CMS-8003 Supporting Statement Part A [rev 9-4-2013 by OSORA PRA]

CMS-8003 Supporting Statement Part A [rev 9-4-2013 by OSORA PRA].doc

Home & Community Based Waiver Requests and Supporting Regulations; 42 CFR 440.180, 441.300-.310 (CMS-8003)

OMB: 0938-0449

Document [doc]
Download: doc | pdf

Supporting Statement Part A

Home and Community-Based Services (HCBS) Waiver Request

CMS-8003, OCN 0938-0449


Background


The Center for Medicaid and CHIP Services (CMCS) within CMS, requests renewal of its application utilized by States to apply for a 1915(c) Home and Community Based Services (HCBS) Waiver.


Section 1915(c) authorizes the Secretary of Health and Human Services to waive certain specific Medicaid statutory requirements so that a State may offer home and community based services to state-specified target group(s) of Medicaid beneficiaries who need a level of institutional care that is provided under the Medicaid State plan. Section 1915(c) HCBS waivers were first authorized in statute in the Omnibus Budget and Reconciliation Act (OBRA) of 1981, with amendments made in 1985, 1986, 1987, 1988, 1990 and 1997 [Note: Attachment B to this package contains the full text of Section 1915(c), as amended]. Final regulations for the 1915(c) waiver program were published on July 25, 1994. Together, the statute and regulations set forth guidance for states regarding the design and implementation of their 1915(c) HCBS waiver programs. In order to adhere to the statute and regulations, States must have mechanisms in place to meet six statutory assurances: Health and Welfare; Financial Accountability; Level of Care of Individuals Served; Service Plans; Qualified Providers; and, Administrative Accountability of the Single State Medicaid Agency.


As of 2013, there are more than 300 HCBS waivers in 47 States and the District of Columbia. These waivers are increasingly utilized by States as the predominant vehicle for community-based long term care services for vulnerable populations.


The Government Accountability Office (GAO) issued a report in 2003 which questioned CMS’ oversight of the States in their management and operations of HCBS waivers. The GAO report was expressly critical of the lack of information that CMS collected from states about their waiver operations, and specifically about states’ quality assurance and improvement activities. Senators Grassley and Breaux sent CMS correspondence that expressed similar concerns. The report and the letter served to provide CMS with an opportunity to improve oversight of the States’ HCBS programs through a multi-pronged approach. In addition to refining CMS guidance and providing States with technical assistance regarding quality, CMS redesigned the application used by States to request HCBS waivers. Improvements to the application were essential to obtaining detailed information from States on the waiver programs, and the strategies employed by the State to meet all of the statutory requirements, particularly assuring the health and welfare of individuals served through the waiver.


CMS revised the waiver application for Section 1915(c) HCBS waivers, and developed a web-based application for States and CMS to use for the submission, review, amendment, renewal and approval of these applications. The revised, web-based application for HCBS waivers contains greater detail on the programs than its paper-based predecessor (developed in 1995). This detail allows CMS to obtain a full breadth of knowledge about the program before rendering a decision on its approval or continuation. Furthermore, the web-based format of the application provides CMS with unprecedented aggregate data regarding the structure and design of these programs, including the anticipated costs and numbers of persons to be served. In addition to the application, CMS developed a complete set of instructions to accompany the document. These instructions and technical guidance provide specific instructions on how to complete the form, and provide all statutory, regulatory and policy guidance applicable to the waiver program.


A. Justification


1. Need and Legal Basis


As indicated above, renewal of this form is essential for the Secretary, and his/her designee at CMS, to determine whether a State’s program meets all applicable statutory and regulatory requirements. In addition to the statutory assurances contained in Section 1915(c), each State’s program must comport with all other elements of Medicaid law except for three notable areas for which waivers are permitted under 1915(c): Section 1902(a)(10)(B), Comparability; Section 1902(a)(1), Statewideness; and, 1902(a)(10)(C)(i)(III), Income and Resources for the Medically Needy.


Within Section 1915(c), there is a requirement that the State must assure the health and welfare of the individuals served within the waiver. This is a standard unique in Medicaid to 1915(c) waivers, and it establishes a significantly higher threshold for approval than other provisions of Title XIX of the Social Security Act.


CMS must review each waiver on its own merits, and each waiver must be judged against all applicable statutory and regulatory requirements. The web-based application eases the paperwork associated with the submission, review, approval and renewal of waiver applications, while simultaneously providing CMS with the information necessary to determine the scope, structure and operation of each waiver program. In addition to the benefits for each individual waiver, the web-based application provides vital national data on long-term care services across the country.


2. Information Users


The web-based application will be used by CMS to review and adjudicate individual waiver actions. The web-based application will also be used by States to submit and revise their waiver requests to CMS.


3. Use of Information Technology


The online tool provides automated calculation features, reduces the need for redundant data entry, improves transparency and record retention capabilities (for both the State and the Federal government), eases submission, eases Federal review and approval activities, and simplifies and standardizes data retention activities. CMS seeks to make only the web-based version of the form available for use by States to ensure consistency of information, accessibility of information, and aggregated information on the country’s home and community based services programs.


4. Duplication of Efforts


The data captured on the Web-Based 1915(c) Waiver Application are not duplicated through any other public information collection.


5. Small Businesses


This collection of information does not involve small businesses or other small entities. Rather, information is collected from Medicaid State agencies.


6. Less Frequent Collection


The frequency with which data is collected is dictated in statute. States seeking a 1915(c) waiver must submit an initial waiver request, which is approved for a three year period. In order to renew a 1915(c) waiver, the State must submit an application. Once a waiver is renewed the first time, it moves to a 5-year renewal cycle. Amendments, which are done at the States’ discretion, may be completed at any time during a waiver’s approval period.


Section 1915(c) waivers are entirely discretionary on the part of the State.


7. Special Circumstances


There are no special circumstances involved in the collection of information from the States concerning implementation of their HCBSW.


8. Federal Register/Outside Consultation


The 60-day Federal Register notice published on August 16, 2013 (78 FR 50057). No comments were received.


Beginning in 2003 through present, CMS has consulted regularly with States and their representative associations on the redesign to the HCBS waiver application. In addition, CMS commissioned a study of some States who were early users of the web-based form (which became available to State in November 2006, with refinements and revisions made in 2007 and 2008 – reflecting some improvements to the technical aspects of the web-based application). Overall, the feedback on the revised waiver application in its web-based format has been positive. The CMS Central and Regional Office have seen an increased efficiency in the review, negotiation and approval of the waiver applications submitted by States, as well as reliable data storage and retention of all official actions.


9. Payments/Gifts to Respondents


No payments or gifts will be given to respondents.


10. Confidentiality


No assurances of confidentiality have been provided.


11. Sensitive Questions


No questions of a sensitive nature are asked.


12. Burden Estimates (Hours & Wages)


The estimate covers 305 waivers currently in operation in 48 States and the District of Columbia serving over one million recipients at a cost of more than $25 billion, and is based on an evaluation of the activities comprising the State record keeping and reporting processes, and CMS’s review and approval of 1915(c) waivers.


In estimating the burden on the States, we considered a number of factors, including the amount of anticipated staff time and salary level necessary to ascertain and enter required information for all waivers (initial and renewal), the increased ease of the web-based application, the more efficient review and approval process, and the simplified renewal process.


Currently, there are 47 States and the District of Columbia which operate more than 300 Section 1915(c) waivers. CMS assumes that each of these jurisdictions will utilize the application for waiver continuation. In addition to the existing pool of waivers, CMS estimates that 8 new waiver applications will be submitted annually by States seeking to expand the array of community based services available to populations who would otherwise require the level of care provided in institutional settings.


New Waivers

In order to initiate a waiver, a State must submit an application to CMS for consideration and approval. The first time a State completes the web-based application, significant time and attention is required to complete all required fields. As indicated above, CMS anticipates 8 new waivers annually. The estimated number of hours to develop a new waiver application is 160 hours. Thus, the total estimated amount of time spent on all new waiver application completion annually is 1280 hours.


Renewal Waivers

On an annual basis, approximately 63 renewal applications are submitted to CMS for review and approval. As of 2013, all but two 1915(c) waivers are included in the web-based system. CMS expects that, for the next three years, states will submit 63 waiver applications for renewal in the system. Renewals in the WMS are more efficient than new applications since much of the data carries forth from the previously approved application and the state need only make modifications to the data as necessary to reflect changes or improvements to their waiver program. CMS continues to estimate that the burden for renewing waivers in the web-based application would be approximately 75 hours.


8 New Applications x 160 hours = 1,280 hours for new applications


63 Renewal Applications x 75 hours = 4,725 hours for subsequent web-based renewal applications


1,280 hours + 4,725 hours = 6,005 total hours of State burden


The estimate of annual cost to the states is $330,811 for the completion of both new and renewal 1915(c) waiver applications.


New Waivers

Salary/Labor

8 Applications x 160 hours = 1,280 hours

$79,864 (Federal Salary GS12-3) x 80% = $63,891 (State Salary)

$63,891/2080 = $30.72 x 1.088 (retirement/insurance) = $33.42 = hourly rate*

$33.42 x 1,280 hours = Estimated State Cost for New Waiver Applications = $42,777


Web-Based Renewal Applications

Salary/Labor

63 Applications x 75 hours = 4,725 hours

$79,864 (Federal Salary GS 12-3) x 80% = $63,891 (State Salary)

$63,891/2080 = $30.72 x 1.088 (retirement/insurance) = $33.42 = hourly rate*

4,725 hours x $33.42 = Est. Cost for Subsequent Web-Based Renewal App. = $157,910

Overhead (18% of Salary/Labor) $36,124

Computer and Other Administrative Costs (47 States x $2000) $94,000

Total Estimated State Costs $330,811


Because CMS reimburses states for 50% of the administrative costs incurred to administer the Medicaid State plan, CMS anticipates the total estimated state administrative costs to be: $165,406.

*The hourly rate was computed using the calendar year 2013 Federal pay scale for the Washington D.C.-Baltimore area. We divided the annual amount by 2,080 to arrive at the hourly rate.


13. Capital Costs


There are no capital costs associated with this collection of information.


14. Cost to Federal Government


The estimate of annualized cost to the federal government is $463,455 for CMS’ review of States’ new and renewal applications for home and community-based services waivers. This estimate is based on CMS’ recent experience in reviewing State cost reports.


New Waivers

Salary/Labor

8 Applications x 160 hours = 1,280 hours

$79,864 (Federal Salary GS 12-3)

$79,864/2080 = $38.40 x 1.088 (retirement/insurance) = $41.78 = hourly rate*

$41.78 x 1,280 hours = Estimated Federal Cost for New Waiver Applications = $53,478


Web-Based Renewal Applications

Salary/Labor

63 Applications x 75 hours = 4,725 hours

$79,864 (Federal Salary GS 12-3)

$79,864/2080 = $38.40 x 1.088 (retirement/insurance) = $41.78 = hourly rate*

4,725 hours x $41.78= Est. Cost for Subsequent Web-Based Renewal App. = $197,411


Overhead (18% of Salary/Labor) $ 45,160

Computer and Other Administrative Costs $ 2,000

Reimbursement for State administrative costs: $165,406

Total Estimated Federal Costs $463,455


*The hourly rate was computed using the calendar year 2013 Federal pay scale for the Washington D.C.-Baltimore area.


15. Changes to Burden


The burden estimates for this renewal PRA application have not increased. The burden has actually decreased from 9,059 hr to 6,005 hr, since all but 2 waivers are already in the system. All but two waivers in the system only require the states to update and not newly populate fields in the application, and all states have attained familiarity with the application and system technology.


Background; from 2008 PRA application:

The burden estimates provided in the 2008 PRA application increased from the 1995 version of the application for 1915(c) HCBS waivers. The increase was directly related to the increased information requested in the revised waiver application. As indicated in the 2003 GAO report and in correspondence from Senators Grassley and Breaux, CMS needed to improve its familiarity and oversight of these programs that serve vulnerable citizens. The increased information not only makes the program design proposed by the state transparent to CMS, it also provides a document for use by the public that explains the waiver program, including persons and geographical areas served, services offered, individual rights and, importantly, the mechanisms used by the State to meet all of the statutory requirements of the 1915(c) waiver program.


The utilization of the web-based application minimized the increased burden, however. The web-based application saves both the state and Federal users’ time by eliminating redundant data entry requirements, streamlining the submission and approval processes, and handling data retention requirements. Furthermore, the web-based application provides unprecedented national data aggregation capabilities, providing CMS with information necessary to successfully monitor state program design and trend information.


While CMS regrets an increase in burden, ensuring the safety and well-being of the individuals served in these waivers takes paramount priority. The revised waiver application provides vital information on the structure and operation of these critical programs.


16. Publication/Tabulation Dates


This collection of information is not intended for publication.


17. Expiration Date


There are no exceptions to the expiration date.


18. Certification Statement


There are no exceptions to the certification statement.


B. Collections of Information Employing Statistical Methods


This collection of information does not employ statistical methods.



7



File Typeapplication/msword
AuthorCMS
Last Modified ByMitch Bryman
File Modified2013-09-05
File Created2013-09-04

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy