0256 Supporting Statement 2013 Oct 28

0256 Supporting Statement 2013 Oct 28.doc

Infant Formula Requirements

OMB: 0910-0256

Document [doc]
Download: doc | pdf

OMB Control No. 0910-0256

Infant Formula Requirements


SUPPORTING STATEMENT


Terms of Clearance: None.


A. Justification


1. Circumstances Making the Collection of Information Necessary

Statutory requirements for infant formula under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act) are intended to protect the health of infants and include a number of reporting and recordkeeping requirements. Among other things, section 412 of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 350a) requires manufacturers of infant formula to establish and adhere to quality control procedures, notify us when a batch of infant formula that has left the manufacturers' control may be adulterated or misbranded, and keep records of distribution. We have issued regulations to implement the FD&C Act's requirements for infant formula in parts 106 and 107 (21 CFR parts 106 and 107). We also regulate the labeling of infant formula under the authority of section 403 of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 343). Under our labeling regulations for infant formula in part 107, the label of an infant formula must include nutrient information and directions for use. The purpose of these labeling requirements is to ensure that consumers have the information they need to prepare and use infant formula appropriately.


In a notice of proposed rulemaking published in the Federal Register of July 9, 1996 (61 FR 36154), we proposed changes in our infant formula regulations, including some of those listed in tables 1, 2, and 3 of this document. The document included revised burden estimates for the proposed changes and solicited public comment. In the Federal Register of April 28, 2003 (68 FR 22341) (the 2003 reopening), FDA reopened the comment period for the proposed rule. Interested persons were originally given until June 27, 2003, to comment on these issues and the 1996 proposal. However, in response to a request, the comment period was extended to August 26, 2003 (68 FR 38247, June 27, 2003). FDA again reopened the comment period on August 1, 2006 (71 FR 43392) (the 2006 reopening) for 45 days to accept comment on a limited set of issues. In a notice of proposed rulemaking published in the Federal Register of April 16, 2013 (78 FR 22442), we proposed to amend our regulations on nutrient specifications and labeling for infant formula to add the mineral selenium to the list of required nutrients and to establish minimum and maximum levels of selenium in infant formula. The document also included revised burden estimates for the proposed changes and solicited public comment. In the interim, FDA is seeking an extension of OMB approval for the current regulations so that we can continue to collect information while the proposals are pending.


FDA requests extension of OMB approval for the information collections requirements contained in the following citations:

Section 412(d) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act - Reporting


Requires submission to the agency of information specified in section 412(d) of the FD&C Act. This includes, under section 412(d)(1) a quantitative formulation of the infant formula, a description of any reformulation or change in processing, assurances that the formula will not be marketed until it meets the requirements of subsection (b)(1) and (I) as demonstrated by testing required under subsection (b)(3), and assurances that the processing complies with subsection (b)(2). In addition, under section 412(d)(2), after the first production of an infant formula, a written verification is required which demonstrates that the formula complies with requirements of subsections (b)(1), (b)(2)(A), (b)(2)(B)(I), (b)(2)(B)(iii), (b)(3)(A), (b)(3)(C), and (I). Furthermore, under section 412(d)(3), if the manufacturer of an infant formula determines that a change in formulation or processing of the formula may affect whether the formula is adulterated under subsection (a), the manufacturer shall, before the first processing of the infant formula, make the submission to the Secretary required by section 412(d)(1).


21 CFR 106.100 - Recordkeeping


Requires maintenance and retention of records associated with microbiological/nutrient testing, quality control procedures, audits and investigation of consumer complaints.


21 CFR 106.120(b) - Reporting

Requires notification to the Agency when there is an infant formula that is adulterated or misbranded that may pose a risk to human health.


21 CFR 107.10(a) – Third Party Disclosure


Requirement for specific nutrient information to be displayed on infant formula labeling.


21 CFR 107.20 - Third Party Disclosure


Requirement for specific directions for use to be displayed on infant formula labeling.


21 CFR 107.50(e)(2) - Reporting


Requires notification to the Agency when there is an exempt infant formula that is adulterated or misbranded that may present risk to human health.


21 CFR 107.50(b)(3) - Reporting


Requirement for labeling to maintain exempt status of infant formula.


