2014 Ss 0190

Supporting Statement

Plants for Planting Regulations

0579-0190

May 2014

Introduction

The information collection 0579-0279 Importation of Nursery Stock Quarantine Regulations, is being combined with this information collection, 0579-0190. These collections include the same regulations; therefore, it will be more efficient to have them consolidated into one collection. Collection 0579-0279 will be discontinued once this collection is approved.

On May 27, 2011, APHIS published in the Federal Register (76 FR 31172-31210, Docket No. APHIS-2006-0011 a final rule that changed the Nursery Stock regulations (7 CFR 319.37 through 319.37 through 319.37-14) to refer instead to “Plants for Planting.” As a result, the title for this information collection has been changed to “Plants for Planting Regulations.”

A. JUSTIFICATION

1. Explain the circumstances that make the collection of information necessary. Identify any legal or administrative requirements that necessitate the collection.

The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) is responsible for preventing plant diseases or insect pests from entering the United States, preventing the spread of pests and noxious weeds not widely distributed into the United States, and eradicating those imported pests when eradication is feasible.

Under the Plant Protection Act (PPA) (7 U.S.C. 7701 – et seq), the Secretary of Agriculture is authorized to prohibit or restrict the importation, entry, exportation, or movement in interstate commerce of plant pests and other articles, to prevent the introduction of plant pests into the United States or their dissemination within the United States.

The regulations in 7 CFR Part 319 prohibit or restrict the importation of certain plants and plant products into the United States to prevent the introduction of plant pests and noxious weeds. The regulations contained in “Subpart-Plants for Planting,” §§ 319.37 through 319.37-14 (referred to as the regulations), restrict, among other things, the importation of living plants, plant parts, and seeds for propagation.

Plant Protection and Quarantine (PPQ), a program within USDA’s Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS), is responsible for implementing the PPA, and does so through the enforcement of its regulations. The nursery stock regulations restrict, among other things, the importation of living plants, plant parts, and seeds for propagation.

Implementing APHIS’ nursery stock regulations requires APHIS to collect information from a variety of individuals who are involved in growing, exporting, and importing nursery stock. The information APHIS collects serves as the supporting documentation needed to issue required PPQ forms and documents that allow importation of nursery stock. This documentation is vital to helping APHIS ensure that plant pests are not introduced into the United States.

APHIS’ regulations on importing nursery stock have eliminated various restrictions on the importation of kenaf seed to establish programs for the importation of approved plants from the Canary Islands and from Israel; require an additional declaration of the phytosanitary certificate accompanying blueberry plants imported from Canada; require that phytosanitary certificates include genus names of the restricted articles it accompanies, and the species’ names when restrictions apply to species within a genus; change the phytosanitary certificate requirements for several restricted articles to reduce the postentry quarantine growing period for Hydrangea spp.; and updated the list of ports of entry and Federal plant inspection stations.

APHIS is asking OMB to approve, for 3 more years, the use of these information collection activities associated with its effort to prevent the spread of plant pests and plant diseases from entering into the United States.

2. Indicate how, by whom, and for what purpose the information is to be used. Except for a new collection, indicate the actual use the agency has made of the information received from the current collection.

APHIS uses the following information activities to prevent the spread of plant pests and plant diseases from entering into the United States by reducing the postentry quarantine growing period for Hydrangea spp.; and to update the list of ports of entry and Federal plant inspection stations. APHIS requires a permit for the following restricted articles to ensure that plant pests and plant diseases are not introduced into the United States. APHIS uses this information to implement and invoke the requirements of the Plant Protection Act.

Foreign Site Certificate of Inspection and/or Treatment (PPQ Form 203) - Business

This form is used by APHIS to verify that all treatments of nursery stock performed outside of the United States, and supervised by an APHIS inspector in the country exporting the regulated articles to the United States, are conducted in accordance with the regulations. The APHIS inspector who supervises treatment, issues a PPQ Form 203 and certifies that the regulated articles have been treated in accordance with the PPQ Treatment Manual, which is incorporated by reference at § 300.1(a).

Written Request to APHIS Official for Permission to Move, Propagate, or Allow Propagation of a Regulated Article - Business

APHIS requires that a person who wishes to move, propagate, or allow propagation of a restricted article under postentry quarantine, request written permission from an APHIS official. This person must concurrently request similar permission from APHIS. This ensures that APHIS is made aware when plants in postentry quarantine are moved or propagated.

Permit for Restricted Articles (Application for Permit to Import Plant and Plant Products (PPQ Form 587)) - Business

a) The restricted articles (other than articles for food, analytical, medicinal, or manufacturing purposes) in any of the following categories may be imported or offered for importation into the United States only after issuance of a written permit by the PPQ programs:

(1) Articles subject to treatment and other requirements of §319.37–6;

(2) Articles subject to the postentry quarantine conditions of §319.37–7;

(3) Bulbs of Allium sativum (garlic), Crocosmia spp. (montebretia), Gladiolus spp. (gladiolus), and Watsonia spp. (bugle lily) from New Zealand;

(4) Articles of Cocos nucifera (coconut); and articles (except seeds) of Dianthus spp. (carnation, sweet-william) from any country or locality except Canada;

(5) Lots of 13 or more articles (other than seeds, bulbs, or sterile cultures of orchid plants) from any country or locality except Canada;

(6) Seeds of trees or shrubs from any country or locality except Canada;

(7) Articles (except seeds) of Malus spp. (apple, crabapple), Pyrus spp. (pear), Prunus spp. (almond, apricot, cherry, cherry laurel, English laurel, nectarine, peach, plum, prune), Cydonia spp. (quince), Chaenomeles spp. (flowering quince), and Rubus spp. (cloudberry, blackberry, boysenberry, dewberry, loganberry, raspberry), from Canada;

(8) Articles (except seeds) of Castanopsis spp. (chinquapin) destined to California or Oregon;

(9) Articles (except seeds) of Pinus spp. (pine), (5-leaved) destined to Wisconsin;

(10) Articles of Ribes spp. (currant, gooseberry), (including seeds) destined to Massachusetts, New York, West Virginia, or Wisconsin;

(11) Articles (except seeds) of Planera spp. (water elm, planer) or Zelkova spp. from Europe, Canada, St. Pierre Island, or Miquelon Island and destined to California, Nevada, or Oregon;

(12) Seeds of Prunus spp. (almond, apricot, cherry, cherry laurel, English laurel, nectarine, peach, plum, prune) from Canada and destined to Colorado, Michigan, New York, Washington, or West Virginia;

(13) Articles (except seeds) of Vitis spp. (grape) from Canada and destined to California, New York, Ohio, Oregon, and Washington;

(14) Articles (except seeds) of Corylus spp. (filbert, hazel, hazelnut, cobnut) from provinces east of Manitoba in Canada and destined to Oregon or Washington;

(15) Articles (except seeds) of Pinus spp. (pine) from Canada;

(16) Articles (except seeds) of Ulmus spp. (elm) from Canada and destined to California, Nevada, or Oregon;

(17) Solanum tuberosum true seed from New Zealand and the X Region of Chile (that area of Chile between 39° and 44° South latitude—see §319.37–5(o));

(18) Small lots of seed imported in accordance with §319.37–4(d) of this subpart; and

(19) Articles (except seeds) of Fraxinus spp. (ash) from counties or municipal regional counties in Canada that are not regulated for emerald ash borer (EAB) but are within an EAB-regulated Province or Territory and are not prohibited under §319.37–2(a).

Markings and Identity - Business

(a) Any restricted article for importation other than by mail (at the time of importation or offer for importation into the United States), will plainly and correctly bear on the outer container (if in a container) or the restricted article (if not in a container) the following information:

(1) General nature and quantity of the contents,

(2) Country and locality where grown,

(3) Name and address of shipper, owner, or person shipping or forwarding the article,

(4) Name and address of consignee,

(5) Identifying shipper's mark and number, and

(6) Number of written permit authorizing the importation, if one was issued.

(b) Any restricted article for importation by mail will be plainly and correctly addressed and mailed to the Plant Protection and Quarantine Programs at a port of entry identified in §319.37–14, will be accompanied by a separate sheet of paper within the package plainly and correctly bearing the name, address, and telephone number of the intended recipient, and will plainly and correctly bear on the outer container the following information:

(1) General nature and quantity of the contents,

(2) Country and locality where grown,

(3) Name and address of shipper, owner, or person shipping or forwarding the article, and

(4) Number of written permit authorizing the importation, if one was issued.

(c) Any restricted article for importation (by mail or otherwise, at the time of importation or offer for importation into the United States), will be accompanied by an invoice or packing list indicating the contents of the shipment.

* The following three information collection activities were previously accounted for under collection 0579-0279 and are being merged into this collection.

Phytosanitary Certificate with Declaration - Foreign

A phytosanitary certificate with an additional declaration is required for Pelargonium spp plants from the Canary Islands be grown under certain conditions confirming that those growing conditions have been met for Pelargonium spp. Plants and will minimize the risk that organisms such as Helicoverpa armigera, Chrysodeixis chalcites and Syngrapha circumflexa (syn. Cornutiplusia circumflexa) might enter the United States via the importation of these plants.

A phytosanitary certificate with an additional declaration is required that plants from Israel be grown under certain conditions confirming that those growing conditions have been met. Plants from Israel run the risk of harboring plant pests such as Spodoptera littoralis and other pests that could be introduced to the United States. Without control measures, S. littoralis could inflict heavy damage to both the yield and quality of U.S. cotton production.

Grower Registration and Agreement – Business and Foreign

Persons in the Canary Islands who produce Pelargonium spp plants for export to the United States must be registered and approved by the National Plant Protection Organization (NPPO) of Spain; and enter into an agreement with the NPPO of Spain whereby the producer agrees to participate in and follow the export program for Pelargonium spp. plants established by the NPPO of Spain.

Persons in Israel who produce plants for export to the United States must be registered and approved by the NPPO of Israel; and enter into an agreement with the NPPO of Israel whereby the producer agrees to participate in and follow the export program for plants established by the NPPO of Israel.

Production Site Registration for Export Program - Business and Foreign

Growers in the Canary Islands who produce Pelargonium spp. plants for export to the United States must meet the following requirements for inclusion in the export program for Pelargonium spp. plants established by the NPPO: Pelargonium spp. plants destined for export to the United States must be produced in a production site devoted solely to production of such plants. The production site must be registered with the NPPO and must employ safeguards agreed on by APHIS and the NPPO.

Growers in Israel who produce plants for export to the United States must meet the following requirements for inclusion in the export program for plants established by the NPPO of Israel. Plants destined for export to the United States must come from a production site devoted solely to production of such plants. The production sites in which such plants are produced must be registered with the NPPO of Israel.

3. Describe whether, and to what extent, the collection of information involves the use of automated, electronic, mechanical, or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses, and the basis for the decision for adopting this means of collection. Also describe any consideration of using information technology to reduce burden.

PPQ Forms 203 and 587 can be downloaded for completion and printed at:

http://www.aphis.usda.gov/library/forms/pdf/ppq203.pdf

http://www.aphis.usda.gov/library/forms/pdf/PPQ587.pdf

4. Describe efforts to identify duplication. Show specifically why any similar information already available cannot be used or modified for use for the purpose described in item 2 above.

The information APHIS collects is exclusive to its mission to prevent the introduction of plant pests into the United States. The information is not available from any other source.

5. If the collection of information impacts small businesses or other small entities, describe any methods used to minimize burden.

The information APHIS collects is the minimum needed to protect U.S. nursery stock and other plant resources from the potential introduction of plant pests into the United States. APHIS has determined that 60 percent of the respondents involved with this information collection are small entities.

6. Describe the consequences to Federal program or policy activities if the collection is not conducted or is conducted less frequently, as well as any technical or legal obstacles to reducing burden.

If APHIS did not collect this information or if this information was collected less frequently, APHIS could not verify that imported nursery stock does not present a significant risk of introducing plant pests into the United States. The establishment of certain plant pests in the United States could cause substantial losses to American agriculture.

7. Explain any special circumstances that require the collection to be conducted in a manner inconsistent with the general information collection guidelines in 5 CFR 1320.5.

• requiring respondents to report informa­tion to the agency more often than quarterly;

• requiring respondents to prepare a writ­ten response to a collection of infor­ma­tion in fewer than 30 days after receipt of it;

• requiring respondens to submit more than an original and two copies of any documents;

• requiring respondents to retain re­cords, other than health, medical, governm­ent contract, grant-in-aid, or tax records for more than three years;

• in connection with a statisti­cal sur­vey, that is not de­signed to produce valid and reli­able results that can be general­ized to the uni­verse of study;

• requiring the use of a statis­tical data classi­fication that has not been re­vie­wed and approved by OMB;

• that includes a pledge of confiden­tiali­ty that is not supported by au­thority estab­lished in statute or regu­la­tion, that is not sup­ported by dis­closure and data security policies that are consistent with the pledge, or which unneces­sarily impedes shar­ing of data with other agencies for com­patible confiden­tial use; or

• requiring respondents to submit propri­etary trade secret, or other confidential information unless the agency can demon­strate that it has instituted procedures to protect the information's confidentiality to the extent permit­ted by law.

No special circumstances exist that would require this collection to be conducted in a manner inconsistent with the general information collection guidelines in 5 CFR 1320.5.

8. Describe efforts to consult with persons outside the agency to obtain their views on the availability of data, frequency of collection, the clarity of instructions and recordkeeping, disclosure, or reporting form, and on the data elements to be recorded, disclosed, or reported. If applicable, provide a copy and identify the date and page number of publication in the Federal Register of the agency's notice, soliciting comments on the information collection prior to submission to OMB.

Productive consultations concerning information collection activities were made in 2013 with the following individuals:

Leo Roozen, Chairman

Society of American Florists

1601 Duke Street

Alexandria, VA 22314

360-424-5533

Joe Bischoff, Liaison

American Nursery and Landscape Assoc.

1250 I St., NW

Suite 500

Washington, DC 20005

(202) 789-2900

Robert Williams, II, AAF, PFCI
Smithers-Oasis - North American Operations
919 Marvin St
P.O. Box 790
Kent, OH 44240
330-676-4422

On Friday, February 21, 2014, pages 9874-9875, APHIS published in the Federal Register, a 60-day notice seeking public comments on its plans to request a 3-year approval of this collection of information. During that time no comments were received.

9. Explain any decision to provide any payment or gift to respondents, other than reenumeration of contractors or grantees.

This information collection activity involves no payments (other than appropriate, program related payments) or gifts to respondents.

10. Describe any assurance of confidentiality provided to respondents and the basis for the assurance in statute, regulation, or agency policy.

No additional assurance of confidentiality is provided with this information collection. Any and all information obtained in this collection shall not be disclosed except in accordance with

5 U.S.C. 552a.

11. Provide additional justification for any questions of a sensitive nature, such as sexual behavior and attitudes, religious beliefs, and others that are considered private. This justification should include the reasons why the agency considers the questions necessary, the specific uses to be made of the information, the explanation to be given to persons from whom the information is requested, and any steps to be taken to obtain their consent.

This information collection activity asks no questions of a personal or sensitive nature.

12. Provide estimates of the hour burden of the collection of information. Indicate the number of respondents, frequency of response, annual hour burden, and an explanation of how the burden was estimated.

• Indicate the number of respondents, frequency of response, annual hour burden, and an explanation of how the burden was estimated. If this request for approval covers more than one form, provide separate hour burden estimates for each form and aggregate the hour burdens in Item 13 of OMB Form 83I.

See APHIS Form 71 for hour burden estimates.

• Provide estimates of annualized cost to respondents for the hour burdens for collections of information, identifying and using appropriate wage rate categories.

Respondents are importers/exporters of nursery stock and NPPO officials. APHIS estimates the total annualized cost to these respondents to be $15,504.00. APHIS arrived at this figure by multiplying the total number of burden hours times the wage hourly rate. ($24.00 X 646 hours = $15,504.00).

These estimates were developed by using historical data through discussions with importers/exporters of nursery stock.

13. Provide estimates of the total annual cost burden to respondents or recordkeepers resulting from the collection of information, (do not include the cost of any hour burden shown in items 12 and 14). The cost estimates should be split into two components: (a) a total capital and startup cost component annualized over its expected useful life; and (b) a total operation and maintenance and purchase of services component.

There is no annual cost burden associated with capital and startup costs, maintenance costs, and purchase of services in connection with this program.

14. Provide estimates of annualized cost to the Federal government. Provide a description of the method used to estimate cost and any other expense that would not have been incurred without this collection of information.

See APHIS Form 79 for annualized cost to the Federal Government. This cost is based on the estimated average time required to process certificates, complete preclearance forms, and fulfill APHIS’ other regulatory obligations. These costs are estimated to be $39,899.00.

15. Explain the reasons for any program changes or adjustments reported in Items 13 or 14 of the OMB Form 831.

ICR Summary of Burden:
		Requested	Program Change Due to New Statute	Program Change Due to Agency Discretion	Change Due to Adjustment in Agency Estimate	Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA	Previously Approved
	Annual Number of Responses	5,364	0	5,164	20	0	180
	Annual Time Burden (Hr)	646	0	559	0	0	87
	Annual Cost Burden ($)	0	0	0	0	0	0

There is a program change increase of +64 respondents, +5164 annual responses and +559 burden hours because APHIS is now merging three information collection activities that were previously approved under collection 0579-0279. When this collection is approved, 0579-0279 will be discontinued

(a) Phytosanitary Certificate with Declaration for Canary Islands and Israel,

(b) Grower Registration and Agreement for Canary Islands and Israel (business and foreign government),

(c) Production Site Registration Export Program (business and foreign government)

There is an adjustment of +20 responses because of a calculation error on the APHIS 71 in the previous submission. The responses were reported as 180 but should have been 200, this error has been corrected.

16. For collections of information whose results are planned to be published, outline plans for tabulation and publication.

APHIS has no plans to tabulate or publish the information APHIS collects.

17. If seeking approval to not display the expiration date for OMB approval of the information collection, explain the reasons that display would be inappropriate.

APHIS will display the OMB expiration date on the PPQ Form 203.

The PPQ Form 587 is used in 9 collections; therefore, it is not practical to include an OMB expiration date because of the various expiration dates for each collection. APHIS is seeking approval to not display the OMB expiration date on this form.

18. Explain each exception to the certification statement identified in the "Certification for Paperwork Reduction Act."

APHIS is able to certify compliance with all the provisions in the Act.

B. Collections of Information Employing Statistical Methods

Statistical methods are not used in this information collection.