Second Federal Register notice

69456

Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 223 / Tuesday, November 19, 2013 / Notices

for the Digital Humanities Start Up
Grants grant program, submitted to the
Office of Digital Humanities.
11. DATE: December 13, 2013.
TIME: 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
ROOM: 402.
This meeting will discuss
applications on the subjects of Archives
and Collections for the Digital
Humanities Start Up Grants grant
program, submitted to the Office of
Digital Humanities.
12. DATE: December 16, 2013.
TIME: 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
ROOM: 402.
This meeting will discuss
applications on the subject of Public
Programs for the Digital Humanities
Start Up Grants grant program,
submitted to the Office of Digital
Humanities.
Because these meetings will include
review of personal and/or proprietary
financial and commercial information
given in confidence to the agency by
grant applicants, the meetings will be
closed to the public pursuant to sections
552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6) of Title 5
U.S.C., as amended. I have made this
determination pursuant to the authority
granted me by the Chairman’s
Delegation of Authority to Close
Advisory Committee Meetings dated
July 19, 1993.
Dated: November 12, 2013.
Lisette Voyatzis,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2013–27572 Filed 11–18–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7536–01–P

NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION
SAFETY BOARD
Notice To Reinstate a Previously
Approved Information Collection;
Comment Request
National Transportation Safety
Board (NTSB).
ACTION: Notice to reinstate a previously
approved information collection for
review and comment.
AGENCY:

In compliance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act, this notice
announces the NTSB is submitting an
Information Collection Request (ICR),
described below, to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
renewal of a previously approved
information collection, NTSB Form
6120.1. This ICR is the second notice, as
required by OMB regulations
concerning approvals of information
collections. This notice again describes
the nature of the information collection
and its expected burden; in addition,

TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

SUMMARY:

VerDate Mar<15>2010

17:21 Nov 18, 2013

Jkt 232001

this notice describes some changes and
additions the NTSB has made to Form
6120.1 after receiving feedback from the
general aviation community.
DATES: Submit written comments
regarding this proposed collection of
information by December 19, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Interested members of the
public may submit written comments on
the collection of information to the
OMB Desk Officer for the NTSB at
Office of Management and Budget, 725
17th Street NW., Washington, DC 20503,
Fax: 202–395–5806 (this is not a tollfree number), email: OIRA_submission@
omb.eop.gov. Commenters are
encouraged, but not required, to send a
courtesy copy of any comments to the
National Transportation Safety Board,
ATTN: Office of Research and
Engineering, 490 L’Enfant Plaza East
SW., Washington, DC 20594.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Loren Groff, NTSB Office of Research
and Engineering, at (202) 314–6517.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The NTSB
announces the proposed extension of a
public information collection and seeks
public comment on the collection in
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act. The NTSB’s collection of
information on Form 6120.1 is
necessary to fulfill the NTSB’s statutory
mandate to investigate transportation
accidents, because the form requests
information concerning aviation
accidents and incidents. This Notice
informs the public that it may submit
comments concerning the proposed use
of this form to the OMB Desk Officer
who oversees NTSB information
collections. This renewal request is not
associated with a rulemaking activity.
Paperwork Reduction Act Requirement
In accordance with OMB regulations
that require this Notice for proposed
ICRs, the NTSB herein notifies the
public that it may submit comments on
this proposed renewal of information
collection. Title 5 CFR 1320.5(a)(1)(iv)
requires an agency to publish in the
Federal Register a notice soliciting
comments regarding the proposed
information collection. The notice must
describe the information collection, the
necessity for the collection, and the
estimated burden the submission of
information will impose on
respondents. This notice must advise
the public that it may submit comments
directly to OMB. In accordance with
these regulations, the NTSB now
advises the public, via this notice, that
it may submit comments directly to
OMB concerning the NTSB’s renewal of
the information collected on NTSB
Form 6120.1.

PO 00000

Frm 00095

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

Prior to soliciting comments directed
to OMB, the applicable regulations
require an agency to first publish in the
Federal Register a notice describing the
information collection, and requesting
the public submit comments directly to
the agency. 5 CFR 1320.8(d). The NTSB
published such notice on May 7, 2013.
78 FR 26659.
Public Input Regarding NTSB Form
6120.1
The NTSB did not receive any written
comments concerning the proposed
renewal of the information collection.
However, the NTSB held what it has
termed a ‘‘listening session’’ to obtain
feedback from the general aviation (GA)
community concerning NTSB
investigations. The majority of NTSB
aviation investigations concern GA
accidents or incidents, and with recent
advances in technology, the NTSB seeks
to ensure it is collecting the most
accurate and important information and
data to ensure appropriate findings of
probable cause.
In furtherance of this goal, the NTSB
met with a group of 28 people who
participated in the NTSB’s GA listening
session on April 3, 2013. These owners,
operators, and other members of the GA
community (such as safety researchers,
educators, owner and builder
associations, and manufacturers)
provided input that prompted the NTSB
to include a question on the form asking
what ‘‘additional equipment’’ the
aircraft contained, within the aircraft
information category. In addition, the
NTSB considered this feedback and now
proposes updates to the form to include
additional options for answers to some
of the questions on the form. These
changes are explained more fully below.
Description of NTSB Form 6120.1
The Pilot/Operator Aircraft Accident/
Incident Report Form is used in
determining the facts, conditions, and
circumstances for aircraft accident
prevention activities and for statistical
purposes. In furtherance of its goal to
ensure the form is updated and includes
information that will assist the NTSB in
investigating accidents and incidents,
the NTSB recently determined it should
replace some questions and reorganize
the form. These changes will ensure the
form solicits information concerning the
latest technologies about which the
NTSB will need information. In
addition, some questions on the form
will now solicit more specific
information.
The majority of the form’s contents
remains unchanged; the form is still
divided into 17 categories, which are
titled as follows: Basic information;

E:\FR\FM\19NON1.SGM

19NON1

Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 223 / Tuesday, November 19, 2013 / Notices
aircraft information; owner/operator
information; airport information (to be
completed if accident or incident
occurred on approach, takeoff, or within
3 miles of an airport); ‘‘flight crew
member 1’’ information; ‘‘flight crew
member 2’’ information 1; additional
flight crew members; passengers/other
personnel; flight itinerary information;
weather information at the accident/
incident site; damage to aircraft and
other property 2; narrative history of
flight; recommendation (concerning
how the accident or incident may have
been prevented); mechanical
malfunction/failure; fuel and services
information; evacuation of aircraft; and
information concerning any other
aircraft involved in the accident or
incident (in the event of a collision).
A. Basic Information
The basic information category
remains largely unchanged; as described
in the NTSB’s previous notice
concerning this ICR, the category
requests information concerning the
location and date and time of the
accident or incident, the phase of
operation during which the accident or
incident occurred, and whether the
occurrence was a collision with other
aircraft. The question concerning the
altitude if the event was an in-flight
occurrence is no longer on the form;
instead, the basic information section
includes fields in which the respondent
can enter in decimal degrees
‘‘minutes:seconds’’ the latitude and
longitude of the accident or incident.
B. Aircraft Information

TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

1. Prior Requests
The aircraft information category
continues to request the following
information concerning the aircraft:
manufacturer, model, serial number,
registration number, weight and center
of gravity of the aircraft, whether the
aircraft was amateur-built, category of
aircraft, type of airworthiness certificate,
number of seats, type of landing gear,
type of maintenance program, type and
date of last inspection, total time on
airframe, type of fire extinguishing
system, type of reciprocating fuel
system, and type of propeller. The
aircraft information category also
1 Previously, the titles of the sections for pilot
information were entitled, ‘‘Pilot ‘A’ Information’’
and ‘‘Pilot ‘B’ Information,’’ respectively.
2 Previously, the questions concerning the degree
of damage the aircraft sustained, whether it was on
fire, whether it exploded, and a description of the
damage were all in distinct categories. In the
proposed new form, the NTSB will seek
information concerning aircraft damage, fire, and
explosion in a general category entitled ‘‘damage to
aircraft and other property.’’

VerDate Mar<15>2010

17:21 Nov 18, 2013

Jkt 232001

continues to request ‘‘yes’’ or ‘‘no’’
answers to the following: Whether the
aircraft had a stall warning system
installed; whether the emergency
locator transmitter (ELT) was activated,
and additional information about the
ELT, such as whether it aided in
locating the accident/incident, its
manufacturer, model/series, serial
number, and battery type. This section
of the form also still requests detailed
information concerning the engine(s) on
the aircraft, such as the engine
manufacturer, model/series, serial
number, date of manufacture, type of
power measurement (horsepower or
pounds of thrust), total time on engine,
time since last inspection, and time
since overhaul.
2. New Requests
Also within the aircraft information
section, the new version of the form will
now request information concerning the
following: The year of manufacture of
the aircraft and if amateur built, the
make of the kit/plans used or whether
the aircraft was built according to
‘‘original design.’’ In addition, the form
now requests a selection from the
following options: ‘‘IFR [instrument
flight rules] equipped and certified,’’
‘‘commercial space flight,’’ or
‘‘unmanned aircraft.’’ The aircraft
information category also now includes
space for two propellers, rather than
one; if applicable, respondents will
complete information indicating the
manufacturer and model of both
propellers. For the question concerning
the ELT on the aircraft, the new form
includes additional questions: The TSO
Number, from a selection of the
following choices: C91 (121.5 MHz);
C91a (121.5 MHz); or C126 (406 MHz).
In this regard, the form also solicits
answers to whether the ELT was still
mounted in the aircraft, whether it was
still connected to antenna, and, if it was
not activated, the reason for its damage
(impact damage, fire damage, battery
expired/damaged, or unknown).
Finally, the aircraft information
section also now includes a selection
from the following list of equipment,
and asks respondents to check any of
the following items that were on the
aircraft: ADS–B, airframe parachute,
angle of attack indicator, autopilot, data
recorder, electronic flight bag or
handheld device, electronic malfunction
display, electronic primary flight
display, handheld GPS, heads up
display, onboard weather, satellite
tracking device, stall warning system,
video recording device, and an option
stating ‘‘other, specify.’’

PO 00000

Frm 00096

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

69457

C. Owner/Operator Information
The owner/operator section of NTSB
Form 6120.1 also remains largely
unchanged, but is organized in a way
that is more easily understandable. The
section continues to request specific
information concerning the status of the
aircraft, such as the names and contact
information for both the owner and the
operator of the aircraft, the Federal
Aviation Regulation (FAR) under which
the flight was conducted, whether the
flight was a revenue sightseeing flight or
air medical flight,3 the purpose of the
flight, the type of revenue operation,
type of cargo operation (if applicable),
and the type of commercial operating
certificate the operator holds. These
questions now contain additional
options, such as FAR 415, FAR 431,
FAR 435, and FAR 437 in the question
asking the ‘‘regulation’’ under which the
flight was conducted; these new FAR
parts will assist the NTSB in identifying
flights that were conducted as part of a
commercial space launch. It also
contains updated options concerning
the purpose of the flight, such as banner
tow, external load, firefighting, glider
tow, and skydiving. The NTSB believes
including these options to the questions
will ensure it obtains the most accurate
responses to the form.
Regarding airport information, the
form continues to request the airport
name and identifier, the aircraft’s
proximity to the airport (as off or on the
airport or airstrip), distance and
direction from airport, and the elevation
of the airport. The form includes boxes
for respondents to check describing the
approach segment, type of IFR
approach, type of visual flight rules
(VFR) approach, runway information,
and type and condition of runway or
landing surface. These questions remain
unchanged. However, within the airport
departure segment question, the form
will now offer the following options in
addition to the existing ones: ‘‘taxi,’’
‘‘takeoff,’’ ‘‘initial climb,’’ ‘‘VFR
departure,’’ ‘‘IFR departure/clearance,’’
and ‘‘unknown.’’ The NTSB believes
these additional options will ensure the
most accurate responses.
D. Crew Information
1. Prior Requests
Concerning the crew aboard the
aircraft, the form continues to request
information on both pilots, such as
names and contact information, dates of
birth, certificate numbers, degree of
injury, seats occupied, whether the
3 The instructions section of the form, which
precedes all questions, now includes brief
definitions of ‘‘revenue sightseeing flight’’ and ‘‘air
medical flight.’’

E:\FR\FM\19NON1.SGM

19NON1

69458

Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 223 / Tuesday, November 19, 2013 / Notices

pilots used seat belts and shoulder
harnesses, the types of pilot and
medical certificates held, the principal
occupation, and date of last aviation
medical examination. With regard to
each pilot’s medical information, the
form also requests a listing of any
medical certificate limitations and
waivers. The form also requests
information concerning each pilot’s
flight reviews, such as the date of the
last flight review and the type of aircraft
used on the last flight review; further,
the form solicits information concerning
each pilot’s ratings, such as aircraft
ratings, instrument ratings, instructor
ratings, and type ratings, as well as
student endorsements. Finally, the form
includes a table requesting the amount
of flight time (categorized into the
following sections: Total flight time,
pilot-in-command time, instructor time,
time in this make/model, and time
during the last 90 days, 30 days, and 24

hours) concerning: all aircraft, the make
and model of the aircraft in which the
pilot accrued the flight time, airplane
single- and multi-engine, night,
instrument, rotorcraft, glider, and lighter
than air. The only addition to the
sections soliciting information on flight
crew member 1 and flight crew member
2 is a ‘‘yes’’ or ‘‘no’’ answer to the
statement ‘‘Flight crew member 1 was
the pilot flying’’ and ‘‘Flight crew
member 2 was the pilot flying,’’
respectively.
2. New Requests and Other Changes
In a category concerning additional
crewmembers, the form now includes
two spaces 4 for listing the following
information concerning different
crewmembers: Crewmembers’ names
and contact information, degree of
injury, seat occupied, type of pilot
certificates, whether the crewmember
was type-rated for the aircraft involved

in the accident or incident, and the total
flight time at the time of the accident or
incident. With regard to passengers, the
form only requests the name, city, state,
and zip code for each passenger, as well
as the seat number, whether the
passenger is crew, non-revenue,
revenue, non-occupant, or Federal
Aviation Administration (FAA).
Previously, the form included eight
spaces for listing eight passengers’
information. The new form includes
four spaces for passenger information,
as the NTSB determined four spaces are
sufficient.
In both the flight crew member 1 and
2 sections, the additional flight
crewmember section, and in the
passengers/other personnel section, the
NTSB has reorganized them and
included additional options concerning
its questions about restraints. Each of
these questions now include the
following table:

Restraint type
Inflatable restraints
Available
Æ
Æ
Æ
Æ
Æ
Æ

Used

None ..............................................................
Lap Only ........................................................
3-point ............................................................
4-point ............................................................
5-point ............................................................
Unknown ........................................................

In addition, the passenger(s)/other
personnel section, which contains four
spaces, now will also include a section
of the restraint table requesting whether
a child under 5 years old was on the
aircraft, and whether the restraint was:
‘‘child restraint,’’ ‘‘lap-held,’’ or
‘‘unknown.’’

TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

E. Flight Itinerary Information
As described in the NTSB’s previous
notice concerning this form, the NTSB
also requests information concerning
the flight itinerary, such as the last
departure point and time of departure,
and the destination. By way of checkthe-box responses, this category also
requests information concerning the
type of flight plan filed, type of air
traffic control clearance or service,
airspace where the accident or incident
occurred, and a description of the
aircraft load. This section does not
contain any proposed changes.
F. Weather Information at the Accident/
Incident Site
The form requests information
concerning weather conditions at the

Æ
Æ
Æ
Æ
Æ
Æ

None .............................................................
Lap Only .......................................................
3-point ...........................................................
4-point ...........................................................
5-point ...........................................................
Unknown .......................................................

time of the accident. These requests
within the weather category continue to
ask for information concerning the
weather observation facility; the source
of weather information; the method of
briefing concerning weather as well as
the type and completeness of the
briefing; the light condition;
characterization of visibility; sky and
lowest cloud condition; the ceiling and
its height; the restriction on visibility;
the wind direction, speed, and gusts; the
type and severity of turbulence; and a
list of Notices to Airman and other
similar advisories in effect at the time of
the flight. In addition, the form requests
the temperature, altimeter setting,
density altitude, and dew point. Finally,
this category of the form requests
information concerning actual and
forecasted conditions concerning icing,
as well as the type and intensity of any
precipitation. This category only
contains the addition of one option in
the ‘‘source of pilot weather information
section’’: Respondents may now select
‘‘on-board weather’’ as their means of
receiving weather information.

Æ
Æ
Æ
Æ
Æ

Not installed.
Installed.
Not deployed.
Deployed.
Unknown.

G. Narrative History of Flight
As stated above, the form concludes
with areas for a narrative history of the
flight and the events or actions the
respondent believes may have
prevented the accident or incident. The
proposed new form contains these
categories in a new location, but the text
of the questions are the same.
H. Other Information
The form seeks information
concerning whether the aircraft
sustained a mechanical malfunction or
failure. The questions within this
category, as well as the categories
requesting fuel and services
information, data concerning the
evacuation of the aircraft (if applicable),
and information concerning the other
aircraft (if a collision occurred) remain
the same as described in the NTSB’s
earlier notice concerning this
information collection.
I. Certification Statement
Finally, as described in the NTSB’s
previous notice regarding this

4 Previously, the form included spaces for three
pilots. The NTSB determined only two spaces are
necessary.

VerDate Mar<15>2010

17:21 Nov 18, 2013

Jkt 232001

PO 00000

Frm 00097

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

E:\FR\FM\19NON1.SGM

19NON1

Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 223 / Tuesday, November 19, 2013 / Notices
information collection, the form also
includes a certification statement for the
respondent to sign, attesting that the
information provided on the form is
complete and accurate to the best of his
or her knowledge. The proposed new
version of the form will allow
respondents to electronically sign the
form by checking a box.

TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Use of Information on NTSB Form
6120.1
As described in its May 7, 2013
notice, the NTSB generally uses the
information provided on Form 6120.1 to
determine the facts, conditions, and
circumstances for aircraft accident
prevention activities and for statistical
purposes. The NTSB typically receives
several notifications for each accident or
incident, but only requests completion
of Form 6120.1 once the NTSB has
determined it will pursue an
investigation into the event. The NTSB
utilizes a ‘‘party process,’’ as described
in 49 CFR part 831, for its
investigations. This process involves the
NTSB’s invitation to outside entities to
assist with an investigation as a ‘‘party.’’
The NTSB extends party status to those
organizations that can provide the
necessary technical assistance to the
investigation. The investigator-in-charge
(IIC), for example, often confers party
status to the operator, aircraft, systems,
and powerplant manufacturers, and
labor organizations involved because of
the accident circumstances. Everyone
involved in an NTSB investigation,
including the parties, depend on
accurate information contained in NTSB
Form 6120.1 while conducting the
investigation and determining which
areas warrant focus and attention.
Overall, the NTSB considers Form
6120.1 to be critical to its statutory
function of investigation accidents and
incidents, and subsequently issuing
safety recommendations in an effort to
prevent future accidents and incidents.
The NTSB has carefully considered
whether this collection of information
on Form 6120.1 is duplicative of any
other agency’s collections of
information. The NTSB is unaware of
any form the FAA disseminates that
solicits the same information Form
6120.1 requires. However, the NTSB
notes some operators may choose to
provide a voluntary report to the
National Aeronautics and Space
Administration (NASA) in accordance
with the Aviation Safety Reporting
System (ASRS). NASA will not accept
ASRS reports concerning aircraft
accidents; however, it is possible that an
operator could report an incident to the
NTSB, as defined in 49 CFR 830.2, and

VerDate Mar<15>2010

17:21 Nov 18, 2013

Jkt 232001

contemporaneously submit an ASRP
report to NASA.
The NTSB notes completion of NTSB
Form 6120.1 is not voluntary, but is
required by 49 CFR 830.15(a). The
NTSB, in general, will not accept
partially completed forms; NTSB
investigators will exercise their
discretion in requesting completion of a
copy of Form 6120.1 a respondent
submits that is partially completed. In
many cases, the NTSB recognizes not all
fields will apply to each event;
therefore, the NTSB will not require
completion of inapplicable fields.
Currently, the NTSB accepts paper
copies of Form 6120.1 sent via postal
mail or facsimile, as well as electronic
copies of Form 6120.1 that respondents
submit via electronic mail. For
electronically submitted copies, the
NTSB notes its public Web site contains
a fill-able version of Form 6120.1. As
described above, the updated version of
the form will include a box the
respondent can check to electronically
sign the form; therefore, respondents
need not scan a copy of the form to send
it via electronic mail, because
respondents now have the option of
completing the form by typing answers
within the electronic version and
sending it via electronic mail.
The NTSB has carefully reviewed the
form to ensure that it has used plain,
coherent, and unambiguous terminology
in its request for information. The NTSB
estimates that respondents will spend
approximately 60 minutes in
completing the form. The NTSB
estimates that approximately 1,800
respondents per year will complete the
form, but notes that this number may
vary, given the unpredictable nature of
the frequency of aviation accidents and
incidents.
Deborah A.P. Hersman,
Chairman.
[FR Doc. 2013–27654 Filed 11–18–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7533–01–P

Licensee Notification of Completion of
ITAAC

[Docket No. 5200025; NRC–2008–0252]

Vogtle Unit 3 Combined License
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Determination of inspections,
tests, analyses, and acceptance criteria
(ITAAC).
AGENCY:

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) staff has determined
that the inspections, tests, and analyses
have been successfully completed, and

SUMMARY:

Frm 00098

Fmt 4703

that the specified acceptance criteria are
met for ITAAC E.3.8.05.01.01, for the
Vogtle Unit 3 Combined License.
ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID
NRC–2008–0252 when contacting the
NRC about the availability of
information regarding this document.
You may access publicly-available
information related to this document
using any of the following methods:
• Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to
http://www.regulations.gov and search
for Docket ID NRC–2008–0252. Address
questions about NRC dockets to Carol
Gallagher; telephone: 301–287–3422;
email: [email protected]. For
technical questions, contact the
individuals listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
document.
• NRC’s Agencywide Documents
Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may access publicly
available documents online in the NRC
Library at http://www.nrc.gov/readingrm/adams.html. To begin the search,
select ‘‘ADAMS Public Documents’’ and
then select ‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS
Search.’’ For problems with ADAMS,
please contact the NRC’s Public
Document Room (PDR) reference staff at
1–800–397–4209, 301–415–4737, or by
email to [email protected]. The
ADAMS accession number for each
document referenced in this document
(if that document is available in
ADAMS) is provided the first time that
a document is referenced.
• NRC’s PDR: You may examine and
purchase copies of public documents at
the NRC’s PDR, Room O1–F21, One
White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David Jaffe, Office of New Reactors, U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555–0001; telephone:
301–415–1439, email: David.Jaffe@
nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION

PO 00000

69459

Sfmt 4703

On October 1, 2013, Southern Nuclear
Operating Company, Inc., (the licensee)
submitted an ITAAC closure
notification (ICN) under § 52.99(c)(1) of
Title 10 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (10 CFR) informing the NRC
that the licensee has successfully
performed the required inspections,
tests, and analyses for ITAAC
E.3.8.05.01.01, and that the specified
acceptance criteria are met for Vogtle
Unit 3 Combined License (ADAMS
Accession No. ML13276A034). This
ITAAC was approved as part of the

E:\FR\FM\19NON1.SGM

19NON1