Attachment L-3:
Descriptions of Outcome Measures for MSD Intervention Study
OI: MSD Symptoms (Individual employee level)
|
||
Label |
Description |
Comments |
OIa |
--NASS Lumbar Spine Outcome Assessment Instrument - 17 items with a 6-point response scale: None of the time (=1) - all the time (=6); not at all bothersome (=1) - extremely bothersome (=6)
Notes:
Factor analysis (Daltory et al, 1996) has identified two
scales:
2)
Neurogenic Symptom scale: six items on frequency and
bothersomeness of leg or foot pain, numbness, and tingling
(questions 4a-b, 5a-b, 6a-b). The mean score of this scale will be
calculated. (OIa-2) The NASS outcome has been found to have acceptability, high re-test reliability, internal reliability, and validity for low back pain and disability (Daltroy et al 1996; Schochat et al 2000; Pose et al 1999; Padua et al 2001; Bosković et al 2009; Schneider et al 2007; Schluessmann et al 2009; Sigl et al 2006; Weigl et al 2006; Schaeren et al 2005).
See Attachment H-1 for a copy of the NASS instrument.
|
Primary outcome
Example null hypotheses:
OIa-1: There will be no difference between mean Pain & Disability scale score ratios (pre/ post intervention scores) when groups are compared (focusing on time period Baseline A to B)
OIa-2: Duration of intervention will not be significantly associated with post mean back Pain & Disability scale score declines
|
OIb |
--Quick DASH Outcome Measure with Work Module Option DASH stands for "Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand." The Quick DASH Outcome Measure is a self-reported questionnaire designed to measure physical function and symptoms in people with any of several MSD of the upper limb. The Quick DASH Outcome Measure is scored in two components: the disability/symptom section (11 items, scored 1-5) and the optional Work section (4 items, scored 1-5). (Beaton et al 2001) See Attachment H-2 for a copy of the Quick DASH instrument.
|
Secondary outcome
Example null hypotheses:
OIb-1: There will be no difference between mean DASH disability/symptom score ratios (pre/ post intervention scores) when groups are compared (focusing on time period Baseline A to B)
OIb-2: Duration of intervention will not be significantly associated with post mean DASH disability/symptom score declines |
OIc |
--Borg CR-10 RPE (Ratings of perceived exertion) (Borg, 1982)
Please rate the OVERALL PHYSICAL EFFORT level demanded by your job today. 0 = Nothing at all; 0.5 = Extremely weak (just noticeable); 1 = Very Weak; 2 = Weak (light); 3 = Moderate; 4 ; 5 = Strong; 6; 7 = Very Strong; 8; 9; 10 = Extremely strong (almost max); . = Maximal;
|
Secondary outcome |
OE: WC data, Quality, Productivity (Establishment level)
|
||
Label |
Description |
Comments |
OEa |
--Workers compensation (WC) data (collected for all participating establishments, from 2 years pre intervention through study duration)
*Analysis of financial related WC outcomes will be deferred until Fall 2015 to allow for proper loss development of claims.
|
Secondary outcome |
OEb |
--Absenteeism measures TBD*
|
Secondary outcome |
OEc |
--Quality measures TBD*
|
Secondary outcome |
OEd |
--Productivity measures TBD*
|
Secondary outcome |
File Type | application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document |
Author | srw3 |
File Modified | 0000-00-00 |
File Created | 2021-01-26 |