30-day notice

65696

Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 214 / Wednesday, November 5, 2014 / Notices

B. Solicitation of Public Comment
This notice is soliciting comments
from members of the public and affected
parties concerning the collection of
information described in Section A on
the following:
(1) Whether the proposed collection
of information is necessary for the
proper performance of the functions of
the agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(2) The accuracy of the agency’s
estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection of information;
(3) Ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and
(4) Ways to minimize the burden of
the collection of information on those
who are to respond; including through
the use of appropriate automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology, e.g., permitting
electronic submission of responses.
HUD encourages interested parties to
submit comment in response to these
questions.
Authority: Section 3507 of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35.
Dated: October 30, 2014.
Colette Pollard,
Department Reports Management Officer,
Office of the Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2014–26339 Filed 11–4–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
[Docket No. FR–5752–N–88]

30-Day Notice of Proposed Information
Collection: Application for Healthy
Homes and Lead Hazard Control Grant
Programs and Quality Assurance
Plans
Office of the Chief Information
Officer, HUD.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:

HUD has submitted the
proposed information collection
requirement described below to the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review, in accordance with
the Paperwork Reduction Act. The
purpose of this notice is to allow for an
additional 30 days of public comment.
DATES: Comments Due Date: December
5, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit comments regarding
this proposal. Comments should refer to
the proposal by name and/or OMB
Control Number and should be sent to:
HUD Desk Officer, Office of
Management and Budget, New
Executive Office Building, Washington,
DC 20503; fax: 202–395–5806. Email:
[email protected].
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Anna Guido, Reports Management
Officer, QDAM, Department of Housing
and Urban Development, 451 7th Street
SW., Washington, DC 20410; email at
Anna [email protected] or telephone 202–
402–5535. Persons with hearing or
speech impairments may access this
number through TTY by calling the tollSUMMARY:

free Federal Relay Service at (800) 877–
8339. This is not a toll-free number.
Copies of available documents
submitted to OMB may be obtained
from Ms. Guido.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
notice informs the public that HUD has
submitted to OMB a request for
approval of the information collection
described in Section A.
The Federal Register notice that
solicited public comment on the
information collection for a period of 60
days was published on September 3,
2014.
A. Overview of Information Collection
Title of Information Collection:
Application for Healthy Homes and
Lead Hazard Control Grant Programs
and Quality Assurance Plans.
OMB Approval Number: 2539–0015.
Type of Request: Extension.
Form Number: HUD 96012, HUD
96009, HUD 96015, HUD 27061, SF 424,
HUD 2994–A, SF LLL, HUD 96010,
HUD 96011, HUD 96014, HUD 424 cbw,
HUD 2880, HUD 96013, HUD 96008,
HUD 27300, SF 424 sup, HUD 2900,
HUD 2991, HUD 2993.
Description of the need for the
information and proposed use:
Respondents: Cities, States and
municipalities, universities, private
companies.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
250.
Estimated Number of Responses: 250.
Frequency of Response: Annual.
Average Hours per Response: 80.
Total Estimated Burdens: 23,760
hours, $950,400.

Information collection

Number of
respondents

Frequency of
response

Responses
per annum

Burden hour
per response

Annual burden
hours

Hourly cost
per response

Annual cost

Total .............................

250

11

1

80

23,760

$40.00

$950,400

1(Annual)

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

B. Solicitation of Public Comment
This notice is soliciting comments
from members of the public and affected
parties concerning the collection of
information described in Section A on
the following:
(1) Whether the proposed collection
of information is necessary for the
proper performance of the functions of
the agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(2) The accuracy of the agency’s
estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection of information;
(3) Ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and

VerDate Sep<11>2014

17:42 Nov 04, 2014

Jkt 235001

(4) Ways to minimize the burden of
the collection of information on those
who are to respond; including through
the use of appropriate automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology, e.g., permitting
electronic submission of responses.
HUD encourages interested parties to
submit comment in response to these
questions.
Authority: Section 3507 of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35.

PO 00000

Dated: October 31, 2014.
Anna Guido,
Department Reports Management Officer,
Office of the Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2014–26338 Filed 11–4–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[LLAK930000.L13100000.FF0000.241A]

Renewal of Approved Information
Collection; Control Number 1004–0201
AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management,

Interior.

Frm 00082

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

E:\FR\FM\05NON1.SGM

05NON1

65697

Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 214 / Wednesday, November 5, 2014 / Notices
30-day notice and request for
comments.

ACTION:

The Bureau of Land
Management (BLM) has submitted an
information collection request to the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) to continue the collection of
information from applicants for oil shale
leases, oil shale lessees, and oil shale
operators. The Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) previously approved
this information collection activity, and
assigned it control number 1004–0201.
DATES: The OMB is required to respond
to this information collection request
within 60 days but may respond after 30
days. For maximum consideration,
written comments should be received
on or before December 5, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Please submit comments
directly to the Desk Officer for the
Department of the Interior (OMB #10040201), Office of Management and
Budget, Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, fax 202–395–5806,
or by electronic mail at OIRA_
[email protected]. Please
provide a copy of your comments to the
BLM. You may do so via mail, fax, or
electronic mail.
Mail: U.S. Department of the Interior,
Bureau of Land Management, 1849 C
Street NW., Room 2134LM, Attention:
Jean Sonneman, Washington, DC 20240.
Fax: to Jean Sonneman at 202–245–
0050.
Electronic mail: Jean_Sonneman@
blm.gov.
Please indicate ‘‘Attn: 1004–0201’’
regardless of the form of your
comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mary Linda Ponticelli at 202–912–7115.
Persons who use a telecommunication
device for the deaf may call the Federal

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

SUMMARY:

Information Relay Service at 1–800–
877–8339 to leave a message for Ms.
Ponticelli. You may also review the
information collection request online at
http://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/
PRAMain.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
3501–3521) and OMB regulations at 5
CFR part 1320 provide that an agency
may not conduct or sponsor a collection
of information unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
Until OMB approves a collection of
information, you are not obligated to
respond. In order to obtain and renew
an OMB control number, Federal
agencies are required to seek public
comment on information collection and
recordkeeping activities (see 5 CFR
1320.8(d) and 1320.12(a)).
As required at 5 CFR 1320.8(d), the
BLM published a 60-day notice in the
Federal Register on August 4, 2014 (79
FR 45216), and the comment period
ended September 3, 2014. The BLM
received no comments. The BLM now
requests comments on the following
subjects:
1. Whether the collection of
information is necessary for the proper
functioning of the BLM, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
2. The accuracy of the BLM’s estimate
of the burden of collecting the
information, including the validity of
the methodology and assumptions used;
3. The quality, utility and clarity of
the information to be collected; and
4. How to minimize the information
collection burden on those who are to
respond, including the use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other forms of
information technology.

Please send comments as directed
under ADDRESSES and DATES. Please
refer to OMB control number 1004–0201
in your correspondence. Before
including your address, phone number,
email address, or other personal
identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
The following information is provided
for the information collection:
Title: Oil Shale Management (43 CFR
parts 3900, 3910, 3920, and 3930).
OMB Control Number: 1004–0201.
Summary: This control number
applies to the exploration, development,
and utilization of oil shale resources on
public lands managed by the BLM.
Currently, the only oil shale leases
issued by the BLM are for research,
development, and demonstration
(RD&D). However, the BLM has issued
a regulatory framework for both
commercial leases and conversion of
RD&D leases to commercial leases.
Frequency of Collection: On occasion.
Forms: None.
Description of Respondents:
Applicants for oil shale leases, oil shale
lessees, and oil shale operators.
Estimated Annual Responses: 24.
Estimated Annual Burden Hours:
1,795.
Estimated Annual Non-Hour Costs:
$526,627.
The estimated burdens are itemized in
the following table:

Type of response

Number of
responses

Hours per
response

Total time
(Column B ×
Column C)

A.

B.

C.

D.

Application for Waiver, Suspension, or Reduction of Rental or Payment In Lieu of Production;
Application for Reduction in Royalty; or Application for Waiver of Royalty—43 CFR
3903.54(b) ................................................................................................................................
Bonding Requirements—43 CFR subpart 3904 ..........................................................................
Application for an Exploration License—43 CFR 3910.31(a) through (e) ..................................
Notice Seeking Participation in an Exploration License—43 CFR 3910.31(f) ............................
Data Obtained Under an Exploration License—43 CFR 3910.44 ..............................................
Response to Call for Expression of Leasing Interest—43 CFR 3921.30 ...................................
Application for a Lease—Individuals—43 CFR 3902.23, 3922.20, and 3922.30 .......................
Application for a Lease—Associations—43 CFR 3902.24, 3922.20, and 3922.30 ....................
Application for a Lease—Corporations—43 CFR 3902.25, 3922.20, and 3922.30 ....................
Sealed Bid—43 CFR 3924.10 .....................................................................................................
Application to Convert Research, Development, and Demonstration Lease to Commercial
Lease—43 CFR 3926.10(c) .....................................................................................................
Drill and Geophysical Logs—43 CFR 3930.11(b) .......................................................................
New Geologic Information—43 CFR 3930.20(b) ........................................................................
Plan of Development—43 CFR 3931.11 .....................................................................................
Application for Suspension of Lease Operations and Production—43 CFR 3931.30 ................

VerDate Sep<11>2014

17:42 Nov 04, 2014

Jkt 235001

PO 00000

Frm 00083

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

E:\FR\FM\05NON1.SGM

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

1
1
24
1
8
4
308
308
308
8

1
1
24
1
8
4
308
308
308
8

1
1
1
1
1

308
19
19
308
24

308
19
19
308
24

05NON1

65698

Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 214 / Wednesday, November 5, 2014 / Notices

Type of response

Number of
responses

Hours per
response

Total time
(Column B ×
Column C)

A.

B.

C.

D.

Exploration Plan—43 CFR 3931.41 ............................................................................................
Modification of Approved Exploration Plan or Plan of Development—43 CFR 3931.50 ............
Production Maps and Production Reports—43 CFR 3931.70 ....................................................
Records of Core or Test Hole Samples and Cuttings—43 CFR 3931.80 ..................................
Application for Modification of Lease Size—43 CFR 3932.10, 3930.20, and 3932.30 ..............
Request for Approval of Assignment of Record Title or Sublease or Notice of Overriding Royalty Interest Assignment—43 CFR subpart 3933 ....................................................................
Relinquishment of Lease or Exploration License—43 CFR 3934.10 .........................................
Production and Sale Records—43 CFR 3935.10 .......................................................................

1
1
1
1
1

24
24
16
16
12

24
24
16
16
12

2
1
1

10
18
16

20
18
16

Totals ....................................................................................................................................

24

........................

1,795

Jean Sonneman,
Bureau of Land Management, Information
Collection Clearance Officer.

The public record for this investigation
may be viewed on the Commission’s
electronic docket (EDIS) at http://
edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired
persons are advised that information on
this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810.

[FR Doc. 2014–26327 Filed 11–4–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–84–P

INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION

Certain Consumer Electronics with
Display and Processing Capabilities;
Commission Decision to Review In
Part a Final Initial Determination
Finding a Violation of Section 337;
Request for Written Submissions;
Extension of Target Date
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:

Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined to review
in part the presiding administrative law
judge’s (‘‘ALJ’’) final initial
determination (‘‘final ID’’) issued on
August 29, 2014, finding a violation of
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337 (‘‘section
337’’), and to extend the target date in
the above-captioned investigation.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Megan M. Valentine, Office of the
General Counsel, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
708–2301. Copies of non-confidential
documents filed in connection with this
investigation are or will be available for
inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the
Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205–2000. General
information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its
Internet server at http://www.usitc.gov.

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

SUMMARY:

VerDate Sep<11>2014

17:42 Nov 04, 2014

The
Commission instituted this investigation
on June 25, 2013, based on a complaint
filed by Graphics Properties Holdings,
Inc. of New Rochelle, New York
(‘‘GPH’’). 78 FR 38072–73 (June 25,
2013). The complaint alleged violations
of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930,
as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, in the
importation into the United States, the
sale for importation, and the sale within
the United States after importation of
certain consumer electronics with
display and processing capabilities by
reason of infringement of certain claims
of United States Patent Nos. 6,650,327
(‘‘the ’327 patent’’); 8,144,158 (‘‘the ’158
patent’’); and 5,717,881 (‘‘the ’881
patent’’). The notice of investigation
named as respondents Panasonic
Corporation of Osaka, Japan and
Panasonic Corporation of North
America of Secaucus, New Jersey
(collectively ‘‘Panasonic’’); Toshiba
Corporation of Tokyo, Japan and
Toshiba America Information Systems,
Inc. of Irvine, California (collectively
‘‘Toshiba’’); Toshiba America, Inc. of
New York, New York (‘‘Toshiba
America’’); Vizio, Inc. of Irvine,
California (‘‘Vizio’’); AmTran Logistics,
Inc. of Irvine, California and AmTran
Technology Co., Ltd. of New Taipei
City, Taiwan (collectively ‘‘AmTran’’);
and ZTE Corporation of Shenzhen,
China, ZTE (USA) Inc. of Richardson,
Texas, and ZTE Solutions of
Richardson, Texas (collectively, ‘‘ZTE’’).
The Office of Unfair Import
Investigations (‘‘OUII’’) is a party to the
investigation. The Commission later
terminated the investigation with

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

[Investigation No. 337–TA–884]

Jkt 235001

PO 00000

Frm 00084

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

respect to Panasonic, Vizio, AmTran,
and ZTE.
On March 31, 2014, the Commission
determined not to review an ID granting
respondents’ motion for summary
determination that claim 1 of the ’881
patent is invalid for indefiniteness, thus
terminating the ’881 patent from the
investigation. Notice (Mar. 31, 2014);
Order Nos. 53 (Feb. 27, 2014), 60 (Mar.
11, 2014, correcting Order No. 53).
On August 29, 2014, the ALJ issued
his final ID, finding a violation of
section 337 with respect to Toshiba.
Specifically, the ALJ found that all of
the accused products literally infringe
claims 2, 3, 7, 25, and 26 of the ’327
patent and claims 1, 4, 7, and 10 of the
’158 patent (‘‘the asserted claims’’). The
ALJ also found that none of the asserted
claims of the ’327 patent are invalid as
anticipated under 35 U.S.C. 102 or as
obvious under 35 U.S.C. 103. The ALJ
further found that none of the asserted
claims of the ’158 patent are invalid as
anticipated under 35 U.S.C. 102, as
obvious under 35 U.S.C. 103, or for lack
of written description under 35 U.S.C.
112. The ALJ also found that the
respondents did not establish that any
of the asserted patents are unenforceable
due to estoppel based on GPH’s
obligation to license the asserted patents
under reasonable and
nondiscriminatory (‘‘RAND’’) terms or
that license exhaustion applies with
respect to any of the asserted patents.
The ALJ further found that a domestic
industry exists with respect to the ’327
and ’158 patents.
The ALJ found, however, that no
violation of section 337 exists as to
respondent Toshiba America with
respect to the asserted claims of the ’327
and ’158 patents because GPH failed to
satisfy the importation or sale
requirement of section 337 establishing
subject matter jurisdiction as to Toshiba
America. No party petitioned for review
of this finding.

E:\FR\FM\05NON1.SGM

05NON1