10 CFR Part 35 - 30-day, Final Federal Register Notice

Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 24 / Wednesday, February 5, 2014 / Notices
scheduling of a teleconference for the
transaction of National Science Board
business. This teleconference had
originally been scheduled for January
30, 2014.
NEW DATE AND TIME: Tuesday, February
4, 2014, 5:00 p.m.–6:00 p.m. EST.
PREVIOUS DATE AND TIME: January 30,
2014 at 4:00 p.m.
SUBJECT MATTER: Task Force members
will discuss a draft report and
recommendations.
STATUS: Open.
This meeting will be held by
teleconference. A public listening line
will be available. Members of the public
must contact the Board Office [call 703–
292–7000 or send an email message to
[email protected]] for the
public listening number. Please refer to
the National Science Board Web site
www.nsf.gov/nsb/notices for additional
information and schedule updates.
Point of contact for this meeting is Lisa
Nichols or John Veysey.
Ann Bushmiller,
Senior Counsel to the National Science Board.
[FR Doc. 2014–02519 Filed 2–3–14; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 7555–01–P

NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION
SAFETY BOARD

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Investigative Hearing
On Thursday, February 20, 2014, the
National Transportation Safety Board
(NTSB) will convene an investigative
hearing to gather additional factual
information for the ongoing
investigation of the UPS Airbus A300–
600 accident at Birmingham, Alabama,
that occurred in August 2013. The
NTSB Chairman Deborah A.P. Hersman
will preside over the investigative
hearing.
On August, 14, 2013, about 0447
central daylight time, UPS flight 1354,
an Airbus A300–600, N155UP, crashed
short of runway 18 while on approach
to Birmingham-Shuttlesworth
International Airport (BHM),
Birmingham, Alabama. The two flight
crewmembers were fatally injured, and
the airplane was destroyed by impact
forces and a postcrash fire. The cargo
flight was operating under the
provisions of 14 Code of Federal
Regulations Part 121 and originated
from Louisville International Airport,
Louisville, Kentucky. Instrument
meteorological conditions existed in the
area at the time of the accident.
The flight crew was landing the
airplane on runway 18 because the
longer runway at BHM was closed for

VerDate Mar<15>2010

17:50 Feb 04, 2014

Jkt 232001

repairs at the time of the airplane’s
arrival. Review of the cockpit voice
recorder and the flight data recorder
indicated that the flight crew was
executing a non-precision localizer
approach using vertical VNAV
guidance, and continued the descent
below the decision altitude. Despite not
having reported the airport in sight, the
crew continued the descent and
received enhanced ground proximity
warning system sink rate warnings; they
then indicated that they had the airport
in sight. The airplane’s vertical speed
began to reduce as the airplane
contacted trees and a power line; the
airplane then impacted the ground
about 0.75 nautical mile from the
threshold of runway 18.
The investigative hearing will discuss
the following issue areas:
• Execution of nonprecision
approaches, including initial and
recurrent training, adherence to
standard operating procedures, and
proficiency
• Human factors issues associated
with effective crew coordination and
resource management applicable to this
accident, including decision-making,
communication, fatigue, fitness for duty,
and monitoring and cross-checking, and
policies, standard operating procedures,
guidance, and training provided to UPS
crewmembers.
• Dispatch procedures, including the
training, evaluation, roles, and
responsibilities of UPS dispatchers, and
the limitations of dispatch-related
software.
Parties to the hearing will include the
Federal Aviation Administration, UPS,
Independent Pilots Association,
Transport Workers Union, and Airbus.
The accredited representative from the
French Bureau d’Enqueˆtes et d’Analyses
pour la se´curite´ de l’aviation civile will
participate on the technical panel.
At the start of the hearing, the public
docket will be opened. Included in the
docket are photographs, interview
transcripts, and other documents.
Order of Proceedings
1. Opening Statement by the Chairman
of the Board of Inquiry
2. Introduction of the Board of Inquiry
and Technical Panel
3. Introduction of the Parties to the
Hearing
4. Introduction of Exhibits by Hearing
Officer
5. Overview of the incident and the
investigation by Investigator-InCharge
6. Calling of Witnesses by Hearing
Officer and Examination of Witness
by Board of Inquiry, Technical Panel,
and Parties

PO 00000

Frm 00053

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

6933

7. Closing Statement by the Chairman of
the Board of Inquiry
The hearing docket is DCA13MA133.
The Investigative Hearing will be held
in the NTSB Board Room and
Conference Center, located at 429
L’Enfant Plaza E SW., Washington, DC,
on Thursday, February 20, 2014,
beginning at 8:30 a.m. The public can
view the hearing in person or by live
Webcast at www.ntsb.gov. Web cast
archives are generally available by the
end of the next day following the
hearing, and webcasts are archived for
a period of 3 months from after the date
of the event.
Individuals requiring reasonable
accommodation and/or wheelchair
access directions should contact Ms.
Rochelle Hall at (202) 314–6305 or by
email at [email protected] by
Friday, February 14, 2014.
NTSB Media Contact: Mr. Eric
Weiss—[email protected]
NTSB Investigative Hearing Officer:
Mr. John Lovell—[email protected]
Sheryl L. Chappell,
Executive Secretariat.
[FR Doc. 2014–02407 Filed 2–4–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7533–01–P

NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket No. NRC–2013–0221]

Agency Information Collection
Activities: Submission for the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB)
Review; Comment Request
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Notice of the OMB review of
information collection and solicitation
of public comment.
AGENCY:

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) has recently
submitted to OMB for review the
following proposal for the collection of
information under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. Chapter 35). The NRC hereby
informs potential respondents that an
agency may not conduct or sponsor, and
that a person is not required to respond
to, a collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number. The NRC published a Federal
Register notice with a 60-day comment
period on this information collection on
November 8, 2013 (78 FR 67203).
1. Type of submission, new, revision,
or extension: Revision.
2. The title of the information
collection: 10 CFR Part 35, ‘‘Medical
Use of Byproduct Material.’’

SUMMARY:

E:\FR\FM\05FEN1.SGM

05FEN1

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

6934

Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 24 / Wednesday, February 5, 2014 / Notices

3. Current OMB approval number:
3150–0010.
4. The form number if applicable:
N/A.
5. How often the collection is
required: Reports of medical events,
doses to an embryo/fetus or nursing
child, or leaking sources are reportable
on occurrence. A specialty board
certification entity desiring to be
recognized by the NRC must submit a
one-time request for recognition and
infrequently revise the information.
6. Who will be required or asked to
report: Physicians and medical
institutions holding an NRC license
authorizing the administration of
byproduct material or radiation from
this material to humans for medical use.
A specialty board certification entity
desiring to have its certifying process
and board certificate recognized by the
NRC.
7. An estimate of the number of
annual responses: 240,145 ((NRC:
31,431 + 1,035 recordkeepers = 32,466)
+ (Agreement States: 201,053 + 6,624
recordkeepers + 2 specialty certification
entity = 207,679)).
8. The estimated number of annual
respondents: 7,661 (1,035 for NRC
Licenses, 6,624 for Agreement States,
and 2 for specialty board certification
entities).
9. An estimate of the total number of
hours needed annually to complete the
requirement or request: 1,066,031 hours
(144,203 for NRC Licenses and 921,826
for Agreement States + 2 for specialty
board certification entities).
10. Abstract: Part 35 of Title 10 of the
Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR),
‘‘Medical Use of Byproduct Material,’’
contains NRC’s requirements and
provisions for the medical use of
byproduct material and for issuance of
specific licenses authorizing the
medical use of this material. These
requirements and provisions provide for
the radiation safety of workers, the
general public, patients, and human
research subjects. Part 35 contains
mandatory requirements that apply to
NRC licensees authorized to administer
byproduct material or radiation
therefrom to humans for medical use.
These requirements also provide
voluntary provisions for specialty
boards to apply to have their
certification processes recognized by the
NRC so that their board certified
individuals can use the certifications as
proof of training and experience.
The public may examine and have
copied for a fee publicly-available
documents, including the final
supporting statement, at the NRC’s
Public Document Room, Room O–1F21,
One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville

VerDate Mar<15>2010

16:50 Feb 04, 2014

Jkt 232001

Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852. The
OMB clearance requests are available at
the NRC’s Web site: http://www.nrc.gov/
public-involve/doc-comment/omb/. The
document will be available on the
NRC’s home page site for 60 days after
the signature date of this notice.
Comments and questions should be
directed to the OMB reviewer listed
below by March 7, 2014. Comments
received after this date will be
considered if it is practical to do so, but
assurance of consideration cannot be
given to comments received after this
date.
Danielle Jones, Desk Officer, Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs
(3150–0010), NEOB–10202, Office of
Management and Budget, Washington,
DC 20503.
Comments can also be emailed to
[email protected] or
submitted by telephone at 202–395–
1741.
The Acting NRC Clearance Officer is
Kristen Benney, telephone: 301–415–
6355.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 31st day
of January, 2014.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Brenda Miles,
Acting NRC Clearance Officer, Office of
Information Services.
[FR Doc. 2014–02424 Filed 2–4–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P

NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket No. NRC–2014–0015]

Agency Information Collection
Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Notice of pending NRC action to
submit an information collection
request to the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) and solicitation of public
comment.
AGENCY:

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) invites public
comment about our intention to request
the OMB’s approval for renewal of an
existing information collection that is
summarized below. We are required to
publish this notice in the Federal
Register under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. Chapter 35).
Information pertaining to the
requirement to be submitted:
1. The title of the information
collection: NRC Form 5, ‘‘Occupational
Dose Record for a Monitoring Period.’’

SUMMARY:

PO 00000

Frm 00054

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

2. Current OMB approval number:
3150–0006.
3. How often the collection is
required: Annually.
4. Who is required or asked to report:
NRC licensees who are required to
comply with Part 20 of Title 10 of the
Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR).
5. The number of annual respondents:
4,146 respondents (104 reactors plus
4,042 materials licensees).
6. The number of hours needed
annually to complete the requirement or
request: 130,852 hours (6,000 hours
reporting plus 124,852 hours
recordkeeping).
7. Abstract: The NRC Form 5 is used
to record and report the results of
individual monitoring for occupational
radiation exposure during a monitoring
(one-calendar year) period to ensure
regulatory compliance with annual
radiation dose limits specified in 10
CFR 20.1201.
Submit, by April 7, 2014, comments
that address the following questions:
1. Is the proposed collection of
information necessary for the NRC to
properly perform its functions? Does the
information have practical utility?
2. Is the burden estimate accurate?
3. Is there a way to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected?
4. How can the burden of the
information collection be minimized,
including the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology?
The public may examine and have
copied for a fee, publicly-available
documents, including the draft
supporting statement, at the NRC’s
Public Document Room, Room O–1F21,
One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852. The
OMB clearance requests are available at
the NRC’s Web site: http://www.nrc.gov/
public-involve/doc-comment/omb/.
The document will be available on the
NRC’s home page site for 60 days after
the signature date of this notice.
Comments submitted in writing or in
electronic form will be made available
for public inspection. Because your
comments will not be edited to remove
any identifying or contact information,
the NRC cautions you against including
any information in your submission that
you do not want to be publicly
disclosed. Comments submitted should
reference Docket No. NRC–2014–0015.
You may submit your comments by any
of the following methods: Electronic
comments to http://www.regulations.gov
and search for Docket No. NRC–2014–
0015. Mail comments to the Acting NRC
Clearance Officer, Kristen Benney (T–5
F53), U.S. Nuclear Regulatory

E:\FR\FM\05FEN1.SGM

05FEN1