0704-0446 Supporting Statement 082014

0704-0446 Supporting Statement 082014.doc

Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement: Evaluation Factor for Use of Members of the Armed Forces Selected Reserve

OMB: 0704-0446

Document [doc]
Download: doc | pdf

Supporting Statement

0704-0446

Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement: Evaluation Factor for Use of Members of the Armed Forces Selected Reserve


A. Justification


1. Requirement. This justification supports reinstatement of an information collection requirement that implemented section 819 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 (Pub. L. 109-163)(10 U.S.C. 2305 Note). Section 819 authorizes DoD to use an evaluation factor that considers whether an offeror intends to carry out a contract using employees or individual subcontractors who are members of the Selected Reserve component of the Armed Forces. In addition, section 819 requires that an offeror stating such intent must submit proof for DoD to consider. DoD amended the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to implement the statutory provisions of section 819 under DFARS final rule 2006-D014, which was published in the Federal Register at 73 FR 62211 on October 20, 2008. The information collection requirement for OMB Control Number 0704-0446 was approved as part of this final rule with an initial expiration date of November 30, 2011. An emergency extension extended the expiration date to February 29, 2012. Renewal of this clearance was inadvertently overlooked.


2. Purpose. For those acquisitions in which contracting officials decide to use this evaluation factor as one of the several factors normally used to determine award of a contract, the offeror’s information will be used as proof of the offeror’s intent to use Selected Reserve members in the performance of the contract. DFARS provision 252.215-7005, Evaluation Factor for Employing or Subcontracting with members of the Selected Reserve, requires this information be submitted with the offer and it is reviewed and evaluated by the contracting officer or panel of evaluators in determining the successful offeror.


3. Information Technology. Improved information technology will be used to the maximum extent practicable. Where offerors have automated systems that contain the information needed for this requirement, they may submit the information in formats that are compatible with the automated systems.


4. Duplication. As a matter of policy, DoD reviews the FAR and DFARS to determine if adequate language already exists. This information collection implements a DoD-unique statutory provision and does not duplicate any other requirement.


5. Small Business. This information collection is the minimum consistent with applicable laws, Executive Orders, regulations, and prudent business practices. Any impact will apply to large and small businesses equally, whenever the solicitation employs an evaluation factor that considers whether an offeror intends to perform the contract using employees or individual subcontractors who are members of the Selected Reserve.


6. Consequences for noncollection. The collection is required only when acquisition officials have exercised their discretionary authority to include this criterion as an evaluation factor for award, and then only if an offeror states an intent to use Selected Reserve members in the performance of the contract. Less frequent collection would not permit DoD to evaluate offers in accordance with the provisions of section 819 of Public Law 109-163.


7. Special circumstances. This collection is consistent with the guidelines in 5 CFR 1320.5(d).


8. Public comments and consultation. Public comments were initially solicited in the Federal Register, at 79 FR 30832 on May 29, 2014, as required by 5 CFR 1320.8(d). DoD received no comments on the proposed information collection. On August 20, 2014, DARS published a notice in the Federal Register at 79 FR 49290 stating that the proposed information collection had been submitted to OMB for approval.


9. Payment to respondents. No payment or gift will be provided to respondents.


10. Confidentiality. The information collected will be disclosed only to the extent consistent with internal DoD proposal evaluation procedures. During evaluation, the information will be considered “procurement sensitive” and, if the offeror’s proposal is declared “proprietary” by the offeror, it will be treated as such. No assurance of confidentiality beyond that normally applied to offers is provided to respondents.


11. Sensitive questions. No sensitive questions are involved.


12. Estimate of Public Burden. Based upon the discretionary nature of this evaluation factor, a maximum of 50 acquisitions is expected to employ it annually. The estimated annual cost to the public is as follows:




a. Number of respondents: 100.

(50 acquisitions X 8 offers X 25% with intentions)

b. Responses per respondent: 1.

c. Total responses: 100.

d. Hours per response: 1.

e. Total hours: 100.

f. Cost per hour: $31.*

g. Total public cost: $3,100.


*Based on the calendar year 2014, GS-09, Step 5 salary of $22.80 plus 36.25 percent burden= $31.06 rounded to $31.


13. Estimated nonrecurring costs. The DoD does not estimate any annual costs burden apart from the hour burdens in item 12.


14. Estimated cost to the Government. The DoD estimates that it will take the Government 1 hour to review and process the information in each response. The estimated annual cost to the Government is as follows:

a. Total responses: 100.

b. Hours per response: 1.

c. Total hours: 100.

d. Cost per hour: $31.*

e. Total Government cost: $3,100.


*Based on the calendar year 2014, GS-09, Step 5 salary of $22.80 plus 36.25 percent burden= $31.06 rounded to $31.


15. Reasons for change in burden. This is a reinstatement of a previously approved information collection under OMB Control Number 0704-0446.


16. Publication. Results of this information collection will not be tabulated or published.


17. Expiration date. DoD does not seek approval to not display the expiration dates for OMB approval of the information collection.


18. Certification. There are no exceptions to the certification accompanying this Paperwork Reduction Act submission.


B. Collection of Information Employing Statistical Methods.


Statistical methods will not be employed.

4

File Typeapplication/msword
File TitleOMB No
AuthorMichael Benavides
Last Modified ByManuel Quinones
File Modified2014-08-20
File Created2014-08-14

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy