2015 SS 0264 - new

2015 SS 0264 - new.docx

Importation of Fruits and Vegetables

OMB: 0579-0264

Document [docx]
Download: docx | pdf

SUPPORTING STATEMENT

OMB No. 0579-0264

Importation of Fruits and Vegetables



2015



JUSTIFICATION

1. Explain the circumstances that make the collection of information necessary. Identify any legal or administrative requirements that necessitate the collection.


The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS), is responsible for preventing plant diseases or insect pests from entering the United States, preventing the spread of pests not widely distributed in the United States, and eradicating those imported pests when eradication is feasible. The Plant Protection Act authorizes the Department to carry out this mission.


Under the Plant Protection Act (7 U.S.C. 7701 – et.seq.), the Secretary of Agriculture is authorized to regulate the importation of plants, plant products, and other articles to prevent the introduction of injurious plant pests.


Regulations contained in Title 7 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 319 (Subpart-Fruits and Vegetables), Sections 319.56 et seq. implement the intent of this Act by prohibiting or restricting the importation of certain fruits and vegetables into the United States from certain parts of the world to prevent the introduction and dissemination of fruit flies and other injurious plant pests that are new to the United States or not widely distributed within the United States.


APHIS allows the following fruits and vegetables from various countries to be imported and subject to inspection and disinfection at the port of arrival: Allium spp., apple, apricot, artichoke, asparagus, avocado, banana, basil, bean, blackberry, blueberry, bok choy, brassica, breadfruit, cassava, cantaloupe, carambola, celeriac, celery, chamomile, cherry, cichorium, citrus, cucumber, cucurbit, dasheen, dill, eggplant, fennel, genip, ginger root, husk tomato, lemon, lettuce, litchi, longan, nectarine, okra, oregano, papaya, parsley, pear, pepper, pineapple, pitaya, pumpkin, rambutan, raspberry, rosemary, spinach, strawberry, swiss chard tamarind, tomato, turnip, waterlily, and watermelon. Few quarantine pests have been detected on fruits and vegetables during inspection at the ports.


APHIS is asking the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to approve for an additional 3 years, the use of these information collection activities, associated with its effort to prevent the spread of plant pests and diseases into the continental United States.





2. Indicate how, by whom, and for what purpose the information is to be used. Except for a new collection, indicate the actual use the agency has made of the information received from the current collection.


APHIS uses the following information activities to prevent the introduction and dissemination of fruit flies and other injurious plant pests that are new to the United States or not widely distributed within the United States.


Phytosanitary Certificate (foreign and business) – To allow the entry of certain fruits and vegetables, each shipment must be accompanied by a phytosanitary certificate issued by national plant protection organization (NPPO) of various countries that contains additional declarations stating fruits and vegetables were grown in an area recognized by APHIS as free of Mediterranean fruit fly (Medfly, Ceratisis capitata). Importers and exporters request these certificates from their country and/or the country of origin. This information is used as a guide to the intensity of the inspection that APHIS must conduct when the shipment arrives. Without this information, all shipments would need to be inspected very thoroughly, thereby requiring considerably more time. This would slow the clearance of international shipments.


Trapping Records (foreign)Trapping is conducted at production sites for the fruit fly Anastepha serpentine at the rate of 1 trap per 10 hectares with APHIS-approved traps and lures. If one A. Serpentina is trapped, at least 10 additional traps must be deployed in the 50 – hectare area immediately surrounding the trap in which the fruit fly was found. If within 30 days of the first finding any additional fruit flies are trapped, the production site will be suspended from exporting until APHIS agrees that phytosanitary measures taken have been effective. NPPO must maintain trapping records to provide to APHIS to ensure adequate trapping procedures are adhered to eliminate any risk of exotic fruit flies from being disseminated into the United States.


Compliance Agreement (business) – Processing plants within the United States must enter into a compliance agreement with APHIS in order to handle grapefruit, sweet oranges, and tangerines imported from Mexico. APHIS will only enter into compliance agreements with facilities that handle and process grapefruit, sweet oranges, and tangerines from Mexico in such a way as to eliminate any risk that exotic fruit flies could be disseminated into the United States, as determined by APHIS.



3. Describe whether, and to what extent, the collection of information involves the use of automated, electronic, mechanical, or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses, and the basis for the decision for adopting this means of collection. Also describe any consideration of using information technology to reduce burden.


APHIS has no control or influence over when foreign countries will automate these phytosanitary certificates.


APHIS permits both paper and electronic recordkeeping systems for trapping records. Compliance Agreements can either be mailed or emailed to APHIS.

APHIS is working with Customs and Border Protection (CBP) via the International Trade Data System (ITDS) Automated Commercial Environment (ACE) initiative to automate these certificates on our end. APHIS and CBP like receiving paper as it includes official seals, stamps, etc. to ensure legitimacy; however, APHIS intends to complete Partner Government Agencies (PGA) message sets to capture the information documented on the certificates. Collection of this data in message sets will support enhanced analysis for establishing importing policy in the future.



4. Describe efforts to identify duplication. Show specifically why any similar information already available cannot be used or modified for use for the purpose described in item 2 above.


APHIS is the only Federal agency responsible for preventing the incursion or interstate spread of plant pests, diseases, and noxious weeds. The information APHIS is collecting is its only source for the information and is not being collected through other forms or reports.



5. If the collection of information impacts small businesses or other small entities, describe any methods used to minimize burden.


APHIS estimates that 60 percent of the respondents are small entities.



6. Describe the consequences to Federal program or policy activities if the collection is not conducted or is conducted less frequently, as well as any technical or legal obstacles to reducing burden.


Failing to collect this information would cripple APHIS’ ability to regulate and prevent the importation of injurious plant pests, plant products, and other articles into the United States.



7. Explain any special circumstances that require the collection to be conducted in a manner inconsistent with the general information collection guidelines in 5 CFR 1320.5.


requiring respondents to report informa­tion to the agency more often than quarterly;requiring respondents to report informa­tion to the agency more often than quarterly;

Daily Log
For purposes of security, facility operators must maintain a daily log to record the entry and exit of all persons entering and leaving the facility while quarantine is in progress.  

requiring respondents to prepare a written response to a collection of infor­ma­tion in fewer than 30 days after receipt of it;

Licensees and permittees must immediately, but no later than 2 days, send stop distribution and sale notices to any jobbers, wholesalers, dealers, foreign consignees, or other persons known to have any such veterinary biological product in their possession, which instruct them to stop the preparations, distribution, sale, barter, exchange, shipment, or importation of any such veterinary biological product.  All notification shall be documented in writing by the licensee or permittee.

Shipments of live VHS-regulated fish must be presented for inspection at a port of entry.  For live fish entering through certain limited ports listed in APHIS’ regulations, the importer must notify the APHIS port veterinarian at least 72-hours in advance of the arrival in the United States of the shipment.  This notification is necessary to ensure APHIS is prepared for the arrival of the shipment at the port of entry, to ensure that inspectors and facilities are available for inspection in the United States, and to contact appropriate persons if any questions arise concerning the importation.  This prior notification to the port veterinarian may be made via phone, fax, or e-mail.

requiring respondents to submit more than an original and two copies of any docu­ment;
requiring respondents to retain re­cords, other than health, medical, governm­ent contract, grant-in-aid, or tax records for more than three years;

Testing records to support an aquaculture facility's claim of disease freedom from VHS virus must be maintained for a maximum of 4 years.  This recordkeeping will provide APHIS with historical documentation to determine the risk of spreading VHS from a given facility.  

APHIS is requiring herd owners to maintain their herd records for as long as the herd remains in the CWD program.  This time varies from herd to herd.

in connection with a statisti­cal sur­vey, that is not de­signed to produce valid and reli­able results that can be general­ized to the uni­verse of study;
requiring the use of a statis­tical data classi­fication that has not been re­vie­wed and approved by OMB;
that includes a pledge of confiden­tiali­ty that is not supported by au­thority estab­lished in statute or regu­la­tion, that is not sup­ported by dis­closure and data security policies that are consistent with the pledge, or which unneces­sarily impedes shar­ing of data with other agencies for com­patible confiden­tial use; or
requiring respondents to submit propri­etary trade secret, or other confidential information unless the agency can demon­strate that it has instituted procedures to protect the information's confidentiality to the extent permit­ted by law.

  • requiring respondents to report information to the agency more often than quarterly;


  • requiring respondents to prepare a written response to a collection of information in fewer than 30 days after receipt of it;


  • requiring respondents to submit more than an original and two copies of any document;


  • requiring respondents to retain records, other than health, medical, government contract, grant-in-aid, or tax records for more than three years;


  • in connection with a statistical survey, that is not designed to produce valid and reliable results that can be generalized to the universe of study;


  • requiring the use of a statistical data classification that has not been reviewed and approved by OMB;


  • that includes a pledge of confidentiality that is not supported by authority established in statute or regulation, that is not supported by disclosure and data security policies that are consistent with the pledge, or which unnecessarily impedes sharing of data with other agencies for compatible confidential use; or


  • requiring respondents to submit proprietary trade secret, or other confidential information unless the agency can demonstrate that it has instituted procedures to protect the information's confidentiality to the extent permitted by law.


No special circumstances exist that would require this collection to be conducted in a manner inconsistent with the general information collection guidelines in 5 CFR 1320.5



8. Describe efforts to consult with persons outside the agency to obtain their views on the availability of data, frequency of collection, the clarity of instructions and recordkeeping, disclosure, or reporting form, and on the data elements to be recorded, disclosed, or reported. If applicable, provide a copy and identify the date and page number of publication in the Federal Register of the agency's notice, soliciting comments on the information collection prior to submission to OMB.


APHIS held productive consultations with the following individuals concerning this information collection:


Ashlynn Elliff

Edinburg Citrus Association

401 West Champion Street

Edinburg, TX 78539-4465

[email protected]

Phone: 956-383-2743


Holly Duban

Program Manager

Texas Department of Agriculture

1700 North Congress, 11th floor

Austin, TX 78701

Phone: 512-463-8207


Stephen Brown

California Department of Food and Agriculture

Plant Health and Pest Prevention Services

Pest Exclusion Branch

1220N. Street, Room A-372

Sacramento, CA 95815

Phone: 916-654-0312


On Tuesday, March 24, 2015, pages 15551-15552, APHIS published in the Federal Register, a 60-day notice seeking public comments on its plans to request a 3-year renewal of this collection of information. No comments from the public were received.



9. Explain any decision to provide any payment or gift to respondents, other than reenumeration of contractors or grantees.


This information collection activity involves no payments or gifts to respondents.



10. Describe any assurance of confidentiality provided to respondents and the basis for the assurance in statute, regulation, or agency policy.


No additional assurance of confidentiality is provided with this information collection. Any and all information obtained in this collection shall not be disclosed except in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552a.



11. Provide additional justification for any questions of a sensitive nature, such as sexual behavior and attitudes, religious beliefs, and others that are considered private. This justification should include the reasons why the agency considers the questions necessary, the specific uses to be made of the information, the explanation to be given to persons from whom the information is requested, and any steps to be taken to obtain their consent.


This information collection activity asks no questions of a personal or sensitive nature.



12. Provide estimates of the hour burden of the collection of information. Indicate the number of respondents, frequency of response, annual hour burden, and an explanation of how the burden was estimated.


Indicate the number of respondents, frequency of response, annual hour burden, and an explanation of how the burden was estimated. If this request for approval covers more than one form, provide separate hour burden estimates for each form and aggregate the hour burdens in Item 13 of OMB Form 83-I.


See APHIS Form 71 for hour burden estimates. APHIS arrived at these estimates through discussions with U.S. importers of fruits and vegetables, as well as with various plant health officials in South America and Mexico.

Provide estimates of annualized costs to respondents for the hour burdens for collections of information, identifying and using appropriate wage rate categories.


APHIS estimates the total annualized cost to these respondents to be $5,377.50 which is the estimated total burden hours (239) multiplied by the estimated average hourly wage ($22.50).

$22.50 x 239 = $5,377.50.


The average hourly wage was provided by USDA’s Agricultural Specialist from various countries via plant health officials.



13. Provide estimates of the total annual cost burden to respondents or recordkeepers resulting from the collection of information, (do not include the cost of any hour burden shown in items 12 and 14). The cost estimates should be split into two components: (a) a total capital and start-up cost component annualized over its expected useful life; and (b) a total operation and maintenance and purchase of services component.


There is zero annual cost burden associated with capital and start-up costs, maintenance costs, and purchase of services in connection with this program.


14. Provide estimates of annualized cost to the Federal government. Provide a description of the method used to estimate cost and any other expense that would not have been incurred without this collection of information.


The estimated cost for the Federal Government is $6,509.00 (See APHIS Form 79.)



15. Explain the reasons for any program changes or adjustments reported in Items 13 or 14 of the OMB Form 83-1.


ICR Summary of Burden:

Shape1

 

Requested

Program Change Due to New Statute

Program Change Due to Agency Discretion

Change Due to Adjustment in Agency Estimate

Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA

Previously Approved

Annual Number of Responses

  685

  0

0

204

  0

  481

Annual Time Burden (Hr)

 239

  0

0

 116

  0

  123

Annual Cost Burden ($)

  0

  0

  0

  0

  0

  0


There is an adjustment increase of + 50 respondents and +204 responses resulting in an increase of +116 total burden hours for this information collection. This adjustment is due to an increase of commodities being imported into the United States.



16. For collections of information whose results are planned to be published, outline plans for tabulation and publication.


APHIS has no plans to publish any data.



17. If seeking approval to not display the expiration date for OMB approval of the information collection, explain the reasons that display would be inappropriate.


There are no USDA forms associated with this collection of information.


18. Explain each exception to the certification statement identified in the "Certification for Paperwork Reduction Act."

APHIS is able to certify compliance with all the provisions in the Act.



B. Collections of Information Employing Statistical Methods


Statistical methods are not employed in this information collection activity.

File Typeapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
File TitleSupporting Statement
AuthorLinda Toran
File Modified0000-00-00
File Created2021-01-24

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy