"Logic Model" Grant Performance Report Standard

"Logic Model" Grant Performance Report Standard

Fair Housing PEI

"Logic Model" Grant Performance Report Standard

OMB: 2535-0114

Document [doc]
Download: doc | pdf

HUD Master Models Private Enforcement Initiative

FHIP-PEI Private Enforcement Initiative

To assist private, tax-exempt Fair Housing organizations in the investigation and enforcement of alleged

violations of the Fair Housing Act and substantially equivalent State and local Fair Housing laws.

Need Statements


There is a need for investigating systematic violations of the Fair Housing Act or substantially equivalent State and Fair Housing local laws.

There is a need for enforcement of violations of the Fair Housing Act and substantially equivalent State and local Fair Housing laws.



Activities and Outputs

Accessibility tests lead to litigation

Tests

Accessibility Workshops attendance

Persons

Accessibility Workshops conducted

Workshops

Allegations litigated

Litigations

Allegations mediated

Mediations

Analyze internet tests

Tests

Assess FHAA case merit

Complaints

Assist clients requesting reasonable accommodation/modification

Persons

Attorney Referral System

Attorneys

Audits

Audits

Businesses whose business practices were analyzed

Businesses

Case management services

Persons

Case meetings w/attorneys

Meetings

Complaint inquiries

Persons

Complaint intake and/or process

Intakes

Complaints filed

Persons

Complaints filed to partner agency

Complaints

Complaints filed Zoning

Complaints

Complaints filed Zoning – Disability Issues

Complaints

Complaints filed/referred to HUD

Complaints

Complaints investigated Zoning

Complaints

Complaints investigated Zoning – Disability Issues

Investigations

Complaints referred to attorneys

Complaints

Contact media when violations identified

Contacts

Counseling for complaints by immigrants

Complaints

Develop protocol for referrals

Protocol

Develop tracking for referrals

Referrals

Direct mailings to underserved households

Households

Documents translated for non-English speakers

Documents

Draft HUD complaints

Complaints

Enforcement proposals filed

Filings

Enforcement proposals filed w/HUD

Proposals

Evaluate/Revise test methodology

TestsMethodology’s

Expert witnesses procured

Persons

Fair Housing assessments

Assessments

Fair housing education/training

Persons

Fair housing education/training for disabled

Persons

Fair housing law & enforcement training/education

Persons

Favorable pre-filing closings

Complaints

FH Counseling

Persons

Litigation

Litigation

Market research prior to testing

Results of Research

Mediation

Mediation

Meetings w/building trade & architectural groups

Meetings

Meetings w/local groups

Meetings

Monitor settlement agreements

Agreements

Monitor zoning changes

Monitoring

Mortgage/lending test conducted

Tests

Non-English speakers receive translated fair housing materials

Persons

Outreach & education

Persons

Paired tests – Administered test

Persons

Partnerships w/fair housing orgs

Partnerships

Partnerships w/local agencies/orgs

Partnerships

Partnerships w/local government

Partnerships

Partnerships with FHAPs

FHAPs

Persons assisted – Disabled

Persons

Persons assisted – Non-disabled

Persons

Phone assisted – Disabled

Persons

Phone assisted – Non-disabled

Persons

Phone tests conducted

Tests

Predatory lending complaints accepted for intervention prevention

Complaints

Property searches

Persons

Provide website

Hits to website

Publications distributed to recipients

Persons

Recruit student interns

Persons

Recruit testers

Persons

Rental complaints intake and/or processed

Complaints

Retest sites

Sites

Sessions/training for non-English speakers

Sessions

Site Assessments

Assessments

Site tests conducted

Tests

Speaking engagements

Events

Speaking engagements attendance

Persons

Staff training

Persons

Targeted investigations

Investigations

Test site visits – Zoning

Visits

Test site visits – Zoning – # of Persons impacted at the census

Persons

Test site visits – Zoning – # of Persons impacted at the census track(s) level

Persons

Test site visits – Zoning – Disability issues

Visits

Test site visits – Zoning – Disability issues - # of persons impacted at the census track(s) level

Persons

Test sites identified

Sites

Testing and evaluation testers trained

Evaluation

Tests retested

Tests

Tests show differential treatment

Tests

Train student interns

Persons

Train testers

Persons

Volunteer help

Persons

Witnesses interviewed

Persons

Other

Other


Outcomes and Indicators


Attorney’s fee received

Dollars

Cases resolved

Persons

Cases resolved to benefit client

Persons

Client damages received via FHAP or litigations

Dollars

Clients indicate use of PEI program as a result of direct mailings to underserved households

Persons

Clients indicate use of PEI program as a result of received publications

Persons

Clients indicate use of PEI program as a result of attending meetings or presentations

Persons

Clients indicate use of PEI program as a result of educational programs

Persons

Clients obtain safe affordable housing

Persons

Clients retain safe affordable housing

Persons

Complaints – Zoning – # of Persons impacted by favorable Zoning changes at the census tract(s) level

