408(b)(2) PRA 3-18-2015

408(b)(2) PRA 3-18-2015.docx

Employee Retirement Income Security Act Section 408(b)(2) Regulation

OMB: 1210-0133

Document [docx]
Download: docx | pdf

408(b)(2) Service Provider Disclosure Requirements

OMB Control Number 1210-0133

March 2015


SUPPORTING STATEMENT FOR PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT SUBMISSIONS


Part A. Justification.


1. Explain the circumstances that make the collection of information necessary. Identify any legal or administrative requirements that necessitate the collection. Attach a copy of the appropriate section of each statute and regulation mandating or authorizing the collection of information.


The prohibited transaction described in section 406(a)(1)(C) of ERISA generally prohibits the furnishing of goods, services, or facilities between a plan and a party in interest to the plan. Because ERISA defines any person furnishing services to the plan as a “party in interest” to the plan, a service relationship between a plan and a service provider would constitute a prohibited transaction under section 406(a)(1)(C) in the absence of relief. Section 408(b)(2) of ERISA provides relief, however, for service contracts or arrangements if the contract or arrangement is “reasonable,” if the services are necessary for the establishment or operation of the plan, and if no more than “reasonable” compensation is paid for the services.


The Department published a final rule under ERISA section 408(b)(2) in the Federal Register on February 3, 2012 (77 FR 5632). The final rule requires reasonable contracts or arrangements between employee pension benefit plans and certain providers of services to such plans include specified information to assist plan fiduciaries in assessing the reasonableness of the compensation paid for services and the conflicts of interest that may affect a service provider’s performance of services. The Department believes that plan fiduciaries need this information when selecting and monitoring service providers to satisfy their fiduciary obligations under ERISA section 404(a)(1) to act prudently and solely in the interest of the plan’s participants and beneficiaries and for the exclusive purpose of providing benefits and defraying reasonable expenses of administering the plan.


Under the final rule, for a contract or arrangement to be “reasonable,” certain service providers must disclose specified information to a pension plan, in writing, before the plan may enter into, extend, or renew the contract or arrangement. The Department’s final regulation requires covered service providers to satisfy certain disclosure requirements in order to qualify for the statutory exemption for services under ERISA section 408(b)(2).


Paragraph (c)(1)(iii) of 29 CFR 2550.408b-2 provides that service providers who expect to receive $1,000 or more in compensation (direct or indirect) in connection with providing one or more of the following services to the plan pursuant to the contract or arrangement:


  • services provided directly to a plan as a fiduciary under ERISA or as a registered investment adviser under the securities laws;

  • services as an ERISA fiduciary to a plan asset investment vehicle in which the covered plan invests;

  • certain services (accounting, auditing, actuarial, appraisal, banking, consulting, custodial, insurance, investment advisory, legal, recordkeeping, securities or other investment brokerage, third party administration, or valuation services ) and receive indirect compensation or fees, such as revenue sharing, for their services; or

  • recordkeeping services or brokerage services to a cover plan that is a participant-directed 401(k)-type plan if one or more designated investment alternatives will be made available through a platform or similar mechanism in connection with such recordkeeping or brokerage services.1


A detailed description of the required disclosures is set forth in item 12, below. Covered service providers must make the disclosures, and update the information disclosed, within the specified time frames. Failure to comply with the final rule would result in a prohibited transaction both under ERISA section 406(a)(1)(C) and under section 4975(c)(1)(C) of the Internal Revenue Code.

The Department believes that the final rule will enhance plan fiduciaries’ understanding of the fees received by plan service providers, directly and indirectly. Greater knowledge of such fees among sponsors and fiduciaries will in turn increase efficiency and competition in the service provider market, thereby generating benefits to plans and thus to plan participants.


The Department also is issuing as part of the final rule a prohibited transaction class exemption. The class exemption grants plan fiduciaries relief from liability for a prohibited transaction resulting from the service provider’s failure to comply with the regulation’s disclosure requirements. The Department recognizes that a plan fiduciary may on occasion unknowingly enter into a contract or arrangement that does not meet the requirements of the regulation for relief under ERISA section 408(b)(2), in the reasonable belief that the service provider has divulged the requisite information. If the requirements of the rule are not satisfied, a prohibited transaction occurs for both the service provider and the plan fiduciary, but for the availability of the class exemption. The preamble to the final rule explains how the Department took the conditional relief available under the exemption into account in assessing the economic costs and benefits of the regulation.  The Department believes that the exemption is essential to achieve the purposes underlying the regulation. The information collection activities associated with the exemption are discussed more fully in question 12, below.

Proposed Guide ICR


On March 12, 2014, the Department proposed an amendment to the final regulation that would require covered service providers to furnish a guide to assist plan fiduciaries in reviewing the information required by the final rule. The Department believes that the proposed amendment will increase the accessibility of information and enhance plan fiduciaries’ understanding of the information already received from covered service providers. Greater knowledge will increase efficiency and competition in the service provider market, thereby generating benefits to plans and thus to plan participants. For the purposes of this renewal submission, because this amendment has not yet been finalized, this provision is not reflected in the hour and cost burden estimates contained in Items 12 and 13 of this supporting statement.


2. Indicate how, by whom, and for what purpose the information is to be used. Except for a new collection, indicate the actual use the agency has made of the information received from the current collection.

The purpose of the information collection is to help plan fiduciaries assemble sufficient information to evaluate the quality and competitiveness of their potential service providers. The information will be used by plan fiduciaries for this purpose. The Department will use the information to monitor transactions with service providers and in any enforcement proceedings. The purpose of the information collection is to help plan fiduciaries access information already being disclosed to them.


3. Describe whether, and to what extent, the collection of information involves the use of automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses, and the basis for the decision for adopting this means of collection. Also describe any consideration for using information technology to reduce burden.


Consistent with the views expressed in the 2012 final regulation, the proposed amendment does not limit the ability of covered service providers to furnish information required by the regulation to responsible plan fiduciaries via electronic media. However, unless the covered service provider's disclosure information on a website is readily accessible to responsible plan fiduciaries, and fiduciaries have clear notification on how to gain such access, the information on the website may not be regarded as furnished within the meaning of the regulation.


4. Describe efforts to identify duplication. Show specifically why any similar information already available cannot be used or modified for use for the purposes described in Item 2 above.


The Department compared two potential overlapping government requirements with the final rule: the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 and the Form 5500 annual report. Both of these requirements are substantially different from the final rule. The Investment Advisers Act guidelines for disclosure of conflicts of interest are generic in scope. The Schedule C of Form 5500 concern retrospective information provided as part of annual reporting, whereas the final rule requires the disclosure of information during the decision making process.


The information collection for the proposed amendment does not require duplicative information. As stated in Item 1 above, it requires covered service providers to provide a guide to responsible plan fiduciaries that will help them navigate and review the disclosures provided by covered service providers.


5. If the collection of information impacts small businesses or other small entities (Item 5 of OMB Form 83-I), describe any methods used to minimize burden.


Small plans will benefit from the increased information produced through disclosures at least as much as large plans. Small covered service providers with relatively simple compensation arrangements can provide a relatively simple, short written disclosure with a related simple guide. The final regulation focused the scope of the regulation on contracts or arrangements with fiduciary service providers and service providers that received indirect compensation or provide access to plan investments. The Department believes that the focus on complex relationships of the final rule will avoid unnecessary burdens on small service providers that will not be subject to its written disclosure requirements.

For the proposed ICR, small plans will benefit from the increased accessibility of information produced through the requirement of a guide at least as much as large plans for the same reasons discussed above for the existing ICRs.


6. Describe the consequence to Federal program or policy activities if the collection is not conducted or is conducted less frequently, as well as any technical or legal obstacles to reducing burden.


The purpose of the final regulation is to ensure that plan fiduciaries have sufficient information to evaluate the quality and competitiveness of the fees received by their potential service providers.  The enhanced disclosure will increase efficiency and competition in the service provider market, thereby generating benefits to plans and plan participants.  These benefits will not be realized if the information is not collected or is collected less frequently.

The Department expects that the guide will reduce the effort plan fiduciaries must expend searching for required information, thereby generating benefits to plans and plan participants. These benefits will not be realized if the information is not collected or is collected less frequently.


7. Explain any special circumstances that would cause an information collection to be conducted in a manner:


requiring respondents to report information to the agency more often than quarterly;


requiring respondents to prepare a written response to a collection of information in fewer than 30 days after receipt of it;


requiring respondents to submit more than an original and two copies of any document;


requiring respondents to retain records, other than health, medical, government contract, grant-in-aid, or tax records for more than three years;


in connection with a statistical survey, that is not designed to produce valid and reliable results that can be generalized to the universe of study;


requiring the use of a statistical data classification that has not been reviewed and approved by OMB;


that includes a pledge of confidentiality that is not supported by authority established in statute or regulation, that is not supported by disclosure and data security policies that are consistent with the pledge, or which unnecessarily impedes sharing of data with other agencies for compatible confidential use; or


requiring respondents to submit proprietary trade secret, or other confidential information unless the agency can demonstrate that it has instituted procedures to protect the information's confidentiality to the extent permitted by law.


None.


8. If applicable, provide a copy and identify the date and page number of publication in the Federal Register of the agency's notice, required by 5 CFR 1320.8(d), soliciting comments on the information collection prior to submission to OMB. Summarize public comments received in response to that notice and describe actions taken by the agency in response to these comments. Specifically address comments received on cost and hour burden.


Describe efforts to consult with persons outside the agency to obtain their views on the availability of data, frequency of collection, the clarity of instructions and record keeping, disclosure, or reporting format (if any), and on the data elements to be recorded, disclosed, or reported.


Consultation with representatives of those from whom information is to be obtained or those who must compile records should occur at least once every 3 years -- even if the collection of information activity is the same as in prior periods. There may be circumstances that may preclude consultation in a specific situation. These circumstances should be explained.


The Department’s Federal Register notice required by 5 CFR 1320.8(d) soliciting comments on the information collection was published on October 15, 2014 79 FR 61903. No comments were received.


9. Explain any decision to provide any payment or gift to respondents, other than remuneration of contractors or grantees.


Not applicable. No payments or gifts will be provided to respondents.


10. Describe any assurance of confidentiality provided to respondents and the basis for the assurance in statute, regulation, or agency policy.


Not applicable to this collection that offers no such assurances.


11. Provide additional justification for any questions of a sensitive nature, such as sexual behavior and attitudes, religious beliefs, and other matters that are commonly considered private. This justification should include the reasons why the agency considers the questions necessary, the specific uses to be made of the information, the explanation to be given to persons from whom the information is requested, and any steps to be taken to obtain their consent.


None.



  1. Provide estimates of the hour burden of the collection of information. The statement should:


    • Indicate the number of respondents, frequency of response, annual hour burden, and an explanation of how the burden was estimated. Unless directed to do so, agencies should not conduct special surveys to obtain information on which to base hour burden estimates. Consultation with a sample (fewer than 10) of potential respondents is desirable. If the hour burden on respondents is expected to vary widely because of differences in activity, size, or complexity, show the range of estimated hour burden, and explain the reasons for the variance. Generally, estimates should not include burden hours for customary and usual business practices.


    • If this request for approval covers more than one form, provide separate hour burden estimates for each form and aggregate the hour burdens in Item 13 of OMB Form 83-I.


    • Provide estimates of annualized cost to respondents for the hour burdens for collections of information, identifying and using appropriate wage rate categories. The cost of contracting out or paying outside parties for information collection activities should not be included here. Instead, this cost should be included in Item 13.


In order to estimate the hour burden of the disclosure provisions under 29 CFR 2550.408b-2, the Department estimated the number of service providers, plans, and arrangements. Based on information from the 2012 Form 5500, the Department estimates that approximately 44,000 defined benefit pension plans (“DB plans”) covering approximately 39.8 million participants and approximately 633,000 defined contribution plans (“DC plans”) covering nearly 90.8 million participants are covered by the rule.2


The Department estimates that, based on data for the 2012 Form 5500 and its Schedule C, there are approximately 17,000 covered service providers. The 2012 Schedule C data also was used to count the number of covered plan-service provider arrangements. On average, defined benefit plans employ more covered service providers per plan than defined contribution plans, and large plans use more covered service providers per plan than small plans. The Department estimates that defined benefit plans have approximately 187,000 arrangements with covered service providers, while defined contribution plans have approximately 1.6 million arrangements. For purposes of this analysis, the Department assumes that about 50 percent of disclosures between service providers and plan fiduciaries are made only electronically.


For purposes of determining the equivalent cost of the hour burden, the Department estimates the hourly labor cost to be about $129.94 for a legal professional, $71.38 for a financial professional, and $30.42 for clerical staff in 2015 dollars. 3, 4


Initial Service Provider Compliance Review: The Department has estimated the hour burden for initial compliance review and implementation for service providers newly entering the market (“new service providers”). Based on data from the 2011 and 2012 Form 5500, the Department assumes that about 15.6 percent of all service providers (170 complex and 2,500 non-complex) will be new each year. The number of new service providers with more complex arrangements (approximately 170 service providers) is estimated using the number of unique service providers who are reported on the Schedule C as having received $1 million or more in compensation. It is likely that service providers with complex arrangements will require more time to comply. Therefore, the Department assumes that covered service providers with complex arrangements will require 24 hours of legal professional time and 80 hours of financial professional time. Non-complex service providers (approximately 2,500 service providers) will require only three hours of legal professional time and 13 hours of financial professional time. Based on the foregoing, the Department estimates that new service providers will incur an hour burden of 58,000 hours annually with an equivalent cost of approximately $4.8 million.


General Information Disclosures: Paragraph (c)(1)(iv) of 29 CFR 2550.408b-2 requires service providers to disclose general information to a responsible plan fiduciary when a contract is entered into, renewed, or extended.


The Department assumes that experienced service providers have a general disclosure template that can be used for all plans and will customize this document by adding individualized information for each plan. This activity includes reviewing and revising formulae and algorithms to present or estimate direct and indirect compensation that will be applied in a pro forma projection for each plan with which the provider has an existing contract. The Department assumes about 6.5 percent of plans are new plans each year based on a comparison of the 2011 and 2012 Form 5500 data. This proportion is a proxy for the percentage of new arrangements and provides an estimate of 117,000 new arrangements every year. The Department estimates that preparing the disclosures for these new arrangements will require one half hour of a legal professional’s time, twenty minutes of a financial professional’s time, and two minutes of clerical staff time per mailed disclosure (58,000 disclosures) will be required to distribute the disclosures. Based on the foregoing, the hour burden to prepare these disclosures will be 99,000 hours annually and the equivalent cost of these hours will be $10.4 million.


Paragraph (c)(1)(vi) requires service providers to provide any other information relating to compensation or fees received in connection with the contract or arrangement that is required for the covered plan to comply with the reporting and disclosure requirements of Title I of ERISA and the regulations, forms, and schedules issued thereunder upon the request of responsible plans fiduciaries or plan administrators of covered plans. The Department is not aware of a basis for determining the number of requests that responsible plan fiduciaries or plan administrators will make; therefore, it assumes that approximately ten percent (180,000) of responsible plan fiduciaries will request additional information annually. The Department further assumes that service providers already will have this information available, because it is required to comply with other legal requirements. Therefore, the Department estimates that it will take clerical staff two minutes per request (180,000 requests) to prepare the information and an additional two minutes per mailed request (90,000 requests) to distribute the requested materials at an hourly labor cost of $30.42. Based on the foregoing, the Department estimates that the yearly and average annual hour burden over the next three years to disclose information upon request will be 9,000 hours at an equivalent cost of $274,000.


Paragraph (c)(1)(v)(B) generally requires service providers to disclose any changes to the general information as soon as reasonably practicable, but no later than 60 days from the date the covered service provider knows of such change. The Department assumes that changes in plan disclosures will occur at least once every three years, because plans normally conduct requests for proposal (RFPs) from service providers at least once every three to five years. If it is assumed that an equal number of plans conduct an RFP in any given year, then approximately 35 percent of arrangements will require an updated disclosure every year, for a total of 629,000 updates to the general information. The Department assumes that one-half hour of legal professional time and one-third hour of a financial professional time will be required to update the disclosures. In addition two minutes of clerical staff time per mailed disclosure (315,000 disclosures) will be required to distribute the disclosures. Based on the foregoing, the Department estimates that the annual hour burden to update the disclosure of general information will be 535,000 hours with an equivalent cost of $56.2 million.


In summary, the Department estimates that the annual hour burden for service providers to disclose the required general information will be 643,000 hours with an equivalent cost of approximately $66.9 million.


Investment Disclosure: Paragraphs (c)(1)(iv)(E) and (F) require fiduciaries to investment vehicles holding plan assets (described in paragraph (c)(1)(iii)(A)(2)) and providers of recordkeeping and brokerage services to a participant-directed individual account plan if they provide access to one or more designated investment alternatives for the covered plan (described in paragraph (c)(1)(iii)(B) (“platform providers”) to disclose investment-related compensation and fee information. This information generally must be disclosed to the responsible plan fiduciary reasonably in advance of the date the contract or arrangement is entered into, extended or renewed, and as soon as practicable, but no later than 60 days after the covered service provider is informed that the information has changed.5 Paragraph (c)(1)(iv)(F)(2) allows covered platform providers to satisfy this disclosure requirement by passing through to the responsible plan fiduciary copies of any state or federally regulated disclosure materials (e.g., prospectuses) provided by the issuer of the designated investment alternative, so long as such issuer is not affiliated with the platform provider, and the platform provider does not know that any of the information contained in such materials is incomplete or inaccurate.


The hour burden associated with disclosing investment-related compensation and fee information will be attributable primarily to the time spent gathering the required information. However, much of this cost will be reduced, because, as discussed above, the rule allows platform providers to satisfy this requirement by passing-through information to the responsible plan fiduciary. Based on the foregoing, the Department assumes that preparation of investment-related compensation and fee information will require one-half hour of financial professional time for each of the new individual account plans. The Department estimates about 6.5 percent of the 508,000 participant-directed individual account plans are new each year and will require initial investment disclosure. Therefore, 33,000 plan fiduciaries will receive this information in 2015. In addition, forty-eight6 minutes of clerical staff time per mailed disclosure (17,000 disclosures,) will be required to distribute the disclosures. The Department estimates that the annual hour burden to disclose the required initial investment information will be 30,000 hours with an equivalent cost of $1.6 million.


In addition, under paragraph (c)(1)(v)(B)(2), service providers must disclose changes to investment information. The Department assumes that service providers will have to disclose changes to investment information to each responsible plan fiduciary at least once per year due to the regulation, resulting in 476,000 disclosures.7 This notification is expected to require one-half hour of financial professional time to prepare and two minutes of clerical staff time per mailed disclosure (238,000) to distribute the disclosures. Based on the foregoing, the annual burden to update investment information is estimated to be 246,000 hours with an equivalent cost of $17.2 million.


In summary, the Department estimates that the annual hour burden for the next three years for service providers to disclose the required investment information is estimated to be 276,000 hours with an equivalent cost of $18.8 million.


Hour Burden Imposed on Plans: The main hour burden that is imposed on plans is additional time spent by new plans ensuring that the plan has received all of the required disclosures. Responsible plan fiduciaries of new plans will have to review the written disclosures and evaluate whether service providers are compliant. Based on data from the 2011 and 2012 Form 5500, the Department estimates that 6.5 percent of plans will be new each year (approximately 44,000). The Department estimates the responsible plan fiduciaries will need one hour of financial professional time to review and evaluate the new written disclosures. Therefore, the hour burden associated with the review for fiduciaries of new plans is estimated to be 44,000 hours annually at an equivalent cost of $3.1 million.


Exemption for Responsible Plan Fiduciary: The class exemption contained in paragraph (c)(1)(ix) of 29 CFR 2550.408b-2 provides relief from ERISA’s prohibited transaction rules for plan fiduciaries that enter into a contract or arrangement with service providers upon a mistaken belief that they have received all of the disclosures required by the final rule. Upon discovering that a covered service provider failed to disclose all of the required information, the responsible plan fiduciary must take reasonable steps to obtain such information, including requesting in writing that the covered service provider furnish the information in order to rely on the exemption and notify the Department if the service provider fails to comply with the written request within 90 days.


While the Department has no basis for estimating the percentage of arrangements where a responsible plan fiduciary will not receive all of the required disclosures from a covered service provider, the Department assumes that 5 percent of arrangements (34,000 arrangements) may experience a failure that will require the responsible plan fiduciary to send a notice to the service provider annually. The Department estimates that one-half hour of a financial professional’s time will be required to prepare the request for the undisclosed information, and one minute of clerical staff time per mailed request (17,000 hours annually) will be required to send the request.


The Department estimates that the burden for plans to send notice to service providers of missing information will be 17,000 hours with an equivalent cost of $1.2 million annually. The average annual hour burden over the next three years for requesting missing information is estimated to be 17,000 hours with an equivalent cost of $1.2 million.


The Department further assumes that service providers may not respond to 10 percent of the requests for undisclosed information within 90 days, which will result in the responsible plan fiduciary preparing and sending a notice to the Department (3,400 notices annually). The Department estimates that one-half hour of a financial professional’s time will be required to prepare the notice, and one minute of clerical staff time per mailed notice will be required to distribute the notice. The Department estimates that the annual burden for plans to send notice to the Department of Labor will be 1,700 hours with an equivalent cost of $122,000.


Summary of the Hour Burden


Table 1 reports the number of respondents and responses of the regulation. In each of the next three years (2015 through 2017) there will be 51,000 respondents (approximately 17,000 service providers and 34,000 plans) and almost 1.5 million responses (approximately 1,435,000 from service providers and 37,000 from plans). The annual average totals approximately 51,000 respondents, and 1.5 million responses.


TABLE 1 .—Number of Respondents and Responses

 

Year 1

Year 2

Year 3

Annual Average

Respondents

51,000

51,000

51,000

51,000

Responses

1,472,000

1,472,000

1,472,000

1,472,000

Note: The displayed numbers are rounded to the nearest thousand and therefore may not add up to the totals.



Table 2 shows the total hour burden of the information collection and Table 3 shows the total equivalent cost. The annual average hour burden for the next three years for service providers is estimated to be 977,000 hours with an equivalent cost of $90.5 million. The average annual hour burden over the first three years for plans is estimated to be 63,000 hours with an equivalent cost of $4.5 million. The total average annual hour burden over the next three years of the information collection is estimated to be 1.0 million hours with an equivalent cost of $95.0 million.


TABLE 2.--Hour Burden

 

Year 1

Year 2

Year 3

Average

Service Providers

977,000

977,000

977,000

977,000

Plans

63,000

63,000

63,000

63,000

Total

1,040,000

1,040,000

1,040,000

1,040,000

Note: The displayed numbers are rounded to the nearest thousand and therefore may not add up to the totals.



TABLE 3.--Equivalent Cost

 

Year 1

Year 2

Year 3

Average

Service Providers

$90,541,000

$90,541,000

$90,541,000

$90,541,000

Plans

$4,477,000

$4,477,000

$4,477,000

$4,477,000

Total

$95,018,000

$95,018,000

$95,018,000

$95,018,000

Note: The displayed numbers are rounded to the nearest thousand and therefore may not add up to the totals.



13. Provide an estimate of the total annual cost burden to respondents or record-keepers resulting from the collection of information. (Do not include the cost of any hour burden shown in Items 12.)


Table 4 reports the number of disclosures that are required to be sent for each type of required disclosure and the estimated number of pages per disclosure. Table 5 reports the estimated printing and postage costs associated with each required notice and disclosure.8 The Department assumes that 50 percent of the disclosures will be sent electronically at no cost, and that the cost of printing and paper for the remaining 50 percent of documents will be 5 cents per page. With the exception of the Investment Information Disclosure for new participant-directed individual account plans, all mailed disclosures will be sent by first-class mail at a cost of $0.49. The Investment Information Disclosure for new participant-directed individual account plans will be mailed priority mail at a cost of $12.65. Based on the foregoing, the Department estimates that the total annual cost burden for years 2015 - 2017 will be $1,336,000 (approximately $1,325,000 for service providers and $11,000 for plans).



TABLE 4.—Number of Disclosures






Number of Disclosures

Percent not Sent Electronically

Pages Per Disclosure

Number of Disclosures Sent by Mail


(A)

(B)

(C)

A*B

Disclose General Information

117,000

50%

10

58,000






Information Upon Request

180,000

50%

10

90,000

Disclosure of Changes to General Information

629,000

50%

5

315,000

Disclose Investment Information

33,000

50%

720

17,000






Disclosure of Changes to Investment Information

476,000

50%

2

238,000






Request for Additional Information for Exemption

34,000

50%

2

17,000






Notice to DOL

3,400

50%

2

1,700

Note: The displayed numbers are rounded to the nearest thousand and therefore may not add up to the totals.


TABLE 5.--Cost Burden 






2015

2016

2017

Average

Disclose General Information

$58,000

$58,000

$58,000

$58,000

Update General Information

$233,000

$233,000

$233,000

$233,000

Information Upon Request

$89,000

$89,000

$89,000

$89,000

General Information Total

$380,000

$380,000

$380,000

$380,000






Disclose Investment Information

$804,000

$804,000

$804,000

$804,000

Update Investment Information

$140,000

$140,000

$140,000

$140,000

Disclose Investment Information Total

$945,000

$945,000

$945,000

$945,000






Request for Additional Information for Exemption

$10,000

$10,000

$10,000

$10,000

Notice to DOL

$1,000

$1,000

$1,000

$1,000

Total

$1,336,000

$1,336,000

$1,336,000

$1,336,000

Note: The displayed numbers are rounded to the nearest thousand and therefore may not add up to the totals.


14. Provide estimates of annualized cost to the Federal government. Also, provide a description of the method used to estimate cost, which should include quantification of hours, operational expenses (such as equipment, overhead, printing, and support staff), and any other expense that would not have been incurred without this collection of information. Agencies also may aggregate cost estimates from Items 12, 13, and 14 in a single table.


Except for minimal costs for storage of the notices to the Department, there is no cost to the Federal Government associated with this information collection.


15. Explain the reasons for any program changes or adjustments reported in Items 13 or 14 of the OMB Form 83-I.


Adjustments are made to reflect the absence of unique burden and costs that occur within the first year a new rule becomes effective. Evaluating whether existing current disclosure practices and documents comply with new regulations is an example of burden which occurs only during the first year. The final rule was published in the Federal Register on February 3, 2012 (77 FR 5632). In addition, the Department uses new estimates for the number of plans, service providers, and associated administrative services based on updated Form 5500 data. Wage rates used in the Department’s estimates in Items 12 and 13 were adjusted using the best available information.


16. For collections of information whose results will be published, outline plans for tabulation, and publication. Address any complex analytical techniques that will be used. Provide the time schedule for the entire project, including beginning and ending dates of the collection of information, completion of report, publication dates, and other actions.


Not applicable since this information collection would not result in the publication of any results.


17. If seeking approval to not display the expiration date for OMB approval of the information collection, explain the reasons that display would be inappropriate.


The OMB expiration date will be published in the Federal Register following OMB approval.


18. Explain each exception to the certification statement identified in Item 19, "Certification for Paperwork Reduction Act Submission," of OMB 83-I.


Not applicable; no exceptions to the certification statement.


Part B—Statistical Methods.


This information collection does not employ statistical methods.

1 The proposed rule included similar categories of service providers, but the final rule includes modifications to include service providers in the third category only if they receive indirect compensation for these services. The final rule also includes investment platform providers as a new category, because they will be required to provide the investment-related disclosures summarized below.


2 Out of these pension plans, approximately 34,000 are small DB plans and approximately 557,000 small DC plans. Small plans generally are those with less than 100 participants.


3 Hourly labor costs are calculated as follows. Legal professional (23-1011): $63.46(2013 BLS Wage rate) /0.69(ECEC ratio) *1.35(Overhead Load Factor) *1.023(Inflation rate) ^2(Inflated 2 years from base year) = $129.94; financial professional (13-2011): $34.86(2013 BLS Wage rate) /0.69(ECEC ratio) *1.35(Overhead Load Factor) *1.023(Inflation rate) ^2(Inflated 2 years from base year) = $71.38; clerical staff (43-6014): $16.35(2013 BLS Wage rate)/0.675(ECEC ratio) *1.2(Overhead Load Factor) *1.023(Inflation rate) ^2(Inflated 2 years from base year) = $30.42.

4 The Department's estimated 2015 hourly labor rates include wages, other benefits, and overhead are calculated as follows: mean wage from the 2013 National Occupational Employment Survey (April 2014, Bureau of Labor Statistics http://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/ocwage.pdf); wages as a percent of total compensation from the Employer Cost for Employee Compensation (June 2014, Bureau of Labor Statistics, http://www.bls.gov/news.release/ecec.t02.htm); overhead as a multiple of compensation is assumed to be 25 percent of total compensation for paraprofessionals, 20 percent of compensation for clerical, and 35 percent of compensation for professional; annual inflation assumed to be 2.3 percent annual growth of total labor cost since 2013 (Employment Costs Index data for private industry, September 2014. http://www.bls.gov/news.release/eci.nr0.htm).

5 Generally, the rule requires service providers to disclose any change to investment information as soon as practicable, but not later than 60 days from the date on which the covered service provider is informed of such change.

6 According to the Deloitte Annual 401(k) Benchmarking Survey 2012, plans average 24 investments. The Department allots two minutes of clerical time per investment per disclosure.

7 The Department assumes that in a given year only the plans existing in prior years will receive updated investment information. Therefore, this disclosure will only go to the fiduciaries of the 93.5 percent of participant-directed individual account plans that are not new.

8 Postage costs are estimated to be 49 cents per mailed disclosure, except for investment information disclosures, whose postage costs are assumed to be $12.65 per mailed disclosure.


14



File Typeapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
File TitleSUPPORTING STATEMENT FOR PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT SUBMISSIONS
Authorridgwayc
File Modified0000-00-00
File Created2021-01-25

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy