Vector Control Att E

OVERVIEW
The National Public Health Performance
Standards (NPHPS) provide a framework to
assess capacity and performance of public health
systems and public health governing bodies. This
framework can help identify areas for system
improvement, strengthen state and local
partnerships, and ensure that a strong system is in
place for addressing public health issues.

ASSESSMENTS
The NPHPS include three assessments:



The State Public Health System Assessment
Instrument focuses on the state public health system,
which includes state public health agencies and other
partners that contribute to public health services at the
state level. The state instrument can be found on the
Association of State and Territorial Health Officials
website.



The Local Public Health System Assessment
Instrument focuses on the local public health system
or all entities that contribute to public health services
within a community. The local instrument can be found
on the National Association of County and City
Health Officials website.



The Public Health Governing Entity Assessment
Instrument focuses on the governing body
accountable for public health at the local level. Such
governing bodies may include boards of health,
councils, or county commissioners. For more
information, contact [email protected].

NPHPS tools are used to





Identify partners and community members in
the public health system
Engage those partners in health assessment
and health improvement planning
Promote improvement in agencies, systems,
and communities

CONCEPTS APPLIED IN THE NPHPS
Four concepts helped to frame and inform the NPHPS:





Figure 1—The 10 Essential Public Health Services

The 10 Essential Public Health Services (outlined in
Figure 1)
A focus on the overall public health system
A description of an optimal level of performance rather
than minimum expectations
An intent to support a process of continuous quality
improvement

BENEFITS OF IMPLEMENTATION
The NPHPS is a valuable tool in identifying areas for system improvement, strengthening state and local partnerships,
and ensuring that a strong system is in place for responding effectively to day-to-day public health issues and public
health emergencies. NPHPS instrument users at all levels report numerous benefits, including







Improvement in organizational and community communication and collaboration
Usefulness in educating participants about public health and the interconnectedness of activities
Strengthening of the diverse network of partners
Identification of strengths and weaknesses
Provides a benchmark for public health practice improvements.

1

NPHPS AND ACCREDITATION
How does the NPHPS align with accreditation efforts?
The NPHPS provides a framework for assessing public health system performance and thus helps health
departments better understand their agency’s role in delivering essential public health services and interacting with
public health system partners. This information may help state and local health departments prepare for or maintain
accreditation status.
There are three specific scenarios for which the NPHPS assessment process and results can help health
departments with accreditation and quality improvement:
1. The Public Health Accreditation Board (PHAB) accreditation guidance specifically identifies NPHPS a tool
or process that can be used meet PHAB standards 1.1.1 (state/community health assessment), 4.1.2
(models of community engagement), and 5.2.1 (community health improvement plan).
2. NPHPS can be used to identify and document the health department’s participation in, or contribution to,
other public health system activities where collaboration is necessary to meet PHAB standards.
Accreditation coordinators can use the NPHPS assessment process and its related documentation to
identify partnerships necessary to meet PHAB standards.
3. Health departments can use NPHPS to identify potential quality improvement opportunities or solutions as
part of meeting PHAB Standard 9.2. Results from the NPHPS strengths-weaknesses-opportunitiespriorities analysis can help health departments identify quality improvement projects, which can aid in the
pre-accreditation stage. Health department staff can then use NPHPS post-assessment guidance to work
through quality improvement planning and implementation. After accreditation, NPHPS assessment results
can also give health departments ideas for addressing areas of weakness found during the accreditation
process.

DRIVING PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT
STEPS TO THE PERFORMANCE
IMPROVEMENT PROCESS

IMPLEMENTATION TIPS

1. Organize participation for performance
improvement.
2. Prioritize areas for action.
3. Explore root causes of performance.
4. Develop and implement improvement plans.
5. Regularly monitor and report progress.










Use a systems approach—build on the
collaboration begun during the assessment.
Follow up with performance improvement priorities.
Select key measures to monitor and manage.
Link measurement to improvement.
Always plan before taking action—take the time to
set priorities and determine strategy.
Align your strategies with your partner
organizations.

For more information,
contact [email protected] or visit
www.cdc.gov/nphpsp
The NPHPS is a collaborative effort of CDC and the following partners:
American Public Health Association • Association of State and Territorial Health Officials
• National Association of County and City Health Officials • National Association of Local Boards of Health
• National Network of Public Health Institutes • Public Health Foundation

2