Persons

Complaints – Zoning Disability issues – # of Persons impacted by favorable Zoning changes at the census tract(s) level

Persons

Complaints closed with advice

Complaints

Develop protocol for referrals

Protocols

Dollar value of the purchased home

Dollars

Dollar value of the rental property obtained

Dollars

Dollar value of the settlement

Dollars

Housing Units opened up from discrimination

Units

Paired test indicates denial of reasonable accommodations

Persons

Paired test indicates denial of reasonable modifications

Persons

Paired test indicates unfair treatment based upon color

Persons

Paired test indicates unfair treatment based upon religion

Persons

Paired test indicates unfair treatment based upon sex

Persons

Paired test indicates unfair treatment based upon chemical sensitivity

Persons

Paired test indicates unfair treatment to American Indians

Persons

Paired test indicates unfair treatment to Asians

Persons

Paired test indicates unfair treatment to Blacks

Persons

Paired test indicates unfair treatment to families with children

Persons

Paired test indicates unfair treatment to Hispanic

Persons

Paired test indicates unfair treatment to persons with mental disabilities

Persons

Paired test indicates unfair treatment to persons with physical disabilities

Persons

Paired test indicates unfair treatment to Whites

Persons

Requests for accommodations/modification granted

Persons

Use tracking system for referrals

Referrals

Other

Other



Measurement Tools


A. Tools to Track Outputs and Outcomes


Bank accounts

Construction log

Database

Enforcement log

Financial aid log

Intake log

Interviews

Mgt. Info. System-automated

Mgt. Info. System-manual

Outcome scale(s)

Phone log

Plans

Pre-post tests

Post tests

Program specific form(s)

Questionnaire

Recruitment log

Survey

Technical assistance log

Time sheets

Other


B. Where Data are Maintained


Agency database

Centralized database

Individual case records

Local precinct

Public database

School

Specialized database

Tax Assessor database

Training center

Other


C. Source of Data


Audit report

Business licenses

Certificate of Occupancy

Code violation reports

Counseling reports

Employment records

Engineering reports

Environmental reports

Escrow accounts

Financial reports

GED certification/diploma

Health records

HMIS

Inspection results

Lease agreements

Legal documents

Loan monitoring reports

Mortgage documents

Payment vouchers

Permits issued

Placements

Progress reports

Referrals

Sale documents

Site reports

Statistics

Tax assessments

Testing results

Waiting lists

Work plan reports

Other


D. Frequency of Data Collection


Daily

Weekly

Monthly

Quarterly

Biannually

Annually

Upon incident

Other



E. Process of Collection and Reporting


Computer spreadsheets

Flat file database

Manual tallies

Relational database

Statistical database

Other






Evaluation Process – These are standard requirements that HUD will expect every program manager receiving a grant to do as part of their project management.

  • An evaluation process will be part of the on-going management of the program.

  • Comparisons will be made between projected and actual numbers for both outputs and outcomes.

  • Deviations from projected outputs and outcomes will be documented and explained.

  • Analysis of data to determine the relationship of outputs to outcomes; what outputs produce which outcomes.




HUD Will Use The Following Management Questions To Evaluate Your Program


  1. How many clients were served during the period of performance?

  2. Of those served how many resulted in cases?

  3. How many cases were resolved?

  4. How many cases were resolved to the benefit of the client?

  5. How many zoning complaints were resolved in favor of the client?

  6. How many estimated persons were favorably impacted by zoning changes?

  7. How many persons obtained safe affordable housing?

  8. How many persons retained safe affordable housing?

  9. What was the dollar value of settlements?

  10. What was the dollar value of purchased homes?

  11. What was the dollar value of rental properties obtained?

  12. How many new fair housing clients were served?

  13. How many new fair housing clients were served as a result of education and outreach efforts?

  14. What were the top three outreach and education efforts that resulted in new clients to your program, e.g., direct mailings to underserved households, distribution of publications, attendance at a meeting or presentation, attendance at an educational program.

  15. How many disability-related cases were resolved to the benefit of the client?

  16. How many disability-related zoning cases were resolved in favor of the client?

  17. How many persons with disability obtained affordable housing?

  18. How many persons with disability retained affordable housing?

  19. What was the average amount of allocated PEI funding used per complaint referred to FHIP’s and HUD?



Carter-Richmond Methodology


The above Management Questions developed for your program are based on the Carter-Richmond Methodology1. A description of the Carter-Richmond Methodology appears in the General Section of the NOFA.


1© The Accountable Agency – How to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Public and Private Programs,” Reginald Carter, ISBN Number 9780978724924.


5


File Typeapplication/msword
AuthorFrederick Richmond
Last Modified ByHUD User
File Modified2014-11-25
File Created2014-11-25

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy