Form 1840-0973 Congressionally-directed grant Final report

Congressionally-Directed Template
Preview Report
Grantee:
Report: Final Report
Final Report Cover Sheet
1. PR/Award No.:
2. Program:
3. Institutional Name & Address:

4. Project Title:
5. US Project Director / Contact Person:
Name:
Title:
Address:

Phone:
Fax:
Email:
6. Performance Reporting Period:
7. Current Budget Period:
8. Authorized Representative:
Name:
Title:
Phone:
I. Project Description
Project Title:
Abstract:
The Husson College Occupational Therapy Department will develop the curriculum and
training materials for a certificate program in Assistive Technology (AT). The program's
target audience will be the broad range of health care practitioners who serve clients
who many benefit from AT and AT evaluations. The course will consist of five courses
and when completed will prepare graduates for certification as assistive technology
practitioners by the Rehabilitation Engineering and Assistive Technology Society of
North America (RESNA). Four of the five courses will also be available as individual
courses.
Online References:
Subject Categories:

Contacts:

Directors

Project Director

Phone:
Fax:
Email:
II. Budget
Project Funds Awarded by FIPSE
(1)Budget (2)Expenditures (3)Estimated Balance

A. Administrative Costs
1. Personnel

$0

2. Fringe Benefits

$0

3. Travel

$0

4. Equipment

$0

5. Supplies

$0

6. Contractual

$0

7. Construction

$0

8. Other

$0

B. Language Stipends (EC-US, US-Brazil projects only)

$0

C. Mobility Stipends (EC-US, US-Brazil projects only)

$0

D. Indirect Costs

$0

E. Training Stipends and Scholarships
Total

$0
$0

$0

$0

Project Cost Share Totals Provided by Institution (and Partners if applicable)
(1)Budget (2)Expenditures (3)Estimated Balance

A. Administrative Costs
1. Personnel

$0

2. Fringe Benefits

$0

3. Travel

$0

4. Equipment

$0

5. Supplies

$0

6. Contractual

$0

7. Construction

$0

8. Other

$0

B. Language Stipends (EC-US, US-Brazil projects only)

$0

C. Mobility Stipends (EC-US, US-Brazil projects only)

$0

D. Indirect Costs

$0

E. Training Stipends and Scholarships
Total
Budget Narrative:
III. Performance Information

$0
$0

$0

$0

Section 1 - Financial Data
1.

Did your organization expend more than $500,000 in Federal funds during the last fiscal year?
( ) Yes

2.

( ) No

( ) N/A

When was your most recent OMB Circular A-133 audit? (Leave blank if you have not had one)
Fiscal Year:

3.

Were there any findings under your most recent audit?
( ) Yes

4.

( ) N/A

( ) No

( ) N/A

Does your organization have procedures in place to minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of
funds to your organization by a Federal agency and your organization’s expenditures of such funds?
( ) Yes

7.

( ) No

Does your organization maintain time distribution records for each employee to account for the total
activity for which an employee is compensated from the present grant award?
( ) Yes

6.

( ) N/A

Have all the findings been resolved through corrective actions?
( ) Yes

5.

( ) No

( ) No

( ) N/A

Does your organization have a current negotiated indirect cost rate agreement?
( ) Yes
( ) No

Negotiated indirect cost percentage rate (please do not include the "%" sign):
Expiration Date:

8.

Total funds expended for for-profits? (No commas)
Equipment: $

Consultants: $

Contractual: $

9.

Total funds expended for scholarships and stipends? (No commas)
Scholarships: $

Stipends: $

Section 2 - Performance Data
1.

Has your project director changed during this reporting period?
( ) Yes
( ) No

1b. If you answered "Yes," please provide the name, title, address, telephone, fax, and E-mail address of
the new project director:

2.

What is the primary purpose of your Congressionally-directed grant? (Check all that apply)
( ) Purchase of equipment, computers, or technology
( ) Endowment
( ) Professional Development
( ) Provide specialized training to underserved
populations
( ) Support an academic program
( ) Enhance student services
( ) Provide service for veterans
( ) Other (Specify)

3.

) Teacher education
) Health care education
) Math education
) Civic engagement/leadership education

( ) Homeland security
( ) Professional education (law, business, journalism,
etc.)
( ) N/A

( ) Provide support for research activities
( ) Provide services to learners with
disabilities
( ) Job Training

( ) Science education
( ) Distance learning education
( ) Humanities or arts education
( ) Vocational or On-the-job training
education
( ) Unspecified curriculum development
( ) Other (Specify)

Methods used to determine outcomes:
(
(
(
(
(
(
(

5.

) Scholarships
) Conferences
) Initiate a new academic program
) Curriculum development

If the purpose of the grant was to support new or ongoing academic programs, in which area(s) of study
would it pertain? (Check all that apply)
(
(
(
(

4.

(
(
(
(

) Assessments
) Surveys
) Observations
) Focus Groups
) Outcomes accounted for by deliverables (e.g., equipment purchased)
) Outcomes consisted of the number of awards made (e.g., scholarships awarded)
) Other (Specify)

Deliverables as outcomes of the grant: (Check all that apply)

(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(

) Project-based conferences
) Conference presentations/speakers
) Project-specific Web-site
) Software programs
) Video Materials
) Printed course materials
) Technical reports
) CD-ROMs/DVDs
) Other (Specify)

(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(

) Conference materials
) Course Modules
) Textbooks
) Books
) Guides and handbooks
) Web-based course materials
) Journal articles
) Purchased equipment

6.

List activities which addressed specific project objectives:

7.

Identify project outcomes (results of meeting objectives) that have notably impacted the Congressional
purpose of your grant. Number each separately and elaborate.

8.

Were any new jobs created as a result of the grant award?
( ) Yes
( ) No

8a. If yes, please estimate the number of jobs:

9.

Do you intend to apply for any competitive grant funding to continue or expand this project within the
next 12 months?
( ) Yes
( ) No

10. FIPSE administers the Congressionally-directed grants for postsecondary education by reviewing
applications, distributing grant management materials, and providing technical assistance on projectspecific issues. Please rate the overall quality of FIPSE's service to your project:
(
(
(
(
(

) Superior
) Very satisfactory
) About average
) Somewhat unsatisfactory
) Very poor

11. If you rated FIPSE's service as less than "Superior", please tell us how our service may be improved.

IV. Report Files
No files available.
