60 day FR notice

60 day FR notice.pdf

Information collections for import injury investigations (producers, importers, purchasers, and foreign producer questionnaires and institution notices for 5-year reviews)

60 day FR notice

OMB: 3117-0016

Document [pdf]
Download: pdf | pdf
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 29 / Wednesday, February 12, 2014 / Notices
33. Altus Dam, W.C. Austin Project:
Consideration of a contract for
repayment of SOD costs.
34. Bull Lake Dam, Riverton Unit, P–
SMBP: Consideration of a contract for
repayment of SOD costs.
35. Twin Lakes Dam, FryingpanArkansas Project: Consideration of a
contract action for repayment of SOD
costs.
36. John and Donna Vandenacre,
Canyon Ferry Unit, P–SMBP, Montana.
Consideration of a request to renew a
long-term water service contract for up
to 562.5 acre-feet of water from storage
in Canyon Ferry Reservoir.
37. Helena Valley ID; Helena Valley
Unit, P–SMBP; Montana: Consideration
of a request for an amendment to the
repayment contract to allow for delivery
of up to 10,000 acre-feet of water for
M&I purposes within the District
boundaries.
38. Savage ID; Savage Unit, P–SMBP;
Montana. Intent to renew the repayment
contract to provide for a long-term-water
supply to the District.
39. Nelson Dikes, Milk River Project:
Consideration of a contract(s) for
repayment of SOD costs.
39. Ruedi Reservoir, FryingpanArkansas Project, Colorado: Amend
existing contract place of use for some
Round II contracts.
40. Mirage Flats ID; Mirage Flats
Project: Consideration of a contract
action for repayment of SOD costs.
41. Guernsey Dam, North Platte
Project, Nebraska and Wyoming: O&M
repayment contracts with North Platte
Project contractors for the repayment of
extraordinary maintenance associated
with Guernsey Dam.
42. Republican River Basin, P–SMBP,
Kansas/Nebraska: Consideration of a
short-term contract(s) with the Kansas
Bostwick ID for use of Reclamation
facilities.

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Discontinued Contract Actions
1. Cornwell Ranch, Milk River Project,
Montana: Consideration of a request to
enter into a new long-term Warren Act
excess capacity contract for conveyance
on nonproject water.
2. Pugsley Ranches, Inc., Lower
Marias Unit, P–SMBP, Montana: Intent
to enter into a water service contract for
up to 144.2 acre-feet of water per year
from storage in Lake Elwell.
Completed Contract Actions
1. Northern Colorado Water
Conservancy District, Colorado Big
Thompson Project, Colorado:
Consideration of an amendment to
describe the District’s commitment to
evaluate and address factors that are
contributing to reduced clarity in Grand
Lake. Completed October 23, 2013.

VerDate Mar<15>2010

17:11 Feb 11, 2014

Jkt 232001

2. Ruedi Reservoir, FryingpanArkansas Project, Colorado: Amend
existing contract term for Round I and
Round II contracts. Completed
September through November 2013.
Dated: December 18, 2013.
Roseann Gonzales,
Director, Policy and Administration.
[FR Doc. 2014–03020 Filed 2–11–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–MN–P

INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
United States International
Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice of proposed collection;
comment request.
AGENCY:

The proposed information
collection is a 3-year extension,
pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–13) (the
‘‘Act’’), of the current generic survey
clearance previously approved by the
Office of Management and Budget
(‘‘OMB’’). The clearance is used by the
U.S. International Trade Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) to issue information
collections (specifically, producer,
importer, purchaser, and foreign
producer questionnaires and certain
institution notices) for a series of import
injury investigations that are required
by the Tariff Act of 1930 and the Trade
Act of 1974. The current generic survey
clearance is assigned OMB control No.
3117–0016; it will expire on June 30,
2014. Comments concerning the
proposed information collections are
requested in accordance with section
3506(c)(2)(A) of the Act; such comments
are described in greater detail in the
section of this notice entitled
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.
DATES: To be assured of consideration,
written comments should be received
no later than 60 days after publication
of this notice in the Federal Register.
ADDRESSES: Signed comments should be
submitted to Lisa Barton, Acting
Secretary, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E St. SW.,
Washington, DC 20436.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Copies of the proposed collection of
information and supporting
documentation may be obtained from
Jennifer Brinckhaus (USITC, tel. no.
202–205–3188). Hearing-impaired
persons can obtain information on this
matter by contacting the Commission’s
TDD terminal on 202–205–1810.
Persons with mobility impairments who
SUMMARY:

PO 00000

Frm 00057

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

8485

will need special assistance in gaining
access to the Commission should
contact the Office of the Secretary at
202–205–2000. General information
concerning the Commission may also be
obtained by accessing its internet server
(http://www.usitc.gov).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Request for Comments
Comments are solicited as to (1)
whether the proposed information
collection is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(2) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate
of the burden of the proposed
information collection, including the
validity of the methodology and
assumptions used; (3) the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and (4) minimization of the
burden of the proposed information
collection on those who are to respond
(including through the use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
forms of information technology, e.g.,
permitting electronic submission of
responses).
Summary of the Proposed Information
Collections
(1) Need for the Proposed Information
Collections
The information requested in
questionnaires and five-year sunset
review institution notices issued under
the generic survey clearance is utilized
by the Commission in the following
statutory investigations: Antidumping
duty, countervailing duty, escape
clause, North American Free Trade
Agreement (NAFTA) safeguard, market
disruption, and interference with
programs of the U.S. Department of
Agriculture (USDA). The Commission’s
generic survey clearance to issue
questionnaires will not apply to
repetitive questionnaires such as those
issued on a quarterly or annual basis or
to other investigations and research
studies conducted under section 332 of
the Trade Act of 1974. The information
provided by firms in response to the
questionnaires provides the basis for the
Commission’s determinations in the
above-cited statutory investigations. The
submitted data are consolidated by
Commission staff and provided to the
Commission in the form of a staff report.
In addition, in the majority of its
investigations, the Commission releases
completed questionnaires returned by
industry participants to representatives
of parties to its investigations under the
terms of an administrative protective

E:\FR\FM\12FEN1.SGM

12FEN1

8486

Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 29 / Wednesday, February 12, 2014 / Notices

order, the terms of which safeguard the
confidentiality of any business
proprietary or business confidential
information. Representatives of
interested parties also receive a
confidential version of the staff report
under the administrative protective
order. Subsequent party submissions to
the Commission during the investigative
process are based, in large part, upon
their review of the information
collected. Included in the proposed
generic clearance are the institution
notices for the five-year sunset reviews
of antidumping and countervailing duty
orders and suspended investigations.
Responses to the institution notices will
be evaluated by the Commission and
form much of the record for its
determinations to conduct either
expedited or full five-year sunset
reviews of existing antidumping and
countervailing duty orders.
(2) Information Collection Plan
Questionnaires for specific
investigations are sent to all identified
domestic producers manufacturing the
product(s) in question. Importer and
purchaser questionnaires are also sent to
all substantial importers/purchasers of
the product(s). Finally, all foreign
manufacturers of the product(s) in
question that are represented by counsel
are sent questionnaires, and, in
addition, the Commission attempts to
contact any other foreign manufacturers,
especially if they export the product(s)
in question to the United States. Firms
receiving questionnaires include
businesses, farms, and/or other forprofit institutions; responses by
domestic firms are mandatory. The
institution notices for the five-year
sunset reviews are published in the
Federal Register and solicit comment
from interested parties (i.e., U.S.
producers within the industry in
question as well as labor unions or
representative groups of workers, U.S.
importers and foreign exporters, and
involved foreign country governments).

(3) Description of the Information To Be
Collected
Although the content of each
questionnaire will differ based on the
needs of a particular investigation,
questionnaires are based on longestablished, generic formats. Producer
questionnaires generally consist of the
following four parts: (part I) General
questions relating to the organization
and activities of the firm; (part II) data
on capacity, production, inventories,
employment, and the quantity and value
of the firm’s shipments and purchases
from various sources; (part III) financial
data, including income-and-loss data on
the product in question, data on asset
valuation, research and development
expenses, and capital expenditures; and
(part IV) pricing and market factors.
(Questionnaires may, on occasion, also
contain part V, an abbreviated version of
the above-listed parts, used for gathering
data on additional product categories.)
Importer questionnaires generally
consist of three parts: (part I) General
questions relating to the organization
and activities of the firm; (part II) data
on the firm’s imports and the shipment
and inventories of its imports; and (part
III) pricing and market factors similar to
that requested in the producer
questionnaire. Purchaser questionnaires
generally consist of five parts: (part I)
General questions relating to the
organization and activities of the firm;
(part II) data concerning the purchases
of the product by the firm; (part III)
market characteristics and purchasing
practices; (part IV) comparisons
between imported and U.S.-produced
product; and (part V) actual purchase
prices for specific types of domestic and
subject imported products and the
names of the firm’s vendors. Foreign
producer questionnaires generally
consist of (part I) general questions
relating to the organization and
activities of the firm; (part II) data
concerning the firm’s manufacturing
operations; and may include (part III)
market factors. The notices of institution
for the five-year sunset reviews include
11 specific requests for information that
firms are to provide if their response is
to be considered by the Commission.

(4) Estimated Burden of the Proposed
Information Collection
The Commission estimates that
information collections issued under the
requested generic clearance will impose
an average annual burden of 173,094
burden hours on 4,929 respondents (i.e.,
recipients that provide a response to the
Commission’s questionnaires or the
notices of institution of five-year sunset
reviews). Table 1 lists the projected
annual burden for each type of
information collection for the July
2014–June 2017 period.
(5) Minimization of Burden
The Commission periodically reviews
its investigative processes, including
data collection, to reduce the
information burden. Questionnaires
clearly state that estimates are
acceptable for certain items. They are
designed in part with check-in type
formats to simplify the response. The
reporting burden for smaller firms is
reduced in that the sections of the
questionnaire that are applicable to their
operations are typically more limited.
Requests by parties to expand the data
collection or add items to the
questionnaire for specific investigations
may not be accepted if the Commission
believes such requests will increase the
response burden while not substantially
adding to the investigative record.
Completed questionnaires have
traditionally been returned to the
Commission in paper form, however the
Commission is promoting options for
electronic submission. For example, the
Commission provides the
questionnaires on the Commission’s
Web site in a fillable Word format and
has created a secure drop box which
questionnaire respondents can use to
securely upload completed
questionnaires. The information
provided in response to its notices of
institution for the five-year sunset
reviews is typically submitted in
document form directly to the Office of
the Secretary although it may be
submitted to the Commission’s
Electronic Data Information System
(EDIS) and Electronic Docket.

TABLE 1—PROJECTED ANNUAL BURDEN DATA, BY TYPE OF INFORMATION COLLECTION, JULY 2014–JUNE 2017
Producer
questionnaires

Importer
questionnaires

Purchaser
questionnaires

Number of respondents .................
Frequency of response ..................
Total annual responses .................
Hours per response .......................

930
1
930
49

1,395
1
1,395
36

1,260
1
1,260
25

1,116
1
1,116
39

228
1
228
10

Total hours ..............................

45,570

50,220

31,500

43,524

2,280

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Item

VerDate Mar<15>2010

17:11 Feb 11, 2014

Jkt 232001

PO 00000

Frm 00058

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

Foreign producer
questionnaires

E:\FR\FM\12FEN1.SGM

Institution notices
for 5-year reviews

12FEN1

Total
4,929
1
4,929
35.1
173,094

Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 29 / Wednesday, February 12, 2014 / Notices
No record keeping burden is known to
result from the proposed collection of
information.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: February 6, 2014.
Lisa R. Barton,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2014–02955 Filed 2–11–14; 8:45 am]

unless, after considering the effect of such
exclusion upon the public health and
welfare, competitive conditions in the United
States economy, the production of like or
directly competitive articles in the United
States, and United States consumers, it finds
that such articles should not be excluded
from entry.

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P

INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–872]

Certain Compact Fluorescent Reflector
Lamps, Products Containing Same and
Components Thereof; Notice of
Request for Statements on the Public
Interest
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:

Notice is hereby given that
the presiding administrative law judge
(‘‘ALJ’’) has issued an Initial
Determination and Recommended
Determination on Remedy and Bonding
in the above-captioned investigation.
The ALJ recommends that the
Commission issue a limited exclusion
order against respondents Maxlite, Inc.;
Satco, Products, Inc., and Litetronics
International, Inc., with respect to U.S.
Patent No. 7,053,540. The Commission
is soliciting comments on public
interest issues raised by the
recommended relief. This notice is
soliciting public interest comments from
the public only. Parties are to file public
interest submissions pursuant to 19 CFR
210.50(a)(4).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robert Needham, Office of the General
Counsel, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
708–5468. The public version of the
complaint can be accessed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at http://edis.usitc.gov, and will be
available for inspection during official
business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.)
in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205–2000.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its Internet server (http://
www.usitc.gov). The public record for
this investigation may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at http://edis.usitc.gov. Hearingimpaired persons are advised that
information on this matter can be

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

SUMMARY:

VerDate Mar<15>2010

17:11 Feb 11, 2014

Jkt 232001

obtained by contacting the
Commission’s TDD terminal on (202)
205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 provides
that if the Commission finds a violation
it shall exclude the articles concerned
from the United States:

19 U.S.C. 1337(d)(1). A similar
provision applies to cease-and-desist
orders. 19 U.S.C. 1337(f)(1).
The Commission is interested in
further development of the record on
the public interest in these
investigations. Accordingly, members of
the public are invited to file
submissions of no more than five (5)
pages, inclusive of attachments,
concerning the public interest in light of
the administrative law judge’s Initial
Determination and Recommended
Determination on Remedy and Bonding
issued in this investigation on February
3, 2014. Comments should address
whether issuance of a limited exclusion
order in this investigation would affect
the public health and welfare in the
United States, competitive conditions in
the United States economy, the
production of like or directly
competitive articles in the United
States, or United States consumers.
In particular, the Commission is
interested in comments that:
(i) Explain how the articles
potentially subject to the recommended
limited exclusion order are used in the
United States;
(ii) identify any public health, safety,
or welfare concerns in the United States
relating to the recommended limited
exclusion order;
(iii) identify like or directly
competitive articles that complainant,
its licensees, or third parties make in the
United States which could replace the
subject articles if they were to be
excluded;
(iv) indicate whether complainant,
complainant’s licensees, and/or third
party suppliers have the capacity to
replace the volume of articles
potentially subject to the recommended
limited exclusion order within a
commercially reasonable time; and
(v) explain how the recommended
limited exclusion order would impact
consumers in the United States.
Written submissions must be filed no
later than by close of business on March
7, 2014.

PO 00000

Frm 00059

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

8487

Persons filing written submissions
must file the original document
electronically on or before the deadlines
stated above and submit 8 true paper
copies to the Office of the Secretary by
noon the next day pursuant to section
210.4(f) of the Commission’s Rules of
Practice and Procedure (19 CFR
210.4(f)). Submissions should refer to
the investigation number (‘‘Inv. No.
872’’) in a prominent place on the cover
page and/or the first page. (See
Handbook for Electronic Filing
Procedures, http://www.usitc.gov/
secretary/fed_reg_notices/rules/
handbook_on_electronic_filing.pdf).
Persons with questions regarding filing
should contact the Secretary (202–205–
2000).
Any person desiring to submit a
document to the Commission in
confidence must request confidential
treatment. All such requests should be
directed to the Secretary to the
Commission and must include a full
statement of the reasons why the
Commission should grant such
treatment. See 19 CFR 201.6. Documents
for which confidential treatment by the
Commission is properly sought will be
treated accordingly. A redacted nonconfidential version of the document
must also be filed simultaneously with
the any confidential filing. All nonconfidential written submissions will be
available for public inspection at the
Office of the Secretary and on EDIS.
This action is taken under the
authority of section 337 of the Tariff Act
of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337),
and in Part 210 of the Commission’s
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR
part 210).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: February 6, 2014.
Lisa R. Barton,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2014–02956 Filed 2–11–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
[Docket No. OAG 146; AG Order No. 3418–
2014]

Pilot Project for Tribal Jurisdiction
Over Crimes of Domestic Violence—
Announcement of Successful
Applications
Office of the Associate
Attorney General, Justice.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:

The Associate Attorney
General, exercising authority delegated
by the Attorney General, is granting the
requests of three Indian tribes to be

SUMMARY:

E:\FR\FM\12FEN1.SGM

12FEN1


File Typeapplication/pdf
File Modified2014-02-12
File Created2014-02-12

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy