2222.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Department of Labor, as part of its
continuing effort to reduce paperwork
and respondent (i.e., employer) burden,
conducts a preclearance consultation
program to provide the public with an
opportunity to comment on proposed
and continuing information collection
requirements in accord with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA–95) (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)). This
program ensures that information is in
the desired format, reporting burden
(time and costs) is minimal, collection
instruments are clearly understood, and
OSHA’s estimate of the information
collection burden is accurate. The
Occupational Safety and Health Act of
1970 (the OSH Act) (29 U.S.C. 651 et
seq.) authorizes information collection
by employers as necessary or
appropriate for enforcement of the Act
or for developing information regarding
the causes and prevention of
occupational injuries, illnesses, and
accidents (29 U.S.C. 657). The OSH Act

E:\FR\FM\09APN1.SGM

09APN1