Supporting Statement for 1545-2073

Supporting Statement for 1545-2073.doc

Substitute Mortality Tables for Single Employer Defined Benefit Plans

OMB: 1545-2073

Document [doc]
Download: doc | pdf

SUPPORTING STATEMENT

OMB #1545-2073



  1. CIRCUMSTANCES NECESSITATING COLLECTION OF INFORMATION


Section 601.201(a)(1) of the Statement of Procedural Rules (26 C.F.R. § 601.201(a)(1)) provides that it is the practice of the Internal Revenue Service (“Service”) to answer inquiries of individuals and organizations, whenever appropriate in the interest of sound tax administration as to the tax effects of their transactions. While the general revenue procedure has obtained a control number (1545-1520) from the Office of Management and Budget, which has been renewed several times, this specialized revenue procedure, which was mandated by the Congress in the Pension Protection Act of 2006, could not be placed in final form until the applicable regulations were almost complete. The authority to consider letter rulings was transferred to the Secretary of the Treasury (and his delegate). Revenue Procedure 2007-37 has been updated (i.e., in effect, superseded) by Revenue Procedure 2008-62, 2008-42 IRB 935. Revenue Procedure 2007-37 may be relied on only for requests submitted prior to December 1, 2008. This revenue procedure describes the process for obtaining a letter ruling as to the acceptability of substitute mortality tables under section 430(h)(3)(C) of the Code.


  1. USE OF DATA


The data will be used by the Internal Revenue Service to evaluate a substitute mortality table of an employer that maintains a defined benefit pension plan and will assist the employers in the notification process. This data may be shared with the Employee Benefits Security Administration of the U.S. Department of Labor or the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation pursuant to the enforcement provisions of title III of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 as amended.


  1. USE OF IMPROVED INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY TO REDUCE BURDEN


IRS Publications, Regulations, Notices, and Letters are to be electronically enabled on an as practicable basis in accordance with the IRS Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998.


  1. EFFORTS TO IDENTIFY DUPLICATION


We have attempted to eliminate duplication within the agency wherever possible.


  1. METHODS TO MINIMIZE BURDEN ON SMALL BUSINESSES OR OTHER SMALL ENTITIES


The regulations under section 430(h) of the Code preclude a small business or other small entity from using substitute mortality tables. Moreover, the revenue procedure requires that the applicable plan have certain populations and experience in order to establish valid substitute mortality tables. Generally, these factors can only be found in larger plans. In addition, the revenue procedure contains a checklist to assist applicants in ascertaining whether they have completed the information sought by the Service.


  1. CONSEQUENCES OF LESS FREQUENT COLLECTION ON FEDERAL PROGRAMS OR POLICY ACTIVITIES


Not applicable.


  1. SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES REQUIRING DATA COLLECTION TO BE INCONSISTENT WITH GUIDELINES IN 5 CFR 1320.5(d)(2)


Not applicable.


  1. CONSULTATION WITH INDIVIDUALS OUTSIDE OF THE AGENCY ON AVAILABILITY OF DATA, FREQUENCY OF COLLECTION, CLARITY OF INSTRUCTIONS AND FORMS, AND DATA ELEMENTS


Revenue Procedure 2007-37, 2007-25 I.R.B. 1433, was published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin on June 18, 2007. Revenue Procedure 2007-37 has been updated (i.e., in effect, superseded) by Revenue Procedure 2008-62, 2008-42 I.R.B. 935, on October 20, 2008. Revenue Procedure 2007-37 may be relied on only for requests submitted prior to December 1, 2008.


We received no comments during the comment period in response to the Federal Register notice dated August 29, 2013 (78 FR 53504).


  1. EXPLANATION OF DECISION TO PROVIDE ANY PAYMENT OR GIFT TO RESPONDENTS


Not applicable.


  1. ASSURANCE OF CONFIDENTIALITY OF RESPONSES


Generally, tax returns and tax return information are confidential as required by 26 USC 6103.


  1. JUSTIFICATION OF SENSITIVE QUESTIONS


In accordance with the Privacy Act of 1974, Treasury has published its complete Privacy Act systems of records notices, which include all maintained records systems as of January 2, 2014; six systems have been amended, altered, or added since April 20, 2010, when the complete notices were last published. See 79 F.R. 209-261 and 79 F.R. 183-206, which was published on January 2, 2014.


A privacy impact assessment (PIA) has been conducted for information collected under this request as part of the “Business Master File (BMF)” system and a Privacy Act System of Records notice (SORN) has been issued for this system under IRS 24.046-Customer Account Data Engine Business Master File. The Department of Treasury PIAs can be found at http://www.treasury.gov/privacy/PIAs/Pages/default.aspx.


Title 26 USC 6109 requires inclusion of identifying numbers in returns, statements, or other documents for securing proper identification of persons required to make such returns, statements, or documents and is the authority for social security numbers (SSNs) in IRS systems.


  1. ESTIMATED BURDEN OF INFORMATION COLLECTION


The total estimated average annual burden varies from 335 hours to 681 hours with a total estimated average annual burden of 508 hours by 50 respondents for a total of 25,400 hours annually.


Estimates of the annualized cost to respondents for the hour burdens shown are not available at this time.


  1. ESTIMATED TOTAL ANNUAL COST BURDEN TO RESPONDENTS


As suggested by OMB, our Federal Register notice dated August 29, 2013, (78 FR 53504), requested public comments on estimates of cost burden that are not captured in the estimates of burden hours, i.e., estimates of capital or start-up costs and costs of operation, maintenance, and purchase of services to provide information. However, we did not receive any responses from taxpayers on this subject. As a result, estimates of the cost burdens are not available at this time.


  1. ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED COST TO THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT


Not applicable.


  1. REASONS FOR CHANGE IN BURDEN


There are no changes to the paperwork burden previously approved by OMB. This submission is for renewal purposes only.


  1. PLANS FOR TABULATION, STATISTICAL ANALYSIS AND PUBLICATION


Not applicable.


  1. REASONS WHY DISPLAYING THE OMB EXPIRATION DATE IS INAPPROPRIATE


We believe that displaying the OMB expiration date is inappropriate because it could cause confusion by leading taxpayers to believe that the information collection will sunset as of the expiration date. Taxpayers are not likely to be aware that the Service intends to request renewal of the OMB approval and obtain a new expiration date before the old OMB approval expires.


  1. EXCEPTIONS TO THE CERTIFICATION STATEMENT ON OMB FORM 83-I


Not applicable.




Note: The following paragraph applies to all of the collections of information in this submission:


An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless the collection of information displays a valid OMB control number. Books or records relating to a collection of information must be retained as long as their contents may become material in the administration of any internal revenue law. Generally, tax returns and tax return information are confidential, as required by 26 U.S.C. 6103.


File Typeapplication/msword
File Title#1545-2073 supporting statement
AuthorInternal Revenue Service
Last Modified ByX50HB
File Modified2014-03-28
File Created2014-03-28

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy