This information
collection has been approved with the following changes: 1. Where
data sought for 2010 and/or 2012, only require the reporting of
data for a single year, and use the most recent year (i.e.,
calendar year 2013). 2. Revise definition of Purchasers to exclude
entities from the collection that purchased less than $5 million in
Dedicated Services in 2013 (in areas where the ILEC is subject to
price cap regulation). 3. Do not require Purchasers to answer
Questions II.E.4-8, II.E.14, II.F.3-7, and II.F.13. Purchasers can
provide information in response to such questions on a voluntary
basis. 4. Require the reporting of revenues and expenditures broken
down by bandwidth as set forth in Questions II.A.16, II.B.9,
II.E.7-8, and II.F.6-7, only if respondent keeps such information
in the normal course of business. Otherwise, respondent can provide
information on a voluntary basis. 5. Only require the reporting of
CLLI code for ILEC wire center in response to Question II.E.2.d if
kept in the normal course of business. Otherwise, respondent can
provide information on a voluntary basis. 6. In Question II.A.11
directed at Competitive Providers, only require responses where the
respondent was selected as the winning bidder on a Request for
Proposal (RFP). Respondents can provide information on unsuccessful
RFP bids and business rules relied upon to submit bids on a
voluntary basis. 7. In Questions II.A.4.c and II.B.3.c regarding
the reporting of Locations with Connections, Providers are only
required to provide the geocode for the Location if the respondent
keeps such information in the normal course of business. Respondent
can, however, provide such information on a voluntary basis. 8. In
Question II.A.5 directed at Competitive Providers regarding fiber
maps and the reporting of Nodes used to interconnect with third
party networks, do not require cable companies to show the feeder
links to locations, only their interoffice transport fiber network.
In addition, cable companies are only required to report their
headends (i.e., Nodes) that they have upgraded to provide metro
Ethernet service, or its functional equivalent. Additionally the
design of the methodology for this information collection is not
sufficiently specific at this time to assess the degree to which
the results will be generalizable. It is therefore not possible to
determine in advance whether the results drawn from this effort
would meet the standards of OMB’s Government-wide Information
Quality Guidelines.
Inventory as of this Action
Requested
Previously Approved
08/31/2017
36 Months From Approved
4,000
0
0
536,000
0
0
10,000,000
0
0
In a December 2012 Report and Order
(FCC 12-153), the Commission initiated a comprehensive special
access data collection and specified the nature of the data to be
collected and the scope of respondents. In conjunction with the
market analysis proposed by the Commission in a December 2012
Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (FCC 12-153), the data,
information, and documents acquired through this collection will
aid the Commission in conducting a comprehensive evaluation of
competition in the special access market and updating its rules for
pricing flexibility for special access services.
The FCC plans to use the data
collected for a one-time, multi-faceted analysis of the broader
special access market. Once the data are analyzed, the FCC can
evaluate whether to make changes to its existing pricing
flexibility rules to better target regulatory relief in particular
geographic areas where actual and potential competition for special
access is likely to constrain prices.
On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that
the collection of information encompassed by this request complies
with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR
1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding
the proposed collection of information, that the certification
covers:
(i) Why the information is being collected;
(ii) Use of information;
(iii) Burden estimate;
(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a
benefit, or mandatory);
(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control
number;
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of
these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked
and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.