21 CFR 107.50(b)(4) - Reporting


Requirement for reformulation information when there is a change in ingredients or processes in order to maintain exempt status of infant formula.


21 CFR 107.50(c)(3) - Recordkeeping


Requirement for manufacturer to maintain records of its quality control procedures. (Regulatory language; burden in 21 CFR 106.100).


2. Purpose and Use of the Information Collection

This information is used by consumers when purchasing, storing and preparing infant formulas. The information is also used by firms and FDA to confirm that the nutrient requirements of the FD&C Act have been met.


Description of Respondents: Respondents to this information collection are manufacturers of infant formula. Respondents are from the private sector (for-profit businesses).

3. Use of Improved Information Technology and Burden Reduction

Through the use of improved information technology the agency is always seeking ways to reduce the burden of maintaining quality control procedures and labeling requirements for infant formulas. Manufacturers of infant formula may submit infant formula notifications in electronic format. FDA estimates that all of the respondents (100%) will use electronic means to submit the required information.

4. Efforts to Identify Duplication and Use of Similar Information

There is no duplicative information collection as a result of the infant formula regulations. The data recorded are specific to the individual processing facilities. No other regulation or information collection duplicates this effort. There are no similar data that can be used or modified for use.

5. Impact on Small Businesses or Other Small Entities

None of the manufacturers of infant formula (0%) fit the definition of small business. The regulations provide flexibility to manufacturers to verify nutrient levels by either testing during production or after processing. This provides the necessary flexibility to accommodate the various manufacturing methods and capabilities of both large and small manufacturers. FDA aids small businesses in complying with its requirements through the agency’s Regional Small Business Representatives and through the scientific and administrative staffs within the agency. FDA has provided a Small Business Guide on the agency’s website at http://www.fda.gov/oc/industry/.


6. Consequences of Collecting the Information Less Frequently

Respondents will submit the required information on an occasional basis, as required by the regulations. The need for confirming nutrient levels of each batch of infant formula has been demonstrated each time a nutrient deficiency or overage has occurred since the passage of the Infant Formula Act of 1980 (IFA). These deficiencies or overages could have resulted in infant illnesses if the problem had gone undetected. However, due to the required testing by the manufacturers, discrepancies in nutrient levels have been found quickly and no illnesses have been reported to FDA resulting from inappropriate nutrient levels found in infant formulas since passage of the IFA.

7. Special Circumstances Relating to the Guidelines of 5 CFR 1320.5

There are no special circumstances associated with this collection of information.

8. Comments in Response to the Federal Register Notice and Efforts to Consult Outside the Agency

In accordance with 5 CFR 1320.8(d), in the Federal Register of May 16, 2013 (78 FR 28854), FDA published a 60-day notice requesting public comment on the proposed extension of this collection of information collection. FDA received no comments.


9. Explanation of Any Payment or Gift to Respondents

FDA does not provide any payment or gift to respondents.


10. Assurance of Confidentiality Provided to Respondents

Information submitted to FDA under the infant formula regulations may contain trade secret and commercial confidential information. Only information that is releasable under the agency’s regulations in 21 CFR part 20 would be released to the public. This information is also safeguarded by Section 301(j) of the FD&C Act and would be protected from disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) under sections 552(a) and (b) (5 U.S.C. 552(a) and (b)).

11. Justification for Sensitive Questions

This information collection does not involve questions that are of a personally sensitive nature.

12. Estimates of Annualized Burden Hours and Costs
12 a. Annualized Hour Burden Estimate


FDA estimates the burden of this collection of information as follows:


Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act or 21 CFR Section

No. of Respondents

Annual Frequency per Response

Total Annual Responses

Hours per Response

Total Hours

Section 412(d) of the FD&C Act, submit formulation information to FDA.

5

13

65

10

650

21 CFR 106.120(b), notify FDA of adulteration or misbranding.

1

1

1

4

4

21 CFR 107.50(b)(3) and (b)(4), Submit formulation information to FDA to maintain exempt status

3

2

6

4

24

21 CFR 107.50(e)(2), notify FDA of adulteration or misbranding of exempt formula.

1

1

1

4

4

Total





682

Table 1.--Estimated Annual Reporting Burden1

1 There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.



Table 2.--Estimated Annual Recordkeeping Burden1


21 CFR Section

No. of Record-keepers

Annual Frequency per Record-keeping

Total Annual Records

Hours per Record

Total Hours

106.100, recordkeeping associated with microbiological/nutrient testing, quality control procedures, audits and investigation of consumer complaints.

5

10

50

400

20,000

107.50(c)(3), recordkeeping associated with quality control procedures.

3

10

30

300

9,000

Total





29,000

1 There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.




Table 3.--Estimated Annual Third Party Disclosure Burden1

21 CFR Section

No. of Respondents

Annual Frequency of Disclosure

Total Annual Disclosures

Hours per Disclosure

Total Hours

21 CFR 107.10(a) and 107.20, labeling requirements for specific nutrient information and directions for use.

5

13

65

8

520

1 There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.


In compiling these estimates, we consulted our records of the number of infant formula submissions received in the past. All infant formula submissions may be provided to us in electronic format. The hours per response reporting estimates are based on our experience with similar programs and information received from industry.


We estimate that we will receive 13 reports from 5 manufacturers annually under section 412(d) of the FD&C Act, for a total annual response of 65 reports. Each report is estimated to take 10 hours per response for a total of 650 hours. We also estimate that we will receive one notification under § 106.120(b). The notification is expected to take four hours per response, for a total of four hours.


For exempt infant formula, we estimate that we will receive 2 reports from 3 manufacturers annually under §§ 107.50(b) (3) and (b) (4), for a total annual response of 6 reports. Each report is estimated to take 4 hours per response for a total of 24 hours. We also estimate that we will receive one notification annually under § 107.50(e) (2) and that the notification will take 4 hours to prepare.


We estimate that 5 firms will expend approximately 20,000 hours per year to fully satisfy the recordkeeping requirements in § 106.100 and that 3 firms will expend approximately 9,000 hours per year to fully satisfy the recordkeeping requirements in § 107.50(c)(3).


We estimate compliance with our labeling requirements in §§ 107.10(a) and 107.20 requires 520 hours annually by 5 manufacturers.



12 b. Annualized Cost Burden Estimate


There are 5 firms marketing infant formula and exempt infant formula in the United States. FDA estimates that the average hourly wage for respondents is equivalent to a GS-9-5 level in the locality pay area of Washington-Baltimore in 2013, $28.04/hour. Doubling this wage to account for overhead costs, FDA estimates the average hourly cost to respondents to be $56.08/hour. The overall estimated cost incurred by the respondents is $$1,693,728.10 (30,202 burden hours X $56.08/hr = $1,693,728.10).


13. Estimates of Other Total Annual Costs to Respondents and/or Recordkeepers/Capital Costs

There are no capital, start-up, operating, or maintenance costs associated with this collection.

14. Annualized Cost to the Federal Government

FDA consumer safety officers review submitted notifications with input from technical reviewers. The dollar estimate for FDA consumer safety officer wages corresponds roughly to GS level 13, step 6, which is $95,459 annually per the 2013 GS Salary Table. These costs are estimated at 3.3 person years (PY) or an approximate total of $315,014.70 ($95,459 X 3.3 PY = $315,014.70).


FDA investigators currently inspect each manufacturing site annually and collect product labels for review. The dollar estimate for FDA investigator wages corresponds roughly to GS level 12, step 3, which is $73,396 annually per the 2013 GS Salary Table. It is estimated that the agency expends approximately 1.3 PY on each firm for a total of 5.2 PY (1.3 PY X 4 = 5.2 PY) on enforcement activities associated with violations of these regulations. The costs are estimated at a total of $381,592 ($73,396 X 5.2 PY = $381,592). Thus, the total cost to the Federal Government is $696,673.90.

15. Explanation for Program Changes or Adjustments

There is no change in burden from that previously approved.


16. Plans for Tabulation and Publication and Project Time Schedule


The agency has no plans for publication of information from this information collection.

17. Reason(s) Display of OMB Expiration Date is Inappropriate


There are no reasons why display of the expiration date for OMB approval of the information collection would be inappropriate.

18. Exceptions to Certification for Paperwork Reduction Act Submissions

There are no exceptions to the certification.

2


File Typeapplication/msword
File TitleSupporting Statement for
AuthorJoanna Capezzuto
Last Modified ByBean, Domini
File Modified2013-10-28
File Created2013-10-28

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy