Att H - Sample Management Report

Attachment H - Sample Management Report.pdf

Annual Survey of the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program Grantees' Program Implementation

Att H - Sample Management Report

OMB: 0920-1046

Document [pdf]
Download: pdf | pdf
Attachment H - Sample Management Report

NBCCEDP
NBCCEDP Grantee Survey: Program Year 1205-1
Grantee Summary Reports

October 2013

Program Services Branch
Division of Cancer Prevention and Control
National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Table 1. Type of Screening Provider Clinics/Sites and Number of Each Type
1205-1

Alabama
ANTHC
Arizona
ASNA
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Iowa
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Mexico
New York
Oregon
Pennsylvania
SCF
South Dakota
SPIPA
Utah
Washington
TOTAL
(% of grantees)
(% of total clinics/sites)

Individual or
# of PCP
group PCP
clinics/sites clinics/sites
(non-FQHCs) (non-FQHCs)
Yes
8

Hospital sites

# of Hospital
sites

Yes

7

Yes
Yes

1
5

Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes

21
3
1
9
7

Other
Yes

Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes

1
2
8
25
2
1
7
5

Yes

Yes
Yes
Yes

7

Yes
Yes

1
4

Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes

179
2
14
4
2
1

Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes

25
10
12
3

Yes
Yes

7
220

Yes
Yes
20
(69.0%)
-

6
227
728
(47.3%)

Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
18
(62.1%)
-

3
3
6
25
146
(9.5%)

Yes
Yes
Yes

Yes
Yes
Yes
10
(34.5%)
-

Total # of
clinics/sites per
grantee
# of Other
8
7
7
7
0
2
7
8
26
72
5
2
16
12
2
2
2
2
8
4
0
204
1
13
26
1
8
3
5
1
0
5
12
223
7
10
12
416
668
470
1344
(30.6%)

NBCCEDP Grantee Survey (1205-1)

Table 2. Patient Navigation for Provision
1205-1

Alabama
ANTHC
Arizona
ASNA
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Iowa
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Mexico
New York
Oregon
Pennsylvania
SCF
South Dakota
SPIPA
Utah
Washington
TOTAL
(% of grantees)

Are patient
navigators used for
screening provision?

# of PNs

# of FTEs

# of sites/clinics

Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes

7
1
2
Don't Know
8
2
3

7
1
1
Don't Know
4
2
3

9
1
1
5
8
0
3

Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes

1
5
2
Don't Know
8
4

Don't Know
2.5
2
Don't Know
Don't Know
1

10
4
2
11
8
0

Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes

1
2
4
6

1
1
4
2

1
12
4
2

Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
23
(79.3%)

1
4
8
8
1
14

Don't Know
4
Don't Know
0
1
Don't Know

Don't Know
Don't Know
6
7
1
Don't Know

NBCCEDP Grantee Survey (1205-1)

Table 3. Evidence-Based Interventions (EBIs) for Screening Promotion
1205-1
Small Media
Alabama
ANTHC
Arizona
ASNA
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Iowa
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Mexico
New York
Oregon
Pennsylvania
SCF
South Dakota
SPIPA
Utah
Washington
TOTAL
(% of grantees)

Client
Reminders

Provider
Reminders
Yes

Reducing
Structural
Barriers2

Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes

Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes

Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
27
(93.1%)

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes

Yes
-

Yes

Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes

Yes
Yes
Yes
-

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes
Yes
Yes

Yes
Yes
Yes
21
(72.4%)

Yes

Yes

Yes
9
(31.0%)

Yes
14
(48.3%)

Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes

Yes
Yes

-

Provider
Total # EBIs
Assessment &
per grantee
Feedback
Yes
4
2
Yes
4
3
2
Yes
4
Yes
3
2
Yes
3
0
Yes
5
1
Yes
5
0
Yes
4
3
4
2
Yes
2
Yes
5
2
3
1
Yes
3
Yes
5
1
Yes
5
2
Yes
5
14
(48.3%)

NBCCEDP Grantee Survey (1205-1)

Table 4. Other Screening Promotion Interventions (non-EBIs)
1205-1
Patient
navigation for
promotion
Alabama
ANTHC
Arizona
ASNA
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Iowa
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Mexico
New York
Oregon
Pennsylvania
SCF
South Dakota
SPIPA
Utah
Washington
TOTAL
(% of grantees)

Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes

Provider
education/
professional
development
Yes
Yes

One-on-one
education

Group
education
Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Client or
provider
rewards
Yes
Yes

Yes

Yes
Yes

Yes

Yes
Yes

Yes
Yes

Yes
Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Other

Yes

Yes

Yes
Yes

Yes

Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
22
(75.9%)

Mass media
Yes
Yes

Quality
assurance/
Quality
improvement
Yes

Yes
Yes
Yes

Yes
Yes
Yes

Yes
Yes
Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes
Yes

Yes

Yes
Yes

Yes
11
(37.9%)

4
(13.8%)

7
(24.1%)

14
(48.3%)

6
(20.7%)

4
(13.8%)

5
(17.2%)

Total # nonEBIs per
grantee
5
5
2
1
1
4
1
3
2
1
4
1
3
1
6
2
2
0
2
1
5
4
2
0
7
3
2
2
1
71

Total # EBIs Total # EBIs
per grantee and non-EBIs
(see Table 3) per grantee
3
8
3
8
5
7
4
5
5
6
0
4
3
4
1
4
2
4
4
5
3
7
2
3
3
6
3
4
5
11
4
6
4
6
2
2
1
3
5
6
5
10
3
7
1
3
4
4
5
12
2
5
4
6
2
4
3
4
91
162

NBCCEDP Grantee Survey (1205-1)

Table 5. Patient Navigation for Promotion
1205-1
In organizations
other than those in
which screening is
paid for?
Alabama
ANTHC
Arizona
ASNA
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Iowa
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Mexico
New York
Oregon
Pennsylvania
SCF
South Dakota
SPIPA
Utah
Washington
TOTAL
(% of grantees)

In organizations in
which screening is
paid for?

# of PNs

# of FTEs

# of
sites/clinics

Yes
Yes
Yes

4
9
1

4
6
1

5
6
1

Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes

5
10
0
3
Don't know
9
4
4
11
8
0

Don't know

Yes
Yes
Yes

Yes
Yes

Yes
10
(34.5%)

Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
21
(72.4%)

Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes

How long have
PNs been used?

How many patients
do they support?

How are PNs supported?

3-4 years
3-4 years
3-4 years

Grantee staff
Reimbursement to providers AND Other
Grantee staff

101-500 patients
101-500 patients
1-100 patients

0
3
Don't know
Don't know
2.5
6.5
Don't know
Don't know
1

Don't know
10
0
3
Don't know
19
5
7
Don't know
8
3

3-4 years
3-4 years
1-2 years
3-4 years
< 6 months
1-2 years
3-4 years
1-2 years
3-4 years
5 years or more
1-2 years

Per-PN reimbursement AND Other
Reimbursement to providers
Other
Grantee staff
Grantee staff AND Other
Per-PN reimbursement
Grantee staff AND Other
Grantee staff
Reimbursement to providers
Per-PN reimbursement
Grantee staff

1-100 patients
101-500 patients
Don't know
101-500 patients
1-100 patients
101-500 patients
101-500 patients
501-1000 patients
> 5000 patients
1001-5000 patients
101-500 patients

4
4

4
4

4
8

1-2 years
5 years or more

Reimbursement to providers AND Per-PN reimbursement
Other

501-1000 patients
501-1000 patients

0
7
6
7
1
Don't know

0
4
Don't know
0
1
Don't know

0
4
9
8
1
12

3-4 years
1-2 years
3-4 years
3-4 years
3-4 years

Grantee staff
Reimbursement to providers
Grantee staff
Grantee staff
Grantee staff

Don't know
101-500 patients
101-500 patients
101-500 patients
Don't know

NBCCEDP Grantee Survey (1205-1)

Table 6. Training and Technical Assistance Needs by EBI
1205-1
Small Media
Alabama
ANTHC
Arizona
ASNA
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Iowa
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Mexico
New York
Oregon
Pennsylvania
SCF
South Dakota
SPIPA
Utah
Washington
TOTAL
(% of grantees)

Client Reminders

Provider
Reminders
Yes

Yes

Yes

Reducing
Structural Barriers
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes

Yes
Yes
Yes

Yes

Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes

Yes
Yes
Yes

Yes
Yes
Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes

Yes

Yes
Yes

Yes
Yes
Yes

Yes
Yes
Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes
Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes
Yes
2
(6.9%)

Provider
Assessment &
Feedback
Yes
Yes

6
(20.7%)

Yes
Yes
12
(41.4%)

Yes
16
(55.2%)

Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
20
(69.0%)

NBCCEDP Grantee Survey (1205-1)


File Typeapplication/pdf
AuthorGressard, Lindsay
File Modified2014-09-19
File Created2013-10-24

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy