Published 60-day FRN

73586

Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 238 / Thursday, December 11, 2014 / Notices
EARLY TERMINATIONS GRANTED—Continued
[November 1, 2014 thru November 28, 2014]

20150195
11/19/2014:
20141588
20150146
20150157
20150170
20150182
20150185
20150188
20150189
11/20/2014:
20150131
20150179
20150192
11/21/2014:
20150144
20150158
20150161
20150181
20150187
20150194
20150210
20150212
20150215
20150217
11/24/2014:
20150199
20150206
11/25/2014:
20150013
20150155
20150223
11/26/2014:
20141011
20141013

.................

G .....

FFL/EM Holdings, LLC; Dr. H. Douglas Barnes; FFL/EM Holdings, ITC.

.................
.................
.................
.................
.................
.................
.................
.................

G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G

Thoma Bravo Fund XI, L.P.; Compuware Corporation; Thoma Bravo Fund XI, L.P.
BAE Systems plc; Perimeter Internetworking Corp.; BAE Systems plc.
Green Equity Investors VI, L.P.; HP V AIV–4, L.P.; Green Equity Investors VI, L.P.
HGGC Fund II, L.P.; SSI/Opinionology Newco LLC; HGGC Fund II, L.P.
Platform Specialty Products Corporation; Permira IV L.P. 2; Platform Specialty Products Corporation.
DTE Energy Co.; LS Power Equity Partners II, L.P.; DTE Energy Co.
Littlejohn Fund V, L.P.; Lindsay Goldberg III L.P.; Littlejohn Fund V, L.P.
Hercules VB Holdings, Inc.; Herff Jones, Inc.; Hercules VB Holdings, Inc.

.................
.................
.................

G .....
G .....
G .....

Mr. Madhava Reddy; CareTech Solutions, Inc.; Mr. Madhava Reddy.
Aetna Inc.; bSwift LLC; Aetna Inc.
Schlumberger N.V.; Don Carruth; Schlumberger N.V.

.................
.................
.................
.................
.................
.................
.................
.................
.................
.................

G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G

Saudi Arabian Oil Company; S-Oil Corporation; Saudi Arabian Oil Company.
Lockheed Martin Corporation; Albert Nardslico; Lockheed Martin Corporation.
DI Parent, LP; Distribution International Holdings, LLC; DI Parent, LP.
Mitsubishi Estate Co., Ltd.; Michael A. Ruane; Mitsubishi Estate Co., Ltd.
Wind Point Partners VII–A, L.P.; KIPB Group Holdings, Inc.; Wind Point Partners VII–A, L.P.
EQT VI (No.1) Limited Partnership; Siemens AG; EQT VI (No.1) Limited Partnership.
Greenbriar Equity Fund III, L.P.; Robert W. Munch and Judith A. Munch; Greenbriar Equity Fund L.P.
Timothy P. Horne; 2003 Riverside Capital Appreciation Fund, L.P.; Timothy P. Horne.
OEC Holdings 4 L.P.; Platinum Equity Capital SPL Partners, L.P.; OEC Holdings 4 L.P.
Scott Rudolph; Natrol Holdings, Inc. (debtor-in-possession); Scott Rudolph.

.................
.................

G .....
G .....

General Electric Company; The Resolute Fund II SIE, L.P.; General Electric Company.
ArcLight Energy Partners Fund V, L.P.; Sempra Energy; ArcLight Energy Partners Fund V, L.P.

.................
.................
.................

G .....
G .....
G .....

CVS Holdings I, LLC; Stephen Bolick; CVS Holdings I, LLC.
Permira V L.P. 2; Metalogix H&S Holdings Ltd.; Permira V L.P. 2.
American Capital Equity III, LP; Schulman IRB Holdings LP; American Capital Equity III, LP.

.................
.................

G .....
G .....

GlaxoSmithKline plc; Leo Constellation Limited; GlaxoSmithKline plc.
GlaxoSmithKline plc; Novartis AG; GlaxoSmithKline plc.

.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....

.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Renee Chapman, Contact Representative
or Theresa Kingsberry, Legal Assistant,
Federal Trade Commission, Premerger
Notification Office, Bureau of
Competition, Room CC–5301,
Washington, DC 20024, (202) 326–3100.
By Direction of the Commission.
Donald S. Clark,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014–28940 Filed 12–10–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750–01–M

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

[60Day-15–15GD]

Proposed Data Collections Submitted
for Public Comment and
Recommendations
The Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC), as part of its
continuing effort to reduce public
burden, invites the general public and
other Federal agencies to take this
opportunity to comment on proposed

VerDate Sep<11>2014

19:07 Dec 10, 2014

Jkt 235001

and/or continuing information
collections, as required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. To
request more information on the below
proposed project or to obtain a copy of
the information collection plan and
instruments, call 404–639–7570 or send
comments to Leroy A. Richardson, 1600
Clifton Road, MS–D74, Atlanta, GA
30333 or send an email to [email protected].
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized and/or
included in the request for Office of
Management and Budget (OMB)
approval. Comments are invited on: (a)
Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information shall have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate
of the burden of the proposed collection
of information; (c) ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected;(d) ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of
information on respondents, including
through the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information
technology; and (e) estimates of capital
or start-up costs and costs of operation,

PO 00000

Frm 00045

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

maintenance, and purchase of services
to provide information. Burden means
the total time, effort, or financial
resources expended by persons to
generate, maintain, retain, disclose or
provide information to or for a Federal
agency. This includes the time needed
to review instructions; to develop,
acquire, install and utilize technology
and systems for the purpose of
collecting, validating and verifying
information, processing and
maintaining information, and disclosing
and providing information; to train
personnel and to be able to respond to
a collection of information, to search
data sources, to complete and review
the collection of information; and to
transmit or otherwise disclose the
information. Written comments should
be received within 60 days of this
notice.
Proposed Project
Emergency Self Escape for Coal
Miners—New—National Institute for
Occupational Safety and Health
(NIOSH), Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention (CDC).

E:\FR\FM\11DEN1.SGM

11DEN1

73587

Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 238 / Thursday, December 11, 2014 / Notices
Background and Brief Description
The Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention’s (CDC) mission is to
promote health and quality of life by
preventing and controlling disease,
injury, and disability. The National
Institute for Occupational Safety and
Health (NIOSH) provides national and
world leadership to prevent workrelated illness, injury, disability, and
death by gathering information,
conducting scientific research, and
translating knowledge gained into
products and services. NIOSH’s mission
is critical to the health and safety of
every American worker. The Office of
Mine Safety and Health Research
(OMSHR), one of the preeminent mining
research laboratories in the world, is
focused on occupational health and
safety research for mine workers.
Recent research by the National
Academy of Sciences (NAS) has called
for a detailed, formal task analysis of
mine self-escape (National Research
Council, 2013). Such an analysis should
identify the knowledge, skills, abilities,
and other attributes (KSAOs) needed by
mine personnel in the event of a mine
disaster to successfully complete an
emergency self-escape. This analysis
will identify gaps between worker
demands and capabilities, and propose
recommendations to either minimize
those gaps or enhance existing systems
(e.g., communications, training,
technology).
The purpose of the project is to
enhance the ability of miners to escape
from underground coal mines in the
event of a fire, explosion, collapse of the
mine structure, or flooding of the area
by toxic gas or water. To escape, miners
need to perform a set of tasks that apply
specific knowledge and skills in moving
through the mine, avoiding dangers, and
using protective equipment. The project

system of collecting information is
‘‘active’’ in that participants are
presented stimuli (e.g., disaster
scenarios, worker roles) and asked
directly to provide their perceptions
(e.g., of tasks or cognitive requirements
needed to accomplish self-escape in that
disaster). Observation checklists have
been developed to capture relevant
information during the unobtrusive
naturalistic observations of self-escape
drills. These data are then organized,
collated, and re-presented to
participants for confirmation of
accuracy. Recommendations are
generated based on study findings,
related research and practices, and
logical inference.
Participants will be mining personnel
drawn from two operating coal mines,
one large and one smaller mine, to
represent the variety within the
industry. The data collection schedule
(e.g., timing and duration of interviews
and focus groups) will be modified as
needed to minimize disruption to mine
operations. No more than 30 miner
volunteers will participate in the study
over three years. Minimal time (< 5
minutes each) will be spent in
recruitment and obtaining informed
consent. Semi-structured interviews
with mine personnel will require 1.5–2
hours of their time depending on the
interview. Focus group sessions will
require approximately 12 hours of their
time total but will be executed in
smaller blocks of time. Observation of
drills will occur as part of normal mine
operations and will not result in any
additional burden on the respondents.
All participants will be between the
ages of 18 and 75, currently employed,
and living in the United States.
There is no cost to respondents other
than their time.

will identify the tasks, knowledge and
skills, procedures, equipment,
communications, and physical
requirements of self-escape. The results
are expected to lead to
recommendations for improvements to
task requirements and procedures,
equipment, training and communication
processes.
NIOSH proposes this three-year study
to better understand the requirements of
emergency self-escape and to answer the
following questions:
• What tasks (and critical tasks) do
miners perform during self-escape?
• What knowledge beyond that
needed to perform normal, routine
mining tasks do miners require to
facilitate successful self-escape?
• What are the cognitive requirements
(such as reasoning, or weighing and
deciding among alternatives,
recognizing when a course of action is
not producing the intended results)
beyond that needed to perform normal,
routine mining tasks?
• What other cognitive abilities or
other cognitive competencies are
needed?
• What gaps exist between what
miners are required to do for self-escape
and their capabilities?
• How can self-escape be improved
by redesigning, eliminating, or
modifying tasks or training, or by
altering or introducing specific
technologies/tools?
To answer these questions, we will
use a task analysis study design that
utilizes a multiple-method approach, to
include (a) review of available research,
(b) interviews and focus group meetings
with participants, and (c) unobtrusive
observation (e.g., of drills). During
interviews and focus groups, targeted
questions are asked to elicit the level
and type of desired information. This

ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS
Type of respondent

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Underground
Underground
Underground
Underground
Underground
Underground

miners
miners
miners
miners
miners
miners

Number of
responses per
respondent

Average
burden per
response
(in hours)

Total
burden
hours

..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................

Recruitment Script ...........................
Informed Consent ............................
Initial Interviews ...............................
Cognitive Task Analysis Interviews
Initial focus group sessions .............
Hierarchical Task Analysis focus
group sessions.

30
30
6
12
12
12

1
1
1
2
6
6

5/60
5/60
90/60
2
2
2

3
3
9
48
144
144

Total ...........................................

..........................................................

........................

........................

........................

351

VerDate Sep<11>2014

coal
coal
coal
coal
coal
coal

Number of
respondents

Form name

19:07 Dec 10, 2014

Jkt 235001

PO 00000

Frm 00046

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

E:\FR\FM\11DEN1.SGM

11DEN1

73588

Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 238 / Thursday, December 11, 2014 / Notices

Leroy A. Richardson,
Chief, Information Collection Review Office,
Office of Scientific Integrity, Office of the
Associate Director for Science, Office of the
Director, Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2014–29047 Filed 12–10–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163–18–P

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES

Proposed Data Collections Submitted
for Public Comment and
Recommendations

Proposed Project
Improving the Impact of Laboratory
Practice Guidelines: A New Paradigm
for Metrics—Clinical and Laboratory
Standards Institute—NEW—Center for
Surveillance, Epidemiology and
Laboratory Services (CSELS), Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

The Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC), as part of its
continuing effort to reduce public
burden, invites the general public and
other Federal agencies to take this
opportunity to comment on proposed
and/or continuing information
collections, as required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. To
request more information on the below
proposed project or to obtain a copy of
the information collection plan and
instruments, call 404–639–7570 or send
comments to Leroy A. Richardson, 1600
Clifton Road, MS–D74, Atlanta, GA
30333 or send an email to [email protected].
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized and/or
included in the request for Office of
Management and Budget (OMB)
approval. Comments are invited on: (a)
Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information shall have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate
of the burden of the proposed collection
of information; (c) ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; (d) ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of
information on respondents, including
through the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information
technology; and (e) estimates of capital
or start-up costs and costs of operation,
maintenance, and purchase of services
to provide information. Burden means
the total time, effort, or financial
resources expended by persons to
generate, maintain, retain, disclose or
provide information to or for a Federal
agency. This includes the time needed
to review instructions; to develop,
acquire, install and utilize technology
and systems for the purpose of
collecting, validating and verifying

Background and Brief Description
The Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention is funding three 5-year
projects collectively entitled ‘‘Improving
the Impact of Laboratory Practice
Guidelines: A New Paradigm for
Metrics’’. An ‘‘LPG’’ is defined as
written recommendations for voluntary,
standardized approaches for medical
laboratory testing that takes into account
processes for test selection, sample
procurement and processing, analytical
methods, and results reporting for
effective diagnosis and management of
disease and health conditions. LPGs
may be disseminated to, and used by,
laboratorians and clinicians to assist
with test selection and test result
interpretation. The overall purpose of
these cooperative agreements is to
increase the effectiveness of LPGs by
defining measures and collecting
information to inform better LPG
creation, revision, dissemination,
promotion, uptake, and impact on
clinical testing and public health. The
project will explore how these processes
and their impediments and facilitators
differ among various intended users of
LPGs. Through this demonstration
project, CDC seeks to understand how to
customize LPG creation and promotion
to better serve these intended users of
LPGs. An important goal is to help
organizations that sponsor the
development of LPGs create a
sustainable approach for continuous
quality improvement to evaluate and
improve an LPG’s impact through better
collection of information.
The CDC selected three organizations
that currently create and disseminate
LPGs to support activities under a
cooperative agreement funding
mechanism to improve the impact of
their LPGs. The American Society for
Microbiology, the Clinical and
Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI),

Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention
[60Day–15–15GE]

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

information, processing and
maintaining information, and disclosing
and providing information; to train
personnel and to be able to respond to
a collection of information, to search
data sources, to complete and review
the collection of information; and to
transmit or otherwise disclose the
information. Written comments should
be received within 60 days of this
notice.

VerDate Sep<11>2014

19:07 Dec 10, 2014

Jkt 235001

PO 00000

Frm 00047

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

and the College of American
Pathologists, will each use their LPGs as
models to better understand how to
improve uptake and impact of these and
future LPGs. Only the CLSI submission
will be described in this notice.
Specifically, the CLSI project will
address two LPGs that are important to
clinical testing and have a high public
health impact: POCT12, Point-of-Care
Blood Glucose Testing in Acute and
Chronic Care Facilities and POCT13,
Glucose Monitoring in Settings without
Laboratory Support. These LPGs
provide guidance and recommendations
for personnel monitoring patient
glucose levels at sites that have access
to a hospital laboratory as well as
locations, such as physician offices or
nursing homes that do not have an onsite moderate or high complexity
laboratory. It is expected that as a result
of sustained improvements in the
process of creating and updating these
clinical LPGs, public health, which
depends upon accurate and appropriate
laboratory testing guided by the use of
LPGs, will also generally benefit. The
intended users of the CLSI’s POCT12
and POCT13 LPGs will include point-ofcare coordinators, clinical laboratory
directors, medical technologists, nurses,
and medical doctors.
The CLSI plans to collect information
using the same survey instrument,
‘‘Fingerstick Glucose Survey’’ (FGS), on
three separate occasions. During the first
information collection (FGS1), all
targeted respondents will be asked to
complete the survey. Respondents who
indicate that they are not familiar with
either POCT12 or POCT13 will be asked
to provide an email address and offered
a free copy of the applicable LPG. This
subset of respondents will be asked to
complete the same survey (FGS2) 4–6
months after receiving the free LPG.
After analysis of the information
collected during the first two surveys,
CLSI will make improvements to
POCT12 and POCT13, such as provision
of educational materials or helpful
products such as quality control logs,
and may also alter their marketing
campaigns to address issues related to
awareness and use of CLSI documents.
The third survey (FGS3) will then be
sent to all targeted respondents
approximately 2.5 years after the first
survey to obtain information that can be
used to evaluate the impact of these
improvements. Respondents that
received a free copy of POCT12 or
POCT13 following the first survey will
also be contacted by email and asked to
take the third survey.
A link to the survey will be
distributed to all targeted respondents
either by email or postcard. The CLSI

E:\FR\FM\11DEN1.SGM

11DEN1