Attachment G-2: Consultation - Canberra

Consultation.canberra.doc

Submission of Unreasonable Adverse Effects Information Under FIFRA Section 6(a)(2)

Attachment G-2: Consultation - Canberra

OMB: 2070-0039

Document [doc]
Download: doc | pdf


EPA Questions Asked in Consultation for the 6(a)(2) ICR:


Name: John Wiegand , Company: Canberra Corporation

Date: 01/30/2014 , e-mail address: [email protected]



(1) Publicly Available Data


  1. Is the data that the Agency seeks available from any public source, or already collected by another office at EPA or by another agency? NO


  1. If yes, where can you find the data? (Does your answer indicate a true duplication, or does the input indicate that certain data elements are available, but that they don’t meet our data needs very well?)


(2) Frequency of Collection


  1. Can the Agency collect the information less frequently and still produce the same outcome? ONLY THE AGENCY CAN ANSWER THIS


(3) Clarity of Instructions


a) The ICR is intended to require that respondents provide certain data so that the Agency can utilize them.


  1. Based on the instructions (regulations, PR Notices, etc.), is it clear what you are required to do and how to submit such data? If not, what suggestions do you have to clarify the instructions? YES – INSTRUCTIONS ARE CLEAR


  1. Do you understand that you are required to maintain records? YES


  1. Considering that there is no required submission format, is it difficult to submit information in ways that are clear, logical and easy to complete? NO – THE VOLUNTARY FORM SUFFICES FOR US.


  1. Regarding the Voluntary Incident Reporting Forms, do you use them? Are they clear, logical, and easy to complete? YES TO BOTH


(4) Electronic Reporting and Record keeping


The Government Paperwork Elimination Act requires agencies make available to the public electronic reporting alternatives to paper-based submissions by 2003, unless there is a strong reason for not doing so. The U.S. E.P.A. Office of Pesticide Programs has a program for electronic study submissions, and is currently developing plans for systems to support electronic incident reporting. The Agency is also concerned to protect FIFRA CBI as well as personal information.


  1. What do you think about electronic alternatives to paper-based records and data submissions? WE APPROVE Current electronic reporting alternatives include the use of web forms/XML based submissions via the Agency’s Internet site and magnetic media-based submissions, e.g., diskette, CD-ROM, etc. Would you be interested in pursuing electronic reporting? YES Are you keeping your records electronically? NOT YET - WE WOULD USE PDF FILES If yes, in what format?


    1. Would you be more inclined to submit CBI on diskette, CD, or DVD, or via web rather than on paper? VIA WEB - CDX

    2. What benefits would electronic submission bring you in terms of burden reduction or greater efficiency in compiling the information? - REDUCED HOURLY BURDEN FOR FORM CREATION.


  1. Burden and Costs


  1. Are the labor rates accurate? YES

  1. The Agency assumes there is no capital cost associated with this activity. Is that correct? YES

  2. Bearing in mind that the burden and cost estimates include only burden hours and costs associated with the paperwork involved with this ICR, e.g., the ICR does not include estimated burden hours and costs for conducting studies, are the estimated burden hours and labor rates accurate? If you provide burden and cost estimates that are substantially different from EPA’s, please provide an explanation of how you arrived at your estimates. YES

  3. Are there other costs that should be accounted for that may have been missed? NO


2


File Typeapplication/msword
File TitleConsultation Contacts for Application and Summary Report for Emergency Exemption (OMB Control # 2070-0032)
Authorcsmoot
Last Modified Byjohnw
File Modified2014-01-30
File Created2014-01-13

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy