"Logic Model" Grant Performance Report Standard

"Logic Model" Grant Performance Report Standard

Fair Housing EOI

"Logic Model" Grant Performance Report Standard

OMB: 2535-0114

Document [doc]
Download: doc | pdf

HUD Master Models Education and Outreach

FHIP-EOI Education and Outreach

To inform the public of their rights and obligations under the Fair Housing Act and substantially

equivalent State and local laws.

Need Statements

Lack of Housing Knowledge

The public has a general lack of knowledge and awareness about what equal opportunity in housing means as well as the obligations of compliance.


Activities and Outputs


Accessibility events

Events

Analysis of local impediments to housing choice

Analysis

Arabic translators/interpreters hired

Persons

Asian translators/interpreters hired

Persons

Community meetings/workshops

Persons

Complaint intake

Complaints

Counseling for non-English speakers

Persons

Design/develop computer tutorial

Computer tutorials

Develop training materials

Materials

Development of fair housing curricula

Curriculum

Development of new activities/materials

Materials/Activities

Development of technical materials on accessibility

Materials

Expand mailing list

Persons

Fact sheets

Materials

Fair Housing activities

Activities

Homebuyer education/training

Persons

Housing counseling and classes

Persons

Identify/participate networking groups

Groups

Immigrant-led tenant associations

Associations

Interpretation for fair housing activities

Sessions

Introduce Fair Housing curricula to students

Persons

Introduce Fair Housing curricula to teachers

Persons

Involve lenders

Lenders

Materials produced in non-English languages

Materials

Media spots

Media spots

Meetings between housing industry and housing groups

Meetings

Newsletters

Newsletters

Outreach and information

Materials

Outreach to American Indians

Persons

Outreach to Asians

Persons

Outreach to college students

Persons

Outreach to disability support organizations

Organizations

Outreach to disabled population

Persons

Outreach to Hispanics

Persons

Outreach to non-English/immigrant population

Persons

Outreach/education to/for local government

Persons

Partnership with homeless activists

Partnerships

Predatory lending training/education

Persons

Press release

Press releases

PSA in non-English language

PSAs

Public awareness ads

Ads

Public Service Announcements

Announcements

Referral of Fair Housing complaints

Referrals

Referrals to Legal Aid

Referrals

Renters' rights booklets

Materials

Russian translators/interpreters hired

Persons

Spanish translator/interpreters hired

Persons

Staff training

Persons

Student intern recruitment

Persons

Train trainers

Persons

Translation of existing Fair Housing materials

Materials

Workshops for investors

Persons

Workshops/Education for non-English speakers

Persons

Other

Other

Outcomes and Indicators


Clients attending classes/workshops

Persons

Clients counseled

Persons

Clients demonstrate understanding of predatory lending

Persons

Clients know rights and able to avoid violations

Persons

Clients make complaint

Persons

Clients pass Fair Housing post-test

Persons

Clients received Fair Housing information

Persons

Clients resolve complaint

Persons

Disabled clients whose living situation improves

Persons

Educational classes

Persons

Foreclosures decline by 18 months

Foreclosures

Homeless clients who find housing

Persons

Landlords/housing industry reps attend classes

Persons

New activities/outreach resulting from analysis

Persons

New clients

Persons

New clients as a result of Fair Housing month activities

Persons

New disabled clients

Persons

New non-English speaking clients

Persons

Non-English speaking clients identify housing discrimination

Persons

Other

Other







Measurement Tools


A. Tools to Track Outputs and Outcomes


Bank accounts

Construction log

Database

Enforcement log

Financial aid log

Intake log

Interviews

Mgt. Info. System-automated

Mgt. Info. System-manual

Outcome scale(s)

Phone log

Plans

Pre-post tests

Post tests

Program specific form(s)

Questionnaire

Recruitment log

Survey

Technical assistance log

Time sheets

Other


B. Where Data are Maintained


Agency database

Centralized database

Individual case records

Local precinct

Public database

School

Specialized database

Tax Assessor database

Training center

Other


C. Source of Data


Audit report

Business licenses

Certificate of Occupancy

Code violation reports

Counseling reports

Employment records

Engineering reports

Environmental reports

Escrow accounts

Financial reports

GED certification/diploma

Health records

HMIS

Inspection results

Lease agreements

Legal documents

Loan monitoring reports

Mortgage documents

Payment vouchers

Permits issued

Placements

Progress reports

Referrals

Sale documents

Site reports

Statistics

Tax assessments

Testing results

Waiting lists

Work plan reports

Other


D. Frequency of Data Collection


Daily

Weekly

Monthly

Quarterly

Biannually

Annually

Upon incident

Other



E. Process of Collection and Reporting


Computer spreadsheets

Flat file database

Manual tallies

Relational database

Statistical database

Other


Evaluation Process – These are standard requirements that HUD will expect every program manager receiving a grant to do as part of their project management.

  • An evaluation process will be part of the on-going management of the program.

  • Comparisons will be made between projected and actual numbers for both outputs and outcomes.

  • Deviations from projected outputs and outcomes will be documented and explained.

  • Analysis of data to determine the relationship of outputs to outcomes; what outputs produce which outcomes.


HUD Will Use The Following Questions To Evaluate Your Program


  1. How many new Fair Housing clients were there?

  2. How many persons attending workshops, counseling and classes by English and non-English speakers?

  3. How many landlords and industry representatives attending Fair Housing activities?

  4. How many complaints were filed?

  5. How many complaints were resolved?

  6. How many persons had their living or housing situation improved?

  7. How many homeless persons found housing?

  8. Was there a reduction in the number of foreclosures? If so, how many?




Carter-Richmond Methodology


The above Management Questions developed for your program are based on the Carter-Richmond Methodology1. A description of the Carter-Richmond Methodology appears in the General Section of the NOFA.



© The Accountable Agency – How to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Public and Private Programs,” Reginald Carter, ISBN Number 9780978724924.


4



File Typeapplication/msword
AuthorFrederick Richmond
Last Modified ByHUD User
File Modified2014-11-25
File Created2014-11-25

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy