1545-0939_Supporting_Statement

1545-0939_Supporting_Statement.doc

Form 8404 - Interest Charge on DISC-Related Deferred Tax Liability

OMB: 1545-0939

Document [doc]
Download: doc | pdf

5




Supporting Statement

(Form 8404)

OMB # 1545-0939



1. CIRCUMSTANCES NECESSITATING COLLECTION OF INFORMATION


IRC section 995(f) requires the shareholders of Interest Charge Domestic International sales Corporations (IC-DISCs) to pay an interest charge on their DISC-related deferred tax liability. Form 8404 was developed to help the shareholders (individuals, corporations, estates, or trusts) in figuring the interest charge. The interest charge is based on the shareholder’s deferred tax liability that results from the shareholders including his or her share of the IC-DISC income in his or her tax return for the year.


2. USE OF DATA


The IRS uses Form 8404 information to verify that shareholders of the IC-DISC have correctly figured and paid the section 995(f) interest charge.


3. USE OF IMPROVED INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY TO REDUCE BURDEN


Form 8404 cannot be filed electronically, since its low volume does not justify the cost of electronic enabling.


4. EFFORTS TO IDENTIFY DUPLICATION


We have attempted to eliminate duplication within the agency wherever possible.


5. METHODS TO MINIMIZE BURDEN ON SMALL BUSINESSES OR OTHER SMALL ENTITIES


There are no small entities affected by this collection.


6. CONSEQUENCES OF LESS FREQUENT COLLECTION ON FEDERAL PROGRAMS OR POLICY ACTIVITIES


If the IRS did not collect this information, the taxpayer would not have the means to calculate the correct interest that would impact their tax liability and the revenue needed to support the Federal government.


  1. SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES REQUIRING DATA COLLECTION TO BE INCONSISTENT WITH GUIDELINES IN 5 CFR 1320.5(d)(2)


There are no special circumstances requiring data collection to be inconsistent with guidelines in 5 CFR 1320.5(d)(2).


  1. CONSULTATION WITH INDIVIDUALS OUTSIDE OF THE AGENCY ON AVAILABILITY OF DATA, FREQUENCY OF COLLECTION, CLARITY OF INSTRUCTIONS AND FORMS, AND DATA ELEMENTS


Periodic meetings are held between IRS personnel and representatives of the American Bar Association, the National Society of Public Accountants, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, and other professional groups to discuss tax law and tax forms. During these meetings, there is an opportunity for those attending to make comments regarding Form 8404.


In response to the Federal Register notice dated August 27, 2014 (79 FR 51226), the IRS received one comment from Alliantgroup, to request changing the due date of Form 8404 to the due date of the Form 1120 (U.S. Corporation Income Tax Return). This change may impact regulations and further research is needed by IRS of the Internal Revenue Code for future consideration.


  1. EXPLANATION OF DECISION TO PROVIDE ANY PAYMENT OR GIFT TO RESPONDENTS


No payment or gift has been provided to any respondents.


10. ASSURANCE OF CONFIDENTIALITY OF RESPONSES


Generally, tax returns and tax return information are confidential as required by 26 USC 6103.


11. JUSTIFICATION OF SENSITIVE QUESTIONS


No personally identifiable information (PII) is collected.


12. ESTIMATED BURDEN OF INFORMATION COLLECTION


Number of Time per Total

Form Responses Response Hours


8404 2,000 7.79 15,580


Non-Individual filers is associated with burden under OMB #1545-0939.


Business Filers is associated with burden under OMB

#1545-0123.


Estimates of annualized cost to respondents for the hour burdens shown above are not available at this time.


The following regulations impose no additional burden. Please continue to assign OMB number 1545-0939 to these regulations.


1.995(f)-1

1.921-1T


13. ESTIMATED TOTAL ANNUAL COST BURDEN TO RESPONDENTS


There are no start-up costs associated with this collection.


14. ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED COST TO THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT


The primary cost to the government consists of the cost of printing this form. We estimate that the cost of printing the form is $288.


15. REASONS FOR CHANGE IN BURDEN


This request is for the reinstatement of an expired information collection.  There is no actual change in burden.


16. PLANS FOR TABULATION, STATISTICAL ANALYSIS AND PUBLICATION


There are no plans for tabulation, statistical analysis and publication.


  1. REASONS WHY DISPLAYING THE OMB EXPIRATION DATE IS INAPPROPRIATE


See attachment.


18. EXCEPTION TO THE CERTIFICATION STATEMENT


Not applicable


Note: The following paragraph applies to all of the collections of information in this submission:


An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless the collection of information displays a valid OMB control number. Books or records relating to a collection of information must be retained as long as their contents may become material in the administration of any internal revenue law. Generally, tax returns and tax return information are confidential, as required by 26 U.S.C. 6103.


OMB EXPIRATION DATE



We believe the public interest will be better served by not printing an expiration date on the form(s) in this package.


Printing the expiration date on the form will result in increased costs because of the need to replace inventories that become obsoleted by passage of the expiration date each time OMB approval is renewed. Without printing the expiration date, supplies of the form could continue to be used.


The time period during which the current edition of the form(s) in this package will continue to be usable cannot be predicted. It could easily span several cycles of review and OMB clearance renewal. In addition, usage fluctuates unpredictably. This makes it necessary to maintain a substantial inventory of forms in the supply line at all times. This includes supplies owned by both the Government and the public. Reprinting of the form cannot be reliably scheduled to coincide with an OMB approval expiration date. This form may be privately printed by users at their own expense. Some businesses print complex and expensive marginally punched continuous versions, at their expense, for use in their computers. The form may be printed by commercial printers and stocked for sale. In such cases, printing the expiration date on the form could result in extra costs to the users.


Not printing the expiration date on the form(s) will also avoid confusion among taxpayers who may have identical forms with different expiration dates in their possession.


For the above reasons we request authorization to omit printing the expiration date on the form(s) in this package.





File Typeapplication/msword
File TitleSupporting Statement
AuthorJ11FB
Last Modified ByDepartment of Treasury
File Modified2015-03-10
File Created2015-03-10

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy