Focus Groups Assessing the Uptake and Effectiveness of Inside Knowledge: Get the Facts About Gynecologic Cancer Campaign Materials
2015/2016 Focus Group Testing with Selected Audiences
Submitted under OMB No. 0920-0800
Focus Group Testing to Effectively Plan and Tailor Cancer Prevention and Control Communication Campaigns
Generic Information Collection
Expiration date December 31, 2017
Supporting Statement Part B
December 22, 2015
Contracting Officer’s Representative:
Mary Puckett, PhD
Division of Cancer Prevention and Control
Phone: 770-488-6451
Fax: 770-488-4335
E-mail: [email protected]
Supported by:
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion
Division of Cancer Prevention and Control
4770 Buford Highway, NE, Mailstop F-76
Atlanta, GA 30341
TABLE OF CONTENTS
B. Data Collection & Statistical Methods ………………………………………….
B1. Respondent Universe……………………………………………………………
B2. Procedures for Information Collection………………………………………….
B3. Methods to Maximize Response Rates………………………………………….
B4. Tests of Procedures or Methods to be Undertaken……………………………...
B5. Individuals Consulted on Statistical Aspects and Individuals Collecting and/or
Analyzing Data…………………………………………………………………..
List of Tables
Table B1-A Ethnic and Sociodemographic Characteristics of Focus Group Areas
Table B1-B Number of Respondents by Population
List of Attachments
A1. Legislative Authority: Public Health Service Act, 42 U.S.C. 241
A2. Johanna’s Law
B. Consent Form
C. Focus Group Discussion Guide
D1. Focus Group Recruitment Form for Hispanic Women
D2 Focus Group Recruitment Form for Low SES Women
D3. Focus Group Recruitment Form for Women with Disabilities
E1. Cervical Cancer Fact Sheet
E2. Uterine Cancer Fact Sheet
E3. Ovarian Cancer Fact Sheet
E4. Vaginal and Vulvar Cancer Fact Sheet
B. DATA COLLECTION & STATISTICAL METHODS
Data collection will consist of a focus group methodology. In a focus group, a small group of people engage in a discussion of selected topics of interest typically directed by a moderator who guides the discussion in order to obtain the group’s opinions (Edmunds, 1999; Krueger & Casey, 2000). Qualitative information will be collected to provide insights about respondents’ knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and behavioral intent regarding the diagnosis and treatment of gynecologic cancers during a guided discussion using Inside Knowledge (IK) campaign materials (all five fact sheets available at www.cdc.gov/cancer/knoweldge in English and Spanish). Focus group findings will be used to inform the development of specific, targeted materials that are culturally appropriate and the refinement of existing campaign materials.
B1. Respondent Universe
Respondents will include a convenience sample of members of the general public who are non-incarcerated, non-institutionalized adults that identify themselves as being Hispanic, of low socioeconomic status or having a disability. These populations of women were chosen because of their need for gynecologic cancer information and persistent gaps in uptake observed in previous focus groups. Self-report of Hispanic ethnicity will be used to identify Hispanic participants. Low SES will include women who self-report meeting one of the following criteria: (1) household income less than $35,000, (2) less than a High School Diploma or GEB, (3) uninsured, (4) unemployed, or (5) make only minimum wage. Women with disabilities will include women who self-report having one of the following: (1) a disability, (2) a mental illness, (3) or substance abuse.
Focus groups will be held in Washington, DC, Chicago, IL, Hampton, VA, Phoenix, AZ, Atlanta, GA, Philadelphia, PA, and San Diego, CA. Table B1-A demonstrates the population of women who will be recruited from each geographic area.
Table B1-A. Ethnic and Sociodemographic Characteristics of Focus Group Areas
U.S. City |
Ethnicity: Hispanic |
Low SES |
Disabilities |
Atlanta, GA |
|
X |
|
Chicago, IL |
|
X |
|
Hampton, VA |
|
X |
|
Philadelphia, PA |
X |
|
|
Phoenix, AZ |
|
X |
|
San Diego, CA |
X |
|
|
Washington, DC |
|
|
X |
A total of 194 respondents will be involved in the focus groups (total estimate from all groups). Focus groups will be held separately in small groups of 10 or fewer respondents. All focus group discussions will be based on a common group of questions (see Attachment C, Focus Group Discussion Guide). In all cases the burden per response is two hours. Table B1-B shows the target number of respondents from each geographic area and audience segment. In all areas, several focus groups will be held in order to obtain the most comprehensive information and insights into the persistent uptake gaps.
Table B1-B. Number of Respondents by Sociodemographic Characteristic
Sociodemographic Characteristic |
No. of Respondents |
Approximate Number of Focus Groups |
Hispanic |
24 |
3 |
Low SES |
100 |
10 |
Disabilities |
70 |
7 |
Total |
194 |
20 |
B2. Procedures for Information Collection
In order to elicit focus group responses to effectively plan for the development of new, targeted materials and refine existing materials for the Inside Knowledge campaign, the following steps will occur:
Participants will be identified and recruited from populations of Hispanic women, low socioeconomic status women, and women with disabilities in Washington, D.C, Chicago, IL, Hampton, VA, Phoenix, AZ, and Atlanta, GA. CDC’s National Comprehensive Cancer Control Program (NCCCP) and their partners, which have vast experience in conducting focus groups and a demonstrated and unique ability to reach individuals in the target populations, will recruit participants (Major 2009, CDC 2012, Stewart 2013). Participants will be recruited using established partnerships with non-profit and community-based organizations to identify participants. Potential participants will be screened using in-person and telephone methods (see Attachments D1, D2, D3). Screening will be based on the particular sociodemographic population of women being tested in each focus group. Prior to conducting the individual focus groups, consent forms will be signed by all participants (Attachment B).
Focus group discussions will be conducted under the direction of a professionally trained moderator. The attached focus group guide (Attachment C) will be used to guide all discussions. The estimated burden per response is two hours. The information collected will be used by DCPC to appropriately plan for the development of new targeted materials and also the refinement of existing Inside Knowledge campaign materials. Focus group questions will be the same regardless of population of the focus group, and the focus group guide will be utilized in every focus group. All focus groups will be held in English, and English Inside Knowledge materials will be used during the group, with the exception of focus groups for Hispanic women, where the focus group will be facilitated in Spanish and English and the existing Spanish and English Inside Knowledge materials will be used. The materials to be tested are included as Attachments E1, E2, E3, and E4. During focus group sessions, participants will be asked questions at the beginning of the session that specifically relate to the key central messages of the IK campaign (see section A1 on page 3) to ascertain their general knowledge and attitudes toward gynecologic cancer. After a facilitated discussion of IK materials (the five fact sheets available at www.cdc.gov/cancer/knoweldge), questions on appeal, saliency, and understanding of the key central messages will be asked again in order to determine qualitative increases in knowledge and behavioral intentions that are consistent with the key central messages.
B3. Methods to Maximize Response Rates
To maximize response rates, we will
Ask local NCCCP grantees and their partners to assist in identifying and recruiting potential focus group participants, drawing on established relationships to efficiently recruit a convenience sample of respondents with diverse points of view;
Offer a modest incentive to respondents who participate in the focus groups for the general public.
B4.Tests of Procedures or Methods to be Undertaken
All DCPC communication campaigns are guided by the Health Communication Process (National Cancer Institute, 2002) which involves four stages: (stage 1) planning and strategy development; (stage 2) developing and pretesting concepts, messages, and materials; (stage 3) implementing the program; and (stage 4) assessing effectiveness and making refinements. The Health Communication Process is not linear, but rather is a circular model in which stages are revisited in a continuous loop of planning, development, implementation, and refinement. DCPC campaign staff carefully record all aspects of campaign development, operation, and evaluation. Innovations and improvements are incorporated into subsequent campaign cycles and periodically published in the peer-review literature (Cooper et al., 2011, Cooper et al., 2013). The use of focus group methodology to inform the development and refinement of communication campaigns has been well documented throughout the literature (Bull, et al., 2002; Edmunds, 1999; Krueger, 1994; Krueger & Casey, 2000; Cooper et al., 2011). Thus, the formative and materials-testing methods currently used by DCPC campaigns have been refined in 14 years of campaign operations.
B5. Individuals Consulted on Statistical Aspects and Individuals Collecting and/or Analyzing Data
The following individuals have been consulted on the design of this qualitative information collection:
Cynthia A. Gelb, BSJ
Division of Cancer Prevention and Control
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
4770 Buford Highway NE, Mailstop K64
Atlanta, GA 30341
Phone: (770) 488-4708
Mary Puckett, PhD†
Division of Cancer Prevention and Control
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
4770 Buford Highway NE, MS-F76
Atlanta, GA 30341
Phone: (770) 488-6451
Sherri Stewart, PhD†
Division of Cancer Prevention and Control
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
4770 Buford Highway, N.E., MS-F76
Atlanta, GA 30341
Phone: 770-488-4616
Ena Wanliss, MS
Division of Cancer Prevention and Control
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
4770 Buford Highway, N.E., MS-F76
Atlanta, GA 30341
Phone: 770-488-4225
Chris Bartlett, MPH*†
SciMetrika, LLC
100 Capitola Dr., Suite 106
Durham, NC 27713
Phone: (919) 354-5238
*Persons responsible for data collection
†Persons responsible for data analysis
References
Bull, S. A., Cohen, J., Ortiz, C. & Evans, T. (2002). The POWER Campaign for Promotion of Female and Male Condoms: Audience Research and Campaign Development. Health Communication, 14 (4), 475-491.
Cooper C., Polonec L., Gelb C. (2011). Women's knowledge and awareness of gynecologic cancer: a multisite qualitative study in the United States. Journal of women's health, 20(4):517-24.
Edmunds H. (1999). The Focus Group Research Handbook. Chicago: NTC Business Books.
Krueger, R.A. (1994). Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Krueger R.A., Casey M.A. (2000). Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Major A, Stewart SL. Celebrating 10 years of the National Comprehensive Cancer
Control Program, 1998 to 2008. Prev Chronic Dis. 2009 Oct;6(4):A133.
National Cancer Institute. (2002). Making Health Communication Programs Work (NIH Publication No. 02-5145). Bethesda, MD: Department of Health and Human Services.
Stewart SL, Lakhani N, Brown PM, Larkin OA, Moore AR, Hayes NS. Gynecologic
cancer prevention and control in the National Comprehensive Cancer Control
Program: progress, current activities, and future directions. J Womens Health
(Larchmt). 2013 Aug;22(8):651-7.
U.S. Cancer Statistics Working Group. United States Cancer Statistics: 1999-2007 Incidence and Mortality Web-based Report. Atlanta: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and National Cancer Institute; 2010.
File Type | application/msword |
File Title | Supporting Statement for |
Author | sxw2 |
Last Modified By | Macaluso, Renita (CDC/ONDIEH/NCCDPHP) |
File Modified | 2015-12-22 |
File Created | 2015-12-18 |