Download:
pdf |
pdf53450
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 174 / Tuesday, September 9, 2014 / Notices
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of Section
222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) and
Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act
have been met.
85,186, KomTek Technologies,
Worchester, Massachusetts. March
28, 2013.
85,214, ConAgra Foods, Inc., Dunkirk,
New York. April 3, 2013.
85,214A, ConAgra Foods, Inc.,
Fredonia, New York. April 3, 2013.
85,364, New Process Steel, El Paso,
Texas. June 6, 2013.
85,380, Clayburn, Inc., Grantsville,
Maryland. June 17, 2013.
85,415, Maggy London International,
Limited, New York, New York. June
30, 2013.
85,417, West Linn Paper Company, West
Linn, Oregon. July 8, 2013.
85,426, Precision Contract
Manufacturing, Inc., Springfield,
Vermont. July 15, 2013.
85,428, Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals,
St. Louis, Missouri. July 16, 2013.
85,449, Nilfisk-Advance, Inc.,
Springdale, Arkansas. July 28, 2013.
85,455, Coastal Vision, U.S., Inc.,
Blaine, Washington, July 28, 2013.
85,459, Superior Industries
International Arkansas, LLC.,
Rogers, Arkansas. July 31, 2013.
85,472, Global Gases America, Inc.,
Bethlehem, Pennsylvania. August 7,
2013.
Negative Determinations for Alternative
Trade Adjustment Assistance
In the following cases, it has been
determined that the requirements of
246(a)(3)(A)(ii) have not been met for
the reasons specified.
None.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Negative Determinations for Worker
Adjustment Assistance and Alternative
Trade Adjustment Assistance
In the following cases, the
investigation revealed that the eligibility
criteria for worker adjustment assistance
have not been met for the reasons
specified.
Because the workers of the firm are
not eligible to apply for TAA, the
workers cannot be certified eligible for
ATAA.
The investigation revealed that
criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (increased
imports) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in
production to a foreign country) have
not been met.
85,280, ClearEdge Power LLC., South
Windsor, Connecticut.
The workers’ firm does not produce
an article as required for certification
under Section 222 of the Trade Act of
1974.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:39 Sep 08, 2014
Jkt 232001
85,249, Mitel, Inc., Mesa, Arizona.
85,293, Microsemi Corporation,
Allentown, Pennsylvania.
85,375, Caterpillar, Inc., Pearisburg,
Virginia.
85,420, Swank Inc., Taunton,
Massachusetts.
85,463, Moser Baer Technologies, Inc.,
Fairpoint, New York.
Determinations Terminating
Investigations of Petitions for Worker
Adjustment Assistance
After notice of the petitions was
published in the Federal Register and
on the Department’s Web site, as
required by Section 221 of the Act (19
U.S.C. 2271), the Department initiated
investigations of these petitions.
The following determinations
terminating investigations were issued
because the petitioner has requested
that the petition be withdrawn.
85,430, EveryWare Global, Inc., Monaca,
Pennsylvania.
85,437, Microsemi Corporation, Garden
Grove, California.
The following determinations
terminating investigations were issued
because the petitioning groups of
workers are covered by active
certifications. Consequently, further
investigation in these cases would serve
no purpose since the petitioning group
of workers cannot be covered by more
than one certification at a time.
85,270, Honeywell International, Inc.,
Phoenix, Arizona.
85,471, Motorola Mobility, Fort Worth,
Texas.
I hereby certify that the aforementioned
determinations were issued during the period
of August 18, 2014 through August 22, 2014.
These determinations are available on the
Department’s Web site www.doleta.gov/
tradeact/taa/taa_search_form.cfm under the
searchable listing of determinations or by
calling the Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance toll free at 888–365–6822.
Signed at Washington, DC this 28th day of
August 2014.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2014–21349 Filed 9–8–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration
[Docket No. OSHA–2011–0181]
Coke Oven Emissions Standard;
Extension of the Office of Management
and Budget’s (OMB) Approval of
Information Collection (Paperwork)
Requirements
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA), Labor.
ACTION: Request for public comments.
AGENCY:
OSHA solicits public
comments concerning its proposal to
extend OMB approval of the
information collection requirements
specified by the Coke Oven Emissions
Standard (29 CFR 1910.1029).
DATES: Comments must be submitted
(postmarked, sent, or received) by
November 10, 2014.
ADDRESSES:
Electronically: You may submit
comments and attachments
electronically at http://
www.regulations.gov, which is the
Federal eRulemaking Portal. Follow the
instructions online for submitting
comments.
Facsimile: If your comments,
including attachments, are not longer
than 10 pages you may fax them to the
OSHA Docket Office at (202) 693–1648.
Mail, hand delivery, express mail,
messenger, or courier service: When
using this method, you must submit a
copy of your comments and attachments
to the OSHA Docket Office, Docket No.
OSHA–2011–0181, U.S. Department of
Labor, Occupational Safety and Health
Administration, Room N–2625, 200
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20210. Deliveries (hand, express
mail, messenger, and courier service)
are accepted during the Department of
Labor’s and Docket Office’s normal
business hours, 8:15 a.m. to 4:45 p.m.,
e.t.
Instructions: All submissions must
include the Agency name and the OSHA
docket number (OSHA–2011–0181) for
the Information Collection Request
(ICR). All comments, including any
personal information you provide, are
placed in the public docket without
change, and may be made available
online at http://www.regulations.gov.
For further information on submitting
comments see the ‘‘Public
Participation’’ heading in the section of
this notice titled ‘‘SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION’’.
Docket: To read or download
comments or other material in the
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\09SEN1.SGM
09SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 174 / Tuesday, September 9, 2014 / Notices
docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov
or the OSHA Docket Office at the
address above. All documents in the
docket (including this Federal Register
notice) are listed in the http://
www.regulations.gov index; however,
some information (e.g., copyrighted
material) is not publicly available to
read or download from the Web site. All
submissions, including copyrighted
material, are available for inspection
and copying at the OSHA Docket Office.
You may also contact Theda Kenney at
the address below to obtain a copy of
the ICR.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Theda Kenney or Todd Owen,
Directorate of Standards and Guidance,
OSHA, U.S. Department of Labor, Room
N–3609, 200 Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20210; telephone (202)
693–2222.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
The Department of Labor, as part of its
continuing effort to reduce paperwork
and respondent (i.e., employer) burden,
conducts a preclearance consultation
program to provide the public with an
opportunity to comment on proposed
and continuing information collection
requirements in accord with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA–95) (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)). This
program ensures that information is in
the desired format, reporting burden
(time and costs) is minimal, collection
instruments are clearly understood, and
OSHA’s estimate of the information
collection burden is accurate. The
Occupational Safety and Health Act of
1970 (the OSH Act) (29 U.S.C. 651 et
seq.) authorizes information collection
by employers as necessary or
appropriate for enforcement of the Act
or for developing information regarding
the causes and prevention of
occupational injuries, illnesses, and
accidents (29 U.S.C. 657). The OSH Act
also requires that OSHA obtain such
information with minimum burden
upon employers, especially those
operating small businesses, and to
reduce to the maximum extent feasible
unnecessary duplication of efforts in
obtaining information (29 U.S.C. 657).
The information collection
requirements in the Coke Oven
Emissions Standard provide protection
for workers from the adverse health
effects associated with exposure to coke
oven emissions. In this regard, the Coke
Oven Emissions Standard requires
employers to monitor workers’ exposure
to coke oven emissions, monitor worker
health, and provide workers with
information about their exposures and
17:39 Sep 08, 2014
II. Special Issues for Comment
OSHA has a particular interest in
comments on the following issues:
• Whether the proposed information
collection requirements are necessary
for the proper performance of the
Agency’s functions, including whether
the information is useful;
• The accuracy of OSHA’s estimate of
the burden (time and costs) of the
information collection requirements,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
• The quality, utility, and clarity of
the information collected; and
• Ways to minimize the burden on
employers who must comply; for
example, by using automated or other
technological information collection
and transmission techniques.
III. Proposed Actions
I. Background
VerDate Mar<15>2010
the health effects of exposure to coke
oven emissions.
Jkt 232001
OSHA is requesting that OMB extend
its approval of the information
collection requirements contained in the
Coke Oven Emissions Standard (29 CFR
1910.1029). OSHA is requesting an
adjustment decrease of 2,448 burden
hours (from 54,241 hours to 51,793
hours). The adjustment decrease is due
to a decrease in the number of batteries
that are subject to the Standard. The
adjustment of the burden hours are
shown in detail by provision in the
supporting statement.
Type of Review: Extension of a
currently approved collection.
Title: Coke Oven Emissions Standard
(29 CFR 1910.1029).
OMB Control Number: 1218–0128.
Affected Public: Business or other forprofits.
Number of Respondents: 19.
Frequency of Responses: On occasion.
Total Responses: 41,348.
Average Time per Response: Varies
from five minutes (.08 hour) to obtain a
physician’s certificate to 12 hours to
develop a compliance program.
Estimated Total Burden Hours:
51,793.
Estimated Cost (Operation and
Maintenance): $884,787.
IV. Public Participation—Submission of
Comments on This Notice and Internet
Access to Comments and Submissions
You may submit comments in
response to this document as follows:
(1) Electronically at http://
www.regulations.gov, which is the
Federal eRulemaking Portal; (2) by
facsimile (fax); or (3) by hard copy. All
comments, attachments, and other
material must identify the Agency name
and the OSHA docket number (Docket
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
53451
No. OSHA–2011–0181) for the ICR. You
may supplement electronic submissions
by uploading document files
electronically. If you wish to mail
additional materials in reference to an
electronic or facsimile submission, you
must submit them to the OSHA Docket
Office (see the section of this notice
titled ADDRESSES). The additional
materials must clearly identify your
electronic comments by your name,
date, and the docket number so the
Agency can attach them to your
comments.
Because of security procedures, the
use of regular mail may cause a
significant delay in the receipt of
comments. For information about
security procedures concerning the
delivery of materials by hand, express
delivery, messenger, or courier service,
please contact the OSHA Docket Office
at (202) 693–2350, (TTY (877) 889–
5627). Comments and submissions are
posted without change at http://
www.regulations.gov. Therefore, OSHA
cautions commenters about submitting
personal information such as social
security numbers and date of birth.
Although all submissions are listed in
the http://www.regulations.gov index,
some information (e.g., copyrighted
material) is not publicly available to
read or download from this Web site.
All submissions, including copyrighted
material, are available for inspection
and copying at the OSHA Docket Office.
Information on using the http://
www.regulations.gov Web site to submit
comments and access the docket is
available at the Web site’s ‘‘User Tips’’
link. Contact the OSHA Docket Office
for information about materials not
available from the Web site, and for
assistance in using the Internet to locate
docket submissions.
V. Authority and Signature
David Michaels, Ph.D., MPH,
Assistant Secretary of Labor for
Occupational Safety and Health,
directed the preparation of this notice.
The authority for this notice is the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3506 et seq.) and Secretary of
Labor’s Order No. 1–2012 (77 FR 3912).
Signed at Washington, DC, on September 4,
2014.
David Michaels,
Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational
Safety and Health.
[FR Doc. 2014–21399 Filed 9–8–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–26–P
E:\FR\FM\09SEN1.SGM
09SEN1
File Type | application/pdf |
File Modified | 2014-09-09 |
File Created | 2014-09-09 |