17-3-3643 U.S. Purchasers' questionnaire

OMB No. 3117-0016/USITC No. 17-3-3643; Expiration Date: 6/30/2017
(No response is required if currently valid OMB control number is not displayed)

LOST SALES AND LOST REVENUE SURVEY
SILICON METAL FROM AUSTRALIA, BRAZIL, KAZAKHSTAN, AND NORWAY
This survey must be received by the Commission by March 22, 2017
See last page for filing instructions.
The information called for in this survey is for use by the United States International Trade Commission in connection
with its countervailing duty and antidumping investigations concerning silicon metal from Australia, Brazil, Kazakhstan,
and Norway (Inv. Nos. 701-TA-567-569 and 731-TA-1343-1345 (Preliminary)). The information requested in the survey is
requested under the authority of the Tariff Act of 1930, title VII. This report is mandatory and failure to reply as directed
can result in a subpoena or other order to compel the submission of records or information in your possession (19 U.S.C.
§ 1333(a)). Further information on this survey can be obtained from Lauren Gamache (202-205-3489,
[email protected]).

Name of firm
Address
City

State

Zip Code

Website
Has your firm purchased silicon metal (as defined on next page) at any time since January 1, 2014?

NO

(Sign the certification below and promptly return only this page of the survey to the Commission)

YES

(Complete all parts of the survey, and return the entire survey to the Commission)

Return questionnaire via the U.S. International Trade Commission Drop Box by clicking on the
following link: https://dropbox.usitc.gov/oinv/. (PIN: SIMN)
CERTIFICATION
I certify that the information herein supplied in this survey is complete and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief and
understand that the information submitted is subject to audit and verification by the Commission. By submitting this certification
I also grant consent for the Commission, and its employees and contract personnel, to use the information provided in this survey
and throughout this proceeding in any other import-injury proceedings conducted by the Commission on the same or similar
merchandise.
I, the undersigned, acknowledge that information submitted in response to this request for information and throughout this
investigation or other proceeding may be disclosed to and used: (i) by the Commission, its employees and Offices, and contract
personnel (a) for developing or maintaining the records of this or a related proceeding, or (b) in internal investigations, audits,
reviews, and evaluations relating to the programs, personnel, and operations of the Commission including under 5 U.S.C.
Appendix 3; or (ii) by U.S. government employees and contract personnel, solely for cybersecurity purposes. I understand that all
contract personnel will sign appropriate nondisclosure agreements.
Name of Authorized Official

Title of Authorized Official

Date

Signature

Phone

Email address

Business Proprietary
Lost Sales and Lost Revenue Survey- silicon metal

Page 2

GENERAL INFORMATION
Background.--This proceeding was instituted in response to a petition filed on March 8, 2017, by Globe
Specialty Metals, Inc., Beverly, Ohio. Countervailing and antidumping duties may be assessed on the
subject imports as a result of these proceedings if the Commission makes an affirmative determination
of injury, threat, or material retardation, and if the U.S. Department of Commerce (“Commerce”) makes
affirmative determinations of subsidization and/or dumping. Questionnaires and other information
pertinent to this proceeding are available at
https://usitc.gov/investigations/701731/2017/silicon_metal_australia_brazil_kazakhstan_and/prelimina
ry.htm.
Silicon metal covered by these investigations is all forms and sizes of silicon metal, including silicon
metal powder. Silicon metal contains at least 85.00 percent but less than 99.99 percent silicon, and less
than 4.00 percent iron, by actual weight. Semiconductor grade silicon (merchandise containing at least
99.99 percent silicon by actual weight and classifiable under HTSUS subheading 2804.61.0000) is
excluded from the scope of these investigations.
Silicon metal is currently imported under statistical reporting numbers 2804.69.1000 and 2804.69.5000
of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). The HTSUS provisions are for
convenience and customs purposes; the written description of the scope is dispositive.
Reporting of information.-- If information is not readily available from your records, provide carefully
prepared estimates.
Confidentiality.--The data furnished in response to this survey that reveal the individual operations of
your firm will be treated as confidential by the Commission to the extent that such data are not
otherwise available to the public and will not be disclosed except as may be required by law (see 19
U.S.C. 1677f). Such confidential information will not be published in a manner that will reveal the
individual operations of your firm; however, general characterizations of numerical business proprietary
information (such as discussion of trends) will be treated as confidential business information only at the
request of the submitter for good cause shown.
Release of information.--The information provided by your firm in response to this survey, as well as
any other business proprietary information submitted by your firm to the Commission in connection
with this proceeding, may become subject to, and released under, the administrative protective order
provisions of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. § 1677f) and section 207.7 of the Commission’s Rules of
Practice and Procedure (19 CFR § 207.7). This means that certain lawyers and other authorized
individuals may temporarily be given access to the information for use in connection with this
proceeding or other import-injury proceedings conducted by the Commission on the same or similar
merchandise; those individuals would be subject to severe penalties if the information were divulged to
unauthorized individuals. Please also retain a copy of the final document that you submit.

Business Proprietary
Lost Sales and Lost Revenue Survey- Silicon metal

Page 3

Contact information.--Please identify the responsible individual and the manner by which Commission
staff may contact that individual regarding the confidential information submitted in this survey. This
may or may not be the person whose signature is at the bottom of page 1.
Name
Title
Email
Telephone

Business Proprietary
Lost Sales and Lost Revenue Survey- Silicon metal

Page 4

PURCHASE INFORMATION
1. Purchases.—Report your firm’s total U.S. purchases of silicon metal. Estimates are acceptable.
2014
Item

2015

2016

Quantity (in short tons)

Purchases of silicon metal produced in-United States
Australia
Brazil
Kazakhstan
Norway
All other countries:1
Sources unknown
Total purchases
1

0

0

0

Please identify these countries:

2. Changes in purchasing patterns.—Please indicate how the shares of your firm’s purchases of silicon
metal from different sources have changed since January 1, 2014.
Did not
Source of purchases purchase Decreased Increased Constant Fluctuated
United States

Australia

Brazil

Kazakhstan

Norway

All other countries

Explanation for trend

Business Proprietary
Lost Sales and Lost Revenue Survey- Silicon metal

Sources unknown

Page 5

Business Proprietary
Lost Sales and Lost Revenue Survey- Silicon metal

Page 6

Major purchasing factors.--Please list, in order of their importance, the main factors your firm
considers in deciding from whom to purchase silicon metal.

3.

1.
2.
3.
Please list any other factors that are very important in your purchase decisions:
4.

Purchasing subject imports rather than domestic products.—
(a)

Since January 2014, did your firm purchase imports of silicon metal from Australia,
Brazil, Kazakhstan, and/or Norway instead of U.S.-produced silicon metal? Respond for
each subject country.

Source

Yes
(also respond to parts (b) and (c))

No
(If “No” for all countries, skip to next
question)

Australia
Brazil
Kazakhstan
Norway
(b)

If you responded “Yes” to part (a), was the imported product priced lower than the
domestic product?
Source
Australia
Brazil

Kazakhstan
Norway

Yes

No

Business Proprietary
Lost Sales and Lost Revenue Survey- Silicon metal

Page 7

4. Purchasing subject imports rather than domestic products.—Continued.
(c)

If you responded “Yes” to part (a), was price a primary reason for purchasing subject
imports rather than domestic product?

Source

Yes

If Yes, estimate the quantity
of imports purchased instead
of domestic product since
January 2014
(in short tons of contained
silicon)

No

If No, please indicate the
reason your firm purchased
imports instead of domestic
product

Australia
Brazil
Kazakhstan
Norway
5.

U.S. producers and import competition.—
(a)

Since January 1, 2014, in connection with a sale or offer to sell silicon metal to your firm,
did U.S. producers reduce their prices of domestically produced silicon metal in order to
compete with lower-priced imports of silicon metal from the subject countries?
Respond for each subject country.
Source
Australia
Brazil
Kazakhstan
Norway

Yes (also respond to
question part (b))

No (If “No” for all countries,
skip to next question)

Don’t know

Business Proprietary
Lost Sales and Lost Revenue Survey- Silicon metal
5.

Page 8

U.S. producers and import competition.—Continued.
(b)

If your firm responded “yes” to any of the above countries, please provide an estimate
of the reduction in U.S. producers’ prices, and any additional explanations, such as
timing (e.g., months/years), frequency of price reductions, or other market/competitive
factors.

Source

Estimated
reduction in U.S.
prices
(percent)

Australia

%

Brazil

%

Kazakhstan

%

Norway

%

Additional explanation, including such information as
timing (e.g., months/years), frequency of price
reductions, or other market/competitive factors

6. Method of purchase--Please provide a general description of your firm’s method(s) of purchase
(e.g., individual purchase, contract, bids, Internet purchases, etc.) for silicon metal.

7. Other explanations--Please provide any additional comments in this box.

Business Proprietary
Lost Sales and Lost Revenue Survey- Silicon metal

Page 9

OMB INFORMATION
7. OMB statistics.--Please report the actual number of hours required and the cost to your firm of
completing this survey.
Hours

Dollars

The questions in this survey have been reviewed with market participants to ensure that issues of
concern are adequately addressed and that data requests are sufficient, meaningful, and as limited
as possible. Public reporting burden for this survey is estimated to average 4 hours per response,
including the time for reviewing instructions, gathering data, and completing and reviewing the
survey.
We welcome comments regarding the accuracy of this burden estimate, suggestions for reducing
the burden, and any suggestions for improving this survey. Please attach such comments to your
response or send to the Office of Investigations, USITC, 500 E St. SW, Washington, DC 20436.

HOW TO FILE YOUR SURVEY RESPONSE
Please do not attempt to modify the format or permissions of the survey document.
Please submit the completed survey using one of the methods noted below. If your firm
is unable to complete the MS Word survey or cannot use one of the electronic methods
of submission, please contact the Commission for further instructions.
• Upload via Secure Drop Box.— Upload the MS Word questionnaire along with a scanned copy of the
signed certification page (page 1) through the Commission’s secure upload facility:
Web address: https://dropbox.usitc.gov/oinv/

Pin: SIMN

• E-mail.—E-mail the MS Word survey to [email protected]; include a scanned copy of the
signed certification page (page 1). Submitters are strongly encouraged to encrypt nonpublic documents
that are electronically transmitted to the Commission to protect your sensitive information from
unauthorized disclosure. The USITC secure drop-box system and the Electronic Document Information
System (EDIS) use Federal Information Processing Standards (FIPS) 140-2 cryptographic algorithms to
encrypt data in transit. Submitting your nonpublic documents by a means that does not use these
encryption algorithms (such as by email) may subject your firm’s nonpublic information to unauthorized
disclosure during transmission. If you choose a non-encrypted method of electronic transmission, the
Commission warns you that the risk of such possible unauthorized disclosure is assumed by you and not
by the Commission.
If your firm did not purchase this product, please fill out page 1, print, sign, and submit a scanned copy
to the Commission.