4 Overall 2018 NRWC Evaluation_final

OMB No. 0915-0212

Exp. 07/31/2021

Public Burden Statement: An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. The OMB control number for this project is 0915-0212. Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 0.083 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to HRSA Reports Clearance Officer, 5600 Fishers Lane, Room 14N136B, Rockville, Maryland, 20857.

2018 National Ryan White Conference on HIV Care and Treatment Evaluation

We hope you enjoyed your experience at the 2018 National Ryan White Conference on HIV Care &Treatment! Our objectives were to provide a conference with opportunities for participants to:

• Learn the latest scientific and programmatic advancements from leaders in the field;

• Identify strategies that enhance recipients’ programmatic and fiscal knowledge;

• Form collaborations and partnerships; and

• Share best practices.

To help us plan for future conferences, please let us know about your overall experience by completing this brief conference evaluation. Thank you!

As a conference participant, what was your role? (Check all that apply)

__ Workshop presenter

__ Poster presenter

__ Attendee

__ Plenary speaker

__ Exhibitor

What is your role in the Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program (RWHAP)? (Check all that apply)

__ Recipient

__ Subrecipient

__ Service Provider

__ National Partner

__ Technical Assistance Provider

__ Consumer/Stakeholder

__ Presenter/Exhibitor

__ Federal staff

__ Other (If selected, please explain)

If you are a recipient or subrecipient, which RWHAP Part(s) funds your organization? (Check all that apply)

• Recipient: Part A

• Recipient: Part B/ADAP

• Recipient: Part C

• Recipient: Part D/Youth

• Recipient: Part F/AETC

• Recipient: Part F/SPNS

• Recipient: Part F/Dental

Please rate the overall quality of your experience at the 2018 National Ryan White Conference on HIV Care &Treatment on a scale of 1 (poor) to 5 (excellent):

1 2 3 4 5

Poor Unsatisfactory Neutral Good Excellent

Please check the boxes below to indicate the degree to which you agree with the statements below:	Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree	N/A
Conference Content
The objectives of the conference were met.
The information provided at the conference will improve my skills.
The majority of subjects covered at the conference were relevant to my work.
Workshops helped me identify strategies to improve systems of care for people living with HIV.
Attendance at the conference increased my knowledge of federal programmatic, fiscal, and administrative requirements.
Conference Tracks	Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree	N/A
The following conference tracks met my expectations:
Increasing Access, Engagement, and Retention in HIV Care and Treatment
Data Utilization
Leveraging Innovative Practices to Improve Outcomes and Address Emerging Priorities
Clinical Quality Management and Quality Improvement
Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program Planning and Resource Allocation: Collaborative Partnerships and Community Engagement
Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program Fiscal and Grant Management Boot Camp
Poster Sessions	Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree	N/A
I was satisfied with the posters presented at the conference.
I can use information gained from the posters in my position.
The posters were easy to access and view.
The poster sessions were scheduled at convenient times.
Conference Logistics	Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree	N/A
The pre-conference communication was helpful and easy to understand.
The conference registration process was easy to follow.
The abstract submission process was user–friendly.
I had adequate time to review the agenda and program prior to the conference.
The conference was well-organized.
The conference website was user-friendly.
The mobile app was useful and easy to use.
The breakout session sign-up process was user-friendly.
The on-site support staff were helpful.
I had adequate opportunities to network with my peers.
I had adequate time to visit the exhibit hall.
Adequate time was allowed for breaks.
The conference venue met my needs.
The food choices in and near the venue met my needs.

Please tell us three things you enjoyed about the 2018 National Ryan White Conference on HIV Care & Treatment:

1. _____________________________

2. _____________________________

3. _____________________________

Please tell us at least one thing that we can improve for a future conference:

____________________________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________________

What additional topics and/or speakers would you like included in future conferences?

____________________________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________________

What components of the conference were the most useful to you and your work?

____________________________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________________

Is there additional feedback you would like to provide?

____________________________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________________

Thank you for completing this conference evaluation.

Remember to complete the evaluations for each plenary (LINK) and breakout sessions (LINK) that you attended. GO HERE (LINK) to earn your CEU credits.

Your feedback will help make the 2020 NRWC even better!