60-Day Notice

Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 93 / Wednesday, May 14, 2014 / Notices

emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES

(OMB) control number 1652–0051,
abstracted below that we will submit to
OMB for renewal in compliance with
the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA).
The ICR describes the nature of the
information collection and its expected
burden. The collection involves the
submission of contact information of
Rail Security Coordinators (RSCs) and
alternate RSCs from freight railroad
carriers; shippers and receivers of
certain hazardous materials; passenger
railroad carriers, including each carrier
operating light rail or heavy rail transit
service on track that is part of the
general railroad system of transportation
and rail transit systems. Also, these
persons are required to report
significant security concerns, including
security incidents, suspicious activity,
and any threat information. In addition,
freight railroad carriers and the affected
shippers and receivers of hazardous
materials are required to document the
transfer of custody of certain hazardous
materials.
DATES: Send your comments by July 14,
2014.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be emailed
to [email protected] or delivered to the
TSA PRA Officer, Office of Information
Technology (OIT), TSA–11,
Transportation Security Administration,
601 South 12th Street, Arlington, VA
20598–6011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Christina A. Walsh at the above address,
or by telephone (571) 227–2062.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.), an agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information
unless it displays a valid OMB control
number. The ICR documentation is
available at http://www.reginfo.gov.
Therefore, in preparation for OMB
review and approval of the following
information collection, TSA is soliciting
comments to—
(1) Evaluate whether the proposed
information requirement is necessary for
the proper performance of the functions
of the agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(2) Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden;
(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
(4) Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including using
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological

VerDate Mar<15>2010

18:25 May 13, 2014

Jkt 232001

collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.
Information Collection Requirement
TSA collects and uses contact
information for rail security officials
under 49 CFR part 1580 (the Rail
Transportation Security Rule) to
enhance the security of the Nation’s rail
systems. The Rail Transportation
Security Rule requires freight railroad
carriers, certain rail hazardous materials
shipper and receiver facilities,
passenger railroad carriers, and rail
mass transit systems to designate and
submit contact information for a RSC
and at least one alternate RSC to TSA.
Section 1580.103 of the Rail
Transportation Security Rule requires
freight railroad carriers, shippers, and
receivers in a High Threat Urban Area
(HTUA) that handle certain categories
and quantities of hazardous materials
set forth in sec. 1580.100(b), known as
‘‘rail security-sensitive materials’’
(RSSM), to provide location and
shipping information on rail cars under
their physical custody and control to
TSA upon request. The specified
categories and quantities of RSSM cover
explosive materials, materials poisonous
by inhalation, and radioactive materials.
The Rail Transportation Security Rule
requires a secure chain of physical
custody for rail cars containing RSSM
which, in turn, requires freight railroad
carriers and certain hazardous materials
shippers, and receivers of RSSM to
document the transfer of custody of
certain rail cars in writing or
electronically and to retain these
records for a minimum of 60 days.
Specifically, 49 CFR 1580.107 requires
documentation of the secure exchange
of custody of rail cars containing RSSM
between: A rail hazardous materials
shipper and a freight railroad carrier;
two separate freight railroad carriers,
when the transfer of custody occurs
within an HTUA or outside of an HTUA
but the rail car may subsequently enter
an HTUA; and a freight railroad carrier
and a rail hazardous materials receiver
located within an HTUA. The
documentation must uniquely identify
that the rail car was attended during the
transfer of custody, including car initial
and number; identification of
individuals who attended the transfer
(names or uniquely identifying
employee number); location of transfer;
and date and time the transfer was
completed.
This Rail Transportation Security
Rule also requires freight railroad
carriers, certain rail hazardous materials
shipper and receiver facilities,
passenger railroad carriers, and rail
mass transit systems to report to TSA

PO 00000

Frm 00062

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

27631

significant security concerns, which
include security incidents, suspicious
activities, and threat information. See 49
CFR 1580.105 and 1580.203.
The total burden for this collection is
approximately 54,023 hours.
Issued in Arlington, Virginia, on May 8,
2014.
Christina A. Walsh,
TSA Paperwork Reduction Act Officer, Office
of Information Technology.
[FR Doc. 2014–10996 Filed 5–13–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–05–P

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Transportation Security Administration
Intent To Request Renewal From OMB
of One Current Public Collection of
Information: Critical Facility
Information of the Top 100 Most
Critical Pipelines
Transportation Security
Administration, DHS.
ACTION: 60-Day notice.
AGENCY:

The Transportation Security
Administration (TSA) invites public
comment on one currently approved
Information Collection Request (ICR),
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) control number 1652–0050,
abstracted below that we will submit to
OMB for renewal in compliance with
the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA).
The ICR describes the nature of the
information collection and its expected
burden. The Implementing
Recommendations of the 9/11
Commission Act of 2007 (9/11 Act)
required TSA to develop and implement
a plan to inspect critical pipeline
systems.

SUMMARY:

DATES:

Send your comments by July 14,

2014.
Comments may be emailed
to [email protected] or delivered to the
TSA PRA Officer, Office of Information
Technology (OIT), TSA–11,
Transportation Security Administration,
601 South 12th Street, Arlington, VA
20598–6011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Christina Walsh at the above address, or
by telephone (571) 227–2062.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:

Comments Invited
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.), an agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information
unless it displays a valid OMB control

E:\FR\FM\14MYN1.SGM

14MYN1

27632

Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 93 / Wednesday, May 14, 2014 / Notices

number. The ICR documentation is
available at http://www.reginfo.gov.
Therefore, in preparation for OMB
review and approval of the following
information collection, TSA is soliciting
comments to—
(1) Evaluate whether the proposed
information requirement is necessary for
the proper performance of the functions
of the agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(2) Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden;
(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
(4) Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including using
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.

emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Information Collection Requirement
OMB Control Number 1652–0050;
Critical Facility Information of the Top
100 Most Critical Pipelines: The 9/11Act
specifically tasked TSA to develop and
implement a plan for inspecting critical
facilities of the 100 most critical
pipeline systems. (See sec. 1557 of the
9/11 Act (Pub. L. 110–53 codified at 6
U.S.C. 1207)). Pipeline operators
determined their critical facilities based
on guidance and criteria set forth in the
TSA Pipeline Security Guidelines
published in April 2011.
TSA intends to continue visiting
critical pipeline facilities and collecting
site-specific information from pipeline
operators on facility security policies,
procedures, and physical security
measures. This collection is voluntary.
TSA will collect information obtained
during the visits using a Critical Facility
Security Review (CFSR) Form. The
CFSR differs from a Corporate Security
Review (CSR) conducted by TSA in that
a CSR looks at corporate or companywide security management plans and
practices while the CFSR will look at
individual pipeline facility security
measures and procedures.1 TSA is
seeking OMB approval to continue
utilizing the CFSR document during
critical facility reviews in order to
collect facility security information.
Information collected from the reviews
will be analyzed and used to determine
strengths and weaknesses at the nation’s
critical pipeline facilities, areas to target
for risk reduction strategies, pipeline
industry implementation of the
voluntary guidelines, and the need for
1 See OMB Control No. 1652–0056 for the PRA
approval of information collection for pipeline
CSRs.

VerDate Mar<15>2010

18:25 May 13, 2014

Jkt 232001

regulations in accordance with the 9/11
Act provisions previously cited. TSA
anticipates visiting 90 critical facilities
each year.
TSA is also seeking OMB approval to
continue its follow up procedure with
pipeline operators on their
implementation of security
improvements and recommendations
made during facility visits. During
critical facility visits, TSA documents
and provides recommendations to
improve the security posture of the
facility. TSA intends to continue to
follow up with pipeline operators via
email on their status toward
implementation of the
recommendations made during the
critical facility visits. The follow up will
be conducted between approximately 12
and 24 months after the facility visit.
TSA will use the information
collected to determine to what extent
the pipeline industry is implementing
the 2011 guidance document and
security improvement recommendations
made during critical facility visits. The
information provided by owners or
operators for each information
collection is Sensitive Security
Information (SSI), and it will be
protected in accordance with
procedures meeting the transmission,
handling, and storage requirements of
SSI set forth in 49 CFR parts 15 and
1520.
The annual burden for the approval of
the information collection related to the
Critical Facility Review Form is
estimated to be 360 hours. A maximum
of 90 facility reviews will be conducted
each year with each review taking
approximately 4 hours (90 × 4).
The annual burden for the approval of
the information collection related to the
follow up on the recommendations
made to facility operators is estimated to
be 450 hours. TSA estimates each
operator will spend approximately 5
hours to submit a response to TSA
regarding its implementation of security
recommendations made during critical
facility visits. If a maximum of 90
critical facilities are reviewed each year,
and TSA follows up with each facility
operator between approximately 12 and
24 months following the visit, the total
annual burden is 450 (90 × 5) hours.
The estimated number of respondents
will be 90 for the critical facility review
form and 90 for the recommendations
follow-up, for a total of 180
respondents. The total estimated burden
is 810 hours annually, 360 hours for the
critical facility review form, plus 450
hours for the recommendations followup procedure.

PO 00000

Frm 00063

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

Dated: May 8, 2014.
Christina Walsh,
TSA Paperwork Reduction Act Officer, Office
of Information Technology.
[FR Doc. 2014–10997 Filed 5–13–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9910–05–P

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R2–ES–2014–N004;
FXES11130100000C4–123–FF01E00000]

Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
and Plants; 5-Year Status Reviews of
Little Colorado Spinedace, Sentry MilkVetch, Siler Pincushion Cactus,
Slender Rush-Pea, and Yuma Clapper
Rail in the Southwest Region
AGENCY:

Fish and Wildlife Service,

Interior.
Notice of initiation of reviews;
request for information.

ACTION:

We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, are initiating 5-year
status reviews under the Endangered
Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act),
of the threatened Little Colorado
spinedace (Lepidomeda vittata),
endangered sentry milk-vetch
(Astragalus cremnophylax var.
cremnophylax), threatened Siler
pincushion cactus (Pediocactus
(=Echinocactus,=Utahia) sileri),
endangered slender rush-pea
(Hoffmannseggia tenella), and the
endangered Yuma clapper rail (Rallus
longirostris yumanensis). A 5-year
review is based on the best scientific
and commercial data available at the
time of the review; therefore, we are
requesting submission of any such
information that has become available
since our original listing of these five
species or since the last 5-year review.

SUMMARY:

To ensure consideration, we are
requesting submission of new
information no later than July 14, 2014.
However, we will continue to accept
new information about any listed
species at any time.

DATES:

For how to submit
information, see Request for Information
and ‘‘How Do I Ask Questions or
Provide Information?’’ in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
information on a particular species,
contact the appropriate person or office
listed in the table in the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:

E:\FR\FM\14MYN1.SGM

14MYN1