VS Stage 2 Non-sub Change Memo

VS Stage 2 Non-sub Change Memo_071814.docx

Continuation of National Children's Study Vanguard (Pilot) Study Data Collection: Study Visits through 60-Months

VS Stage 2 Non-sub Change Memo

OMB: 0925-0593

Document [docx]
Download: docx | pdf




DATE: July 18, 2014


TO: Dr. Margo Schwab

Office of Management and Budget

Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs


FROM: National Children’s Study Program Office


SUBJECT: Request for Non-Substantive Change to National Children’s Study, Vanguard (Pilot) Study (OMB Control #0925-0593, Expiration Date: June 30, 2017)

– Stage 2 Review of Request for Revision


CC: Ms. Seleda Perryman, Ms. Mikia Currie, Dr. Sarah Glavin, Ms. Jamelle Banks



The National Children’s Study (NCS) received a Notice of Action from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) on June 3, 2014 approving the continuation of NCS Vanguard Study data collection activities through the 60 month Study visit. The terms of clearance as noted on this action are as follows.

This package is being approved in stages due to breadth and complexity of the changes requested. The approval granted May 2014 ONLY covers the following elements: a) the continuation of already established data collection events (age-defined Study Visits or triggerbased collections) including all associated instruments protocols and consent documents, b) revision to the previously approved 30 month Study Visit, c) establishment of new Study Visits at 36 and 42 months. Although subsequent approval must be sought before implementing new Study Visits at ages 48, 54, and 60 months, adding biospecimen sampling to prior approved visits, conducting substudies and incentive tests, and initiating the sibling cohort, no additional public comment is required for the re-submission of the refined requests for these study components because public comment has already been sought and preliminary instruments were provided in the original submission. Additional discussion is also required to ensure that datasets are made available to non-NCS researchers in a manner consistent with the context in which they were approved.


Per these terms of clearance, the NCS now requests a non-substantive change from the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) to reflect refinements made to previously approved Study visits. Details are provided below.

1. Revision to Study Visits at 48, 54 and 60 months

As indicated in the initial submission, data collection activities at 48, 54, and 60 months are required to assess enrolled children as they age through key developmental periods. These Study visits have been approved in concept as part of the full clearance but are not yet implemented. The 48, 54, and 60 month Study visits will be administered to eligible, enrolled participants previously recruited from 40 NCS Vanguard Study locations.



Each Study visit is comprised of multiple components and modules; some are used repeatedly across several Study visits, while others are specific to defined ages or developmental stages. Per the above terms of clearance, the NCS has streamlined and updated components as appropriate. Table 1 below describes modifications made to age-specific modules since the initial submission. A complete listing of all domains included in each questionnaire is provided in Table 3 below.


Table 1. Revisions to originally submitted 48, 54, and 60M Instruments

Questionnaire

Module Name

Revisions

48 Month Child

Physical Activity

Removed 1 item

48 Month Adult

Sleep Routine

Removed 2 items

48 Month Household

Occupational/Hobby Exposures

Shortened module to 3 items

54 Month Adult

Cultural Values

Removed module

60 Month Child

Physical Activity

Removed module


Sun Exposure

Removed module


Noise Exposure

Replaced original module with streamlined version used in 36 Month Child Questionnaire

60 Month Household

All Modules

Removed all questions in the questionnaire



NCS visits are developed to align with specific periods in child development and assessments are intended to measure known developmental milestones. The scope of the assessments is based on the rate of development and the extent of the change during these time frames.1 Broad categories describing these milestones include Social & Emotional; Language/Communication; Cognitive; and Movement/Physical Development.2 The NCS also measures biological, environmental and social factors, categorized as General Health; Social Environment; and Physical Environment. These categories are mapped to specific instruments, assessments, and collections proposed for the 48, 54, and 60 Month Study visits. Table 2 provides this mapping for the sample collections, physical measures, and scored assessments associated with each Study visit. Collections or assessments that have not been implemented at younger ages are presented in italics.



Table 2. Sample Collections/Assessments and Associated Developmental Milestones of the 48, 54, and 60M Study visits

Collection Type

Collection/Assessment

Target or Subject(s)

Milestone(s)

Study Visit(s)

Physical Measures

Anthropometry

Child

General Health

48M, 60M


Blood Pressure

Child

General Health

48M, 60M


NIH Toolbox Visual Acuity Test

Child

General Health

60M


Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis

Child

General Health

48M, 60M


Lung Function

Child

General Health

60M


NIH Toolbox Early Childhood Motor Battery

Child

General Health; Movement/Physical Development

60M


Physical Activity Monitoring

Child

General Health; Movement/Physical Development

48M, 60M






Biospecimens

Blood

Child; Adult

General Health; Physical Environment

60M


Urine

Child; Adult

General Health; Physical Environment

60M


Saliva

Child

General Health; Physical Environment

60M


Microbiome

Child; Adult

General Health; Physical Environment

48M


Baby Teeth

Child

General Health; Physical Environment

60M






Environmental Samples

Vacuum Bag Dust

Household

Physical Environment

48M, 60M


Dust Wipe

Household

Physical Environment

48M, 60M


Noise

Household

Physical Environment

60M






Scored Assessments

Ages & Stages Questionnaire-3TM

Child

Social & Emotional;

Language/Communication;

Cognitive;

Movement/Physical Development

48M, 60M


SWAN Rating Scale for ADHD

Child

Social & Emotional;

Language/Communication;

Cognitive

60M


NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery

Adult

Social & Emotional;

Language/Communication;

Cognitive

48M


NIH Toolbox Parent Proxy Emotion Battery

Adult

Social & Emotional


48M


Major Life Events

Adult

Social & Emotional; Social Environment

60M


Autism Quotient Test

Child

Social & Emotional; Social Environment;

Language/Communication;

Cognitive

54M


NIH Toolbox Early Childhood Cognition Battery

Child

Language/Communication;

Cognitive

60M



Table 3 provides similar information for the questionnaires administered at each Study visit. All domains and sections included in each questionnaire are noted, with any section not previously implemented at younger ages highlighted in italics.


Table 3. Questionnaire Domains and Associated Milestones from the 48, 54, and 60M Study visits

Questionnaire

Section Name

Target or Subject(s)

Milestone(s)

Study Visit(s)

Core

Child Care/Day Care Arrangements and Exposures

Child

Social Environment; Physical Environment

48M, 54M, 60M


Viewing of Media/Reading Books

Child

Social & Emotional; Social Environment;

Language/Communication;

Cognitive;

Movement/Physical Development

48M, 54M, 60M


Program Participation/Receipt of Benefits

Child; Household

Social Environment

54M


Health Insurance

Child

Social Environment

54M


Health Care Utilization/Access

Child

General Health; Social Environment

48M, 54M, 60M


General Health

Child; Adult

General Health; Social & Emotional

48M, 54M, 60M (Child); 48M, 60M (Adult)


Medical Conditions – General

Child

General Health; Social & Emotional

48M, 60M


Medical Conditions – Asthma & Eczema

Child

General Health

48M, 54M, 60M


Well-Child Care/Vaccinations

Child

General Health

48M, 54M, 60M


Emergency Room/Urgent Care Visits

Child

General Health

48M, 60M


Hospitalizations

Child

General Health

48M, 60M


Medications

Child

General Health

48M, 54M, 60M


Sleep Routine

Child

General Health; Social Environment; Social & Emotional

48M, 54M, 60M


Concerns about Child’s Development

Child

Language/Communication; Movement/Physical Development ; Social & Emotional

48M, 54M, 60M


Employment

Adult

Social Environment

48M, 60M


Occupation

Adult

Physical Environment; Social Environment

48M, 60M


Education

Adult

Social Environment

48M, 60M


Housing Characteristics

Household

Physical Environment; Social Environment

48M, 54M, 60M


Neighborhood Characteristics

Household

Physical Environment; Social Environment

48M, 54M, 60M


Pesticide Use

Household

Physical Environment

48M, 54M, 60M


Smoking in Home

Household

Physical Environment; Social Environment

48M, 54M, 60M


Pets

Household

Physical Environment; Social Environment

48M, 54M, 60M


Income

Household

Social Environment

54M






Age-Specific

Parenting

Child

Social Environment; Social & Emotional

48M


Physical Activity

Child

Movement/Physical Development; General Health; Social Environment; Physical Environment

48M


Sun Exposure

Child

General Health; Social Environment; Physical Environment

48M


Occupational/Hobby Exposures

Household

Physical Environment

48M


Sleep Routine

Adult

General Health; Social Environment; Social & Emotional

48M


Dietary Food Frequency

Child

General Health

54M


Health Behaviors

Child

General Health; Social Environment; Physical Environment

54M


Religious Affiliation

Adult

Social Environment

54M


Parenting (Parental Modernity Scale)

Adult

Social Environment; Social & Emotional

54M


Noise Exposure


Child

Environmental Exposures; Social Environment; Social & Emotional

60M


Race/Ethnicity

Child

Social Environment

60M


School Experiences

Child

Social Environment; Social & Emotional; Physical Environment

60M


Household Composition & Demographics

Adult

Social Environment

60M






Interviewer Completed

Interviewer Observations

Child; Adult; Household

Social Environment; Social & Emotional; Physical Environment

48M, 54M, 60M


Indoor/Outdoor Dwelling Visual Observations

Household

Social Environment; Physical Environment

48M, 60M






Trigger-Based

Secondary Residence

Household

Social Environment; Physical Environment

48M, 54M, 60M


NCS Sub-Studies

Two NCS sub-studies were previously approved but are not yet implemented. This non-substantive change request seeks clearance to begin their administration starting at the 36 month Study visit.


Noise. Noise is recognized by the European Union and the World Health Organization as an important exposure to children (European Union, 2011; World Health Organization-Joint Research Centre of the Commission, 2011). While the principal health impact of loud noise is hearing loss, effects arising from lower noise levels may include hypertension, tachycardia, increased cortisol release, and increased physiologic stress (Seidman and Standring, 2010). Recent studies have addressed non-auditory health effects of noise in children including reduced cognitive function, inability to concentrate, increased psychosocial activation, nervousness, and helplessness (Schell et al., 2006; Evans et al., 2001; World Health Organization-Joint Research Centre of the Commission, 2011). Living in crowded and noisy environments is associated with health risks for children including an increase in stress (Ising & Kruppa, 2004). Studies of aircraft noise indicate a slight tendency towards a positive relationship between aircraft noise exposure and blood pressure in children, and studies on road-traffic noise show a more uniform trend in the direction of a positive relationship with systolic blood pressure in children (Paunović et al, 2011).


Sources of environmental noise are not well characterized but include noise such as transient noise intrusions from outdoors (e.g., airplanes, cars, trucks, construction, industry, or outdoor events) and sources indoors (e.g., television, music, appliances, and ventilation equipment). Some noises can arise from either outdoors or indoors (e.g., sounds made by neighbors, talk, laughter, slamming doors, and noise from animals, such as barking dogs) (Omlin et al, 2011; European Union, 2011).


Typically, noise is assessed by recall questionnaire about exposure to noise or by measurement of a specific external source outside the home, such as an airport or highway. Both are inferior to a direct measurement of noise as proposed by the NCS. The NCS proposes to investigate the feasibility, acceptability, and cost to characterize noise in the homes of participants with a noise measurement device. This study will test the performance of the selected device to measure and record the intensity and duration of noise in the environment, the ability to identify sources of noise detected, assess participant tolerance and burden for this kind of measurement assessment, and determine the cost to deploy this kind of device. From this study, the NCS will learn the logistics required to set up an instrument to measure noise in homes, the duration of monitoring required to characterize noise in homes, and if the results of direct measurements are superior to conventional procedures.


Noise measurements will be conducted in the homes of approximately 200 NCS enrolled children, randomly selected, from one Regional Operations Center (ROC). (These children will not be the same as those children enrolled in the sub-study of physical activity). Noise measures will be collected at the 36 and 60 Month Study Visits for a total of 400 measurements. This number of measurements should provide a sufficient number of sampling events to determine the logistics to deploy the device, participant acceptance of the device in their home, and encounter different sources of noise.


The ability to efficiently and economically measure noise directly would produce better quality data while reducing participant burden than current measurement procedures (i.e., questionnaires).


Physical Activity. The NCS proposes a direct measurement of childhood physical activity at the 36, 48, and 60 Month Study Visits. We seek to identify an objective, unbiased measure of physical activity of young children, as report of these measures by parents and caregivers are often subjective and potentially less informative than direct measures.


The NCS will pilot the use of accelerometers at three data collection points with a subsample of approximately 200 NCS enrolled children in one ROC using a protocol developed and tested by the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). (These children will not be the same as those children enrolled in the sub-study of noise). A total of 600 measurements will be taken. This number of measurements should provide a sufficient number of sampling events to determine the logistics to deploy the device, assess participant acceptance of the device, and assess differences in physical activity at different ages.


NHANES successfully measured physical activity in 3-4 year old children with an 80% compliance rate. Additional data collection is needed in the NCS, because there is limited experience with measuring physical activity in young children and no longitudinal studies of physical activity measurement in young children to our knowledge. More study is needed to test the performance and ability to evaluate accelerometer data in a cohort of young children and to gain experience with the rate of change in children’s physical activities (and the ability to measure them) as they grow older. This collection will provide data on the benefits and limitations of the methodology, the informative value of accelerometer data to estimate children’s physical activities, and an evaluation of the logistics associated with data capture, transmission, and analysis of accelerometer data. Multiple data collection times are required as the changes in data over time are currently unknown.


2. Revisions to Informed Consent Documents

The consent materials were revised in response to the comments provided by OMB.  A number of revisions were made across the consent materials to:

  • remove the use of the term “confidentiality;”

  • to clarify and harmonize the periodicity of visits across all consent materials;

  • to clarify the time points/ages at which children can be considered legal adults and provide their own consent versus the 21-year period that we hope to follow participants; and

  • to provide more examples of sites on the body for planned skin swab collections.  


These changes to the consent materials are noted in a summary table (Attachment 7) that lists individual comments and NCS responses.  We also provided responses to six specific questions from OMB which touched on some of the areas specified above as well as issues regarding reconsent and the frequency of consent administration.  A comprehensive response is available in Attachment 7.

In general, with regard to our approach to informed consent, the NCS views informed consent as a process rather than a single event.  In the Vanguard Study, informed consent and assent are regarded as ongoing, cumulative processes rather than as single events.  After administration of the initial informed consent form, the NCS ongoing consent process continues with the administration of the Multimode Visit Information Script (MMVIS, Attachment 13) and the Sample Collection Visit Information Sheet (SCVIS) requirements (Attachment 14).  Participants’ ongoing verbal consent or dissent for Study participation as well as for participation in specific assessments is obtained using these materials which are tailored to explain the activities around Study contacts and assessments. The MMVIS is read at all contacts (regardless of mode of visit administration) and the SCVISs are provided for the in-person visits including where assessments other than questionnaires are planned.


Because the NCS develops the content of contacts on a flow basis, the SCVISs are a critical part of the ongoing informed consent process.  The MMVIS includes a reminder of the key points of the general information about Study participation conveyed during the initial consent process. In response to discussion with OMB, these key points have been made uniform across the MMVIS and the SCVIS as part of the changes made to the consent materials.  The combination of the initial consent, which includes documentation of consent, and then the administration of MMVIS AND SCVIS materials for ongoing verbal consent for Study participation and the conduct of specific assessments, achieves a robust, informative, and minimally burdensome consent process.


List of Attachments (includes only instruments/documents that were revised from the original submission)

Attach 1. 48 Month Adult Questionnaire

Attach 2. 48 Month Child Questionnaire

Attach 3. 48 Month Household Questionnaire

Attach 4. 54 Month Adult Questionnaire

Attach 5. 60 Month Child Questionnaire

Attach 6. 60 Month Household Questionnaire

Attach 7. IRB Response to OMB Consent Concerns

Attach 8. Informed Consent Form - Pregnant Woman

Attach 9. Informed Consent Form – Fathers and Parental Partners

Attach 10. Informed Consent Form – Adult

Attach 11. Parental Permission Child Participation- 6 Months to Age of Majority

Attach 12. Parental Permission Child Participation- Birth to 6 Months of Age

Attach 13. Multi-Mode Visit Information Script

Attach 14. Sample Collection Visit Information Sheet Scripts

Attach 15. HIPAA Authorization to Obtain Bodily Fluids and Tissues

Attach 16. Authorization for Release of Birth Certificate

Attach 17. Authorization for Release of Child Death Certificate

Attach 18. Authorization for Release of Parent/Guardian Death Certificate

Attach 19. Reconsideration Questionnaire Adult

Attach 20. Reconsideration Questionnaire Child

1 Developmental Milestones: Motor Development R. Jason Gerber, Timothy Wilks, and Christine Erdie-Lalena.  Pediatrics in Review 2010; 31:267-277. 

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20595440


Developmental Milestones: Cognitive Development Timothy Wilks, R. Jason Gerber, and Christine Erdie-Lalena.  Pediatrics in Review 2010; 31:364-367.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20810700


Gerber RJ, Wilks T, Erdie-Lalena C. Developmental milestones 3: social-emotional development. Pediatr Rev. 2011 Dec;32(12):533-6.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22135423


27


File Typeapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
AuthorGraber, Jessica (NIH/NICHD) [E]
File Modified0000-00-00
File Created2021-01-27

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy