60-Day Federal Register Notice

22940

Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 74 / Wednesday, April 17, 2013 / Notices

3. Project Sponsor and Facility:
Houtzdale Municipal Authority
(Beccaria Springs), Gulich Township,
Clearfield County, Pa. Application for
surface water withdrawal of up to 5.000
mgd (peak day).
4. Project Sponsor and Facility: WPX
Energy Appalachia, LLC (Susquehanna
River), Great Bend Township,
Susquehanna County, Pa. Application
for renewal of surface water withdrawal
of up to 1.000 mgd (peak day) (Docket
No. 20090303).
Authority: Pub. L. 91–575, 84 Stat. 1509 et
seq., 18 CFR Parts 806, 807, and 808.
Dated: April 9, 2013.
Thomas W. Beauduy,
Deputy Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 2013–08991 Filed 4–16–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7040–01–P

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
Notice of Intent To Rule on Request To
Lease Airport Property for NonAeronautical Purpose at the Bradford
Regional Airport, Lewis Run, PA
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) DOT.
ACTION: Notice of request to lease airport
property for non-aeronautical purpose.
AGENCY:

The FAA proposes to rule and
invite public comment on the lease of
land for non-aeronautical purpose at the
Bradford Regional Airport, Lewis Run,
Pennsylvania under the provision 49
U.P.C. 47125(a).
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before May 17, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Comments on this
application may be mailed or delivered
to the following address:
Thomas Frungillo, Airport Director,
Bradford Regional Airport, 212
Airport Drive, Suite E, Lewis Run,
Pennsylvania 16738.
and at the FAA Harrisburg Airports
District Office:
Lori K. Pagnanelli, Manager, Harrisburg
Airports District Office, 3905
Hartzdale Dr., Suite 508, Camp Hill,
PA 17011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Charles Trice, Civil Engineer, Harrisburg
Airports District Office, location listed
above.
The request to lease property may be
reviewed in person at this same
location.

sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

SUMMARY:

aeronautical purpose at the Bradford
Regional Airport under the provisions of
Section 47125(a) of Title 49 U.S.C. On
April 9, 2013, the FAA determined that
the request to lease airport property for
non-aeronautical purpose at the
Bradford Regional Airport (BFD),
Pennsylvania, submitted by the
Bradford Regional Airport Authority
(Authority), met the procedural
requirements.
The following is a brief overview of
the request:
The Authority requests the lease of
approximately 0.50 acres of nonaeronautical airport property to the
Lafayette Township Sewer Authority
(Sewer Authority), Lewis Run,
Pennsylvania. The land was acquired
without Federal participation. The
undeveloped property is located in
Lafayette Township, east of Roberts
Road and immediately adjacent to and
north of Pennsylvania State Route 59.
The Sewer Authority is proposing to use
the property to construct an extension to
the existing Lafayette Township
underground sewer system, and connect
the extension to an existing sewer line
on airport property. As shown on the
Airport Layout Plan, the property does
not serve an aeronautical purpose and is
not needed for airport development. The
sewer line will also not interfere with
normal airport operations. There will be
no proceeds from the lease of the
property, however, the airport will
receive equal if not greater intangible
benefits including: the allocation of two
(2) tap-in connections to the sewer line;
and the allowance of two (2) Equivalent
Dwelling Units, each of which
apportion 400 gallons of sewage flow
per day into the new system.
Any person may inspect the request
by appointment at the FAA office
address listed above. Interested persons
are invited to comment on the proposed
lease. All comments will be considered
by the FAA to the extent practicable.
Issued in Camp Hill, Pennsylvania, April 9,
2013.
Lori K. Pagnanelli,
Manager, Harrisburg Airports District Office.
[FR Doc. 2013–08953 Filed 4–16–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P

The FAA
invites public comment on the request
to lease airport property for non-

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

VerDate Mar<15>2010

16:50 Apr 16, 2013

Jkt 229001

PO 00000

Frm 00099

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Maritime Administration
[Docket No. MARAD 2013 0045]

Information Collection Available for
Public Comments and
Recommendations
Notice and request for
comments.

ACTION:

In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this
notice announces the Maritime
Administration’s (MARAD’s) intentions
to request extension of approval for
three years of a currently approved
information collection.
DATES: Comments should be submitted
on or before June 17, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr.
Shashi Kumar, U.S. Merchant Marine
Academy, Kings Point, NY 11024.
Telephone: 516–726–5833; FAX: 516–
773–5539, or Email:
[email protected]. Copies of this
collection also can be obtained from that
office.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title of Collection: United States
Merchant Marine Academy Alumni
Survey.
Type of Request: Extension of
currently approved information
collection.
OMB Control Number: 2133–0542.
Form Numbers: KP2–66–DK1, KP2–
67–DK2, KP2–68–DK3, KP2–69–ENG1,
KP2–70–ENG2, KP2–71–ENG3.
Expiration Date of Approval: Three
years from date of approval by the
Office of Management and Budget.
Summary of Collection of
Information: The United States
Merchant Marine Academy is an
accredited federal service academy that
confers BS and MS degrees. The
Academy is expected to assess its
educational outcomes and report those
findings to its Regional Accreditation
authority in order to maintain the
institution’s degree granting status.
Periodic survey of alumni cohorts and
analysis of the data gathered is a routine
higher education assessment practice in
the United States.
Need and Use of the Information: The
information gathered will be analyzed
and used for program management and
improvement.
Description of Respondents:
Respondents are graduates of the U.S.
Merchant Marine Academy.
Annual Responses: 500 responses.
Annual Burden: 125 hours.
Comments: Comments should refer to
the docket number that appears at the
SUMMARY:

E:\FR\FM\17APN1.SGM

17APN1

Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 74 / Wednesday, April 17, 2013 / Notices
top of this document. Written comments
may be submitted to the Docket Clerk,
U.S. DOT Dockets, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590. Comments also
may be submitted by electronic means
via the Internet at http://
www.regulations.gov. Specifically
address whether this information
collection is necessary for proper
performance of the functions of the
agency and will have practical utility,
accuracy of the burden estimates, ways
to minimize this burden, and ways to
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity
of the information to be collected. All
comments received will be available for
examination at the above address
between 10 a.m. and 5 p.m. EDT (or
EST), Monday through Friday, except
Federal Holidays. An electronic version
of this document is available on the
World Wide Web at http://
www.regulations.gov.
Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search
the electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (Volume
65, Number 70; Pages 19477–78) or you
may visit http://www.regulations.gov.
Authority: 49 CFR 1.93.
Dated: April 11, 2013.
By Order of the Maritime Administrator.
Julie P. Agarwal,
Secretary, Maritime Administration.
[FR Doc. 2013–09020 Filed 4–16–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–81–P

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA–2007–28927; Notice 2]

Sidump’r Trailer Company, Inc., Grant
of Petition for Decision of
Inconsequential Noncompliance
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Grant of petition.
AGENCY:

Sidump’r Trailer Company,
Inc. (Sidump’r) has determined that the
rear impact guards on certain trailers
that it manufactured between January
10, 2006 and April 13, 2007 do not
comply with paragraph S5.1 of 49 CFR
571.224, Federal Motor Vehicle Safety
Standard (FMVSS) No. 224, Rear Impact
Protection. Sidump’r has filed an

sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

SUMMARY:

VerDate Mar<15>2010

16:50 Apr 16, 2013

Jkt 229001

appropriate report pursuant to 49 CFR
Part 573, Defect and Noncompliance
Responsibility and Reports, dated April
20, 2007.
Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 30118 (d) and
30120 (h) and the rule implementing
those provisions at 49 CFR Part 556,
Sidump’r has petitioned for an
exemption from the notification and
remedy requirements of 49 U.S.C.
Chapter 301 on the basis that this
noncompliance is inconsequential to
motor vehicle safety. Notice of receipt of
a petition was published, with a 30-day
public comment period, on August 16,
2007, in the Federal Register (72 FR
46127). The National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA)
received no comments. To view the
petition and all supporting documents
log onto the Federal Docket
Management System (FDMS) Web site
at: http://www.regulations.gov/. Then
follow the online search instructions to
locate docket number ‘‘NHTSA–2007–
28927.’’
For further information on this
decision, contact Mr. Luis Figueroa,
Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance,
NHTSA, telephone (202) 366–5298,
facsimile (202) 366–1002.
Trailers Involved: Affected are
approximately 416 model 223, 325 and
425 side dump bulk material hauling
trailers manufactured by Sidump’r
between January 10, 2006 and April 13,
2007.
Summary of Sidump’r’s Analysis and
Arguments: Sidump’r first became
aware of the noncompliance of these
trailers when Sidump’r received a
customer inquiry on or about February
27, 2007 regarding the rear impact
guards installed on the subject trailers.
As a result of this inquiry, Sidump’r
stated that it commenced a thorough
engineering evaluation of the rear end of
the subject trailers to determine whether
they meet the requirements of FMVSS
No. 224. Following this engineering
evaluation and after consultation with
its counsel, Sidump’r determined that
the trailers do not comply with FMVSS
No. 224.
Specifically, Sidump’r has
determined that the location of those
guards does not meet the requirements
of paragraph S5.1.3 of FMVSS No. 224
because there is a ‘‘push block’’ located
at the rear of the trailer chassis
extending 23.62 inches (600 mm) to the
rear of the rear impact guard. Sidump’r
stated that it considered the ‘‘push
blocks’’ to be the ‘‘rear extremities’’ of
the subject trailers. Therefore, it
concluded that the rearmost surface of
the horizontal members of the rear
impact guards are located 11.62 inches
(295 mm) too far forward of the ‘‘rear

PO 00000

Frm 00100

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

22941

extremity’’ of the trailers to conform
with the requirements of paragraph
S5.1.3.
Sidump’r also examined the
possibility of the ‘‘push block’’ itself
serving as the rear impact guard. It
determined that the ‘‘push block’’ itself
does not constitute a compliant rear
impact guard as originally installed
because it exceeds the maximum ground
clearance of 22 inches (560 mm)
allowed by paragraph S5.1.2 of FMVSS
No. 224 by 1.5 inches (38 mm).
Sidump’r stated that it has corrected
the problem that caused the
noncompliance in the trailers they
produced after April 20, 2007 by
modifying the design of the trailers to
incorporate an additional horizontal
member mounted to the underside of
the ‘‘push block’’ assembly.
Sidump’r also stated that it believes
this noncompliance is inconsequential
to motor vehicle safety and that no
further corrective action is warranted
due to the geometric characteristics of
the trailers and the nature of their field
usage. Specifically, Sidump’r makes the
arguments that the overall level of safety
of the subject trailers is equivalent to a
compliant trailer because their ‘‘push
block’’ is equipped with a guard-like
structure that is comparable to a
compliant rear impact guard based on
dimensional considerations, and on a
simulation of the guard performance 1
when subjected to the loads required
under FMVSS No. 223. Sidump’r
additionally supported its position that
the overall level of safety of the
noncompliant trailers is equivalent to
comparable trailers by comparing them
to road construction controlled
horizontal discharge trailers and by
citing several previous decisions where
NHTSA granted temporary exemptions
from compliance with FMVSS No. 224
as the result of petitions filed under 49
CFR Part 555 Temporary Exemption
From Motor Vehicle Safety and Bumper
Standards for noncompliances that it
considers similar in consequence to
those covered in this petition.
Discussion
Requirement Background
Paragraph S5.1.3 Guard Rear Surface
of FMVSS No. 224 requires:
At any height 560 mm or more above the
ground, the rearmost surface of the horizontal
member of the guard shall be located as close
as practical to a transverse vertical plane
tangent to the rear extremity of the vehicle,
but no more than 305 mm forward of that
1 Fred P. Smith, P.E., CSP, Under Ride Report
(Alpine Engineering and Design, Inc., 2007).
Supplemental petition data as submitted on May
14, 2008 to docket number NHTSA–2007–28927.

E:\FR\FM\17APN1.SGM

17APN1