Management and Oversight of the National Estuarine Research Reserve System

ICR 201312-0648-010

OMB: 0648-0121

Federal Form Document

Forms and Documents
Document
Name
Status
Supporting Statement A
2013-12-16
ICR Details
0648-0121 201312-0648-010
Historical Active 201008-0648-004
DOC/NOAA
Management and Oversight of the National Estuarine Research Reserve System
Extension without change of a currently approved collection   No
Regular
Approved without change 03/26/2014
Retrieve Notice of Action (NOA) 01/27/2014
  Inventory as of this Action Requested Previously Approved
03/31/2017 36 Months From Approved 03/31/2014
151 0 21
8,909 0 10,682
0 0 1,215

The National Estuarine Research Reserve System is a network of 28 areas representing different biogeographic regions of the United States that are protected for long-term research, water-quality monitoring, education and coastal stewardship. Established by the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, as amended, the reserve system is a partnership program between the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and the coastal states. NOAA provides funding, national guidance and technical assistance. Each reserve is managed on daily basis by a lead state agency or university, with input from local partners. Information is required from states proposing designation and from existing reserves regarding development of management plans, ecological characterizations,and grant awards.

US Code: 16 USC 451 Name of Law: Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972
  
None

Not associated with rulemaking

  78 FR 49257 08/13/2013
79 FR 4325 01/27/2014
No

  Total Approved Previously Approved Change Due to New Statute Change Due to Agency Discretion Change Due to Adjustment in Estimate Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA
Annual Number of Responses 151 21 0 0 130 0
Annual Time Burden (Hours) 8,909 10,682 0 0 -1,773 0
Annual Cost Burden (Dollars) 0 1,215 0 0 -1,215 0
No
No
Total responses increased from 21 to 151 and burden hours decreased from 10,682 to 8,909. However, in the 2010 extension, responses and burden for grant progress reports had been eliminated inadvertently. Also in the 2010 extension, grant application responses had been incorrectly included with NEPA and SHPO documentation as one, rather than two, responses, for a total of one hour's burden. Total burden for these two responses should have been 9 hours (8 for the application and one for the documentation, as they are currently). There would still have been an increase in responses (130 to 151) and a decrease in hours (11,138 down to 8,909). Additional adjustments: Site nomination documents are reproduced by the federal government, alleviating the need for the respondent to produce copies. Based on feedback from respondents and the experience with the most recent site nominations and designations, the burden for this activity has been increased by 25%, from 2,000 to 2,500 hours; however, the frequency required has decreased. Respondent burden has decreased for site profile and management plan development. NOAA has developed new guidance that provides a streamlined process to develop these documents and it is anticipated that reporting burden will decrease by ten percent (both decreased from 2,000 to 1,800 hours). Copying and postage charges have been eliminated, as the government now actively encourages electronic submissions.

$59,042
No
No
No
No
No
Uncollected
Michael Migliori 301 563-1126

  No

On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    (i) Why the information is being collected;
    (ii) Use of information;
    (iii) Burden estimate;
    (iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);
    (v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
    (vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;
 
 
 
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.
01/27/2014


© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy